Hope Walz Says Republicans' Obsession With Old State Flag Is Like a Racist...
Appeals Court Says Administration's Argument to Allow the IRS to Share Data With...
A Call From the 83rd Floor, a Mother’s Life’s Work, and a...
MS NOW’s New Membership Service Allows Users to Talk to Rachel Maddow, Joe...
The Actual Problem in the Clancy Mistrial Wasn’t the Holdout — It Was...
Joy Reid Couldn’t Wash It Off: Wajahat Ali Goes Shopping for a New...
Arlington County to Pay Families of Wage-Earners Detained by ICE Up to $2,000
Danbury, Connecticut City Council Votes to Allow Noncitizens to Be Hired As Police...
Caught on Tape: Nebraska 'Independent' Admits He Only Backed the Wall to Win...
Site Runs 'Hit Piece' on CA Assemblyman Who Sent $6 Million to His...
'Do Us a Favor and Stay Home': Families Confront Mamdani Over 9/11 Ceremony
CNN’s Anderson Cooper Examines the Need for Climate Justice ($$$) in Nepal
American Heroes of 9/11: Welles Crowther
Cartoon Cancer: Animated Gavin Newsom Says Having the DSA Under the Dems' ‘Big...
Prof Says ‘Someone Can Do the Funniest Thing’ to Nick Shirley Before the...

Judge throws out lawsuit claiming concealed carry on campus will infringe on academic freedom

The NRA happily spread the word Monday that a legal challenge to the state’s campus carry law by three University of Texas at Austin professors was dismissed by a federal judge Friday.

Advertisement

Despite vocal opposition, the legislation passed in 2015 but didn’t take effect until August 2016, when a federal judge denied a request by three professors for a preliminary injunction to block it. Students opposed to campus carry returned to school that fall waving sex toys in a “Cocks not Glocks” protest.

Fast-forward to 2017, and a federal judge has again ruled against professors fighting the law. The Texas Tribune reports that District Judge Lee Yeakel wrote that the professors couldn’t present any “concrete evidence to substantiate their fears” that campus carry would limit their free speech.

“The professors claimed, among other arguments, that the law violated their First Amendment rights since the possibility of a gun being in their classrooms might make them hesitant to discuss controversial issues,” the Tribune reported … although there’s been plenty of evidence recently that students don’t need firearms to shut down speech they consider controversial.

https://twitter.com/MitchBehna/status/884461853254049795

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/erik22lax/status/884469470902722561

https://twitter.com/soof46/status/884495056115298304

* * *

Related:

 

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement