Marrow-Minded: Ben Rhodes Says His Bones Tell Him Racism Over Obama Shapes Today’s...
What a Fool Conceives: Believe It or ‘Yacht’ — Adopted Man’s Dad Is...
Socialism Offers 'Liberation,' but It's Really About Control
'Having the Trains Run on Time Is Worth Me Having to Ride in...
Socialism Offers 'Liberation,' but It's Really About Control
Man Needs Conservative Christian to Explain Why They're Against Free School Lunches
Rep. Ayanna Pressley Says We’ll Never Have Justice for Nolan Wells, Unveils Hashtag...
TIME: How Can the President of Peace Be Calling for the Annihilation of...
WI Gubernatorial Candidate Stands With To-Be-Deported President of Islamic Society of Milw...
CNN’s Jake Tapper White-Knights for Kaitlan Collins Again Against Historically Unpopular P...
‘You’re Welcome, America’: Newsom Signs EO Protecting AI From Being Renamed by Trump
Renee Good's Attorney Says She Was Just Driving Home When Her Drive Was...
Israel War Room Torches NBC News' Post About Plane That Apparently Decided to...
JD Vance Personally Thanks Trump As a Marine for Ending the War in...
VIDEO: Former DOJ Lawyer John Yoo Says Christa Pike Could Face a Firing...

Women's March wants your signature on its Pledge of Liberation

We’re not going to suggest that the Women’s March wasn’t a success, at least judging by attendance and media attention. Still, though, while the organizers claim a worldwide turnout of 5 million, could that many people possibly share a political agenda?

Advertisement

It’s fair to say those millions came away from the event not having any more in common than when they arrived. Ironically, despite early claims that it was not an anti-Donald Trump event, would even a tiny fraction of that many have turned out to march had Hillary been elected president as expected?

Anyone confused about the agenda of the Women’s March need be confused no longer; it’s all been laid out in painstaking detail in a new Pledge of Liberation to which supporters are being asked to add their electronic signatures.

Let’s agree whoever wrote the pledge got it wrong straight out of the gate, seeing as it’s addressed to “Our Elected Officials.” If you’re signing your name to a petition addressed to elected representatives, you might not be as oppressed as you think.

In short, the later sections on environmental justice and police violence and LGBTQIA+ rights and economic justice all boil down to this:

We are determined to build a society in which all women — including Black women, Latina women, AAPI women, Indigenous women, poor women, immigrant women, disabled women, Muslim women, Jewish women, lesbian, bisexual, queer and trans women — are free and able to care for and nurture themselves and their families, however they are formed, in safe and healthy environments free from structural impediments.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/SouthernKeeks/status/861733057119870977

“We pledge allegiance to each other and to the liberation of all people. Join us.” Unless you’re pro-life, and then you’re still not welcome. We’re guessing white women and men as well as people who aren’t poor can sign up as allies of the movement, as long as they keep their privilege in check.

https://twitter.com/RealKiraDavis/status/861735154686939136

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos