NBC News: Judges Who Ruled Against Trump Say Harassment and Threats Have Upended...
Tim Walz Says ICE Raids Are What Happens ‘When They No Longer Hide...
Ho Ho No: Libertarian Compares Santa to Illegals, Gets Ratio'd Into the North...
Former EU Commissioner Butthurt About Being Banned From the US for Censorship
Derek Hunter Violated X's Rules Against Hateful Content With Post About Jennifer Welch
Peak Christmas Nerdery: Full Probability Analysis of Why the Home Alone Family Slept...
Margaret Sullivan Says Journalism's Goal Is to 'Afflict the Comfortable and Comfort the...
Conservative Clash: Bari Weiss Allegedly Turns on Megyn Kelly After She Snubs CBS...
A Warm AI Christmas Card From The Democrats, But Not Really
Cali's Insane Solution to Wildfires: Force 2M Homeowners to Rip Out Gardens Instead...
Katie Miller Hits Taylor Swift's Donation to Feeding America With a Reality Check
Merry Christmas from the Map-Challenged: Jesus the Palestinian, According to Clueless Left...
'You Know Who I Am': Former RI Mayoral Candidate 'Abused' by Cop Who...
Belated Festivus Grievances: X's Broken Algo, Scams Stealing Billions, and Anti-Semitism C...
ICE Aims to Speed Up Deportations by Renovating Warehouses to Hold 80,000 Illegals...

Women's March wants your signature on its Pledge of Liberation

We’re not going to suggest that the Women’s March wasn’t a success, at least judging by attendance and media attention. Still, though, while the organizers claim a worldwide turnout of 5 million, could that many people possibly share a political agenda?

Advertisement

It’s fair to say those millions came away from the event not having any more in common than when they arrived. Ironically, despite early claims that it was not an anti-Donald Trump event, would even a tiny fraction of that many have turned out to march had Hillary been elected president as expected?

Anyone confused about the agenda of the Women’s March need be confused no longer; it’s all been laid out in painstaking detail in a new Pledge of Liberation to which supporters are being asked to add their electronic signatures.

Let’s agree whoever wrote the pledge got it wrong straight out of the gate, seeing as it’s addressed to “Our Elected Officials.” If you’re signing your name to a petition addressed to elected representatives, you might not be as oppressed as you think.

In short, the later sections on environmental justice and police violence and LGBTQIA+ rights and economic justice all boil down to this:

We are determined to build a society in which all women — including Black women, Latina women, AAPI women, Indigenous women, poor women, immigrant women, disabled women, Muslim women, Jewish women, lesbian, bisexual, queer and trans women — are free and able to care for and nurture themselves and their families, however they are formed, in safe and healthy environments free from structural impediments.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/SouthernKeeks/status/861733057119870977

“We pledge allegiance to each other and to the liberation of all people. Join us.” Unless you’re pro-life, and then you’re still not welcome. We’re guessing white women and men as well as people who aren’t poor can sign up as allies of the movement, as long as they keep their privilege in check.

https://twitter.com/RealKiraDavis/status/861735154686939136

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement