Eric Swalwell in 2023: Don’t Take His Word He Did Nothing Wrong With...
The Rig Picture: Nancy Pelosi Warns That Trump Is Planning to Hack Our...
Hacked? UK Home Office Promises Grooming Gangs Inquiry, No More Policing of Social...
Celebs Sign Open Letter Demanding ICE Detention Facility Holding Children Be Shut Down
David French Says Trump Is the Worst Free-Speech President of His Lifetime
The TDS Crowd and Lib Media Do NOT Like Trump and Hegseth's Response...
LGBTQ Crowd Lobbies Worcester City Council to Become a 'Sanctuary City for the...
New Law Forces Boise Mayor to Take Down Pride Flag From City Hall
Rubio Tuesday
Voters Don't Love Republicans — But They're Terrified of Democrats
NBC News: ICE Will Be Stationed Outside Graduation Events for New Marines
Judge Blocks Construction of White House Ballroom Unless Congress Authorizes It
Disappointed Gov. Gavin Newsom Says Conversion Therapy Is Discredited Junk Science
Mehdi Hasan: 'Nothing Justifies October 7 but October 7 Justifies Everything'
The Cult Strikes Back: Chicago Bulls Waive Jaden Ivey for Calling Out Forced...

Good luck with that: Public editor maintains ESPN will not stick to sports, whether viewers like it or not

After news broke Wednesday that ESPN would be cutting around 100 people, mostly on-air personalities, it wasn’t long before people pointed to the sports network’s continual detours into liberal politics as a probable cause.

Advertisement

Bleacher Report football columnist Michael Freeman slammed as “pathetic pieces of garbage” those who blamed politics for the layoffs, and Wednesday evening, ESPN Public Editor Jim Brady chimed in to clarify that the layoffs were a matter of economics, plain and simple; although he did acknowledge the network’s drift to one side of the political spectrum. Hmm … wonder which side?

It was just two weeks ago that Brady published a nearly 3,000-word essay concluding that “ESPN has made it clear: It’s not sticking to sports.”

Nope. Brady wasn’t quite as gruff as Freeman, but his message was similar: ESPN’s mix of sports and politics had nothing to do with the layoffs.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Supposing it’s true that the layoffs at ESPN were a function of “the less favorable economics of an unbundled cable world” — what would it hurt to listen to the public and lay off the politics? “Like it or not” isn’t what most would consider responsive customer service.

https://twitter.com/nabby60/status/857398521607200769

https://twitter.com/fysbox/status/857400495165538306

https://twitter.com/bobby15248309/status/857399472292335620

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/WaynesterAtl/status/857275807009562625

https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/857349708133675008

* * *

Related:

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement