Trump-Hating Psychiatrist Proves She Needs a Civics Course While Opining About SCOTUS
Kristi Noem Needs More Courageous Advisers
WHOOPSIES: Emory University Professor Who Was Tackled by Police Confesses to Assaulting Of...
Biden Sees Economy 'Through the Eyes of Scranton and Working People' (Not THESE...
Russel Brand: From Raunchy to Redeemed
Bill Maher as the 'Voice of Reason' on the Left Continues to be...
'It's Not a Safe Place' Says Former Fed Prosecutor Who Was Punched in...
The New York Times EMBARRASSES Themselves in an Attempt to Cover for Lying...
Being Conservative Is the NEW Punk Rock and Biden's Interview With Stern Proves...
White House Down: Biden Aides Attempted to OUST Press Secretary KJP, Fail Because...
'I Love This Trooper!' No Nonsense Officer Shows How to Efficiently Remove a...
Strong 'Do You Know Who I Am?' Vibes: Monroe County DA Refuses to...
Where Are THESE Protests? DAMNING Thread Shows How U of Maryland Violated Student...
Dem Mayor of Denver Called a 'Fascist' for Telling Campus Occupiers They've Got...
Jill Biden Stepped in As Joe Told U.S. Wounded Warriors the Good News...

Wellesley's Commission for Ethnicity, Race, and Equity offers tips to avoid pain, injury caused by guest speakers

Faculty members at Columbia University felt compelled to dismiss the work of upcoming campus speaker Charles Murray as “tendentious dogma,” but at least they did so while reminding students and others that his presence on campus was no excuse for violence.

Advertisement

It’s unfortunate that any statement to that effect was necessary at all, but it could have been worse: Reason.com reports that the Commission for Ethnicity, Race, and Equity (CERE) at Wellesley recently sent an email discouraging “guest speakers with controversial and objectionable beliefs” without first considering the possible pain, injury, harm, and damage to the student body.

Yes, those are all words used in the email … about guest speakers.

Controversial speakers are also considered an imposition on the liberty of the disempowered, “who often feel the injury most acutely and invest time and energy in rebutting the speakers’ arguments.”

Can’t they just ignore speech with which they disagree, if it’s that painful to process? Apparently not: “Students object in order to affirm their humanity. This work is not optional; students feel they would be unable to carry out their responsibilities as students without standing up for themselves.”

Advertisement

Then what’s this talk about the need for faculty and administrators to step in on their behalf, as “the responsibility to defend the disempowered does not rest solely with students”? Actually, never mind. It’s not like we’d ever be allowed on campus anyway asking painful questions like these.

https://twitter.com/inflatedKarma/status/844635664360583170

https://twitter.com/adviceforbernie/status/844633673966243844

https://twitter.com/Osscitio/status/844773466968535041

https://twitter.com/WoganMay/status/844632352173252608

https://twitter.com/WoganMay/status/844632986167492609

Any students concerned that they, in their zeal to encourage discussion, might actually “stifle productive debate by enabling the bullying of disempowered groups,” are welcomed to approach CERE for expert guidance.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement