Sick Take: 'Sure He's a Nazi, But Blue No Matter Who' Regarding Maine...
Socialist Seattle Mayor Gets Aggressively Saved By Handlers When a Reporter Politely Asks...
Chris Murphy Lied About Elon Musk Doing a Heil Hitler Salute but Guess...
Wake Up America: The Democrats Are No Longer Just the Opposition — They're...
Sen. Chris Van Hollen Adds 'Went Through a Rough Period' *Exception to Having...
Ron DeSantis Made Sure Nobody Will Take Hakeem Jeffries Seriously Again
The GOP Chairman Growing His Party in 80/20 Democrat Silicon Valley
The Man, the LEGEND: Check Out What Trump JUST DID to Anti-Ice May...
He's a MONSTER: Senate Republicans' Ad Featuring Graham Platner's Own POSTS Is Honestly...
LOL! Straight In Our VEINS: WATCH What Saxophonist Does While Listening to Kamala...
Olivia Julianna Claims Scott Jennings GLARED at Her for Being in the Same...
Compare Tim Walz Portraying Trump and Musk As Nazis to Who He's Campaigning...
X Account Using Grok to Explain SCOTUS Ruling to Ilhan Omar As if...
'Reeks of Jealousy'! Scott Jennings Swatted Down a MeidasTouch Lefty and Jim Acosta...
In RUSH to Scold SCOTUS on Ethics, Rashida Tlaib TRIPS Over Her Own...

Wellesley's Commission for Ethnicity, Race, and Equity offers tips to avoid pain, injury caused by guest speakers

Faculty members at Columbia University felt compelled to dismiss the work of upcoming campus speaker Charles Murray as “tendentious dogma,” but at least they did so while reminding students and others that his presence on campus was no excuse for violence.

Advertisement

It’s unfortunate that any statement to that effect was necessary at all, but it could have been worse: Reason.com reports that the Commission for Ethnicity, Race, and Equity (CERE) at Wellesley recently sent an email discouraging “guest speakers with controversial and objectionable beliefs” without first considering the possible pain, injury, harm, and damage to the student body.

Yes, those are all words used in the email … about guest speakers.

Controversial speakers are also considered an imposition on the liberty of the disempowered, “who often feel the injury most acutely and invest time and energy in rebutting the speakers’ arguments.”

Can’t they just ignore speech with which they disagree, if it’s that painful to process? Apparently not: “Students object in order to affirm their humanity. This work is not optional; students feel they would be unable to carry out their responsibilities as students without standing up for themselves.”

Advertisement

Then what’s this talk about the need for faculty and administrators to step in on their behalf, as “the responsibility to defend the disempowered does not rest solely with students”? Actually, never mind. It’s not like we’d ever be allowed on campus anyway asking painful questions like these.

https://twitter.com/inflatedKarma/status/844635664360583170

https://twitter.com/adviceforbernie/status/844633673966243844

https://twitter.com/Osscitio/status/844773466968535041

https://twitter.com/WoganMay/status/844632352173252608

https://twitter.com/WoganMay/status/844632986167492609

Any students concerned that they, in their zeal to encourage discussion, might actually “stifle productive debate by enabling the bullying of disempowered groups,” are welcomed to approach CERE for expert guidance.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement