Israel War Room Torches NBC News' Post About Plane That Apparently Decided to...
JD Vance Personally Thanks Trump As a Marine for Ending the War in...
VIDEO: Former DOJ Lawyer John Yoo Says Christa Pike Could Face a Firing...
Trump Stole the Stage at the California Gubernatorial Debate
OOF: Pretty Sure We Know Why Abdul El-Sayed TRIED Deleting THIS X Post....
Jessica Tarlov Thought Using a Trump Post to Sell Her Book Was a...
'Did the Terrorist Write This Headline?' CBS Dusts Off a Media Cliché for...
Xavier Becerra Set Himself Up Like a Bowling Pin for Steve Hilton's Debate...
'What a SICK Woman': Ana Kasparian Implies FlyDubai Attack Was a False Flag...
Adam Schiff's Election Disinformation Warning Collapses Under the Weight of All the Shamel...
From the TOP ROPE! Scott Jennings Leaves CNN Panel STUNNED Stupid About High...
Let's Call the Randi Weingarten-Prof. Alliance What It REALLY Is: A Cartel With...
SELF-OWN ALERT! Dem Rep Stomps on a Rake in Rush to Slam Trump...
'Did a COMPLETE 180': Tom Homan TORCHES Abigail Spanberger for BETRAYING Virginia and...
Let's GOOOO! Burlington School Officials in Panic As Students Refuse Taking Part in...

Wellesley's Commission for Ethnicity, Race, and Equity offers tips to avoid pain, injury caused by guest speakers

Faculty members at Columbia University felt compelled to dismiss the work of upcoming campus speaker Charles Murray as “tendentious dogma,” but at least they did so while reminding students and others that his presence on campus was no excuse for violence.

Advertisement

It’s unfortunate that any statement to that effect was necessary at all, but it could have been worse: Reason.com reports that the Commission for Ethnicity, Race, and Equity (CERE) at Wellesley recently sent an email discouraging “guest speakers with controversial and objectionable beliefs” without first considering the possible pain, injury, harm, and damage to the student body.

Yes, those are all words used in the email … about guest speakers.

Controversial speakers are also considered an imposition on the liberty of the disempowered, “who often feel the injury most acutely and invest time and energy in rebutting the speakers’ arguments.”

Can’t they just ignore speech with which they disagree, if it’s that painful to process? Apparently not: “Students object in order to affirm their humanity. This work is not optional; students feel they would be unable to carry out their responsibilities as students without standing up for themselves.”

Advertisement

Then what’s this talk about the need for faculty and administrators to step in on their behalf, as “the responsibility to defend the disempowered does not rest solely with students”? Actually, never mind. It’s not like we’d ever be allowed on campus anyway asking painful questions like these.

https://twitter.com/inflatedKarma/status/844635664360583170

https://twitter.com/adviceforbernie/status/844633673966243844

https://twitter.com/Osscitio/status/844773466968535041

https://twitter.com/WoganMay/status/844632352173252608

https://twitter.com/WoganMay/status/844632986167492609

Any students concerned that they, in their zeal to encourage discussion, might actually “stifle productive debate by enabling the bullying of disempowered groups,” are welcomed to approach CERE for expert guidance.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement