NYPD News Absolutely Roasted For Confiscating a ... (Checks Notes) ... 'Final Fantasy'...
Gov. Ron DeSantis Pressures ICE Into Re-Arresting Alleged Rapist
US Conducts First Air Drop of Humanitarian Aid in Gaza Strip
New Republic: Hatchet Man Ben Sasse Fires All University of Florida DEI Staff
'OH MY GOD!' Trump Roasts DA Fani Willis in Campaign Speech (You've GOTTA...
Trans Space Force Official Says to Use Pronouns in Your Emails
Retailer Offers Discount If You Take Their 'Digital Course in Racial Inclusion'
What Is Going On at Deer Creek School District? Video Shows Children Licking...
Man Upset Freed Hamas Hostage Doesn’t Look Like She ‘Went Through Hell’
Bloomberg: Google Pulls AI Feature After 'Right-Wing Backlash'
New York Magazine: Biden Talks Regularly With His Staff About Sex
NY Times/Siena Poll About What Would Happen If the Election Were Held Today...
60 Minutes Teases Story About How Texas Has 'Aggressively Challenged' Biden's Border Autho...
No Kidding: Appeals Court Rules J6 Defendants Handed Improperly Enhanced Sentences
Here's a 'Biden vs. Reality' Double Shot and Chaser About the Debt

Could the New York Times have found a softer couch for its recollection of the blind sheik?

Nearly a week after the death of the “blind sheik” Omar Abdel Rahman in a U.S. prison, the New York Times published an interview with his lawyer, Lynne Stewart, in which she remembered Rahman not as a terrorist but as the “personification of an American hero.”

Advertisement

Credit is due the New York Times for interrupting its loving ode to Stewart, who served prison time for smuggling messages from Rahman to his followers in Egypt, with a quick reality check from the National Review’s Andrew C. McCarthy, who was lead prosecutor in the case against Rahman.

“The blind sheikh was neither an American nor a hero — he was the antithesis of both,” McCarthy added. “He would have been offended at the former suggestion, and all civilized people at the latter.”

Even though the blind sheik was convicted in 1995 of plotting “what prosecutors said” was a campaign of terror that included the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and hoped to take out tunnels and other landmarks, Fox News’ Greg Gutfeld took special notice of little qualifiers like that one sprinkled throughout the New York Times piece.

Advertisement

It certainly was good of the Times to allow the lead prosecutor to have a word, then, seeing as every mention of the blind sheik’s crimes is prefaced by the disclaimer, “prosecutors said.”

For a more definitive look back at the trial of the blind sheikh, McCarthy offered his own take in National Review that pulls no punches.

 

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement