The Party of Empathy Wishes JK Rowling Had Been Offed by Her Ex-Husband
'Morally Obtuse Idiots': Matt Walsh UNLOADS on the Lindsay Clancy Jurors the Way...
James Talarico’s Pastor: People in This Church Wish Trump’s Assassin ‘Had Been More...
Here's the Self-Refuting Media Headline of the Day That Proves 'No Such Thing...
It's Time to Talk About 'Lanterns,' the Left's Latest Effort to Destroy Something...
LA County Takes $5 Million Meant for Fire Victims and Hands It to...
South Park Spent Decades Roasting Everyone. Now It’s Just ‘Orange Man Bad’
Judge: 'Heinous and Outrageous' — Rich 8th Graders Charged After Brutal Filmed Assault...
IMPEACH! TDS Media Reports Trump's Generous With Holiday Bonuses for Staff (Out of...
Prosecutor: No Threats, No Obsession — Acton Fair ‘Attack’ Suspect Just Wanted to...
It's Come to THIS? Frustrated Clancy Juror Explains What the Lone Holdout Just...
Atty Forgets to Click Off Gun Safety in Botched Ambush of Ex-Wife —...
Dem Senator Says Nobody in Her Party Wants Taxpayer-Funded Care for Illegals (Then...
Do-Gooder Professor Heroically Defends Her Cheap Illegal Gardener After ICE Rightfully Arr...
They Laughed When Conservatives Said They’d Come for Your Gas Stove ... San...

'Words matter': Katie Pavlich notes that campaign talk of Muslim ban haunted Trump in court

Truth:

There’s a party on Twitter tonight, and everyone who opposed President Trump’s executive order on immigration and refugees is invited, now that the 9th Circuit Court has ruled a judge’s stay on the order will not be lifted, at least for now. It’s a little bit like the celebration liberals had expected to have had the night of Nov. 8, and even 2016’s biggest loser is having a chuckle.

Advertisement

Decisions by the 9th Circuit are overturned more often than not, and it’s worth noting just what Thursday’s ruling meant, and what it didn’t.

And speaking of the merits:

Believe it or not, Townhall editor, White House correspondent, and BuzzFeed-triggering conservative opinion commentator person Katie Pavlich and the New York Times’ Maggie Haberman came to the same conclusion, though, on Donald Trump’s campaign rhetoric coming back to haunt him.

Advertisement

Uh-oh:

As Twitchy reported, one judge of the three behind Thursday’s unanimous ruling distinguished himself in court by clarifying that the Muslim ban of which Trump spoke on the campaign trail was not the travel ban of his executive order; millions of Muslims from countries not specified in the order were unaffected, while non-Muslims from seven countries were … and those countries weren’t drawn from a hat.

Still, it’s clear that the appeals judges were concerned about the idea of a Muslim ban, regardless of the text of the order.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/DrTabio29/status/829838314127683586

https://twitter.com/windh1/status/829861513670303744

https://twitter.com/chrisflory/status/829838606260912128

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/jagnp99/status/829838587264905216

That’s probably why progressives are squeezing as much enjoyment out of the ruling as they can for tonight.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement