Full Commie Trainwreck: NY Dem Brad Lander Embraces Radical Islamists, Hopes to Join...
Podcaster Airs Pro-Life Congresswoman’s Ectopic Pregnancy Story Despite Her Request Not To
CA State Senator Wiener Accuses Bible of Rainbow Hijacking – Because History Started...
Judge Blocks Trump Administration From Using Database to Ensure Noncitizens Can’t Vote
Judge Finds That DOJ Investigation of Tim Walz Was Politically Motivated; Gavin Newsom...
Trans-WHAT-icide? Chicago's Brandon Johnson Invents a Whole New Word to Deflect From His...
'DO IT'! Looks Like Elon Musk Has Had Enough of Rep. Ro Khanna's...
Lance Twiggs, Tyler Robinson’s Trans Partner, Now in TX and Seeking Witness Protection...
I Asked Democrats for an Iota of Sanity on the Mall and the...
Chuck Schumer Slips Up: 25 Million Voters Erased
Something Interesting (and Totally Predictable) Is Happening in Latin America Without USAI...
Anti-ICE Agitator Blocking ICE Facility Entrance Is the 'Lefty Meets Pavement' Clip of...
Hillary Clinton Remains Angry and Bitter About Losing in 2016 (the Constitution Is...
'Saved You a CLICK': Justine Bateman BLISTERS The Atlantic for Hating on World...
Four Ex-Presidents Brag 'Zero Drama' BUUUUT X Delivers the Receipts

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement