LIVE Election Results on Twitchy! Primary Night in Tennessee
If Students Can’t Handle Seeing Their Grades, They’re Not Ready for College
Hasan Piker Angry With Think Tank Third Way for 'Preparing for War' Against...
Canadian Lefty Lectures Americans: Melania Trump Less of a 'Real American' Than Born-In-US...
David Hogg Reminds Us It's Been Two Years of Total GOP Control and...
NYT's David French Informed of the Difference Between Nick Fuentes and Hasan Piker
Francesca Hong Spins Her Slams on Holidays With 'I'm Just Not a Fun...
Hasan Piker Tries to Backpedal on His 'America Deserved 9/11' Stance and Twitter...
Mamdani Booed Off Stage As Cops Hold Back Furious Crowd
Coco Gauff: 'Men Don't Belong in Women's Tennis... but Please Don't Yell at...
Not While I'M Alive! Justine Bateman SHREDS Islamic Scholars Caught Bragging About Taking...
Gov. Gretchen Whitmer Tells MI Which Dems to Vote for in Order to...
This Jarvis Post on Expensive Burritos Just Torched Every Political Faction on X
Doesn't Even Play One on TV: Fake Doctor Abdul El-Sayed Says He 'Can't...
Amy Klobuchar FURIOUS When Crowd Boos and Laughs in Her Face As She...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement