Boomers and Lesbians Teach What Democracy Looks Like Through Song
California Giving Free Sex Changes to Homeless Illegal Aliens
Lefty Media Has a Breakdown Amid Reports About Who DNI Tulsi Gabbard Might...
Jim Acosta Confirms That Trump Has Published Another ‘Crazy Jesus Post’
Mark Sanford Jumps Back Into Politics: Because His Legacy of Embarrassing His Kids...
Rep. Ayanna Pressley Says 'It Is a Death Sentence' to Deport Anyone to...
Shri Thanedar’s ‘Sick Burn’ on Stephen Miller Backfires BIGLY — All of X...
Trans Journalist Who Keeps Getting Mistaken for Her Trans Colleague Has a Theory
WaPo: Government Could Lose Billions by Discouraging Illegals From ‘Engaging in the Tax...
'Janky America': Michelle Obama Unhappy Again Now That a Non-Obama Is President
Karoline Leavitt Reminds WH Reporter What a Joke Is When Questioned About Trump's...
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Passes Along Credible Reports of a 'Teen Trend' Forming
Zohran Mamdani's Straight-Up Giddy That It's 'Happy Tax Day' (Carol Roth Has a...
Adam Schiff Says He Wouldn’t Have Gone Near Swalwell With a Ten-Foot Pole...
Zohran Mamdani Is Extremely Disturbed by Violence Shown by NYPD and Will Open...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement