Late Night Fun With Graham Fatner, Der Uber Grossenfurher
Rep. Ro Khanna Beclowns Himself: Epstein Crusader Campaigns for Alleged Woman-Abuser Graha...
Nazi-Tatted Nepo-Baby Just Delivered the Final Nail in #MeToo’s Coffin — And the...
The Blind Sheikh’s Defense Witness Wants to Gut America’s Defense Budget
Dem Senator Whitehouse Bankrolling Platner Tells His Victims to Get Over It —...
Matt Stoller Ditches 'HR Lady' Politics for Nazi-Tattooed, Sexting, Girlfriend-Roughing, R...
With the Bidens Determined to Stay in the Spotlight This Year, CNN Has...
Marco Rubio Faced Down a Democrat Firing Squad and Walked out Without a...
Jimmy Kimmel Melts Down Over Spencer Pratt’s Strong LA Mayor Run: ‘We Should...
Worst. Take. EVER --> Sure, Graham Platner Assaulted That Conservative Woman BUUUT ...
When Do We Get an Update From MS NOW's Morning Joe About the...
Hakeem Jeffries Gets Reality Nuked After Being Triggered by Trump's Plan to 'Ruin'...
That One Time the Republican Nominee for Governor of Iowa Schooled Obama TO...
Well, Well, WELL... What Do We Have HERE?! Even NBC Notices Late Ballot...
Believe ALL Women? Krystal Ball Smears Graham Planter Accuser and Trips SPECTACULARLY Over...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement