Judge Orders Trump Admin to Restore White House Access to CNN, MSNOW, and...
Same-Sex Drive: Dem Rosa DeLauro Puts the Brakes on Roadtrip to MA Lesbian...
Rep. Frederica Wilson Honors Nolan Wells' Parents and 'Other Parents of Murdered Young...
The Revolution Will Be Catered: X Notices the Fence at DSA's 'Tax the...
Taylor Lorenz Explains How Lesbians Can Drink at a Bar With a Strict...
‘Proud Anchor Baby’ Congresswoman Introduces Legislation to Abolish ICE and 'Dismantle' DH...
Fernando Mendoza Is the Total Package — and Now He’s Teaching Gen Z...
Nancy Mace Is Speechless Over Sunny Hostin’s Brag About Being a Holdout Juror...
Ben Rhodes Trying to Imagine a Foreign Ambassador Calling for the Arrest of...
L Is for Lie, Ms. Rachel: Star Slammed for Passing a Biased Report...
AP: Guess the Race of Second Suspect Arrested in Hanging of Black Woman
Shockingly the Network Newscasts Are ALL OVER the ActBlue Foreign Funding Scandal (JUST...
RIP What’s Left of LA: Nithya Raman Takes the Lead Over Karen Bass
Javier Milei Just Destroyed the UN's 'Arrogant Parasites' Off the Top Rope (Right...
CNN’s Jake Tapper Not Going to Dignify Trump’s Juvenile Post About the Brilliant...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement