AOC Is Concerned Republicans Are Turning Young Men Into REAL MEN
Chuck Schumer No Longer Wants Justice Gorsuch to 'Reap the Whirlwind' (at Least...
We Feel SHOCKED: Latest Epstein BOMBSHELL Lands Right on Democrat Stacey Plaskett's HEAD...
Trump Activates 'Backup Plan' After Supreme Court Strikes Down Tariffs
Most DELISH Schadenfreude EVER: NYC Democrats RAGE at Zohran Mamdani for Raising Their...
CNN's Jake Tapper Notes Kash Patel Was Interviewed by His Former Deputy...
Death of Comedy Rides a Pale Horse: Stephen Colbert's Lily White Killers of...
Scott Jennings Dismantles Jon Ossoff As Only He CAN for Openly Trying to...
Tom Homan ENDS Democrats' ICE/Nazi Rhetoric by Asking Them One Simple Yet DAMNING...
Jonathan Turley Has a Potential Buzzkill for Those Celebrating the SCOTUS Ruling on...
Jasmine Crockett Says It's DEMOCRATS Who Are Racist Now and There's Just NOT...
Story of How the Oakland Mayor's Car Got Stolen Is the Most 'Democrat...
BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules on Trump’s Tariffs
Susan Rice Lets the Mask Slip While Making Disturbing, Fascist THREATS Against Trump...
Republicans HILARIOUSLY 'Celebrate' Dems Choosing Governor In Name Only Spanberger to Give...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos