NC State House Candidate Posts That the Ovens at Dachau Are Where Trump...
Gavin Newsom, Abdul El-Sayed, Adam Schiff Scold DHS for Racist Post Featuring ‘Mr....
PERFECTION! Guess Who Rescued a Stranded Anti-Trump MS NOW Crew in the TX...
James Talarico Tells Jimmy Kimmel What Jesus Would Do If He Visited the...
Two Epstein 'Survivors' Kicked Out of the Republican Midterm Convention
Three Year Letterman Calls Out Canadian Troll Whose Visa Was ‘Pulled’ Over Vile...
New Video Shows the Harrowing ‘Attack’ on Ohio Gubernatorial Candidate Amy Acton
USA TODAY: Gen Z Leaving ‘Odd’ Posts About Charlie Kirk Using 'Humor' to...
COMMENTER Trying to Smear Lone Holdout Juror Upset That Megyn Kelly Called Her...
Talarico Said All His Donations Come From Texans (Kimmel of Course Did NOT...
Gov. Ron DeSantis Has an Offer for the Lone Holdout Clancy Juror Enduring...
End Wokeness Has Video of a Bunch of Democrats Doing Their Best Obama...
Abigail Spanberger Gets TORCHED on X for Claiming Americans 'Lost Their Lives' on...
Did the AP Not Want to Completely Ruin AOC's Narrative by Leaving Something...
The Difference Between How NBC Boston Covers 11 Jurors vs. the Holdout Is...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement