Todd Blanche Takes on a Deranged (and Preemptively Pardoned) Dirtbag Named Adam Schiff
Gov. Tim Walz on Pardoned Child Rapist: 'We Can't All Be Judged by...
Canadian Woman in ICE Custody After Slapping Teen in Pro-Trump, Pro-ICE Clothing
Escape From New York: Gov. Kathy Hochul Blames Trump for Families and Businesses...
Podcaster Thinks Homeschooling Is Weird, Doesn’t Trust Anyone Who Wants to Be With...
Kamala's Kids: Gubernatorial Candidate Mike Lindell's Pillow Prices Are a Nazi Dog Whistle
Here's What Was in the Van of the 'Upstanding Non-Citizen on His Way...
Get Out Already: Mahmoud Khalil Sues Heritage Foundation, Stephen Miller Under KKK Act
Biden and His Autopen Return With Big Announcement
Sen. Blumenthal Continued to Insist There's No Evidence of Jack Smith Wrongdoing...
Second 'ICE-Related Fatality' This Week After Mexican Flees Encounter, Is Hit by Tractor-T...
No-Show Shame: EVERY Democrat Arrives As an Empty Seat for Senate Anti-Fraud Hearing
Here's How Republicans at Hearings Should Respond to Dem Questions About the 2020...
AG Nominee Todd Blanche Needed No Words to Properly Respond to Insults From...
Roach Encroachment: Los Angeles TV News Reporter Braves a Big Bold Bug During...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement