A Big Stretch: The Atlantic Reaches Across the Pond to Find a Writer...
Seize Heil!: Dem Graham Platner Imagines Himself As a Robin Hood Socialist Who...
Double Drivel: Hakeem Jeffries Ignorantly Claims New York Knicks Fan Trump Knows Nothing...
Craze and Means: Trump’s Not the Only Republican Kristen Welker of NBC News...
WNBA’s Brianna Turner Opposes USA 250 Patches on Uniforms Because Players Wouldn’t Have...
Jonathan Chait: The GOP's Refusal to Accept Spencer Pratt's Defeat Is Bizarre and...
Los Angeles Dodger Blake Treinen Was Not Wearing a Pride Hat on Pride...
WSJ Calls Them 'Dark Years.' Reality Calls Them Graham Platner’s Entire Pathetic Adult...
End Wokeness: ‘Nothing Can Prepare You for the Voice of this US House...
Bernie’s Last Gift to America: A Cheating Socialist With a Nazi Skull Tattoo
Woman Sues to Stop UFC Freedom 250 Event, Claiming ‘Aesthetic Injury’ to Her...
See Jane Divorce Dick: Scott Pelley Compares Getting Fired to Wife Jane’s Murder
Karmelo Anthony’s Defense Asks If It Was Possible Austin Metcalf Impaled Himself on...
Democrats Admit: Forget Border, Prices, or Crime — We’re Impeaching President Trump on...
Ex-Gawker Writer's Pathetic Knicks Fanfic: 'Boo Trump, Cheer My Commie Hero' Gets Absolute...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement