Smug Libs Melting Down Over UFC at Lincoln Memorial Get Brutal HISTORY Smackdown...
HA! Lefty's 'My Life Sucks Because There's a Trillionaire' Post Goes VIRAL for...
Get the NET! Check Out Popehat's Unhinged COLLAPSE on Lefty Utopia BlueSky Over...
Happy Birthday President Trump! Here's a Top 10 List of All Your KICK-BUTT...
Jim Acosta Likens Trump’s Name Coming Off the Kennedy Center to the Historic...
The Name of Defame: CNN’s Abby Phillip Defends Bakari Sellers Calling Musk a...
‘I’ll Rip Your Teeth Out’: Muslim ‘Civil Enforcement Officers’ Fired After Threatening Bri...
Law Prof Says Karmelo Anthony Is Entitled to a New Trial Because It...
Libs Lose Their Minds Over UFC & Motocross at the WH — Yet...
Hot New Trend: Posting Photos of Yourself Urinating on Austin Metcalf’s Gravestone
It’s ’Gut-Wrenching’ That Thugs Who Broke Police Officer’s Back in Pro-Hamas 'Protest' Are...
Progressive 'Christian' Author Anne Lamott Uses Her 'Last Favor' With God to Beg...
MeidasTouch: Pilot Filed Safety Reports After Being Blinded by Lights From Trump's UFC...
City Council Meeting in Michigan Doesn't Look Like America, Says End Wokeness
AZ Journo Craig Harris Exposed: Coordinating with Teachers Union While Sending His Kids...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos