DHS Statement About What ICE Has 'Quietly Carried Out' Will Send Dems to...
You Can See Dem Debbie Dingell Internally SCREAMING As Scott Jennings Owns Her...
Desperate Democrats Brag About Abigail Spanberger Making Something Already Illegal ... Ill...
Byron York Reminds Us It's the Third Anniversary of the Biggest Backfire in...
Canada Instantly Regrets Starting a Trade War With Trump
NYC Legal Immigrants Are Working Together to STICK IT to Zohran Mamdani and...
Hakeem Jeffries Trips Over Dems' Stable of DSA Lunatics While Claiming Republicans Are...
Oh, Honey... NO! Jessica Tarlov Plays Stupid Games With Stupid Posts in Lame...
OOF: David Axelrod's Ugly Swing at Natalie Harp Hits Barack Obama RIGHT in...
Former Abdul El-Sayed Staffer Hints at BIG TIME Tea That Will SPILL If...
Gov. JB Pritzker Stomps on a Ratio Rake During Attempted Brag About IL...
RUH-ROH, Sounds Like BIG Trouble in Democrat-Land: Hakeem Jeffries Opposes MAJOR DSA Initi...
MAZE Has Proof That Bernie Sanders Has Been Working Off the Exact Same...
Abdul El-Sayed Scrambles As Old Video Surfaces of Him Blaming America for Creating...
'Still a LOSER': Fired Kirk-Hating Journo CHEERS Forcing WaPo to Take Her Disgusting...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement