CNN's Numbers Guy Has a Reality Check for TDS Crowd Claiming Trump Supporters...
Hochul Begs Billionaires to Come Home— Iowahawk Counters with Bounty for Every 'Fugitive'...
Sen. Angus King Is STILL Upset That Tulsi Gabbard Hasn't Listed Climate Change...
Bridges and Cougars and Butterflies, Oh MY! Chris Rufo Exposes Yet ANOTHER Gavin...
For SOME Reason Unhinged Sen. Elissa Slotkin Is Scared by the Thought of...
'There's Your Midterm Ad'! Dem Rep Said the Quiet Part Out Loud About...
Actor Jerry O’Connell Can’t Win: Leftist Family Mad, X Followers Mad, So He...
The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 - Religion, Morality and Knowledge in Education
Houston, We Have a Creepy Dem House Candidate: Bobby Pulido's Plane Pervert Video...
Rand Paul Blocks Fellow Repub Katie Britt From Introducing Markwayne Mullin at DHS...
At Least He's (Accidentally) Honest: Jeff Merkley Says the Quiet Part Out Loud...
Gov. Kathy Hochul Begs the Rich Who Have Fled NY to Return and...
Ro, Ro, Ro Your Votes Gently Down to Zero — ALL His Endorsements...
They Uncovered Massive Illegal Immigrant Fraud—Then the Obama DOJ Destroyed Their Lives
NYT Warns of Online Radicalization... By Calling Two Biological Males 'Women' and Dodging...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos