Former Fetterman Staffers (Losers) Launch X Dump Account, Promise Private Texts Starting S...
When Mothers Rally for a Child Killer, the Slippery Slope Is No Longer...
DA Couldn't Believe a Reporter Asked Him This Question About the Prosecution of...
America Is Healing: Maryland Renaissance Festival Announces a Ban on Furries
Reporter Describes Some Clancy Jurors As Mistrial Was Declared (Imagine What the Holdout...
Dishonest Rep. Ted Lieu Pushed Fake News About Where the GOP Convention Link...
Senate Hopeful’s Temper Tantrum: El-Sayed Destroys Store Property Because Someone Dissed H...
Wajahat Ali Nods Along As Rula Jebreal Slurs Hakeem Jeffries As 'Monkey' and...
OOPS! Mike Huckabee Apologizes for Unfortunate 'Typo' in His Valediction to Maria Bartirom...
Cop Says 3-Foot Petting Zoo Donkey HeeHaw ‘Charged’ Him, So He Shot the...
Holdout Won't Budge in Clancy Trial; Judge Calls Mistrial, Defense Asks High Court...
NYC Assembly Socialist Has the Most Insane Suggestion of All Time for How...
‘Limited by Their Experience’: James Talarico Explains Why Straight White People Have 'Bli...
Scott Jennings Feels Bad for Jasmine Crockett … CNN Panelist Acts Like He...
American Heroes of 9/11: Betty Ong

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement