Message on Jack Smith's Shirt at 'Power to the People' Concert Confirms Partisan...
Pucker Up: Amy Klobuchar Disrespects the American Flag While Kissing Up to Somalis...
Tom Homan Breaking Out Puppets and Crayons to Explain Immigration Law to CBS...
Retired Army Medic LEVELS Ro Khanna and His Partisan War-Blame Checklist in 1...
Polls Bear Little Positives for GOP
Sen. Chris Murphy Thought Visiting the Middle East Made Him Look BRAVE. He...
Jessica Tarlov Claims Mamdani Is Actually 'Pretty Cool' for Not Ushering in Sharia...
RUH-RO! Ro Khanna Reaps a Ratio TSUNAMI on Post Blaming Republicans for America's...
That One Time John Fetterman Made Donna Brazile Look STUPID on Bill Maher...
People Are LOVING How BADLY Western Lensman EMBARRASSED Amy Klobuchar With Old Biden...
Xavier Becerra Has Some SERIOUS ’Splainin’ to Do About That $12 Sob Story...
Bro, Take the L! James Talarico's OFFICIAL Campaign Account BUSTED Lying About Rally...
MI’s Jewish AG Supports Abdul El-Sayed Because He’ll Better Protect Separation of Church...
Socialist Asks What You Want Your Tax Dollars Going to If Not Food...
Lunatic Tries to Run Down Maine Wire Reporter for 'Invasion of Privacy': Suspect...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement