'You're Late to the MAGA Party!' Dems AGAIN Try to Rip Off (and...
Maximum Overdrive: NBC News Once Again Reports About the Violent Rage of Self-Driving...
People Mag Slams Trump's Transphobic Joke About Kaitlan Collins (and Everyone Has the...
Journo Tells Rupert Lowe a Lot of People Could Interpret 'Anglo-Saxon' as White...
Convicted Murderer Karmelo Anthony Seeks a New Trial, Claims Judge Was Biased
Judges Enter Orders Preventing DHS From Terminating TPS for Ethiopia, South Sudan
Landlords Ban Work-from-Home Tenants: Because Using the Place You Rent Is Apparently Too...
NYT's Maggie Haberman Reports Trump Has Massively Escalated Against the Smithsonian
NY Talk Show Host Sid Rosenberg Drops the Mic in Describing Zohran Mamdani...
Madison Police Completely Surrender Press Conference to Black Activist Ranting About Colon...
Canadian Journalist Annie Dufour Big Mad After Watching Trump Roast the Press at...
Mehdi Hasan Wants to Know Why Dan Goldman Only Mentioned Jewish Man Stabbed...
Sister of Man Shot by Cop Says His Long Criminal History Tells a...
BLM Is Back in Force: Activists Harass Sidewalk Diners in Madison, WI, Surround...
Leftist Podcaster Emma Vigeland Demands 'Better White Women' — Starts by Exempting Herself

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement