Oilfield Rando SHREDS John Thune Claiming Repubs Hate Trump With DAMNING Reminder of...
Does NOT Work Anymore: Brandon Gill Isn't ABOUT to Let Rep. Yassamin Ansari...
'What's the PROBLEM?' Maria Bartiromo DROPS Ro Khanna for Pushing SAVE Act Lies...
Newt Gingrich Absolutely DISMANTLES Jon Ossoff Point-by-Point on Every Issue in Brutal Pos...
Imagine What I Could Pay for by Confiscating the Wealth of These Musk...
'So GHEY': Scott Wiener Attacking Christian MLB Players for 'Defacing Their Pride Caps'...
Hunter Biden Pivots to a Career in Comedy by Telling Joe Rogan Why...
Amy Klobuchar Trying to Appeal to America First While TRASHING Trump Is Even...
Mike Lee Goes OFF on John Thune, Spills the TEA About What's REALLY...
'This You?' Matt Van Swol DROPS Smarmy Jerk John Pavlovitz Over Antifa Claim
Omnipresent Obama: Former President Says He Emulates George Washington With ‘Quiet’ Post-W...
BleachBit Biden: Hillary Clinton Erases Past, Says She Was Always Against Sleepy Joe’s...
I Can't Be Sure, But I THINK Joe Biden Is Bragging to Jay...
Rumors Squashed: Knicks Confirm White House Visit as Libs Melt Down
Laken Riley’s Legacy on the Ballot — Collins Authored the Law, Ossoff Voted...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement