Lost and Tossed: DSA Co-Chair Serves Up Word Salad When Pushed on ‘Open...
'Cancel Thanksgiving' Francesca Hong Says All Her Opponent Talks About Is Culture Wars
'Get Comfy Being Ruthless,' Says Kamala — Same Party That Already Tried Everything...
Vice President JD Vance on 'Odd' Abdul El-Sayed: 'The Guy's Crazy and Would...
Bad Sign for the Left? Jill Biden Aide Crosses Party Lines to Endorse...
Attorneys General From Three States Subpoena Anthony Fauci
WNBA Commissioner Reacts to Two Male Ex-NBA Players Vying to Join the Women’s...
Hasan Piker Imagines the Complaints If Charlie Kirk Were Stumping for GOP Candidates
Royce White Says She's Getting Hate When She Just Wants to Hoop With...
Terrible Person, Worse Comedian: Mike Rogers Gets the Last Laugh As El-Sayed’s Zinger...
Francesca Hong Will NOT Like Bill Maher's Take on Her Sudden Embrace of...
David Weigel Demands Evidence of El-Sayed’s Violent Rhetoric ... X Hands Him a...
'I Think Someone's Nervous!' Gavin Newsom's in a Panic Over the Senate Confirming...
Let the Tantrums Begin: Left Wing Tears Flow As Todd Blanche Is Confirmed...
DSA Chair Proves Commies Skip the ‘Thinking’ Part of Policy — Won't Affirm...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement