Beyond Parody: What Was Once a Darkly Hilarious SNL Skit Is Now a...
Ari Fleischer Has GREAT Questions After Mamdani's 'ID to Enter Stores but Not...
Gosh, This Is WEIRD: You Won't Believe THIS Inconvenient Fact About DSA Members...
Holy DUMPSTER-FIRE, Batman! Francesca Hong FAN-GIRLING Over Ilhan Omar Goes REALLY Wrong (...
Dr. Bhattacharya Puts Politico on BLAST for Misreporting RFK Jr. Put Constitution Over...
Spencer Pratt Spotted NYC Mayor Mamdani Being a Devious Communist at City-Run Grocery...
Michigan Dem Operative Spills ALL the Tea, Admits the Party Is Worried About...
Don't Give the CDC a Pass on COVID, Newly Released Docs Show They...
Don't Look Now, but We've Found ANOTHER American Holiday Francesca Hong Hates
Did NOT Have Martina Navratilova Dropping the MIC on Lefty Rag Smearing Sophie...
Is She CRYING?! Seattle Socialist Mayor CRUMBLES When Pressed by Media During Shooting...
Step Aside, Zohran! Francesca Hong's Next Up in Bringing on Jim Crow 2.0
HA! Scott Jennings Using Zohran Mamdani's ID-Required Grocery Stores to KNEE-CAP Dems Is...
It's ALL HAPPENING! Scott Presler Cries Tears of POLITICAL JOY Sharing HUGE News...
Oh, WOW! NOW We Know WHY the Biden Team Fought So Hard to...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement