Jemele Hill Lectures America: Spencer Pratt’s Candidacy ‘Says More About Us’ Than Him
Peak Taylor Lorenz: Hoping the 'Communist Mayor' Fixes the Cashew Cream Cheese Gap
Thom Bomb: Bolo-Wearing Tillis Drops ‘Extra Filter’ and Explodes on Trump Senate Pick...
Bernie Sanders Proves Dave Portnoy Right — Stumps for Maine’s Nazi Sympathizer
Fishy Move: Fl Gov Candidate James Fishback Marries Mystery Blonde Weeks After Ditching...
Thomas Massie Melts Down: 'AI Hotel Room Throuple Video With AOC and Omar'...
Rubio Condemns Hezbollah Call to Overthrow Lebanese Government
WATCH: Shabbos Kestenbaum Humiliates Ana Kasparian On Air — She Blocks Him Immediately...
Veterans Affairs and Armed Services Remember on Memorial Weekend
And Just Like That She Became a Meme: Clueless Correspondent's WH Shooting...
'SICK of It': Taxpayer Confronting Local Gov for Putting Illegals First Will Take...
What Graham Platner Did When PRESSED About His Vile Comments Regarding Army Combat...
James Woods Shares DAMNING Laundry List of Just How Unhinged, Destructive, and VIOLENT...
Oh, THE HORROR! Looks Like This Lil Fella's Upset With Trump's WH Comms...
Post Takes Trump/Iran Deal Rumors Apart 1 by 1 Sharing What's REALLY Happening...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement