Chris Cuomo Praises ‘Rebranded’ AOC for Keeping Her Principles While Changing Political Po...
Homeless Hero?: Elizabeth Warren Wonders If Spider-Man Can Afford a Place to Live...
Extreme Makeover: DSA Darling AOC Begins Rebranding Campaign to Convince Voters She’s a...
Buzz Patterson Shares an Open Letter to Press Explaining Why Operations Are Classified
The Economist Outs Paw Patrol As Gender-Normative Pro-Police Propaganda
Here's a Call From the London Police About 'Malicious Communication' Set to LEGO...
Report: FBI Had 14 Informants on Biden Corruption but Ran Op to Dismiss...
Dem Gov. Hopeful Cindy Holscher in Red-State Kansas: 'No Idea If Jesus Was...
Mehdi Hasan Wonders If the Press Will Be Harder on Trump Now That...
'Playing My Own Words Is Defamation': Hasan Piker Melts Down Over Scott Jennings...
Good: Macro Rubio Did Not Answer CNN Reporter Who Asked If He Put...
Rick Wilson Is Late Getting in His Dig on Trump ‘Cowering Like a...
'Hitting the Stereotype SO on the Nose'! Pics From Francesca Hong's Farewell Event...
Ballot Pox: MS NOW’s Jen Psaki Admits Democrat Leaders Pick Nominees, Not the...
Al Jazeera Reports Ilhan Omar Won Her Primary Overwhelmingly Without Support From AIPAC

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement