Bring in the Bulldozers: Madison and State Police Dismantle Black Lives Matter Encampment
Mamdani Gets Caught As Grocery ID Policy Backfires
Welcome to the Party, Pal: Mark Halperin Suddenly Notices a TEENY Bit of...
This Alone, This Right Here Should Be Disqualifying for Francesca Hong... Sadly, Commies...
Ok, HAMAS: Ben Rhodes Shrieks About AIPAC (the Jews!) in Thread Pushing Abdul...
BOOMITY: Mike Rowe Responds to ENRAGED Crazies Who FREAKED Over His EPIC Post...
Max Miller REALLY Stepped in It When He Released Those DropBox Files to...
Self-Proclaimed Socialist's Reddit Post Shows How Much the DSA Actually DESPISES the Worki...
She Doubled DOWN! LOL! Obama Bros' Attempt to Give Francesca Hong a Defund...
WUT? Krystal Ball Vapidly Announces the Left Is the MOST Pro-America Faction in...
C'MON! Dan Goldman Comes SO CLOSE to Outing Antisemitic Dems in BRUTAL Back-and-Forth...
HO HO HA! That One Time Christmas LITERALLY ATTACKED Francesca Hong (I'm SHOOK!)
Spencer Pratt Lists ALL the Ways Capitalism Has Made Hasan Piker Who He...
So, NOT Climate Change?! Alleged Spokane Wildfire Arsonist Arrested — WOW, How TF...
Worst ... Dad ... EVER! Seth Moulton Throws His Daughters Under the Bus...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement