Update: Boston's Trans Period Pride Event Is Back On: 'We Are Not Backing...
Roseanne Remembers How No One Stood Up for Her
USA Today Reports Several GOP-Run States Have Declared June Nuclear Family Month
'Stay the Course': Parents of Children With Down Syndrome React to Despicable Abortion...
'The Only Good Cracker Is a Dead Cracker': This Karmelo Anthony Supporter Seems...
Delaney Hall Further Trolls Chef José Andrés With Menu of ‘Chef’s Signature Meals’
Paradise Lost: California’s Stunning Scenery Can’t Hide Its Comically Broken Elections
Gov. Gavin Newsom, Sen. Mark Warner Butthurt Over SCOTUS Upholding Alabama’s Congressional...
Rep. LaMonica McIver Notes That Every Detainee in Delaney Hall Is a Person...
Not Sending Their Best: Bessent Exposes Democrat Rep. Chu's Shocking Ignorance
NYT Bombshell: Platner's Exes Reveal Assaults, Dominance Rape Fantasies, 'Hatchet Wounds,'...
CNN’s Aaron Blake Scolds Ron DeSantis for Spreading Baseless Suspicion About CA Election
New York State Dems Pass Bill to Change ‘Mother’ to ‘Gestating Parent’
Thousands of Families Are Reading the Declaration of Independence to Their Kids
Thousands of Families Are Reading the Declaration of Independence to Their Kids

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement