Desperation: Stephen King Shows X His 'Dark Half' In a BIZARRE Defense of...
Heavy Vetting: Scott Jennings Says Dems Scrutinized Graham Platner’s Past But Signed Off...
Racist Race: Jasmine Crockett Still Angry with Dem Party for Backing and Electing...
MS NOW’s Chris Hayes and Rachel Maddow Say They Knew All Along That...
Young Washington Beats Supergirl at the Box Office Over the Holiday Weekend; Excuses...
'Immigrant' Mahmoud Khalil’s Independence Day Wish Is Freedom and Justice for Everyone (Bu...
Lyndsey Fifield Has a Question for Ruben Gallego and Dems After Their Sudden...
Judge Cites Trump Admin’s Hostility to Nonwhite Immigrants in Unfreezing Benefit Applicati...
Ro Reversal: Dem Khanna Overlooked Platner’s Nazi Tattoo but Ends Endorsement Over Latest...
Donna Brazile: Accused Rapist Graham Platner Just Needs Time to Heal
The Odyssey’s Lupita Nyong'o Would Ask Homer Why He Gave Women So Little...
Minnesota Mayor Observes America's 250th by Meeting With Somalia's President at His Palace
Platner’s Backers Hit Delete: The Great Endorsement Purge Begins
Essence Calls Cover Girl Ketanji Brown Jackson ‘The People’s Champion’
Marjorie Taylor Greene: Last Soldier Standing for Graham Platner (And Getting Paid for...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos