'Journalism' Trifecta! This Week CNN Set the 'Shameless and Embarrassing Fake News' Bar...
Something's Missing From Abdul El-Sayed's Response to Trump's Reminder About His Top Suppo...
Julie Kelly Spots Telling Info in New DOJ Filing in the Comey '8647'...
Bill Maher Makes Dems and Media Smearing Natalie Harp Look Like the Awful...
VA AG Jay Jones Tells County Sheriff He's Under Investigation for ::Checks Notes::...
Radical Left Rising: Britt Blasts Abortion Extremism, Johnson Warns of Midterm Stakes
Pull Yourself Together, Hasan — Getting Giddy Over Trump Calling You a Terrorist...
Mark Cuban Gripes About High California Taxes Before Endorsing James Talarico in Texas...
NYT Reporter Warns DSA-Dems Want to ‘Take Out Our Entire Constitutional System’ on...
Jasmine Crockett Says the Democrat Party Will Face a Racial Reckoning After Midterm...
'Stop Gaslighting Me!': FL Dem. Senate Nom and Dem Chair Explode in Yelling...
Oh, SHELL No!: Canadian WNBA Team Introduces Non-Binary Turtle Mascot With She/They Pronou...
One Meta Data Center Just Doubled (and Then Some) Teachers’ Pay in a...
Chris Cuomo Says Ossoff’s Natalie Harp Dig Meant Her and Trump Hanging Out...
Melugin Highlights Illegal Who Poured Hot Wax on Kids — Then Schools Cato...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement