Meteorologist Chris Martz Obliterates Adam Schiff's Climate Change Panic Button
Letters From the Basement: Afghan Girls Risk Arrest to Learn : Then Hand...
'This You?' Scott Jennings NUKES David Axelrod for Phony Outrage About SCOTUS Criticism
WHOOPS! Gavin Newsom Tried to Pin High Housing Costs on Trump and KO'd...
JD Vance Provides the PERFECT Response After James Talarico Names His 'Favorite' Drag...
Hasan Piker Hates America, Abuses His Dog yet El-Sayed Embraces Him and Campus...
Kamala Harris Makes Articulate, Coherent Post on Dems' Call to Slow AI, Raises...
Mehdi Hasan Marvels at Childlike Ignorance of Brett Kavanaugh Explaining Why 9/11 Happened
Federal Judge Refers Leftist Philly DA to DOJ for Criminal Investigation
Judge Blocks the Kennedy Center Board From Putting Trump's Name on the Building...
How NYC’s First Couple Hides Devout Islamism Behind Western Clothes and Drag-Show Vibes
Rep. Thomas Massie Moves to Impeach Pete Hegseth for High Crimes and Misdemeanors
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Busts Out ‘The Robot’ in TikTok Rooftop Dance
Famous Last Words He Yelled on Camera: ‘I’m Not Going Back to Haiti.’...
NY Regents Scrap Graduation Exam Requirement: ‘You Don’t Assess a Fish on Climbing...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement