Bernie Coaches Baby Socialists: Keep the Real Agenda Quiet Until After You’ve Fooled...
Patients Who? Nurses Ditch the Sick to Stage a Walkout After ICE Grabs...
Mental Loop Lunacy: Hillary Clinton Still Hasn’t Gotten Over Her 2016 Presidential Debate...
Marriage on ICE: ‘Lifelong Republican’ Shocked to Learn Immigration Laws Apply to His...
Dr. Robert Malone Puts Fauci's Wife and the NIH on BLAST After She...
Half Woman by Birth Canal, Full WNBA Prospect by Declaration: Enes Freedom Enters...
'I Hate Mackinac': Michigan Senate Hopeful Abdul El-Sayed Prefers Dubai Over America’s Cro...
Bombshell Trump Interview Confirm Trump Understands Everything About 2026
It Must Be Pretty Good: Ben Shapiro's New Movie Trailer Has Infuriated ALL...
Wait... WUT? Marjorie Taylor Greene Declares Trump 'the Past,' Lectures Conservatives on C...
'Grouchy FAUCI' —> Fauci's Wife the EPITOME of Class As She Does THIS...
YIKES: Francesca Hong's Clapback at David Axelrod's 'Faculty Lounge Exotica' Dig Takes AWK...
That Emoji... LOL! Mehdi Hasan Learns the HARD WAY Not to Pick a...
OOF! Not Sure Chuck Schumer Can Come Back From WHOOPIN' Doug Burgum Just...
Iranian Woman Explains What Abdul El-Sayed REALLY Means When He Claims He Cares...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement