CNN Gets a New Threat to Democracy to Freak Out About and I...
Discovered Camera Roll Shows What Really Went Down at State Dinner With Chinese...
Grounded for Bad Behavior: Trump Kicks CNN Off of Air Force One for...
The Three Big Obvious Reasons Richard Linklater’s Latest Film Trilogy Is Facing a...
Grok Is Coming to X Group Chats, but Apparently You Have to Invite...
Crazy Commies Continue Clown Car Cavalcade in Last Ditch Bar Circus
Hasan Piker: ‘I Was Supposed to Get Arrested’ — Then Ithaca Paid Better...
The Fastest Rent Cut in America Is Named ICE, and Cooperating Cities Are...
Seth Dillon Shares 'One of the Craziest Headlines From the Woke Era' ......
Ed Sheeran’s Messy Gillette Gigs Get the Boot — Promoter Says ‘Safety’ Timeline...
What Happens When Government Forgets Who It Works for?
Hasan Piker Mocks Fallen Navy SEALs Who Drowned Stopping Iranian Weapons
Mamdani and Soros Locking Eyes in Photo Proves Zohran Only Hates Some Billionaires
It's NOT Difficult to Tell How the AP Feels About SCOTUS' Ruling on...
Bulwark’s Tim Miller Discovers English Proficiency Tests the Instant a Venezuelan PhD Owns...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement