UK Police Spray Man Carrying Newly Purchased Baseball Bat in Its Original Packaging
Haitian Man Collapses in Tears While Being Fitted With Ankle Monitor by ICE
Hasan Piker, Rolling Stone's Latest Swoon-Worthy Terrorist Sympathizer
CNN Calls Out Tim Scott for Using Abdul El-Sayed's Full Name in Ads...
People Express Their Love for Harmless Minneapolis Highway Scooter Takeover
Mod Fraud: Jessica Tarlov Tries to Rebrand NYC DSA Member AOC As a...
New York DSA to Illegal Aliens: ‘You Don’t Have to Have Papers to...
Dems (Led by Bakari Sellers) Remain Obsessed With Nikki Haley’s Name and She’s...
Joe Scarborough Shocked Anti-Semitic DSA Co-Chair Wanted to Attend Hamas Rally After Oct...
WNBA Player’s 'White Privilege' Tweet After Flagrant Foul Suddenly Has Nothing to Do...
Lawsuit Seeks to Prevent Rumored Somali Gang Shootout at Minnesota State Fair
'Sacred Right to Seize Homes - or It's Over': Mamdani Aide Drops Mask,...
Francesca Hong Explains That Toxic White Supremacy Is Ingrained in This Country's History
Surgical Strife: Seattle City Council Approves Taxpayer Money for ‘Trans Refugee’ Sex Chan...
Sports Illustrated Changes Its Headline About Sophie Cunningham and ‘Karma’ After Backlash

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement