Killer Argument: Female Oprah Crowd Laments Black Women Can’t Get Away With Murdering...
Twerk of Art: Cartoonish Bronze ‘Everywoman’ Statue Is Unveiled (and Reviled) in London
Trial of Smiles?: Female Lindsay Clancy Jurors Share Laughs Over Court Antics of...
Socialism 2026 Talks Transfeminist Absolutionism and Communist Sex Forests
Rep. Rashida Tlaib Says Antony Blinken ‘Totally Waited’ and Did Nothing to Stop...
DHS Announces That 19-Year-Old High School Serial Groper Has Been Deported
Yesterday’s Call, Tomorrow’s Anniversary
'A Gentle and Generous Soul': X Pays Tribute to Andrew Wimsatt
Bill Kristol: We Should Be Appalled Trump Is Trying to Impose the Anti-American...
Libs of TikTok Exposes Universities Celebrating the First ‘Kirkaversary’
Psaki Panics Over Fetterman Switch Talk — Maybe Democrats Should Have Behaved Better
Lindsay Clancy Juror Said It Was 'Disgusting' That Lone Holdout Re-Enacted Stranglings
Abdul El-Sayed Called American Prisons Racist and a Weapon. Michigan May Make Him...
Hillary Clinton Suggests Netanyahu Allowed October 7 to Happen So He Could ‘Come...
James Talarico Tells NBC News He ‘Missed the Mark’ When Speaking About Dismantling...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement