Acosta and Phang Beg Pelley to Join Their Broadcastaways on the Podcast Islands...
Barn Burner: Trump Abandons Kristen Welker Grilling As She Cries ‘We Travelled All...
Pearl-Clutching Pelley: Fired ‘60 Minutes’ Host Was OFFENDED at Hearing Americans Distrust...
Decision Desk HQ Declares Nithya Raman Second in LA Mayor Race, Overtaking Spencer...
Jarvis Meme'd Them Perfectly: Jack Cocchiarella Endorses His Fellow Sex Pest Graham Platne...
Hugh Laurie Just Delivered the Most Sophisticated Burn of 2026 to a Leftist...
Pratt's Lead VANISHES: California’s Shady Late Drops Appears to be Officially Stealing LA...
Harpy Jennifer Welch: 'Susan Collins is a MAGA Fascist' — Says the Woman...
Kurt Schlichter Goes Sarcastic About Election Counts
Platner’s Heart Tattoo: Covering the Swastika, Keeping the Obsession
Ro Khanna: 'I Believe Lyndsey Fifield' on Platner Abuse Allegations — But Still...
FCC Chairman Calls the Media Out Over Scott Pelley
Iron Will’s Dad Enrages Disgusting, Horrible Lefties by Celebrating and Loving His Son...
(GOODBYE) Hello Fresh Ad for Those 'Prepping' for Pride Month One of the...
POPCORN! DataRepublican Says 'Hello' to Mr. Hunter Biden and His Newfound Popularity on...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement