Senate Candidate Alexander Vindman’s Aides Shield Him From Questions About Graham Platner
Principles? What Principles? Cuck Schumer Sticks by Nazi Platner, Repeats Win Mantra Like...
Mamdani-Backed Congressional Candidate Deletes Posts About Abolishing Police, Prisons, and...
Boston Mayor’s ‘Trans Period Pride’ Event to Celebrate Menstrual Equity Cancelled
Caught on Camera: Graham Platner Flees Reporter Asking the One Question Every American...
Jill Biden Tells The View About Hunter's One Beautiful Child, Beau
It's a BIGGIE - We're LIVE! Twitchy Has the Latest CA, Los Angeles,...
Governor Newsom Press Office Genuinely Sorry for the MAGA People Miserable About Pride...
What Ben Sasse’s Battle With Death Revealed About Modern Family Life
James Talarico’s Church Funds Trans Summer Camp and Travel for Out-of-State Abortions
Graham Platner Finally Took Down His Creepy Kik Profile After 3,000 Days
UK Police Release DAMNING Bodycam Footage of Themselves Handcuffing a Stabbed Henry Nowak
Jake Tapper Wondering If Jill Biden Was Enabling Her Husband Through 'WHAT WE...
Umm ... WHAT? Buckley Carlson Wants America to Embrace Russia as Our Anti-Globo-Homo...
Freudian SLIP?! Jill Biden Misspeaks, Spills ALL the Tea on Joe 'Picking' Kamala...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement