John Kennedy Using Hillary Clinton to Diminish Tim Walz's Masculinity in BRUTAL Takedown...
Greg Gutfeld ENDS Zohran Mamdani for Tone-Deaf Blankets Gifted to Homeless People FREEZING...
Mike Johnson Strong Arms Schumer, Jeffries As Democrat 'Power Struggle' Erupts
Another One Bites the DUST! Nurse Who Talked Openly About Letting ICE Agents...
Billie Eilish's House Built on Stolen Land? NO WAY! Tribe Member Says He...
Scott Jennings ZINGS Pete Buttigieg for Pretending He Knows How Republicans Think As...
One of the BIGGEST Bombshells Yet Buried in Latest Epstein Doc Dump and...
Chris Cuomo's Curse-Filled Apology for His Coverage Does Not Go the Way He...
MN Fraud Whistleblowers 'Thanking' Ilhan Omar for Supporting Amy Klobuchar's Run for Gov...
BOOM! Tulsi Gabbard Torches Senate Dems in Scorching Letter: Zero Punches Pulled on...
Virginia Democrats Eating THEIR OWN in Hilarious Self-Sabotage Gerrymander Meltdown and We...
Trevor Noah's Questionable History of Posting Creepy, Inappropriate Things Comes Back to B...
The White House Goes on Offense, Showing Everyone Who Democrats' Heroes Really Are
Get 'Em, Hammer! Harmeet Dhillon Promises Justice After Desecration of SoCal Catholic Scho...
Panic On the Streets of London: Morrissey Drops a Truth Bomb About What...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement