Sexist TOOL Wajahat Ali Shows How Muslim Men REALLY Treat Women With UGLY...
Deets of 2012 Hijab Hate Crime Hoax Abdul El-Sayed Blamed on Islamophobia Have...
Middle Ma’am?: CNN’s Dana Bash Says She Sees All Sides, Scott Galloway Praises...
Tragic Carpet Stride: Actress Shailene Woodley’s Eccentric Emmy Ensemble Elicits Cringe an...
The Mitch Is Back: Kentucky Sen. McConnell Returns to Congress for First Vote...
Macklemore Dropped From Ed Sheeran Tour
Professor Who Blamed Austin Metcalf's Father for His Death Wishes MAGATs 'Happy Kirkiversa...
NYT: Whistleblower Says Federal Agents May Have Broken Laws to Find Noncitizens on...
CBS News Flies to Liberia to Show Us Hotel Where Deportees Are Being...
Enjoy Totally Authentic Footage of Gavin Newsom Fly Fishing With CNN's Jake Tapper
Bernie Sanders Says Abdul El-Sayed Faces the Same Kind of Bigotry That JFK...
NYT, NBC News Hot and Bothered by Ad in Which Sydney Sweeney 'Sexualizes...
Rep. Shontel Brown Demands Federal Investigation Into 'Possible' Lynchings
MA Takes Custody of Daughter of Couple Who Won’t Affirm Her Gender, Gets...
Is Ilhan Omar Going to Finally Face Consequences?

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement