Broom Schtick: ‘Black Snape’ Memes Explode Online After AI-Generated Rap Video Goes Viral
The Economist: Soaring Number of Canadian Muslim Schools Traced to Islamophobia
SCHUMER SHUTDOWN SALE: 60% Off VIP Memberships!
The Economist: A Month of Bombing Iran Has Achieved Nothing
WSJ: Cancellation of Student Visas Has Left Africa’s Brightest With Broken Dreams
Dems Shut Down Govt, TSA Goes Unpaid — CNN Mad at Rick Scott...
NBC News: Trump Travel Ban Separates Young Husband From Wife Here on Student...
Protect American Medical Education: Merit Over Imports and Discrimination
Gov. Mikie Sherrill Won't Let New Jersey Tolerate Roving Masked Militias, Bans Masks
Two Years After Its Collapse, Let’s Check in on the Rebuilding Effort of...
Puck Yuks: Nashville NHL Team Unveils Rainbow PRIDE ‘Gay Predators’ Logo, Laughter Erupts...
PANIC: ‘White Plague’ Is Deadlier Than COVID and Is on the Rise in...
Testosterone-Fueled Tantrum: Trans LOL-YER Loses It in Court, Resists Arrest Gasping 'I Ca...
Governor Newsom Press Office Making Grindr Jokes About Critics
From Roof to Handcuffs: Cambridge Woman Goes Viral for Hiring Illegals and Calling...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement