‘Independence Day 1776’: Revolutionary AI Short Reveals the ‘True Story’ of America’s Brea...
Barely Living Room: Zohran Mamdani Lectures America Flanked by a Joyless, Captured, Catato...
Ro Khanna Says Elizabeth Warren’s Ultra-Millionaire Tax is the Ultra-Moral Way to Cancel...
Twitchy Celebrates America 250
Patti LuPone ‘Furious’ After Gay Cruise She’s On Gets Banned From Turkey for...
Radical Reveal: Colorado DSA Candidate Shares Secret Socialist Solution to All of America’...
Rand Paul Calls Out Sketchy Birth Tourism Loophole — BIG Dummy Kinzinger Responds...
As Backward as His Ideas: Zohran Mamdani Lectures America from the Wrong Side...
Taylor & Travis’ Lavish Wedding: Road Closures, Millions to Charity and a Masterclass...
Bill Maher Tells JD Vance He'd Need Subpoena Power in Order to Get...
Ratio-Palooza! Journo Says Military Jets Flying Over DC for America 250 Makes it...
Zohran Lights Up the Sky: Fans Praise Him for 'FREE' Macy’s Fireworks Show...
Ben Ferguson Pointed Out CNN Wasn't Complying With Mamdani's A/C Rule and the...
Cellphone Video Captures the Moment Gunfire Erupts at a Michigan Mall
Zohran Mamdani's Speech Marking America's 250 Is Exactly What I Expected

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement