Scott Jennings Turns Abby Phillip Into a Sputtering Mess in Heated Debate on...
Lesbian Minister at James Talarico's Church Brags About Him Fooling People As a...
MS NOW Hosts BEG Hasan Piker to Stop Being Himself Until After the...
WOOF! Dems Are Gonna Have to Do Some SERIOUS Damage Control After Hasan...
No WONDER They Pled the FIFTH: NEW House Report Drops ActBlue's DAMNING 2024...
El-Sayed Will 'Get the Money Out of Politics' by Raking in Donations From...
Unsound Barrier: Dem Shri Thanedar’s X Post Shows He Doesn’t Get the ‘Ins...
Jessica Tarlov Didn’t Know Biden Lied About ‘Secure Border’ Until Fox News Drone...
Tapped Out Tapper: CNN’s Latest Attempt to Lure in Viewers As Bad As...
Tiny Village to Be Dumping Ground for Asylum-Seekers Votes to Become Independent From...
Say It Isn’t Sole: NY X Account Posts Freakish Foot-Face Photo to Promote...
Bernie Sanders Says It’s Embarrassing How Little the President Knows About the Dangers...
'FactPost' Claims Pennsylvania Has Reported Four Measles Deaths This Year; Shapiro Piles o...
Jake Tapper Thinks CA’s COVID Response Is Being Used As a Cudgel on...
Boston Herald: Lindsay Clancy Holdout Juror Now Getting the Negative Attention He Deserves

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement