This Isn’t Asylum — It’s Why We Can’t Let Democrats Win Again
NASA Administrator Shares a Seriously Bada** Photo of the Artemis II Liftoff ('MERICA!)
Strong Voice Against Trumpism Notes Ivanka Trump Wasn’t a Citizen When She Gave...
The Verge Argues That the Artemis Moon Base Project Is 'Legally Dubious'
April Fool's Day Fun: Police Introduce Elite Unit of SAUSAGE Dogs
This Kid Gets It! One ... Ahem ... Outspoken Youngster Tells CNN Exactly...
Anti-ICE Activists on Patrol Approaching Cars and Demanding Badges, IDs, or Warrants
Former City Councilman Sentenced After Investigation Found 71 Voter Names Registered to Hi...
California's First Partner Wants to Hold Tech Leaders Responsible for 'Jordan Peterson-Typ...
Chuck Schumer Found a Way to Inject Anti-Trump Politics Into the Artemis II...
Laura Ingraham Says One Question Alone Indicates How Preposterous Justice KBJ’s Appointmen...
TDS Media Claim Trump Was Made to Feel 'Very Small' With a Bad...
Jasmine Crockett Says Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson ‘Continues to Flex Her Brilliance’
‘If I Steal a Wallet in Japan,’ Justice KBJ Argues That Makes Her...
Ron DeSantis Is Not a Boomer: FL Gov Drops Common Sense on Worthless...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement