Doomsday Bouquet: NRCC Gifts Flowers to Dem Jeffries for Being So Blooming Wrong...
Sen. Ted Cruz Looks at NY Election Results, Declares 'Rich Children Like Playing...
Perpetual PhD Parasite: 7th-Year Student Can't Afford NYC, Runs for Congress to Live...
The Guardian: Texas Protesters Received Unusually Harsh Sentences in Crackdown on Dissent
ICE to Fine Attorney for Filing Dozens of False Asylum Claims on Behalf...
Sydney Gallego Tries to Defend Hubby Ruben, Katie Miller Brings the Receipts and...
Brian Allen’s Heartwarming Interfaith Moment: Three Grifters United by the One True Faith...
The Dangerous Fallacy: ‘Exposing’ Radical Leftists Won’t Save Us — Their Voters Are...
NY Congressional Nominee Founded Group Whose Goal Was Total Eradication of Western Civiliz...
Trump Adds Insult to Ousted Dem Rep. Dan Goldman's Injury With One Final...
THERE it Is! WaPo Remembered to Blame Something for Algae-Gate in DC
Judge Bans Trump Administration From Implementing Executive Orders on Election Integrity
Dem Rep. Ted Lieu's Insane Spin on Trump Canceling a Bill Signing Is...
Goldman Sacked: Dem ‘Designated Liar’ Blindsided by Terrible Truth of His Party’s New...
Hakeem Jeffries Is Done: Is This the End of His Career?

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement