NRSC Video Montage ENDS Abdul El-Sayed's Attempt to Distance Himself From 'a Twitch...
People Are LOVING Laura Ingraham Taking Abdul El-Sayed APART for Ignorant Comment on...
Oh, HONEY: Lefty Phone Banker Roasted for Whining That Voters Keep Asking Her...
'Now We Know Why'! Scott Jennings Flashes Back to What Happened on CNN...
This Is RICH: Chuck Schumer’s PAC Drops Some SERIOUS Coin on Supposed Anti-Big-Money...
Trump's Second Term Will Never Survive the Latest Cringe-Worthy Celebrity 'Resistance' Vid...
Climate Exchange: AI Doomsayers Sound Just Like Climate Doomsayers
Hasan Holiday: Neera Tanden Wants Piker to Take a Hike but Appears Keen...
Naked Partisanship: Jen Psaki’s Fake Outrage Over Sydney Sweeney’s Nude Betting Ad Gets...
Zoinks!: Courtroom Sketch of Terror Suspect Has X Talking ‘Scooby Snacks’ and Making...
The Economy’s Dead? Somebody Better Tell Toys ‘R’ Us
Shame on You, Jarvis: Nancy Mace Tells Men to Stop Sending Her 'Nasty'...
Mid-Trial, Jurors Were Thinking of Doing a Joint Press Conference on Postpartum Depression
Dem. Senate Candidate Would Trade Five Americans for One Illegal Alien Farmworker
University of California Students May Struggle With Basic Math but Are Graduating at...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos