US Oil and Gas Assn. Notices They're a Useful Prop for Democrat Photo...
Free Stuff Isn't FREE? WHO KNEW?! Zohran Mamdani Reverses Course on Yet ANOTHER...
NBC News Baffled That Most Latinos Do Not Use The Term 'Latinx'
ABC News Reports This Inflation Update Is 'Defying Fears' (Stoked by Dems and...
WHOA. Bad Timing?! Pramila Jayapal Shares Her Shiny New Trans Bill of Rights...
Sen. Lisa Murkowski's SAVE Act Gaslighting (on STEROIDS!) Torched By the Most Perfect...
CNN's Abby Phillip Understands 'Tom Homan Has Been Big on This Lost Children...
HILARIOUS Thread of Champagne Socialist Mamdani Bro Throwing TANTRUMS Over Airline Injusti...
'He's a FRAUD': Meteorologist Takes Al Gore's FREAK-OUT Over Trump Admin Overturning Obama...
Lee Zeldin Reality Nukes Alarmist BS From Dems and Media After Trump Ended...
WATCH As Keith Ellison Suddenly Realizes He Just Told the TRUTH About Dems...
Fire and ICE: Authorities Look for Arsonist Seen Setting Kansas City Building Ablaze
CNN Buries the Lede Again: This Resignation Story Is No Different
CA State Sen. Scott Wiener Joins Elementary School Students in Anti-Ice Walkout
CBS News: As Pathways to Freedom Narrow, More Detainees Are Voluntarily Leaving the...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos