Sonny Hostin Says Her Kids Have Fewer Civil Rights Since SCOTUS Ended Race-Based...
Maine Kampf: Bernie Sanders Gives Dem Senate Hopeful Graham Platner His Socialist Seal...
JK Rowling Reacts to Two Jews Wounded in London Stabbing Attack by Somali-Born...
Judge Halves Rapist’s Sentence Noting He’s an African American Male Who’s ‘Experienced Thi...
Texas Judge Clears Way for Work to Resume on Muslim-Centric EPIC City
Report: Planned Parenthood Used Codeword ‘Benghazi’ to Hide Millions in PPP Loans
DeSantis 'Scared' of Marc Elias? Florida's Shifted 20 Points Red and the Court...
Democrats Deliver: PA House Democrats Pass Bill Banning Whites-Only Housing
Jonathan Turley Lists Ways Dems Are Patriotically Ushering in America's 250th Anniversary
Fatah Officials Accuse IDF of Training Rats to Attack Palestinian Children
MeidasTouch Correspondent Reports on Saturday Night’s ‘Dinner Incident’
Libs Like Keith Olbermann Debate the Real Meaning of '86', Insist It's Not...
'He Should Withdraw the Statement, IMMEDIATELY!' — Trump Hammers Jeffries for Calling SCOT...
Jasmine Crockett Calls Wheelchair-Bound Gov. Abbott a 'DEI Hire' — 'A Tree Made...
Jim Acosta Starts Ticking After Learning 60 Minutes Edited Down Trump’s Interview

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement