No Interviews, No Free Palestine Drama: Studios Keep Mark Ruffalo Quiet for Spider-Man...
PolitiFact's Defense of WI Dem Candidate for Gov Is Why So Many 'Fact-Checkers'...
Is That Really Their Only Concern? MSNOW Frets Fauci’s Fifth Amendment Could Become...
OUCH! Bernie Moreno Straight-Up NUKED Fauci AND His 'Dirtbag Attorney'
DNC Woes Continue As New Report Reveals They Were Scammed by Someone Pretending...
Senator Hawley Hilariously Forces Fauci to Plead the Fifth on His Tie Color...
WNBA’s Stef Dolson Slaps on Pro-Trans Tank Top to Own the Cons… Her...
Fauci Wanted to Plead the Fifth but Have His Lawyer Do the Talking...
Rand Paul Mocks Fauci's Cowardly Invocation of the Fifth Amendment During Senate Hearing
Frenzy on X After Fauci Refuses to Answer Congress: Users Call Him Coward...
Rand Paul Makes a GREAT Case for Fauci's Pardon Being Put to the...
One Guy Shows Up to Protest the Tate Brothers’ Detention … Discovers He’s...
Kerry Kennedy Defends Dr. Fauci's Right to Privacy (There's Just One Problem)
Dem Senator Who Was Feeling Good About Graham Platner Is Now Feeling Good...
Shackles Shakedown: Mayor Zohran Mamdani Is Open to Making New Yorkers Pay Slave...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement