Safe at Home: DHS Sec. Markwayne Mullin Explains to CNN's Jake Tapper Why...
Woke CA Teacher Brags About Marrying Gaza Resident Online for Green Card —...
Far-Left Sends Elite Prep School Socialist Oliver Larkin to Primary Jared Moskowitz (Becau...
DeWine Intervention: Ohio Governor Tells CNN’s Jake Tapper Why He's Against Sending ‘Temp’...
Dem Raphael Warnock: Socialists and Communists Are Welcome Under His Party’s ‘Big Tent’...
Tweet Makes a Point About the Consequences of Socialism
No Money for Schools? Mary Katharine Ham Schools the Commie on NYC's $40K-Per-Student...
Sen. Blackburn, Gov. Stitt Congratulate ICE Nominee
DeWine, Kasich Argue Against Removing Haitians
Aw, How Heartbreaking: Illegal Parents Forced to Take Their Kids Home With Them
Exceptionalism Unmatched: Full-Service America Hosts Iran for World Cup … Then Bombs Them...
Meltdown ALERT! Thomas Massie Lashing OUT When Asked About Ex-GF and an NDA...
'Hello, Mr. French': DataRepublican Turns Her Attention to David French and HOOBOY, YIKES,...
Ain't THAT Sweet?! Merch at Texas Democrat Convention SCARY Reminder of Who They...
John Cornyn's SMUG Post Talking Down to Grassroots About the SAVE Act BACKFIRES...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement