Twilight Zone Politics: Carville Backs Parkland Activist David Hogg to Lead ‘Dysfunctional...
Scott Jennings Warns of Dem Outrage After Sharing ‘Racist’ Cross on Sen. Graham’s...
Senator John Fetterman to Democrats: 'If You Don’t Want Me, Just Say So'
Brit Hume Counts the Ways Things Could Get VERY Awkward for Fauci at...
Rahm Emanuel, the Last Sane Dem, Tells Party: Stop Chasing Abolition Fantasies and...
MI Senate Candidate (D-Commie) El-Sayed’s Financials Drop: Rules for Thee, Overseas Rental...
Catherine Herridge Adds Disturbing Context to Tapes of Biden Sharing Classified Info With...
Patricia Heaton Drops Epic Banger: Watch for Jake Tapper’s New Book, 'How Fauci...
They're SO Guilty: Entire CNN Panel EXPLODES on Lydia Moynihan for Daring to...
My Dinner With Anthony: CNN’s Jake Tapper Was Sharing Meals in His Home...
CNN’s ‘Media Analyst’ Brian Stelter Opts to Ignore Fauci Diary Scandal Involving Tapper...
Minneapolis Restaurant Taking a 'Break' After Taking Prices Off the Menu in Name...
Black Lives Matter Mob in Madison Blocks Entrance to 'Racist Bar'
Jonathan Chait Argues That Abolishing the Senate May Be the DSA’s Best Idea
Lawyer Says Elderly and Disabled Will Suffer as 350,000 Haitians Lose Temporary Protected...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement