Jonathan Turley's Thread Unravels Hillary Clinton's Utter Contempt for Middle America
Eat Your Wheaties Because You'll Need Your STRENGTH to Adequately Mock These UFC...
Ma'am? LOL! Buzz Patterson Just CLEANED Hillary's Clock Spilling Some Seriously DAMNING Te...
Jim Acosta Has Staked Out the Kennedy Center and Provides Another Gripping Berlin...
Social Media Platform the UK Is Still Allowing Kids Under 16 to Use...
Weather Channel Falls FLAT on Its Trump-Hating FACE After Pushing APOCALYPTIC UFC Freedom...
Super Rich Actor Leads Dems Into a Bold Midterm Strategy of 'I Can't...
THEY MAD: UFC Freedom 250 Fighter 'Goes Off-Script' Going THERE About Michelle Obama...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
Soros Silence: Scott Jennings Rebukes Dems on CNN for Focusing on Musk but...
Reid’em and Weep: Ex-MSNBC Host Tells Leftist Crowd That Fired ‘Journos’ Exiled to...
Replace Your Bettes: Dems Enlist Octogenarian Singer to Counter Trump’s UFC Freedom 250...
Platner Platitudes: Dems Jeffries and Warnock Regurgitate ‘Voters’ Decide’ Slop for Maine...
President Trump: Iran Deal is Now Complete
Griftin' Hillary Strikes Again: Clutching Pearls at UFC While Shilling White House Coaster...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement