The New Midterm Outlook Has Hakeem Jeffries Sweating
Ken Cuccinelli's Thread Detailing Virginia Dems Latest Efforts to Overturn Redistricting R...
Bless Her HEART! Jessica Tarlov Jumping on the Cotton-Pickin' Shame Wagon to Dunk...
The Cotton-Pickin' Left Tries to Force Jen Kiggans to Resign ... Over a...
Got a PROBLEM With That?! Kevin O'Leary UNLOADS on Bakari Sellers for Divisive,...
Stacey Abrams Subpoenaed for Some Pretty MASSIVE Campaign Finance Violations
And Here We GOOO: Scott Jennings SHUTS DOWN Dems Who Want Racist Districts...
Thomas Massie Allegations, Reportedly From His Ex-GF, Making the Rounds on X and...
REEEE! Nutbag Rebekah Jones Sees Something Super FASCIST-Y on Redistricted Tennessee Map a...
He Isn't Just Unhinged, He's REALLY Stupid: Check Out How BAD VA AG...
PA Supreme Court Justice David Wecht Leaves Democratic Party Over Rise in Antisemitism
Dem Katie Porter Says Fellow Gubernatorial Candidate Leaked Video of Her Verbally Abusing...
Politico ‘Journo’ Warns Republicans They’ll Be Called ‘Racists’ for Umpteenth Time If VRA...
Dem FCC Official Tells Jimmy Kimmel Bestie Jake Tapper About Trump's Effort to...
Spanish Police Fear Islamist Terrorists Taking Advantage of Massive Grant of Legal Status

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement