'Lost the PLOT'! Iowahawk OWNS Judd Legume in SPECTACULAR Thread for Tone-Deaf Dig...
IT'S A DIABOLICAL ZIONIST PLOT: Twitter Laughs as Student Releases White Mice in...
Babs Streisand Unleashes Fact-Free Meme About Differences in Republican vs. Democrat Econo...
Taylor Lorenz Goes After Libs of TikTok Again
Russia Hoaxer Says We're One Vote Away From the 'End of Democracy as...
'Pro-Palestine' Encampments Won't Allow Journalists to Enter or Ask Questions
Expelled Vanderbilt Student Was Admitted for High School Activism
Cal Poly Shuts Down Its Campus Until Autumn After Students Trash 'Intifada Hall'
James Biden Listed His Credentials as 'Joe's Brother' in Pitch to Qataris
Hunter Biden Plans to Sue Fox News for Airing 'Intimate' Photos From His...
Scotland’s First Minister of Hate Speech Resigns
Columbia FACULTY Form Human Chain Around Pro-Hamas Encampment
Racist Hobbies? K: Thread of Hobbies Lefties Deemed Racist a Hilarious Look Into...
Jewish UCLA Student Forcibly Blocked from Attending Class by Pro Hamas Mob
'DOOR KNOB': Georgetown Prof Tries Dunking on Bethany Mandel About Israel and It...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement