BACKPEDAL! The Guardian Walks Back Tulsi Gabbard Hit-Piece (Check Out Who Their Source...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
Duper Bowl: Ed Krassenstein’s ‘Liam Ramos’ Bad Bunny Grammy Hoax Post Gets Boost...
What the Canuck? Confused Public Has Questions About Canadian Olympic Team’s Bizarre Fashi...
Home Alone: Harry Sisson’s Response to Personally Housing Illegal Aliens Is ‘Mi Casa...
Texas Congressman Looney Tune Gene Wu, Shows His Racist Side Too
No to Voter ID: Hakeem Jeffries Tries to Justify Dems Being on Unpopular...
'How Do You Do, Fellow Bad Bunny Fans?', John Kasich Drops Cringeworthy...
Delete Your Account: John Harwood Gets DRAGGED By X for His Nasty-Looking Super...
Senate Republican Leader John Thune Provides a Sneak Peek of the Pregame Flyover
Halftime S***show: Even NFL Players Have NO IDEA Who Bad Bunny Is (Just...
HHS Hands Off Some Gameday Menu Suggestions
Legal Action Launched to Stop Puberty Blocker Experiment ON CHILDREN
Whoa, His Eyes Get BIGGER? Adam Schiff's Reaction to ABC's Jon Karl Pushing...
Narrative OBLITERATED --> Watch Dana Bash Call Hakeem Jeffries Out TO HIS FACE...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement