Hakeem Jeffries Gets Boxed in: He Might Never Win Again
AOC Says States Like TN Want to 'Wipe Out Every Black Representative' While...
Bill Melugin Schools Democrats: No, Biden Did Fly in Hundreds of Thousands of...
Hakeem Jeffries Makes It Clear His 'Trump Threatens Our Norms and Institutions' BS...
The Left's Meltdown Over the Lincoln Memorial Pool Is a Perfect Reflection ......
John Fetterman's Take on Assassination Attempt Deniers Will Enrage 'Tinfoil Hat Brigade' D...
Ro Khana Trips SPECTACULARLY Over Tim Scott While RANTING About Zero Black South...
Mark Kelly Pulls Out His Shovel and Keeps Digging Over His Classified Info...
Angry Staffer Derps AGAIN! Claims MAGA Influencers Have Super SECRET Chat Where Trump...
MAZE's 'Beautiful, 4-Part Story' Starring Stephen Colbert Is Like a Greek Tragedy Except...
She's Gonna BLOW! Leigh McGowen Suffers Psychotic BREAK on CNN Panel Talking About...
The Bad, the Ugly, the Absolute CORRUPT: HERE Is What Really Went Down...
Holy COPE, Batman! Dolt Morgan J Freeman Uses Grok to 'Prove' Red States...
'Democrats Just Dropped a New Pro-Spencer Pratt Ad' in L.A. (They Say This...
Minnesota Dems Brag About Creating an Office to Aggressively Go After Fraud and...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement