UK Home Secretary Claims Every Woman Arriving on a Small Boat Has Been...
Yes, We Can Imagine Biden Gunning Down an American Civilian in Broad Daylight
The Atlantic Does 4,000-Word Piece on Haitian With Ankle Monitor Who Jumped in...
Jake Tapper Upset That His Tax Dollars Were Used to Air a Blatantly...
Member of Parliament Urges Canadians to Keep Up Boycott of American Products and...
WaPo: SNL Does a Skit Lampooning Republicans
Superintendent Addresses Hateful Messages Targeting Somalis Following Shooting at Homecomi...
Extreme Elonphobia: ‘Musk’ Doc Filmmaker Lives in Fear of MAGA Multibillionaire Despite No...
Brian Stelter Scoop: Politico Booted Off of Air Force One on Monday
Excuse Us but WTF Did He Just Say? Dual Citizenship?! WOW: Abdul El-Sayed...
Scott Jennings to Jake Tapper: Voters Should Hold Noses and Elect Ken Paxton...
NBC News: There Was No Medical Oxygen or Mask in Tennessee’s Execution Chamber
Backfire to End ALL Backfires —> Abdul El-Sayed Announces OBAMA Is Joining Him...
Next-Level CREEPY: Aaron Rupar Will NOT Stop Posting Weird Things About Natalie Harp...
Mike Rogers Exposes Very WEALTHY ELITISTS Who Actually Own Abdul El-Sayed in Receipt-Fille...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement