New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani Leads Public Prayer in Prospect Park
British MPs Call for Investigation of Member Who Called Mass Public Muslim Prayers...
Cato Director Says It’s ‘Totally False’ That Noncitizens Get Welfare at Double the...
Minnesota City Bringing Back the Old, ‘Problematic’ State Flag
Jim Acosta Whines to Adam Schiff at Pretend Hearing About Trump and MAGA...
WSJ: Boom in Autism Therapy Is ‘Medicaid’s Fastest-Growing Jackpot’
AOC Needs More Than Therapy: $19K in Donor Money for Ketamine Shrink
MAGA Allegedly Mad at The Pitt for Portraying Very Realistic Scene of ICE...
The Bulwark’s Tim Miller Asks James Talarico About the Size of ‘God’s Sausage’
Match Day 2026: Celebrating the Joy, Questioning the System – Time to Prioritize...
Polymarket's Meme Bar Fails Spectacularly – TVs Down, Vibes Crashed, Situation Unmonitored
Hasan Piker Declares: 'Good Cubans' Stay Starving Under Communism—'Crazy' Ones Left for Fr...
Trump Admin Moving Forward With Deporting 'Maryland Man' (Sen. Van Hollen Has Time...
Sick! UN Documents Child Brides on the Rise in Gaza, Calls It a...
Mueller's Death Sparks Outrage and Praise: Trump Says 'Good Riddance,' Dems Mourn a...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement