Here’s TN State Rep. Justin Pearson Doing More Performative In-Your-Face Nonsense
Dumb and Dumber: Hunter Biden and Candace Owens Team Up in Bizarre Grifter...
Google Says Technical Issue in Google Earth Caused the Pacific Palisades to Be...
Usual Suspects Butthurt Over Creation of IRS ‘Anti-Weaponization Fund’
Ha! Judge Rules That Obnoxious Kars4Kids Jingle Must Stop Airing in California
Political Prosecution in Minnesota: ICE Agent Charged for Enforcing Immigration Law
HuffPost Accidentally Did a GREAT Job of Obliterating a Dem Talking Point on...
Anderson Cooper's Tearful, Self-Serving 60 Minutes Farewell Blown Away by ONE IMAGE
Threat 'Neutralized' After Shooting at Islamic Center of San Diego Where Children Were...
Krystal Ball Vapidly Announces That Americans Have Been the REAL Terrorists All Along
Jonathan Lemire GLORIOUSLY Debunked by HIMSELF After Claiming Trump Hasn't Been Age-Dinged...
Stacey Abrams Helpfully Points Out Why Dems Are in Freakout Mode After SCOTUS...
Go White Girl! Abigail Spanberger Getting Her Groove on Is the Most Terrifying...
All the SUCK! 'Credentialed' Press Outside Mangione's Hearing Reminds Us WHO the Left...
Shocker! NYC's Socialist Mayor Disagrees With Ronald Reagan's Classic Quote About Big Gov'...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement