Sociopath Celebrates Stabbing Death of New Mom Who Took a Job at an...
We Used to Be a Village. Now We Call the Cops on a...
Jemele Hill Doubles Down on Her Claim That Capitalism Is Tied to White...
Bernie Sanders Introduces Legislation to Pause AI Development in US Immediately
Hakeem Jeffries Says Pete Hegseth Will Be Held Accountable for Lawless Strikes on...
Cato Stooge Tells Congress It Created Illegal Immigration by Making Legal Immigration 'Imp...
CNN's Burnett Talks to NJ Governor About Trump's Baseless Claims on Noncitizens Registered...
James Woods Has a Few Choice Words for George Clooney About Mark Ruffalo...
JD Vance Drops a Truth Bomb About What's REALLY at Stake (Dems Will...
Thomas Massie Blocked Me From His OFFICIAL Account and All I Got Was...
Milo Calls HIMSELF a Persecuted Human Rights Icon After Being Deported and Jokes...
Take the L! Cenk Uygur Posts DUMB JOKE to Save Face After His...
MS NOW Asks Kamala Harris Why Dems in Red States Want Her to...
People Are LOVING How Dana Loesch Dismantled and DOG-WALKED Abdul El-Sayed With One...
Dem Rep on C-SPAN Issues a Deportation Challenge That Tom Homan Will Gladly...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement