Somali? Fraudsters Vandalizing MN GOP Candidate's Car SO DUMB They Missed the CAMERA...
If What Happened to Mark Kelly at This Conference Is Indicative of Dem...
Rashida Tlaib Sucks. That's It. That's the Headline. (Hint: Hands Up Don't Shoot)
OOF! Bill Maher Breaks Out Actual STATS Brutally DISMANTLING Gen Z's 'Affordability Crisis...
'Biggest F**k You in HISTORY:' Mark Cuban ENDS Ro Khanna in HEATED Back...
Racists 'Essentially Achieved an Indirect Lynching' of Fabulist Professor Jason Arday
Sen. Chris Van Hollen Has a New 'Maryland Man' in Teacher of the...
Radical Is Rad: DSA Co-Chair Says Americans Will Eventually Warm to Abolishing Police...
Joe Rogan Diagnoses the Problem With Capitalism: No Free Healthcare
Gun Control Activists Including Shannon Watts Pile on Hasan Piker
Power to Account?: Podcaster Terry Moran Says ABC News Killed True COVID Lab...
Thomas Massie: It's Hard to Take Nick Shirley Seriously Until He Starts Calling...
David Hogg: If Data Centers Have So Many Benefits, Build Them in the...
British Politicians and Academics Make Cambridge University Prof Jason Arday's Tragedy Abo...
London Mayor Sadiq Khan Blames Black Professor's Suicide on 'Unacceptable Hounding and Abu...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement