Here's a Poll About Flying the American Flag on the 4th of July...
Doctor Who’s 'Been Everywhere' Declares American Groceries Trash, Gets Schooled on Cool AC...
Do Nothing Ivy League PhD, Broke in NYC, Hates Jews: The Perfect Democrat...
'They’re Terrible People Who Don’t Love America' — JD Vance Goes Nuclear on...
Al Gore's Attempted 'Right All Along' Brag Collapses Under the Weight of its...
POPCORN! Watch Hillary Clinton Absolutely SQUIRM When Pressed to Comment About Graham Plat...
Mommy's Little Senator: 37-Year-Old Texas Dem Talarico Shares a Checking Account With His...
PA Supreme Court Smacks Down Soros DA Krasner: Needs Adult Supervision Before Freeing...
OUCH! CNN Sinks Gavin Newsom's Spin on Why California's 'First Partner' Is Under...
No Late Night Waffle House for Iran: Iranian World Cup Team Booted from...
'A Million Times Worse Than Epstein': New UK 'Groomer' Gang Report Is a...
Impeach Cobbler: Scott Jennings Knows What Dems Are Cooking Up for Midterms and...
Chicago Mayor Says Flaming Cross Lit to Protest Trump and Christians Is Reminder...
Swindler’s Tryst: X Users Clamor for SPLC Agent and Neo-Nazi Rom-Com Movie (Based...
JK Rowling Has Thoughts on ‘Woman’ Arrested for Pleasuring ‘Herself’ in Front of...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement