Fauci's Diary Provides Many More Reasons to Distrust and Despise the Media (Here...
'Don’t Bill Us Until After the Mid-Terms': DNC’s Desperate Cash-Masking Gambit
Talarico Discovers He Needs Black Voters After Defeating a Black Woman — Now...
TWOCH Full VOD Episode 07252026
YIKES! It Sure Looks Like the DNC's Doing Their Part to 'Get the...
Exposed: Fauci Dined at Jake Tapper’s Home During the Lockdowns He Pushed on...
What First Amendment? Shiloh Hendrix Judge Omitted a Pretty Key Detail in Her...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
A ‘Wish’ Squalled Wanda: ‘Journalists’ Mad at Trump Were ‘Syked’ Over WHCD Rush...
Democrats Push Haley Stevens As the ‘Authentic Voice of the People’ but No...
Fellow Americans: Trump Doubles Down on Comparing CNN’s Kaitlan Collins to Trans Icon...
NBA Player Kuzma Reminds Everyone That Just Because Mamdani Has a Mic Doesn’t...
Mamdani Should Step Aside: Let 9/11 Families Grieve in Peace on the 25th...
Mamdani’s Wife’s Bestie Just Dropped Peak Nazi Fanfic: 'Zios' Caused WWI Defeat and...
Repeat the Line: Katie Hobbs' X Account Has a Joe Biden Moment on...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement