Antifa Terrorists Who Led ‘Noise Demo’ (With Guns) on ICE Facility Sentenced to...
Radical Hospitality? Poetica Coffee Owner FAFO: $400K Tax Deadbeat, 9/11 Truther, and Dan...
Judge Sides With Rioters, Says Safety Fence Around Federal Building Tramples Their Free...
LIVE Election Results With TWITCHY! Primary Night in New York, Maryland, and South...
SCOTUS: Rastafarian Can’t Sue Prison Guards for Shaving His Dreadlocks (Scott Wiener Whine...
SCOTUS: Green Card Holders Can Be Stripped of Legal Status If They Have...
Whoopi Goldberg Trapped: New Karmelo Anthony Footage Causes Big Problems for 'The View'
Judge BLOCKS Trump Administration From Restricting SNAP Benefits for Soda and Candy
Come On, Baby, Take a Ride With Me... In My Taxpayer-Funded NYPD SUV:...
Mamdani-Backed Oct. 7 Cheerleader Vying for NY-13 Seat — Gets Rightfully Grilled Over...
WITCH-With-a-B Tara Palmeri Airs Pro-Life Rep's Ectopic Pregnancy Even After She Begged He...
Oh, HONEY: Jemele Hill Pulls a Lotta STUPID Out of Her Arse Blaming...
YIKES! LEAKED Audio of James Talarico Admitting He HATES Christianity Should END His...
John C. Reilly Thinks the Right Lacks Empathy — Bless His Heart
NOT an Airport: Dana Loesch Had the PERFECT Response to Tucker Carlson Taking...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos