LA Raw: Mayoral Candidate Who Promises to Fix Homelessness Failed at Fixing...
CAIR-CA Leader Advises Followers Not to Write ‘I Hate All Zionists’ in Their...
Va. Dem Sen. Louise Lucas' Statement After the FBI Raid of Her Office...
Ted Lieu’s Red Line to Support Dem Candidate Is Promise to Remove Trump’s...
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot: Kash Patel's Gift of Personalized Whiskey Bottles Sends Left Into...
The Lack of Freedom for Today's Children Makes Me Weep for the Future,...
Right’s Insane, Racist Fever Dream Won’t Stop Palestinian Muslim From Running for NY...
Republican TN State Senator 'Owned' by Nashville Students Over Redistricting
The View’s Election Denial: Behar Claims GOP Will Cheat Midterms, Florida No Longer...
The Democrats Triggered by DHS and Trump Posting the Seal for NICE, Told...
OUCH! Va. Dem Sen. Lucas' 2022 FBI Jab at Trump Via a GIF...
MS NOW Claims FBI Has Opened Investigation Into Atlantic Writer Who Did Hit...
Obama Opens His Monument to Self-Love ... 'Don’t Forget Your Photo ID' (But...
Katie Pavlich Throws a Wrench in Dems' Spin About FBI's Raid at Office...
Fake Pastor Talarico Preaches Envy and Class Warfare — Direct Violation of the...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement