Democratic Socialist Says Conviction for Stealing Food Stamps Qualifies Her to Serve As...
Lawyer 'Hopes This Helps': Having a Final Order of Removal Is Not a...
Taylor Swift Shows Off the Ring After Kelce’s TD The Backlash Says More...
Maryland Man's 'Lynching' Ruled a Suicide, Disappointing Conspiracy Theorists and Politici...
The White House Just Put Out a Short Video Designed to Make Boycotting...
Mark Ruffalo Sad That Gavin Newsom Handed a Big Win to Trump and...
Fox News Joins CNN to Boycott Trump
Quiet Part Out Loud: Chris Murphy Declares That Dems Want to Control the...
Try Not to Laugh at This Headline About What the Media's Just Now...
It's Time to Fight Back Against Socialism
BRUTAL: People Are LOVING Ann Coulter SHREDDING 'Refugee' Ilhan Omar in This New...
Hasan Piker's REPUGNANT Treatment of Haley Stevens Shows Socialists Hate Democrats Most of...
Cleveland Rocks! Law Professor Sues Dearborn, Michigan for Discrimination Against Jews, Ch...
Jon Stewart Reminds Us How Dumb He REALLY Is in Unhinged Rant About...
Scott Bessent Can't Help but LAUGH As CNBC Journo Tries Arguing With Him...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement