Eagles Defensive Coordinator Mocks Dr. Fauci to Escape a Reporter's Question
Yikes: Official WNBA Account Posts Players Betting on Itselves, Then Scrubs the Evidence
Look at This Insane Video From Spain for a Reminder of What Dem/DSA...
Detroit Rev. Picks Stevens Because El-Sayed Won’t Shut Up About Gaza Long Enough...
'Made Me Sick': Ex DNI Tulsi Gabbard Reminds Everyone Why Dr. Fauci Took...
'Jail Won’t Fix His Heart': NYU Student Defends Letting Rapists, Including Her Own,...
Fetterman Tells Bernie to Sit This One Out; Sanders Fires Back, Questions Whether...
Basement Hermit Michael Tracey Shocked That People Whose Lives Were Ruined Still Care...
Sen. Eric Schmitt Digs Up a Fauci-Related Flashback From NPR to Let Them...
Joyce Carol Oates Calls Criticism of Nolan’s ‘The Odyssey’ the 'Crude Language of...
The Atlantic Says the Fauci Hearing Was Full of 'Unchallenged Allegations' (Yeah, About...
Let's Check in With How the DNC's Male Voter Outreach Is Going
The Two Jakes: Tapper Finally Mentions the Fauci Diary on CNN but Not...
Chris Rufo Exposes California Program That Gives Taxpayer-Funded Meth Pipes to the Homeles...
Scold News: Five Years Ago, Fauci Chum Chuck Todd Was Lecturing the Vaccine-Hesitant...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement