Columnist Says Criticism of Katie Porter’s Temperament Is ‘Blatantly Sexist’
Hantavirus Cruise Ship Outbreak Hits Close to Home: Not COVID 2.0, But Lessons...
Stephen Colbert’s Friend, Barack, Gives Him a Personal Tour of His Presidential Center
$11 Million Somali Medicare Fraudster Given Probation in Plea Deal With MN AG...
From Giggle Box to Hanky Time: Dem. Vice Chair Malcolm Kenyatta Gets a...
Sam Stein Overlooks Tim Scott While Worrying It’ll Be ‘Another 100 Years’ Before...
Kathy Griffin Wants You to Feel Rage on Election Day Over Arrest of...
Disney Cruise Families Stunned by Onboard Arrests — The Shocking Reason Border Patrol...
Rep. Steve Cohen Says Tennessee's Insane New Maps Would Destroy the Black Community's...
Play Stupid Games, Win Stupid Prizes: Krassenstein Canceled by His Own Side for...
The Bulwark Floats the Idea of Graham Platner Running for President in 2028
'Go to Gaza Yourself': Man Urges Gay Pro-Palestine Protester to Experience Hamas 'Hospital...
AOC Is Thinking About How Black Americans Created Democracy in This Country From...
Yet Another Gen Z Dweeb Declares 'The Rule of Law Is Dead' Because...
Our Sides Are Splitting! Jen Psaki Claims Democrats Don't Choose Nominees in a...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement