Fetterman Credits Trump’s Private Check-In on His Ill Father As Media Paints Him...
Uh-Oh! The Clintons Are Seeking an 'Intern' and We're Pretty Sure We Know...
Matthew Yglesias to Democrats: You Can’t Campaign With Hasan Piker Then Pretend You...
GOP Senator Acknowledges Prices Are Too High
Jelly Roll Lost 300 Pounds and Every 'America First' Fan He Ever Had...
Fight the Patriarchy — Unless It’s Muslims: Kathy HOCHUL Slaps on a Hijab...
Clyburn Backs Packing the Court to 13 … Critics: Then Let Trump Appoint...
'They're PANICKING!' Peeps Are LOVING Monica Crowley's PERFECT Takedown of the Mainstream...
Karma ALMOST Comes for Dick Blumenthal While He Lectures America About Train Safety
There Is Speculation As Midterm Elections Approach
Laura Loomer, Marjorie Taylor Greene and Green's Daughter THROW DOWN Over Milo and...
OUCH! Mike Rogers Uses 'Alpha' Little Man Abdul El-Sayed's SELF-OWN to EMASCULATE Him...
No WAY, Eh! Canadian Warns Americans That We Don't Know How MAD They...
Dana Bash Tries SO Hard to Make Tom Homan Feel BAD About Deporting...
COPE Accordingly: Lake America OFFICIALLY on Google Maps and Our Lefty Pals Just...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement