LEEEEEEROY JENKINS! Kamala HQ Account Gets Dragged for 'Tomorrow' Teaser Video
Feed the ‘Journos’: For the Cost of a Cup of Coffee You Can...
Dear Diary: Ex-CNN ‘Journo’ Jim Acosta Says He’d Fire Scott Jennings If He...
Four Charged With Using 115 Stolen Identities to Collect $1 Million in Food...
Sen. Ted Cruz Lays Waste to Officers From Netflix and Warner Brothers (And...
Mom Says She’d Rather ‘Take Out’ Herself and Her Kids Than Be Taken...
BOOM: Tom Homan Asks Why We Don't Educate Children About Trump Making His...
The Tide Is Turning: Two Major Medical Associations Call for a Halt to...
The Atlantic: 'We're Witnessing a Murder' of The Washington Post by Jeff Bezos
Hot Take: There Is Not a Serious Market for 'Hard News' for Conservatives
Lefty Activist Gives the Most Ironic Justification EVER for Anti-ICE Roadblocks in Minneap...
ABC News: ICE Prevented Disabled US Citizen’s Father From Attending His Funeral
Kevin Sorbo Says GOP Should Have Bought Super Bowl Ad Time to Air...
FBI Raids Biological Lab Inside Vegas Home Owned by Chinese National With Ties...
'For What?': Daily Mail Reporter Pressures JD Vance to Apologize to the Family...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement