Jessica Tarlov Saying Dems Are on the Side of Sanity Nearly Made Bill...
Good Samaritan Tells Reporter Near the White House How CNN Can Get Its...
Converse-Troversy! Washington Post Tries to 'Sneak' in Some Race Rage Over Shoe Ad
Remember When Brian Stelter Asked If Fox News Should Lose WH Access and...
'It's Two Letters': Scott Presler Hauls Out a Kamala Classic As the Debate...
Self-Proclaimed 'Cis Gender Woman' Tells J.K. Rowling She Can't CHOOSE Who's a Woman...
Video Compilations End CNN's Screeching About the WH Ban and 'Fair and Accurate...
She's Still GOING: Sue O'Connell Straight-Up UNHINGED, Continues Picking Fights With X Ove...
Nancy Mace SO Emasculated Mehdi Hasan That He Went AFTER Her on X...
Seattle Mayor Hopes an Executive Order and Blaming GOP Will Save Her Crumbling...
Yup, She Can STILL Make 'Em Cry: Sarah Huckabee Sanders SHUTS Journo Whining...
WH Drops a BRUTAL Reality MOAB After CNN Defends Their 'Fair and Accurate...
It's 'Orangeland' Now: President Trump Announces PERMANENT Greenland Security Deal
Napoleonic Syndrome: Stepstool Abdul Challenges Vance to a Beard Inspection and Weightlift...
DeSantis Is Enforcing the Law, but Rep. Salazar Is Selling Amnesty With a...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement