New Hollywood Movie Attacks Chris Hansen for … (Checks Notes) … Catching Pedophiles
This Is 'Journalism' at ABC ... The View’s Ana Navarro Electioneers a House...
New Republic: Trump Banning Student Loans for Majors That Don’t Earn Enough Money
Jake Tapper, Thomas Massie Play 'Fun Police' With White House Deputy Chief of...
Five Terror Suspects Arrested Near UK Air Force Base Sunday Released on Bail;...
Cryptic Campaign: Don’t Say ‘Cheese!’ — The Laughing Cow’s Logo Switch Is Nothing...
Boston Mayor Invites Illegal Immigrants to Apply for $575 Scholarship to Learn to...
There's Been a THIRD Arrest but ABC News STILL Doesn't Want to Ruin...
AOC's Political Future Crumbling? Democrats Warn Her To ‘Stay Away'
Here's a Flashback Reminder Ahead of the Midterms of the Ease With Which...
COVID Fraud Chris Cuomo Says Scott Jennings ‘Has a Lot to Answer for...
Todd Blanche Caught ABC's Martha Raddatz Pushing More BS, So She Wanted to...
Senate Dems Skipped a Hearing on Protecting Women's Sports, So Guess Who Else...
DHS Has 4 Words (and 1 GIF) for 'Migrant Caravan' Reportedly Headed Toward...
Monday Morning Meme Madness

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement