NEW: Details Released of One of the Alleged Organizers of UFC White House...
Rachel Bitecofer Tries to Give 'The Left' Credit for Building America’s Middle Class...
Greg Gutfeld SHREDS Jessica Tarlov for Scolding Trump After UFC Fighter Calls Michelle...
Justine Bateman UNLOADS on Gavin Newsom As a California Taxpayer With DAMNING Laundry...
Can't EVEN Make This UP! LOL! SPLC Boss Had a Neo-Nazi Lover ......
Jennifer Van Laar Goes Straight-Up FAFO and Breaks Out a MAJOR Receipt...
Scott Jennings Reacts to Ana Navarro’s R-Rated Rant About Robert De Niro and...
Out to Lynch: ‘Historian’ Heather Cox Richardson Tells Jim Acosta UFC ‘Impulse’ Tied...
Miles Off: ‘Anonymous’ Writer Says UFC Freedom 250 Event Was Humiliating Image of...
Phallus in Chains: The View’s Sunny Hostin Says Claims Michelle Obama Is a...
How Will UK Enforce Its Ban on Social Media for Kids Under 16?
Judge Dismisses Lawsuit by Nonbinary Park Ranger Fired for Hanging Trans Flag in...
CBS News: Veteran Desperately Urging ICE to Release His Wife; 'It Rips My...
Can't You FEEL the Love? Obamas Unveil Commissioned Portrait of Themselves at Presidential...
Sister of MI Senate Candidate Charged With Aggravated Battery at Anti-ICE Protest

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement