'So, Like, a Normie D**che': Hasan Piker Gets Demolished ... by His HAIRDRESSER
Gov. Josh Shapiro Claims Newborn Died From Measles, Doubles Down When Caught Lying
Mamdani's 'Signature Childcare Program' Launch Provides a Preview of City-Owned Grocery St...
'Learing Center' Alert! Minn. Dems Spent HOW MUCH on Beds That 7 Homeless...
Do You Notice Something About the Scene As Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Insists...
CNBC's Joe Kernen Delivered Some Brutal Trade War Reality Checks to Canada's Ex-...
WaPo Gets Shredded During Attempt to Help Dems With Spin About Arrested Illegals
Stephen Miller Drops a Truth Bomb About Illegal Aliens That Should Be in...
Dem Abdul El-Sayed Is Trying to Pretend His Senatorial Campaign Was Never About...
Trump Blasts NYT's Maggie Haberman for ‘Sources Say’ 9/11 Smear, CNN’s Jake Tapper...
From Usha Vance’s Marriage to Melania: Stepstool Abdul El-Sayed Can’t Leave Other Men’s...
Oompa Loompa-Sized Activist Calls America a Dictatorship — and Walks Off Unarrested
Michelle Obama Says She Doesn’t Miss Her Kids at Home. A Lot of...
Jeffries Accuses Trump and Republicans of ‘Jim Crow-Like Tactics’ and ‘Wickedness’
Jasmine Crockett Ain’t Standing by Any Man — Especially Not the One She...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement