Member of Trans Death Cult the Zizians Charged in Execution-Style Murders of Her...
John Fetterman Asks Why He’s the Only Dem Senator to Denounce ’Self-Identified Communists’
Evita Duffy Claps Back at Daily Beast’s Obsession: ‘I Don’t Find Fulfillment From...
Say 'Free Palestine' or Else: Free Palestine Thug Corners Cowering Scott Wiener at...
‘Temporary’ Insanity: Attorney on MS NOW Says Haitian Refugees Should Stay Because Equity...
Convicted Traitor Bradley Manning Trades Leaking Secrets for Dropping Beats at DSA Commie...
James Carville: Done Sharing a Tent With Jew-Haters … Except an Actual Nazi-Tattooed...
Jemele Hill: Is Boomer Esiason Saying Caitlin Clark Deserves 'Special Treatment' for Being...
Clown Ro Khanna Accuses Man With Chinese Wife of Being Racist Against the...
FIFA to Allow Rainbow Flags at Seattle’s ‘Pride Match’ Between Iran and Egypt...
Team Newsom Tried and Failed to Convince SCOTUS There's a Grocery Store Exception...
Deleted Tweet Alert: Phoenix Mercury Mocks Caitlin Clark After Its Players Maul and...
Krystal Ball Can’t Believe Antifa Terrorist Faces Jail ‘For Having Leftist Reading Materia...
We Saw It, So You Have To: Abdul El-Sayed Dances to Whitney Houston...
Tara Palmeri’s ‘My Notes Disagree’ Defense After Betraying Kat Cammack Is Peak Media...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos