Chicagoan Calls Obamas Out Over Black Contractors and Workers Owed MILLIONS for Presidenti...
Cynical Publius Uses Simple MATH to Take Jake Tapper Blaming Hegseth for Flu...
Lefty Venture Capitalist Paul Graham BLOCKED Me for Pointing Out Dems Have ALWAYS...
The MOMENT Abby Phillip Tries Playing the Obama Race Card With Lydia Moynihan...
SO MUCH Worse: Sharyl Attkisson Adds a WHOPPER to Tulsi Gabbard's DAMNING Lists...
'Amazing'! Here's a DC Reflecting Pool Update From ABC News' Chief Algae Correspondent
Because OF COURSE! X Drags TF Out of Jessica Tarlov for Sad, 2-Word...
HA! Hillary's Paddington Bear Ensemble Inspires Some of the Most Vicious, HILARIOUS Memes...
Barack Obama Gets Introduced to Barack Obama After Slamming Those Pushing 'Perpetual Anger...
Going Out With a Bang! Tulsi Gabbard Drops MASSIVE Receipts on Fauci In...
Wander and Wonder: Joe Biden Abandoned on Stage at Obama Library Opening -...
Library Lies: Obama Rewrites the Book on 2012 Presidential Contest with Mitt Romney...
Me, Michelle, and I: The Former First Lady Says the Next Chapter of...
Muslim Texan Who Wanted to Participate in GOP Convention Leaves in Tears
Climate Captivity: Al Gore Compares Abolition of Slavery to Fight Against So-Called Global...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos