German World Cup Tourist Freddy Hits the Gun Range, Learns About Freedom (and...
Rob Schneider Declares Islamophobia Doesn’t Exist in Response to Proposed VA Legislation
Rep Says There Are So Many Homophobes in This Admin With 'Weird, Like,...
CNN's Brian Stelter Says CBS Is 'Prebunking' President Trump's Address
NBC News: Young Dad Working to Give His Daughter a Stable Life Killed...
Masked Woman at Mamdani Housing Event Declares That Eviction Equals Violence
Former Marine and Congressional Candidate Arrested After Saying Trump Must Be 'Killed'
CNN Legal Analyst Norm Eisen Flirts With Libel of Todd Blanche on Nicolle...
‘The Odyssey’s’ Bad Rap Gets Worse With a Cringe Cast Video That’s Giving...
New York Post: Sen Ruben Gallego Had Sexual Relationships With Two House Staffers
Pro-Illegal Alien Dem James Talarico Laughably Laments Biden ‘Failing to Secure Our Southe...
JD Vance Torches Thune For SAVE Act Stalling in Senate
Mic Drop Alert! Ex AG Reminds Adam Schiff That Hating Trump Does NOT...
TEE-HEE! Chuck Schumer's Reaction When Reporter Asks Him About Farting on the Floor...
Harvard Dolt Proposes Cutting a Deal With the Right to LET the Left's...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement