Platner Sent His Hurting Wife Out to Take the Heat — Been There,...
Twist and Tur: MS NOW 'Journo' Claims Dem James Talarico Took Back ‘God...
Cop Copulating Judge Reprimanded for Cheating in Chambers on the Taxpayer's Dime
Pray for Krystal Ball: Her Husband, Kyle Kulinski, Says ALL Republicans = Pedophiles,...
Erick Erickson on Platner: They Will Run From Him
Ro Khanna Pivots From LA Mayoral Race and Democrat Incumbents to Trump and...
Turley: Rep. Wasserman Schultz Yesterday's News in Democrat Land
Sexting Scandal Just Got Worse: Platner Team Threatened Former Staffer Then Tried to...
Larry Elder Nails Analogous Response to Fox News Headline Screengrab
'WOKE OVERLOAD': Rashida Tlaib Says Women Having Periods Equals Economic Violence and I...
Black Democrat SHREDS Jon Favreau for Defending Platner 'Cuz 'He's a White Man'...
His FACE! LOL! WATCH Democrat Andy Kim Duck, Dodge, and DIVE During CNN...
Dems Are Twisting Themselves Into DESPERATE Pretzels Defending Platner, HERE Are Some of...
What I Read About Platner's Wife AFTER She Defended Her Scumbag Husband Makes...
Just INSANELY Creepy: GUESS Which Democrat Thought Posting His Texts With a 13-YEAR-OLD...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement