Forever Lost: Stephen A. Smith Says Establishment Dems Must Win Back Voters From...
Barb McQuade Loses It on MS NOW As SCOTUS Torches Dem Dream of...
Masked Antifa Thug Attacks Videographers at Seattle Pride Event With a Baseball Bat
Scorn Porn: Failed ‘Journalist’ Jim Acosta Posts Video Mocking Attendance at Great America...
Man Arrested for Shooting Participants in the World Naked Bike Ride with a...
Several States Will Not Send an Official Delegation to the Great American State...
CATO Simp Notes That Agent Who Shot Renee Good Has Never Been Charged...
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey Repeals Ban on Adult Bathhouses in Honor of Pride...
Nate Silver Looks at Sales Figures for Dr. Jill Biden’s Memoir
Brad Lander's Jewish Blind Spot: Whitewashing Mamdani's Wife's Jew-Hatred for Political Su...
Nicholas ‘Dog Rape’ Kristof Names Children Who Have Died From Elon Musk’s Aid...
Make Up Your Dang Mind, Hakeem: Supreme Court Whiplash: Pack It Yesterday, Praise...
Fetterman Roasts Dem ‘Crazypants’ as Media Pulls a Classic: Total Amnesia Until the...
Hands Off, Bros: Muslim Grad’s Handshake Ban Goes Viral, Proving Tolerance is One-Way
Unbothered King: Justice Clarence Thomas Walks Through Capitol with Zero Drama While Media...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement