Ron DeSantis Ends Pennsylvania’s Recruitment Attempt: ‘Florida Has More Wawa Stores’
NYT Tries Sympathy for Illegal Who Sneaked Back In to Birth ‘Anchor Baby’...
Ilhan Omar’s Phony ‘War Survivor’ Act Exposed: She Wasn’t a Victim — Her...
Christine Amanpour Claims She’s the Same Military Rank as Pete Hegseth: 'My Dog...
LIES! Ayanna Pressley: Deporting Haitians Will Collapse U.S. Healthcare Because They’re 1...
The Drunk Republican (and Others) Troll the UK MERCILESSLY After They Found Out...
'Isn't Communism Awesome?' 'New Study' About Mamdani's City-Owned Grocery Stores Will Only...
Zero Self-Awareness Detected: KBJ Says Fellow SCOTUS Justices Are 'Utterly Irrational'
Pattern of Ignorance: Dem Hakeem Jeffries Dodges 'Years of Rumors' Question About Eric...
Wait, Eric Swalwell Reportedly Spent HOW MUCH Donor Money on Hotels?
Trump Wins: Iran Agrees to 'Everything' As Strait of Hormuz Opened 'Forever'
Crockett and Dockets: Jilted Jasmine Shares Career Plans After Losing House Seat and...
Chuck Schumer's Attempt to Mock Trump's Authenticity Gets Roasted Into a Fully Cooked...
Journo Who Admits Burying Swalwell Info Now Blames Fox for Not Covering It—Even...
Spineless in New York: Rep. Lawler Sides With 'The Squad' to Protect Haitian...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement