James Carville Explains Why Lindsey Graham Is Always Trying to Lick Trump’s Face
Better Security Than the Border: Met Gala Tackles Gatecrasher They’d Welcome at the...
Seattle Mayor Roasted After Thug Caught on Security Camera She and Migrant Groups...
Luke Rosiak’s Medicaid Exposé Part 2 Drops: Single Landlord Owns 288 Medicaid Shell...
Ayatollah Khamenei Told to Stop Posting Because He’s Dead
Cringe Overload: Katie Porter's New Ad Brags About Yelling at Staff and Calls...
Marco Rubio Just Delivered the Most Powerful American Dream Speech of 2026 —...
NBC News: Mexican Restaurant Owners Using Cinco de Mayo to Combat Anti-Immigrant Sentiment
Michael McFaul: Shameful That Canada Is Now a More Consequential Leader of Free...
Mexicans Rage at American Beach Home: 'Stay Out' – But Migration and Remittances...
Reuters: The Supreme Court ‘Gutted’ a Core Voting Rights Act Protection
CNN: Trump Admin Opening Investigation Into Smith College in ‘Latest Move to Limit...
Katie Miller Confronts Biased Abby Phillip — HuffPost’s S.V. Dáte: 'Her Husband IS...
'In Short, He's in Deep DOO-DOO': MASSIVE Public Records Audit Shows Ro Khanna...
LA Mayor Karen Bass Wastes $250K on Anti-ICE Virtue Signal ... Useless Taxpayer-Funded...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement