Mayor Zohran Mamdani Pleased to Announce New York's Fashionable New Sidewalk Sheds
HIDE THE WOMEN! Zohran Mamdani's Explanation of Why R*pe Is Rising In New...
Toronto Police in ‘Trans SUV’ Post Video of Harassment by Pickup Truck Driver
Yes, Lefties, Red States Are HORRIBLE and You Should Stay Far, FAR Away...
Fairfax County Police Gets Ratioed Into The Sun After Proudly Announcing New Translation...
Bernie Sanders Rake Stomps During His Lecture About Which Side Doesn't 'Believe in...
Brit Lit Twit: Singer Dua Lipa Opens ‘Banned Book’ Library Filled With Easily...
Newsom Embraces Communists, Will Soon Regret It
Only Scott Jennings Could Infuriate Neera Tanden SO MUCH That She Makes This...
'You Make Me SICK, You Rotten Dog': Michael Rapaport Makes Ro Khanna His...
Elissa Slotkin Said the Quiet Part Out Loud While Panicking About What the...
RUH-ROH! DSA Activist's Scolding Thread About Lazy DSA Members Sounds Like Trouble in...
Riots Breaking Out in Maine After ICE Shot Suspect Trying to Run Them...
Who's Up for MORE Proof That Rep. Ro Khanna Is 'a Fraud on...
Rents Hit ALL-TIME HIGH Under Champagne Socialist Running New York City; In Other...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement