Terrible Terrorist Tabloid: Rolling Stone Anoints Hasan Piker a Top 'Influencer' For 2026
Don Lemon Says He’s Like Malcolm X and Can ‘Tell the Truth’ Since...
Systemic Racism: Brandon Johnson Brags About Violating Civil Rights Law in His Administrat...
ICE Nabs Its Own Cheerleader: Milo Yiannopoulos Held in Louisiana Detention Facing Removal
Imagine That!: Dem Chris Murphy Lies About DHS Illegal Alien Crackdown in Connecticut
Democrats Invent a Trump Affair Scandal, but Gavin Newsom’s Aide Has Been Velcro’d...
Heap Big OUCH! Scott Bessent Offers Elizabeth Warren a Free Course on 'Foreign...
Joe Walsh Remains One of the Biggest Self-Serving, Annoying TOOLS on Social Media
HA HA HA —WATCH! Never-Trumper Norm Eisen Accidentally Makes Case Against ALL Mail-In...
Hillary Clinton-Inspired Immigration Shot and Chaser Proves She Has ZERO Actual Principles
The Bloc of Michigan Voters the GOP Must Win Over
Canadian Report on Where Carney's 'Response to Trump's Trade War' Is 'Winning Fans'...
People Are LOVING the Faces a CNN Panel Makes As Scott Jennings Explains...
Don't Look Now, but Kamala Harris Is Stealing Trump's Lines Again
Scumbag Dem. Who Left His Wife and Kids for Younger Woman Calls Trump...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement