Reporter Decides Murder Trial Is the Perfect Backdrop for Cute Little Wink —...
It's Petty but I Can't Get Enough of Watching Chris Murphy Squirm When...
'We Will Always Love Her': Dolly Parton, Country Music Icon, Passes Away At...
Why Nobody Likes YOU: Mean, Haggard, Wrinkled Debbie Dingell's Swipe at Natalie Harp...
Abdul El-Sayed Screws Himself With Failed Risk-It-All Fox News Interview
THIS —> EPIC Post Drops Democrats Claiming Republican Tax Cuts Cost Americans THE...
Media's BIG LIE Busted: Michael Schellenberger Drops a Whole LOTTA Inconvenient (to the...
'OWN IT!' Ben Shapiro SHREDS Abdul El-Sayed for Refusing to Denounce His Hasan...
Let the Memes BEGIN! Hakeem Jeffries' Homeless Guy Vibe Trump Post BACKFIRES Hilariously...
Would You Look at THAT? John Cleese Might FINALLY Be Catching On
CNN Panel's SAVE Act Debate Goes Off the RAILS When Conservative Refuses to...
OOF: Bill Melugin Just Made Abdul El-Sayed Look Even DUMBER on Immigration and...
Abdul El-Sayed SPEECHLESS As Jesse Watters Drops Sharia Law BOMBSHELL During Crazy Intervi...
It's Time Again to Crank Up the Cringe-O-Meter: JB Pritzker Is 'Governor-Maxxing'
Socialist Angie Nixon Says Billionaires and Elected Officials Are Conspiring to Keep Stude...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement