Clarity for Claire: Democrat McCaskill Gets Cause and Effect Lesson After Decrying ICE’s...
Tom Homan Hammers Hapless Heckler at TPUSA and Sends Him Home to His...
Bernie Sanders is Asking Dem Leadership to Drink the Communist Kool-Aid and Endorse...
Liberal Afraid Alligator Alcatraz Is Incinerating Illegal Aliens
Florida Franchise? Kristi Noem Says Five States Are Considering Their Own Versions of...
Shed No Tears for the Bureaucracy
Jillian Michaels Shocked as CNN’s Abby Phillip Defends Illegal Alien Teen Labor on...
Sen. Patty Murray: GOP Is Afraid If Kids Watch PBS They’ll Learn to...
Here's More Info on an Arrested California 'Farm Worker' From the ICE Raid...
Rep. Jayapal Gets Ratioed Into Orbit for Pushing the Left's Latest Pro-Illegal Immigration...
Bernie for Borders? Sanders Says He Wants to Keep Illegal Aliens Out but...
Harmeet K. Dhillon Lays the Smackdown on Sen. Alex 'Jose' Padilla
He's SUPER SERIOUS, Y'all! Florida Senator Posts Dour Selfie to Demand Oversight of...
Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Tours Alligator Alcatraz, Says They're Living in Cages
The Party of Women Strikes Again! Zohran Mamdani Thinks NYPD Shouldn't Respond to...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement