Podcaster Adam Corolla Calls Out Katie Couric After Her Tongue-Bathing ‘Interview’ With Ga...
Chinese Account Likes AI Propaganda Video Showing US Airman Bombing a Little Girl...
Katie Couric Explains the SAVE Act, Says Voter Fraud Is ‘Vanishingly Rare’
Remember Mamdani's 'She's Just a Private Citizen' Line? NY Mag Begs to Differ:...
Daily Mail: 'Staggering' Number of US Troops Wounded in War With Iran
Harvey Weinstein Calls Rikers 'Hell' — Turns Out Power Dynamics Suck When You're...
DNC Suing to Compel the Trump Administration to Say If It's Planning to...
MD's Eye-Opening Thread: Be Cordial, But Hover Like a Hawk – Hospital Horror...
Here We GO! Georgia US House 14 Special Election General Results LIVE With...
‘Media Personality’ Notes Pete Hegseth Doesn’t Salute Black Service Member
Weird Lefty Wonders Why Kai Trump Could 'Irreversibly Transition' Her Teeth as a...
Bill Maher Tells Podcaster His Position Feels Like 'Someone Who Just Wants to...
DHS Says News Report of US Citizen Being Detained for Two Days is...
Shots Fired at US Consulate in Toronto, RCMP Confirms It's a National Security...
This Hero Wears Blue: Viral Image of NYPD Chief Inspires Hope Among New...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement