The Media's Spin on Reports of Reflecting Pool Vandalism Couldn't Have Been More...
The New Yorker's Review of JD Vance's New Book Is a 'Distasteful' Blend...
MAZE's Flashback to Brian Stelter Driving the Final Nail Into the 'Journalism' Coffin...
Scott Jennings Sinks CNN Panelist's BS About How Obama Defeated Reflecting Pool Algae...
Tim Walz Took a Reflecting Pool Jab at Trump and Accidentally KO'd Himself...
She's Back, Baby! Kamala, Goddess of Gibberish, Drops a HUMDINGER of a Word...
SERIOUSLY? James Woods' Shot and Chaser Maddeningly Sums Up MSM-Style 'Priorities'
‘Justice’ for Just Us: Kamala Harris Tells Don Lemon She’ll Go After Trump’s...
Can’t Take a Joke: Doc Tells Joy Reid ‘Michelle Obama Is a Man’...
Butthurt in Texas: Crockett Bails on Dem State Convention, Still Furious Over Talarico...
SPLC-Funded Ossoff Suddenly Has Nothing to Say About His Donors' 'Pay-to-Play White Suprem...
Anne Hathaway Pregnant at 43: A Beautiful Blessing — And a Necessary Reality...
Shuck the Heck Up! 'Oysterman' Nazi College Dropout Lectures America on Impeaching SCOTUS...
Harry Truman, You Ain't: Victor Davis Hanson Sums Up Obama's Narcissistic Scolding In...
All Hell Broke Loose at Obama's Presidential Center Grand Opening

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos