Abdul El-Sayed’s ‘Genocide’ Post From October 2023 Gets a Fresh Look
Two Ambassadors Tell Jim Acosta Trump Admin Reminds Them of Germany in the...
Here's the Group Backing That USPS Whistleblower Calling Out Trump's 'Chaotic' Mail-In Bal...
'Rev.' Talarico’s Federal Abortion Corps: Critics Call Out Fanatic After Post-Dobbs Letter...
Chuck Todd Thinks Susan Collins Sharing Factual Info About Her Dem Opponent Shows...
Woman Wants Us to Imagine the ‘Psychological Whiplash’ Tyler Robinson Must Be Going...
BRUTAL! Susan Collins Vowed Not to Mention Something About Troy Jackson (Guess What...
Try Not to Get Whiplash From MS NOW's Chris Hayes' Pivot on Musk...
American Heroes of 9/11: The Boatlift
Mamdani’s Signal Army: Influencers Get Daily Talking Points — Some Get $5K–$20K in...
James Talarico's Quest to Prove His Real Texan Cred Led Him to Cracker...
Netflix Earns Eye Rolls After Previewing Doc About Journos' Harrowing Ride on 'The...
Biden-Appointed Lesbian Judge Writes Opinion: No First Amendment Right to Pride Flags in...
This Is NOT the Person CNN Anchors Needed Rushing to Their 'Journalism' Defense
Spencer Pratt Trolled ‘Filthy Commie’ Hasan Piker and the Ownage Has Been Spectacular

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement