Governor Newsom Press Office Asks Why Republicans Hate That They Count Every Vote
Trial: Karmelo Anthony Was Asked to Leave 15 Times Before Fatal Stabbing
'How Is This Real?' Scott Pelley's Post-Firing Instagram Pic Sparks More Than a...
Report: Sen. Chris Murphy Funding Group Behind Anti-ICE Riots
The Economist Looks at the 'New' Dangerous Rhetoric About Anti-White Prejudice in British...
Border Czar Tom Homan Explains What Happens If Delaney Hall in Newark Is...
New Republic: The Firing of Scott Pelley Will 'Reverberate in American Journalism History'
WaPo: Pete Hegseth Takes Six of His Kids Along on Official Visit to...
Woman: Kiddo Came Home Crying After Being Told in Sex Ed That Only...
Obama Bro Says JB Pritzker Should Strip Family of Bears Ownership and Give...
Dem Rep. Debbie Dingell Decides a Profanity-Laced Shaming Is the Best Way to...
Here's a Platner Campaign Update That's 'Everything You Need to Know About the...
Lefty Thug Trying to Block Vehicles at ICE Detention Center Gets Introduced to...
Border Security Funded, Family Values Defended: Conservatives Deliver on Capitol Hill
Ex Biden-Harris Staffer Explains Why Hypocrisy Is Running Rampant (THIS Deflection Sounds...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement