Boston Globe: Queer Community Splintered Over Lesbian Bar That Dropped Strict Mask Mandate
CBS News: Critics Say Converse 'Lynching' Ad May Have Been Intentionally Crafted to...
Vandals Spray-Paint ‘Kill Donald Trump’ and ‘Talarico — Love Wins’ at Site of...
Grand Jury Finds Zero Evidence of Foul Play in Death of Black Teen;...
Chris Christie Is Thinking About 2028, and X Has Thoughts
The Snark Is Strong With This One: JD Vance Echoes His Boss With...
What Alaska’s 50+ Voters Are Saying About the Senate Race
Choice of Color: Podcaster Joy Reid Sides With Clancy Trial Holdout Juror for...
Trump Made His First Remarks Without the TV Pool and Reviews Are Enthusiastic
Venezuelan Shot and ‘Denied Urgent Medical Care’ Released From Hospital
Sit This One Out, Slick: Gavin Newsom Tries to Hop on the Trump...
Abdul El-Sayed Flips OUT When Pushed on His Past Refusal to Support Kamala...
The Voting Bloc That Could Decide the Alaska Senate Race
Trump Ripped Iran & Cuba in Fiery UN Speech As They Storm Out...
From the TOP ROPE! Rubio to NATO: If We Can’t Use the Bases,...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement