Comrade Mamdani’s DSA Just Pledged to 'Defend' Chinese Socialism — Peak Democrat Energy
'Dems Deliver' Account Celebrates NY Bill That Would Only Deliver Higher Prices at...
Dem Running for Maine Senate Troy Jackson Completely Blank on Tourist Spots in...
Senate Candidate Troy Jackson Is TRYING to Change the Subject to Susan Collins...
Seattle Mayor Forces Black Police Chief to Resign As Scapegoat for Shooting Chaos...
Dylan Mulvaney Has a 'Dolls Night Out' With 'Sarah' McBride and the Jokes...
Silly Prison Abolitionist Thinks Cages Are Cruel—Wait Until He Sees What the Pitchforks...
Hunter Biden Blames Trump Family for His Woes While Cursing Them All—Including the...
Mehdi Hasan’s Knickers in a Full Twist After Haley Stevens Tells His Fake-Doctor...
Ketanji Brown Jackson Is Picky About Media Choices to Convey Impartiality (Guess Where...
'What's the Mood on BlueSky?' Host Ken Jennings Hears His Toughest Jeopardy Question...
Streamer Hasan Piker Who Said America Deserved 9/11 Guarantees 2028 Dem Nominee Will...
Legacy Media Outlets Downplay Moroccans Swarming Into Spain, Focus on ‘Right-Wing’ Respons...
White Site: Kamala Harris’s DEI Devotion Ends at Border of Her Swanky New...
Sen. Corey Booker Observes Brian Sicknick Day in New Jersey, Who Gave His...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement