Scott Jennings Calls Birthright Citizenship Ruling by SCOTUS an ‘Abomination’ That Benefit...
Dems Frame Their SCOTUS Birthright Citizenship Victory As a Hyper-Partisan Loss, Vow to...
NYC DSA Leader Won’t Condemn Darializa Avila Chevalier’s Post About Wiping Her Dirty...
Third Reich Rugrat: Middle School Yearbook Baby Photo Is Causing a ‘Führer’ in...
Ringleader of Pakistani Grooming Gang Stripped of Citizenship but Can't Be Deported
PA Senators Reach Across the Aisle to Rally Commonwealth for Great American State...
The Amish Clearly Do Not Want to Assimilate Into American Society, Yet the...
The Nation Scolds AOC for Never Apologizing for Covering for the Pro-Genocide Wing...
Axios: GOP Reboots the Red Scare as Young Voters Embrace Socialism
Elon Musk Responds to Nicholas Kristof’s List of Children He’s Killed With Aid...
Gov. Tim Walz: The Supreme Court Says States Can Be Cruel to Trans...
NBC Offers Viewers a 'Trigger Warning' Before Reporting the SCOTUS Ruling on Title...
Anchor Baby Congresswoman Celebrates Birthright Citizenship Ruling by 'Sell-Out Supreme Co...
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Uses … (Wait for It) … TikTok Slang in...
Ro Khanna Is One Wealthy MOFO and Here I Thought Democrats Were the...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement