Jill Biden Now Claims She Feared a Stroke — But Only After Spending...
Brandon Johnson Says He Will Fight ‘Teen Takeovers’ by Holding Social Media Accountable
Tim Miller's Blasphemous Meltdown: 'The Bulwark' Doubles Down on Vulgar Anti-Christian Att...
DHS Secretary Drawing Up Plans to Block International Flights Into Sanctuary Cities
DNC Insults Trans Community in Vulgar Response to Stephen Miller Post About James...
Zaid Jilani Wants to Know Why Graham Platner’s ‘Accidental Tattoo’ Is Disqualifying
No, James Talarico: Galatians 3:28 Doesn’t Mean God is Nonbinary
ICE Agent Shover Rep. LaMonica McIver Says ICE Henchmen Are Shoving Her 'Neighbors'
'This Is Texas, THIS Is Not': Ken Paxton's First Ad About Low-T Talarico...
Jesse Watters Reading 'Disgusting' RNC Research on Graham Platner Didn't Sit Well With...
Dems Lost It After Polis Freed GOP Grandma — Today He Showed Up...
MAD About You? Trump Compares Dem James Talarico to Famous Freckled Freak Comic...
DNC's Photo Attempt to Counter Backfire From Talarico's Past Anti-Meat Comments REEKS of...
AOC Wears Hijab for Eid, Ignites Backlash: 'Suddenly She Knows What a Woman...
Harry Sisson's Revisionist Sports History About Colin Kaepernick Gets Community Note Nuked

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos