Elizabeth Warren Chose the Perfect Location From Which to Record Her Anti-Rich Person...
Gov't Spending Math Sinks Lefty Claims That Confiscating Elon Musk's Wealth Would Solve...
Limit and Give It: Scott Jennings Schools Grabby CNN Dems Who Want to...
The Hateful Eight: Musk's Money Milestone May Have His ‘Biggest Fans’ Seeking Trillionaire...
Lying Lemon: Activist Podcaster Pushes Debunked Fiction That Karmelo Anthony Murder Jury W...
'How Wonderful... We Never Anticipated This': CNN Stunned by Southern Hospitality During W...
Here's Why Class Warfare Lefties Are Ignoring THESE Working Folks Profiting From Elon...
'Tax the Rich!' Chant Hits Too Close to Home — Hasan Piker Panics...
Literally Can’t Watch Seinfeld Anymore: Mehdi Hasan Melts Down After Jerry Refuses to...
Finally, a Democrat With a Spine: Fetterman Torches Platner as a Bona Fide...
Raw Story Journo Defends Platner’s Nazi Tattoo as ‘Drunk Mistake’ — Ex-Girlfriends Say...
Harwood Sneers at Former Plumber Markwayne Mullin — Then Wonders Why Dems Got...
Impeachmental Illness: Scott Jennings Burns CNN Dems Who Claim Party’s Not Running on...
California Democrats Proclaim (Or Try To) Who Is and Who Is NOT 'Allowed'...
Texas Dem Bobby Pulido Bragged About Springing Pedophile Bandmate from Jail — Now...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement