TICK TOCK! New (DAMNING) D.C. Circuit Court Ruling AGAINST Joe Biden Proves That...
Flaming Hot Message: Scott Jennings Shuts Down CNN Dems Trying to Shift Blame...
Appointed Senator Darline Graham Is Running to Hold Onto SC Senate Seat Once...
'Best Thing Going': Former NY Governor Andrew Cuomo Says Socialist Movement in Dem...
Jennifer Welch Gets a Glow-Up to Debate Trump's Dementia With Scott Jennings
Reading Writing and Revolution: Teachers Union Speeches Give Us The Three Rs
Don Lemon: MAGA Is the Modern-Day Nazi Party ‘Without the Holocaust and All...
Dead Teen Discovered Inside $1M Home of Ayanna Pressley's Ex-Con Husband — Media...
Irony Detectors EXPLODE After Reports About the Only Civilian Injured by Anti-ICE Bomber...
Renter Says She’s the Reason Her Landlord Doesn’t Have to Get a Real...
Rubio Lifts the Veil: Havana Weaponized American Radicals Against Their Own Country for...
Trillion Dollar Clown Show: 20 percent of College Students Can Barely Read After...
Mehdi Hasan Upset CNN Reported Khamenei Killed Thousands, Then Whitewashed Netanyahu’s Bod...
James Talarico Says No One Should Have to Crowdfund Cancer Care Because Healthcare...
DSA Loser Brigade Meltdown: 'Noooo, Iran Can't Bankroll Hamas, Hezbollah & the Houthis...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos