Glenn Beck Spots Something VERY Telling for Sale at The Obama Center's Merch...
CNN's Jake Tapper Provides the Dem Response After John King Says Republicans Are...
Who Can Louise Lucas' Supporters Contact to Get a Refund on These Shirts...
People Are Connecting Some Dots About Gavin Newsom's $20 Million 'FREE DIAPERS' Program
CNN's Abby Phillip Had No Problem With the FA Part of Dem Redistricting...
Drunk History: AOC Rewrites the American Revolution as a Communist Struggle Against 'Billi...
AOC Says Black Representatives Are Being Wiped Out In Tennessee, Forgets Dem Steve...
VA Map Slap: CNN Delivers Brutal Reality Check to Hakeem Jeffries and His...
Commie Influencer Hasan Piker Cites JFK to Justify Violence After VA Ruling, Forgets...
‘Told You So!’ Former VA AG Jason Miyares Warned State Dems Redistricting Scheme...
Ted Cruz Needed 2 Words to Finish Off a Months-Long Feud With Beleaguered...
Literally Testified for the Blind Sheikh — Now Leading Race for US Congress...
Hantavirus Cruise Ship Americans Get One-Way Ticket to Nebraska Isolation
Matt (Matty)Yglesias Throws Tantrum Over Judges Who Won't Let Virginia Dems Ignore the...
'F***!' Anonymous House Dems Spill to Axios How Disastrous the SCOVA Ruling Is...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement