Moob Swings: Man-Breasted Democrat George Conway Laughably Claims Trump Has Low Testostero...
Law Prof Butthurt That Trump Fired New US Attorney an Hour After He...
Body Discovered Inside Ayanna Pressley’s Million-Dollar House Owned by Her Ex-Con Husband
Immigration Officials Allowed to Consider Use of Benefits When Granting Permanent Legal St...
How the Tables Turn: Andrew & Tristan Tate Busted in Miami Right Before...
Mehdi Hasan Triggered by Marco Rubio's Speech on Far-Left Violence
The AP Tracks Down Ex-Wife of ICE Agent in Its Video of 'What...
Jesse Kelly Was Right: Europeans Visit America for the World Cup and Realize...
'Abolish Rent' Author Says Rent Is Paid ‘At the Barrel of a Gun’...
JJ Watt Proves He’s the GOAT: Turns a Fan’s ‘What If’ into Beers...
Boston Globe: Woman Came to Boston for Noah Kahan Concert and Now She's...
Mamdani Holding 'Active Conversation' on Legality of Arresting Netanyahu at the UN This...
Canadian Fire Chief Opens Wildfire Update With a Land Acknowledgement, Coughing Americans...
Election Integrity Explained by (Checks Notes) Olive Garden
Marco Rubio Delivers a Blistering Speech Against Communism and Far-Left Political Violence

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement