Male Juror in Lindsay Clancy Murder Trial Slams ‘Holdout Juror’ for Refusing to...
No Retraction: ABC ‘News’ Deletes False X Post Blaming Tesla Vehicle for Deadly...
UK Charity Trying to Understand Decision to Deny Access to a Boat Carrying...
UK: Feminist MP Who Campaigned Against Men-Only Clubs Joins Gender-Segregated Muslim March
Vanity Fair: New Doc Says Elon Musk Had ‘A Degree of Certainty’ About...
Fetterman Crosses the Aisle: Democratic Senator Praises Trump at RNC, Infuriates His Own...
Gubernatorial Candidate Says Her Pronouns Are Mom, Texan, and Soon-To-Be Governor
Pray the Grounded Girls Get Chosen Before the Bitter Ones Hoard the Good...
'I'm Saving Your Number': CBS' Gayle King Fangirls Over Lindsay Clancy's Attorney
Hunter Biden Launches $LAPTOP Memecoin, Which Crashes 99 Percent Two Hours After Launch
Brian Stelter Has a Pic From the Packed House at Oliver Darcy's 'Information...
Mehdi Hasan Wants Apologies From Those Who Insisted War Would Stop If Hamas...
FAIL: James Talarico Tries to Convince a Reporter He No Longer Believes All...
Joe Scarborough: White House Will Hate the Success of Tennis Star From S**thole...
Those CREEPY HANDS! Gavin Newsom Scolds JD Vance While Bragging About Healthcare for...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos