Lunatic Tries to Run Down Maine Wire Reporter for 'Invasion of Privacy': Suspect...
Woman Mystified by Middle Eastern-Looking Men Filling Up Walmart Grocery Carts With Milk...
Shooting Outside High School Football Game in Minnesota Blamed on Somali Gangs
Amy Siskind Wants All 57 Men in Cornell Fraternity’s Group Chat Investigated and...
Extreme or Extremely Funny? Steve Hilton ‘Lesbian’ Campaign Ad Is Rubbing Some Voters...
Ro Khanna Can't Believe Vance Would Go So Low As to Tell a...
Bill Maher Roasts Hack Media Over Reports of an Argument in the Cockpit...
TMZ: Christa Pike Donated Her Last Meal Money to Buy Pizza for the...
Steve Hilton Couldn't Help but Notice What Susan Rice's Demand About Xavier Becerra...
This Explosive Headline Is a Lock for First-Ballot Induction Into the 'TDS Hall...
The Evolution of the Dems' 'Noncitizen Voting Never Happens' to This Judge's Ruling...
Hot Take on The View: Biden Might Still Be President If Dems/Media Had...
School Is in Session! Tom Homan Teaches 'Deportation 101' to Reporter Pushing Dem...
Lyin’ Witch and the Wardrobe: Dem Peggy Flanagan Is Struck Fashion Senseless in...
Triggered by Vigor: CNN’s Kasie Hunt Questioned Trump’s Health but Time Reporter Shot...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement