Sec. Markwayne Mullin Says HSI Has 300,000 More Voter Fraud Cases It's Getting...
Gov. Gavin Newsom Signs Bills Restricting ICE’s Use of Flash Bangs, Shock Gloves,...
Scott Jennings Notes Interesting Timing of Mayor Mamdani Releasing His Anti-Antisemitism V...
A Bad Night Is Not Automatically a Crime — and Pretending It Is...
Sen. Jim Justice Walks Back (Sort of) Comments Going Soft on Immigration Enforcement
Sen. Chris Van Hollen Says Act to Ban Stock Trading Would 'Disenfranchise American...
Sean Davis Puts the Final Mushroom Cloud Over NYTimes' 'We Don't Publish Unverified...
Sen. Alex Padilla Calls Out Markwayne Mullin's 'Election Conspiracy Claims About Noncitize...
Senate Dems Block Legislation to Ban Insider Trading, Citing Attached ‘Voter Suppression’...
These Christians Risk Everything to Follow Jesus
Better Off Head? Actor John Cusack’s New High Brows Raise Low-Brow Laughs Online
End Wokeness Shows How Fast the Copy and Paste Hijacking Spin Made the...
NYTimes' Defense of Hijacking Headline Is the 'Most Unintentionally Hilarious Tweet of All...
Iran's Hail Mary Plea Just Gave Trump Everything He Needed
Socialism Is Real. It's Dangerous. And They're Organizing.

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement