BOOM! James Talarico Demands Racism Condemnation From Ken Paxton — What Happened Next...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
Dem Dropout: Scott Jennings Brutally Reminds Mallory McMorrow That Disavowing Hasan Piker...
Devlin on Trial: Juror Says Pro-Lindsay Clancy Women on Panel Had Ulterior Motive...
Propaganda Playbook: Jimmy Kimmel and James Talarico Dust Off Old Colbert Script for...
The Resistance, Distilled: Man Attacks a Doll Because JK Rowling Still Won’t Pretend...
On the 25th Anniversary of 9/11, Treacherous Duo Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib...
WI 'Political' Journo Deletes UGLY Posts About Tom Tiffany's Emergency Water Landing (Got...
Sen. Ron Johnson Brings Further Evidence of Virus Cover-Up
'Birthing Person' Jones Tried to Smear XX-XY's Jennifer Sey and It Was a...
DeSantis Comments on Suggestion of Democrat AI Oversight
Hasan Piker: El-Sayed’s Heartfelt 9/11 Tribute Was Scripted Because He ‘Can’t Say the...
Abdul El-Sayed Needed Hasan Piker for His Senate Primary ... Now He Has...
Hasan Piker Was 10 on 9/11 ... He Still Claims Mocking It Is...
Pete Buttigieg’s Fix for a ‘Nakedly Partisan’ Court: Add Six Seats and Hope...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement