Texas Daycare Accused of Running a Fight Club and the Internet Immediately Broke...
DEFCON MAPLE SYRUP: Carney Prepared for a Trump Invasion, and X Has Entered...
'Here's Why God Is Trans': Episcopal Priestess Says Mary Assigned Jesus Male at...
Macklemore Announces Free Palestine Tour After What Happened to Him From the Billionaire...
Pastor at James Talarico’s Church Says We Have No Way of Knowing If...
Flock Cameras Gone, Predator Dead: Sheriff Judd’s ‘We Could Have Saved Him’ Argument...
James Talarico Asks How Paralyzing a DoorDash Driver Makes Anyone More Safe
Longhorns Coach Sarkisian Blames Trump’s Exit for Miami’s Title-Game Loss, but Facts Say...
Instead of Arresting Netanyahu, Mamdani Plants an Olive Tree With Palestinian Families Fro...
Obama Was ‘Absolutely Confident’ Women Would Govern Better. X Is Less Certain -WATCH.
Netanyahu Rips Mamdani, Saying Genocide Is What His Buddies Would Have Done If...
CAT-Egorically Insane: NYC Shelter's Adoption Policy Is So Unhinged, Even PETA Is Calling...
Hakeem Jeffries Says Justice Has Been Delayed for Nolan Wells, but Not Denied;...
John Cleese Suggests That He Wishes African Slaves Had Been ... (Ahem) ......
Steele the Same: MSNOW President Claims Former RNC Chair Adds to Network’s ‘Broad...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement