Grifting, Humorless Scolds: BLM Protests Kevin Hart's Roast Because There Was a George...
From Medicare for All to Free Primary Care for All: Why Dems Keep...
Norm Would Be So Proud: NBC News Worries About the 'Backlash' After Chinese...
'Drag Them'! Eric Trump Intends to Sue MS NOW and Jen Psaki for...
Obama Bro Ben 'Hamas' Rhodes Wonders Why Jews Are Mad About the 'Rape...
Big Apple First Lady’s Sour Playlist: 'Hungry But Sexy for Palestine' Loaded With...
Let's All Celebrate the 2-Year Anniversary of the Most Ill-Advised Debate Dare of...
From Our Singed, Smoked Hands! Nithya Raman Wants to Ban Backyard BBQs in...
Treacherous RAT: James Woods Putting John Thune on BLAST Over the SAVE Act...
'Promises Made, Promises BROKEN': Intl. Association of Fire Fighters Just Ripped Spanberge...
Trump Strong Arms Traitors to Their Faces
Think Fairfax DA Descano's Testimony Was Bad? You Ain't Seen NOTHIN' Yet: Check...
WATCH How Fairfax Co Prosecutor Warned About Mother-Murdering Illegal REACTS When Pressed...
'Beyond Parody': Jen Psaki Finds It Very Problematic That Trump's Son Accompanied Him...
FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT! Unhinged Loon Who Literally Owes His Win to Abigail Spanberger...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement