Thumbnails From Hell: A New Level of Cringe Revealed - The Awful 'Art'...
Twitchy Celebrates America 250
Party Panic: Donny Deutsch Says GOP Will Paint ALL Dems as Socialists and...
FactPost: Trump Admin Planning to Cut Down DC's Oldest Cherry Tree to Make...
Alexandria, VA Promotes Snitch Line for Sparklers This Fourth; Dearborn Announces 'Zero To...
Smoke Scream: Washington Post 'Scoop' That Trumps Fireworks on July 4 Is 'Very...
WNBA's Alyssa Thomas Says People Are Calling Her a Thug for Throat-Punching Caitlin...
Bill Kristol Thinks the Dem Establishment Can Learn a Lesson from Socialist Upset...
Zohran Mamdani to Deliver ‘Major Address’ Marking America’s 250th With Newly Naturalized C...
Fundraiser Started for USAF Major Arrested for ‘Heroic Act of Civil Disobedience’ on...
AP Lets Everybody Know the Danger Their Journos Are Facing to Cover Taylor...
Heavily Armed Would-Be Trans Terrorist Arrested for Planning Mass Shooting; Check out This...
Bernie Sanders Picked a Heck of a Week to Ramp Up His 'Solar...
Not Just New York: 15-Term Colorado Incumbent Loses to Democratic Socialist From Ethiopia
This Was All Trump Needed. They're Gonna Regret It.

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement