Taylor Lorenz: Queen of Cancel Culture & Leopards Eating Faces Party Founder Discovers...
Lunatic District Attorney Vows to 'Blow Up' White House Ballroom
Dana Loesch’s Bold Fix: Stuff Near-80 Icons in Giant Koozies Before We Lose...
Chris Murphy Finally Remembers the State He's Supposed to Represent (Just Not the...
Mike Rogers Nukes Abdul El-Sayed's Attempt to Distance Himself From yet ANOTHER Issue
Can't Help but Notice What Abdul El-Sayed Does NOT Do When Responding to...
Dem Rep. Debbie Dingell Tells Wolf Blitzer She's Tired of People Asking Her...
Sean Parnell Makes a Pledge to Gold Star Families on the Fifth Anniversary...
Hillary Clinton Welcomes Dem 'Experiment' to See If Unhinged Socialists Can Help Win...
DEM-Olition Man: Philly DA Larry Krasner Wants to Blow Up the White House...
Victor Davis Hanson: Schumer and Jeffries Lost Control of Dem Party, Talarico Makes...
Jessica Tarlov: Abdul El-Sayed ‘Seemed Like a Bro’ From U of M, Not...
ABC News Interviews Alex Pretti’s Grieving Family, Who Want Accountability
Variety Thinks Rosie O'Donnell Should Shatter Comedy's Glass Ceiling With Her Own Show
Active Duty USAF Major Who Called for Trump’s Impeachment on Capitol Steps Charged...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement