Guy Wearing DSA Pin Fist-Bumps Woman in ‘Hot Girls for Zohran’ Shirt
Psycho Woman Finds a Way to Paint Lindsay Clancy's Husband As a Suspect...
A Family Benefit That Rewards Marriage, Motherhood, and Citizenship
Lindsay Clancy Defense Attorney ‘So Proud’ of Jury Foreperson for Identifying Holdout Juro...
WaPo: County Coroner Confirms First Infant Death From Measles in Amish County; Shapiro...
WaPo: USS Abraham Lincoln's Stop in Thailand Was Pervaded With a Sense of...
He Did It on Purpose: NYC Mayor Mamdani Hands 9/11 Pen to Al-Qaeda...
Documentary to Examine If Elon Musk Used 'Space Lasers' to Rig the 2024...
VA Dem Party Official Imprisoned for Child Sexual Abuse Material Kept Some High-Profile...
Monster Mash?: Creature Feature Fans React to Godzilla/King Kong Film Hiring ‘Intimacy Coo...
Lay Off of Wajahat Ali, Who Is ‘Just a Small-Time Podcast Host Who...
Team Newsom Would Like Us to Believe Gavin's 'Huge' Crowd in SC Is...
Joy Reid Launches Rehab Tour for Wajahat Ali and Guest Who Called Hakeem...
'Just Perfect'! Guess Where James Talarico Is Taking His 'Grassroots' Campaign to Rake...
Fans Paid a Fortune for Ed Sheeran ... Got Macklemore’s Unsolicited Free Palestine...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement