Scott Wiener Asks Who Would Campaign by Demonizing Children Who Just Want to...
WaPo: Pentagon Moving to Recruit Hundreds of Troops to Be Spectators at White...
New Yorker: In Nation of MAGA Hats, ‘Patriotism Just Isn’t Cool Anymore’
CBS News: Jill Biden Supported Hunter’s Pardon Because She Didn’t Want Him in...
Scar Issue: Dems ‘Forget’ Biden's Post-Op Topless Trans Activists at WH While Blasting...
DHS Secretary Ratioed for Thanking NJ Governor for Her Cooperation in Restoring Law...
Atlantic Drops 'Do Better Than Platner' Bomb as Shipwreckedcrew Warns: DNC Prepping Anothe...
Rioters Dismantle the ‘First Amendment Barriers’ Set Up by New Jersey State Police
Dem Senate Hopeful Graham Platner’s Wife Flagged His Sexually Explicit Texts With Other...
The Bulwark's Tim Miller Asks for More Posts About James Talarico's Hot Vegan...
Here's a Hilarious Detail About Who Runs the 'Nonpartisan' Texas Polling Firm Showing...
Left Loses it Over Hegseth Wife Workout With Troops — Forgets Jill’s Cabinet...
David Axelrod Spots a 'Hilarious Turn of Events' in TX Senate Race (and...
Just Another Dem-Funded Riot: A Signal Message Exposed the Organized Machine Behind NJ...
CNN’s Smerconish Torches Graham Platner: '18 Years of Nazi Tattoo Was a Daily...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement