The DSA’s Destructive Platform Exposes the Ignorance of Dem Leaders’ ‘Big Tent Party’...
Defiant Gov. Mikie Sherrill Says Registered Illegal Alien Voters Are ‘Citizens of New...
Daughter of Turkish President Wants to Decolonize the West, Adopt Ideas From Islam...
Berlin Pride Killer Attended Three-Day Deradicalization Course Run by Progressive White Wo...
He Preened While Families Buried Their Dead: an Unfiltered Response to the Fauci...
Man Who Dislikes Concept of Capitalism Just Wants to Make Art and Be...
Gavin Newsom’s Ex-Mistress Admits She Wet the Bed on Their First Night Together
Rashida Tlaib Is Concerned About Whom Haley Stevens Accepts Money
NYT Shocked: ICE Enforces Visa Laws at Airports—Foreigners With Expired Papers Actually De...
Berlin’s Queer Commissioner Says Far-Right Will Seize on Muslim Pride Attack to Demonize...
'If I Had to Ramble for 8 Hours': Adam Hamawy Excuses Hasan Piker’s...
Texas Rep. Files American Dream and Promise Act to Extend TPS Protections for...
Inside the U.S. Capitol: The Christian Heritage Hidden in Plain Sight
Joe Biden's Ghostwriter Erased the Tapes After He Heard About Robert Hur's Investigation
AARP's John Hishta Reveals the Polling Data That Could Decide the Midterm Elections

Brit Hume dismisses as 'utter claptrap' professors' defense of safe spaces as 'incubators of new ideas'

As Twitchy reported last month, the University of Chicago’s dean of students scored big with a refreshing letter to incoming students, letting them know not to expect either safe spaces into which they could retreat or trigger warnings accompanying guest speakers.

Advertisement

Of course there was a backlash, with Jeet Heer aruging in The New Republic that the letter was an attack on academic freedom that would have a chilling effect on educators charged with shepherding today’s special snowflakes from high school to adulthood.

On Wednesday, The College Fix reported that more than 140 professors co-signed a letter in the campus newspaper defending safe spaces, and Fox News’ Brit Hume summed it up pretty well.

The educators defended safe spaces in their letter by tracing their history in “gay, civil rights, and feminist efforts of the mid-20th century” and called them “incubators of new ideas away from the censure of the very authorities threatened by these movements.”

Further, they noted that requests for safe spaces “often touch on substantive, ongoing issues of bias, intolerance, and trauma that affect our intellectual exchanges,” concluding, “We deplore any atmosphere of harassment and threat.”

That is a bunch of claptrap. So if, say, an assistant professor goes in search of muscle to prevent a reporter from covering a protest in a “media-free safe space,” who exactly is doing the threatening?

Advertisement

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement