Dem Elizabeth Warren’s Frequent Liar Pro-Graham Destroyed by Platner’s Political Career No...
Ebonics Is Back: Activists Pushing for Black English in Preschools to Boost California’s...
Report Lays Out the Leftist 'Ideological Capture' of the Smithsonian
Um, Never Mind: Graham Platner’s Thing Was Being ‘A Real Working-Class White Guy’
Bill Kristol Has Hot Take on Unarmed Family Man Shot by ICE While...
Breaking: Graham Platner Says He's Suspending Campaign Operations
Platner Campaign's 'Listen to Us' Survey Left Wide Open — Public Turns It...
Matt Stoller Digs In: ‘It’s Not a Nazi Tattoo and You Know That’
'We Were Sold a Character Arc': MSNOW Pundit Molly Jong-Fast Admits Media Bought...
John Fetterman Gives the WaPo a MUCH More Accurate Headline About Graham Platner's...
Amanda Litman Praises Michelle Goldberg’s Platner Apologia: ‘Everyone Made Mistakes Here’
Pundit Notes That GOP Isn’t Calling for Ken Paxton to Drop Out Despite...
Why This American Mom Chose Norway and Erling Haaland as Her New World...
Nick Searcy Spotted the Only Unforgivable Sin Cory Booker Isn't Willing to Overlook...
Ryan Grim, Drop Site News Report That Graham Platner's Victim Was Sort of...

Brit Hume dismisses as 'utter claptrap' professors' defense of safe spaces as 'incubators of new ideas'

As Twitchy reported last month, the University of Chicago’s dean of students scored big with a refreshing letter to incoming students, letting them know not to expect either safe spaces into which they could retreat or trigger warnings accompanying guest speakers.

Advertisement

Of course there was a backlash, with Jeet Heer aruging in The New Republic that the letter was an attack on academic freedom that would have a chilling effect on educators charged with shepherding today’s special snowflakes from high school to adulthood.

On Wednesday, The College Fix reported that more than 140 professors co-signed a letter in the campus newspaper defending safe spaces, and Fox News’ Brit Hume summed it up pretty well.

The educators defended safe spaces in their letter by tracing their history in “gay, civil rights, and feminist efforts of the mid-20th century” and called them “incubators of new ideas away from the censure of the very authorities threatened by these movements.”

Further, they noted that requests for safe spaces “often touch on substantive, ongoing issues of bias, intolerance, and trauma that affect our intellectual exchanges,” concluding, “We deplore any atmosphere of harassment and threat.”

That is a bunch of claptrap. So if, say, an assistant professor goes in search of muscle to prevent a reporter from covering a protest in a “media-free safe space,” who exactly is doing the threatening?

Advertisement

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement