UK City Council Launches Court Bid to Ban Union Jacks That ‘Intimidate Diverse...
You Got Nailed: Tom Hanks Drops a Funny on MS NOW's Ratings and...
Major Pakistani Donor to Zohran Mamdani & NYC Democrats Arrested in Massive $38M...
NBC News: Tiny Baseball Team Cancels Pride Night After Players Refuse to Wear...
Presidents (Minus Trump) Gather at Obama Library — Bush Suddenly Redeemed, Election Denier...
Deranged: Whoopi Wants Knicks to Visit White House for Slavery Reminder, Not Victory...
CNN: Trump Administration Plans to File at Least 250 Denaturalization Cases by October
Toot Suit Riot: Kevin Bacon Dons ‘Bean’ Blazer for Meatless Wednesdays, X Users...
Ben Rhodes Explains Difference Between Obama's Iran Deal and 'Whatever Trump Is Doing'
Democrats Swoon Over Ugandan-Born Socialist's Knicks Parade Speech, Immediately Demand He...
Poster Explains Bible Verses Are Overt Religious Symbols While Pride Hats Are Not
LA City Council Advances Proposal to Allow Non-Citizens to Vote in City Elections
Michelle Obama Calls 'Dreamers' the Soul of the Nation (RNC Research Reminds Us...
Commie Mayor’s Wife Skips Jeans for Pirate Hooker Designer Dress at City Hall...
CNN Releases Poll Showing Leftist, White, Millennial and Boomer Chicks Like Obama Best...

Brit Hume dismisses as 'utter claptrap' professors' defense of safe spaces as 'incubators of new ideas'

As Twitchy reported last month, the University of Chicago’s dean of students scored big with a refreshing letter to incoming students, letting them know not to expect either safe spaces into which they could retreat or trigger warnings accompanying guest speakers.

Advertisement

Of course there was a backlash, with Jeet Heer aruging in The New Republic that the letter was an attack on academic freedom that would have a chilling effect on educators charged with shepherding today’s special snowflakes from high school to adulthood.

On Wednesday, The College Fix reported that more than 140 professors co-signed a letter in the campus newspaper defending safe spaces, and Fox News’ Brit Hume summed it up pretty well.

The educators defended safe spaces in their letter by tracing their history in “gay, civil rights, and feminist efforts of the mid-20th century” and called them “incubators of new ideas away from the censure of the very authorities threatened by these movements.”

Further, they noted that requests for safe spaces “often touch on substantive, ongoing issues of bias, intolerance, and trauma that affect our intellectual exchanges,” concluding, “We deplore any atmosphere of harassment and threat.”

That is a bunch of claptrap. So if, say, an assistant professor goes in search of muscle to prevent a reporter from covering a protest in a “media-free safe space,” who exactly is doing the threatening?

Advertisement

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement