Is Trump's Golf Game Really Any Good? Now We Know - Trump and...
NYT: ‘Far Right’ Spreads Baseless Claims About Biden’s Whereabouts
CNN's Gen Z Correspondent Explains Ties Between Kamala Harris Campaign and ‘Brat Summer’
Congressman Introduces Articles of Impeachment Against Kamala Harris
FINALLY! Just Stop Oil Loons Are Facing Long Prison Sentences, and They Deserve...
Alyssa Milano Shares a Weird Picture Crying Over Kamala
A Real-Life Episode of 'Veep': Kamala Harris Cackles Her Way Into Wisconsin
Read This NYT Hagiography of Joe Biden From Two Days Before the Debate
Mayorkas, Wray Decline to Appear at Assassination Hearings
Ana Navarro's Political Car Chronicles Quickly Devolved into a Weird Kamala Fairy Tale
Jim Acosta: 'Irresponsible' for Trump to Say What Secret Service Admits (That They...
If You Like Your Plan, You Can Keep It (Not!): Kamala Harris Wanted...
Stochastic Terrorism Alert: After Assassination Attempt, Harris Ad Calls Trump 'Existentia...
‘Prepare Yourselves’: Kamala Harris Has ‘Got The One-Handed Egg Crack Down’
Chill, Keith! Olbermann LOSES IT Over Cardinals Using Trump's Fist Gesture, Deletes Post...

Brit Hume dismisses as 'utter claptrap' professors' defense of safe spaces as 'incubators of new ideas'

As Twitchy reported last month, the University of Chicago’s dean of students scored big with a refreshing letter to incoming students, letting them know not to expect either safe spaces into which they could retreat or trigger warnings accompanying guest speakers.

Advertisement

Of course there was a backlash, with Jeet Heer aruging in The New Republic that the letter was an attack on academic freedom that would have a chilling effect on educators charged with shepherding today’s special snowflakes from high school to adulthood.

On Wednesday, The College Fix reported that more than 140 professors co-signed a letter in the campus newspaper defending safe spaces, and Fox News’ Brit Hume summed it up pretty well.

The educators defended safe spaces in their letter by tracing their history in “gay, civil rights, and feminist efforts of the mid-20th century” and called them “incubators of new ideas away from the censure of the very authorities threatened by these movements.”

Further, they noted that requests for safe spaces “often touch on substantive, ongoing issues of bias, intolerance, and trauma that affect our intellectual exchanges,” concluding, “We deplore any atmosphere of harassment and threat.”

That is a bunch of claptrap. So if, say, an assistant professor goes in search of muscle to prevent a reporter from covering a protest in a “media-free safe space,” who exactly is doing the threatening?

Advertisement

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement