Uh Oh! Looks Like Eric Swalwell's Troubles Just Got Worse
People Are LOVING Laura Ingraham's SLAM on Abigail Spanberger After Illegal Murders Virgin...
Calif. Dem Comms Guy Gets Ratioed Into Orbit After Calling Nick Shirley a...
Rashida 'From the River to the Sea' Tlaib BIG MAD at Brutally Honest...
Scott Jennings' Biden Inflation Fact-Check So ENRAGES CNN Lefty He Sputters and Spittles...
Everybody's Letting Rep. Ro Khanna Know His 'Medicare for All' Pitch Sure Smells...
UK's Asylum Seeker 'Welcome Pack' Shows HOW DANGEROUS Islam Really Is, Especially to...
Mamdani's City-Run Grocery Store Dream Just Got Even MORE Insane (Ain't Socialism Grand!)
Shush TINY: Mike Rogers BODIES Abdul El-Sayed and His Sad Little Man Syndrome...
Making Her FAMOUS: TikTok Mom-ster Goes VIRAL for Tormenting Baby in Her Lap...
Erin Burnett and Maggie Haberman Continue to Struggle With the Idea of a...
Dem Abdul El-Sayed Panders to Black Voters by Claiming He’s African Since His...
Jessica Tarlov Says Vindman’s Defeat Signals End of Dem ‘Superheroes’ of Trump’s First...
Indecision 2028: Reporter Stumps Dem Gov. Gavin Newsom With ‘Would You Be a...
UK 'Asylum-Seekers' Being Handed Booklets Teaching Them That Women Are for More Than...

Judge who struck down D.C. gun regulations 'wasn't authorized to hear case'

Zoe Tillman of the National Law Journal reports that a federal appeals court today ruled that a New York federal judge should never have been assigned to a Washington, D.C., gun case, vacating his order that struck down certain District gun regulations as unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.

Advertisement

Earlier this year, U.S. District Judge Frederick Scullin Jr. handled the Palmer v. District of Columbia case, which challenged an earlier set of local gun laws that banned the public carrying of firearms. Scullin ruled the law unconstitutional. When Scullin was automatically assigned to a related case, challenging the requirement that individuals in the District show a “good reason” or “proper reason” for having the gun before they could get a license, the D.C. Office of the Attorney General argued that Scullin shouldn’t have heard the case and vacated his decision.

The case will go back to the district court for assignment to a new judge, Tillman reports.

Advertisement

WTOP reports that today’s ruling is just the latest in the District of Columbia’s long history of wrangling over gun rights:

A 2008 Supreme Court ruling struck down the city’s longstanding ban on handguns, and the city rewrote its gun law in response, allowing people to have handguns for self-defense in the home but not to carry them in public.

Residents and others sued over the new law. Scullin struck down the city’s ban on carrying handguns outside the home in 2014, and the city again rewrote its laws, allowing residents to carry guns but only if they have the required “good reason.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement