Ten ANTIFA Members Arrested and Charged With Attempted Murder in Ambush of ICE...
CNN’s Dana Bash Says It’s Harder for GOP to Politicize Deadly Texas Flooding...
Tom Homan Has Had Enough of the Left's Rhetoric After an Officer was...
TikToker Claims Video of Abandoned Still-Running Lawnmower Shows Illegal Aliens’ Fear of I...
Humble Hero: Coast Guard Swimmer Scott Ruskan Shares Spotlight with Kids Rescued from...
Wisconsin State Senator Gets Dragged Brutally After One of the Dumbest 2A...
Tik Toker Goes on Obscenity-Laced Rant, Says Texas Girls Died in Flood Because...
Democrats Have Created a Violent Monster They Can No Longer Control
Report: Hamas Has Put a Bounty on American Aid Workers and Demands a...
Ron DeSantis Has a Suggestion for Elon Musk That Could Have a MONUMENTAL...
Border Patrol Chief Gregory Bovino Has a Message for Karen Bass: 'Better Get...
MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough Can’t Directly Blame Trump for Deadly Texas Floods so He’s...
Thanks, Obama! Turns Out the 'Affordable Care Act' Made Healthcare MORE EXPENSIVE Than...
Karen Bass DEMANDS ICE Leave During Massive Raid in MacArthur Park (Spoiler: They...
Totally Warped Dem: Photoshopped Jogging Post by Hakeem Jeffries Shows How Bent He...

Judge who struck down D.C. gun regulations 'wasn't authorized to hear case'

Zoe Tillman of the National Law Journal reports that a federal appeals court today ruled that a New York federal judge should never have been assigned to a Washington, D.C., gun case, vacating his order that struck down certain District gun regulations as unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.

Advertisement

Earlier this year, U.S. District Judge Frederick Scullin Jr. handled the Palmer v. District of Columbia case, which challenged an earlier set of local gun laws that banned the public carrying of firearms. Scullin ruled the law unconstitutional. When Scullin was automatically assigned to a related case, challenging the requirement that individuals in the District show a “good reason” or “proper reason” for having the gun before they could get a license, the D.C. Office of the Attorney General argued that Scullin shouldn’t have heard the case and vacated his decision.

The case will go back to the district court for assignment to a new judge, Tillman reports.

Advertisement

WTOP reports that today’s ruling is just the latest in the District of Columbia’s long history of wrangling over gun rights:

A 2008 Supreme Court ruling struck down the city’s longstanding ban on handguns, and the city rewrote its gun law in response, allowing people to have handguns for self-defense in the home but not to carry them in public.

Residents and others sued over the new law. Scullin struck down the city’s ban on carrying handguns outside the home in 2014, and the city again rewrote its laws, allowing residents to carry guns but only if they have the required “good reason.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement