Disgusting: Julie Roginsky Goes Full Hitler on Bari Weiss
Dem Rep. Ted Lieu Suggests 'Best Way to Oppose Fake News' and We...
Marco Drops the Gloves! State Department Sanctions European Leaders Who Censor Free Speech
Compare Crime Stats From Last Year of Biden to First Year of Trump...
Going Lower: Eric Swalwell Politicizes a Former GOP Rival's Terrible Cancer Diagnosis
Politico's Even MORE Annoying European Bureau Claims the 'Far Right' Is 'Stealing' Christm...
The New Yorker Has a Lot of People Asking Why They Deleted This...
Slow News Day: The Hill Reports That Adam Kinzinger Cancels His Paramount Plus...
BURN! El Salvador Prez Makes Hillary Clinton an Offer She WILL Refuse Regarding...
We Thought Eric Swalwell Had Achieved Peak Cringe. We Were Wrong
Hunter Biden Says We Don't Want Immigrants That Are Coming Here Illegally
Man Warns MAGA That He's Not the Guy to Attack and Will Go...
Report: Trump Flew on Epstein’s Plane Once With a 20-Year-Old Woman
Hot Take: Kids Should Not Be in Church Until They're 18, Otherwise It's...
Judge Jeb Boasberg Orders Return of More Than 200 Illegal Aliens Deported to...

Judge who struck down D.C. gun regulations 'wasn't authorized to hear case'

Zoe Tillman of the National Law Journal reports that a federal appeals court today ruled that a New York federal judge should never have been assigned to a Washington, D.C., gun case, vacating his order that struck down certain District gun regulations as unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.

Advertisement

Earlier this year, U.S. District Judge Frederick Scullin Jr. handled the Palmer v. District of Columbia case, which challenged an earlier set of local gun laws that banned the public carrying of firearms. Scullin ruled the law unconstitutional. When Scullin was automatically assigned to a related case, challenging the requirement that individuals in the District show a “good reason” or “proper reason” for having the gun before they could get a license, the D.C. Office of the Attorney General argued that Scullin shouldn’t have heard the case and vacated his decision.

The case will go back to the district court for assignment to a new judge, Tillman reports.

Advertisement

WTOP reports that today’s ruling is just the latest in the District of Columbia’s long history of wrangling over gun rights:

A 2008 Supreme Court ruling struck down the city’s longstanding ban on handguns, and the city rewrote its gun law in response, allowing people to have handguns for self-defense in the home but not to carry them in public.

Residents and others sued over the new law. Scullin struck down the city’s ban on carrying handguns outside the home in 2014, and the city again rewrote its laws, allowing residents to carry guns but only if they have the required “good reason.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement