Mouthful of Madness: Canadian Pol Rattles Off Uber-Inclusive String of Letters, Numbers, a...
Bash and Burn: CNN Celebrates D.C. Magazine’s Glowing Profile of Its Third Place...
WaPo Columnist Makes the Case Against Muslim Assimilation
Full House Actress Reveals She Was Under Anesthesia During OJ Simpson Bronco Case...
Nuns Suing New York State Over Law Requiring Them to Affirm Gender Identity
Michael Moore Still Hates the USA: Praises Iran's 'Greatest Civilization' and Calls Americ...
Iryna Zarutska‘s Murderer Found 'Incapable to Proceed' With His State Trial
Denial Ain't Just a River In Egypt: Abi Spanberger Refuses to Accept Her...
Tucker Guest Seth Harp Burns Source Like an Amateur: Names Army Leaker in...
Harmeet K. Dhillon Trolls Troll Marc Elias (and Looks Fabulous Doing It)
Newsweek: New Poll Claims Over Half of Americans Want Congress to Impeach...
You Can’t Make This Up: Iowa 'Pastor' Sprints Full Speed From 'Is God...
Sen. Schumer's 'Military Moron' Swipe at Trump Accidentally Kicks Biden (AND Chuck) Right...
Impeachment Inquiry Leader Rep. Dan Goldman Says Impeachment Doesn't Cut It Anymore
Lawrence O'Donnell Says This ONE Thing Trump Did Is Why 25A Exists (and...

Latest 'liberal media conspiracy theory' doesn't quite match definition of theory

Earlier today, Politico’s Glenn Thrush dismissed a series of emails between then-Hillary Clinton aide Philippe Reines and Politico White House correspondent Mike Allen as “tradecraft” and nothing more. For those who missed the story, Gawker had uncovered emails between Reines and Allen negotiating an interview with Chelsea Clinton, with Allen appearing to guarantee Reines that he would produce “totally positive coverage” of his subject in exchange for her availability.

Advertisement

The Washington Post’s Chris Cillizza then appeared to back up Thrush, citing a piece by Callum Borchers in the Post today dismissing Gawker’s interpretation of the emails:

One interpretation of Allen’s e-mail to Philippe Reines, the Clinton aide, goes something like this: Hey, I’m looking for just a few minutes with Chelsea during an important time for her mom. This isn’t a probing, “60 Minutes”-style sit-down, so don’t worry about fielding anything out of left field.

Not so bad, right?

But the Republican translation will likely go more like this: What can I do to make Chelsea look good because, as we all know, I and my Web site (and most of the media) live to serve the royal family of the Democratic Party.

That indeed is an alternative interpretation; however, it completely ignores the very cozy relationship between Reines and CNN’s Elisa Labott, documented in detail last night by American Commitment president Phil Kerpen. Emails show Reines “suggesting” pro-Hillary tweets which then appeared nearly verbatim on Labott’s Twitter feed as news items. This coordination happened more than a few times. Just a conspiracy theory?

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/RobProvince/status/669576368523489280

https://twitter.com/EF517_V2/status/669582816380874754

https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/669583592809336832

“Republican White House hopefuls sometimes go looking for bias where it’s not obvious, or nonexistent,” Borchers concludes.”But, in this case, they won’t have to look very hard. This time, Politico made their job easy.”

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/JayCaruso/status/669580907561529345

https://twitter.com/MoonbatCatnip/status/669583721356328960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement