HOOBOY: Jessica Tarlov Learns the HARD WAY You Don't Mess With Texas Trying...
Joe Scarborough's SAVE America Act Fit Was Hard to Watch
WOW: Newly Released CIA Docs Show the Biden Administration Declared WAR on Motherhood...
So... Extradition? Republic of Somaliland Drops Some CRAZY-DAMNING Receipts About Ilhan Om...
Judging From This Cover The Economist Is Trying to Sell Subscriptions to the...
Ric Grenell Posts the PERFECT 2-Word DIG at Dems Throwing Hissy Fit and...
Dogged House Dems Had Another Chance to Prove How Much They Oppose Deportations...
Megyn Kelly Ditches the Last Shred of Sanity We Hoped She Had Left...
Here's a Shot/Chaser Starring Kathy Hochul Telling Certain New Yorkers to Get Out...
WOOF: Yale Prof Tim Snyder SCHOOLED on Basic Economics After He Claims 'Migrants...
Dem Sen. Warnock Makes an Accidental Pitch for the SAVE Act Before Claiming...
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy Has the Last Word About a Fresh Boondoggle in...
Joe Kent's Attempt to Use Charlie Kirk for Anti-Israel Argument DEBUNKED By Charlie...
RUH-ROH, RAGGY! Laura Ingraham Reports on the Possible REAL Reason Joe Kent Resigned
Hypocrisy Alert: Iranian Regime Bigwigs' Children Now Professors at Elite Unis Shaping Ame...

Latest 'liberal media conspiracy theory' doesn't quite match definition of theory

Earlier today, Politico’s Glenn Thrush dismissed a series of emails between then-Hillary Clinton aide Philippe Reines and Politico White House correspondent Mike Allen as “tradecraft” and nothing more. For those who missed the story, Gawker had uncovered emails between Reines and Allen negotiating an interview with Chelsea Clinton, with Allen appearing to guarantee Reines that he would produce “totally positive coverage” of his subject in exchange for her availability.

Advertisement

The Washington Post’s Chris Cillizza then appeared to back up Thrush, citing a piece by Callum Borchers in the Post today dismissing Gawker’s interpretation of the emails:

One interpretation of Allen’s e-mail to Philippe Reines, the Clinton aide, goes something like this: Hey, I’m looking for just a few minutes with Chelsea during an important time for her mom. This isn’t a probing, “60 Minutes”-style sit-down, so don’t worry about fielding anything out of left field.

Not so bad, right?

But the Republican translation will likely go more like this: What can I do to make Chelsea look good because, as we all know, I and my Web site (and most of the media) live to serve the royal family of the Democratic Party.

That indeed is an alternative interpretation; however, it completely ignores the very cozy relationship between Reines and CNN’s Elisa Labott, documented in detail last night by American Commitment president Phil Kerpen. Emails show Reines “suggesting” pro-Hillary tweets which then appeared nearly verbatim on Labott’s Twitter feed as news items. This coordination happened more than a few times. Just a conspiracy theory?

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/RobProvince/status/669576368523489280

https://twitter.com/EF517_V2/status/669582816380874754

https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/669583592809336832

“Republican White House hopefuls sometimes go looking for bias where it’s not obvious, or nonexistent,” Borchers concludes.”But, in this case, they won’t have to look very hard. This time, Politico made their job easy.”

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/JayCaruso/status/669580907561529345

https://twitter.com/MoonbatCatnip/status/669583721356328960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos