US Oil and Gas Assn. Notices They're a Useful Prop for Democrat Photo...
Free Stuff Isn't FREE? WHO KNEW?! Zohran Mamdani Reverses Course on Yet ANOTHER...
NBC News Baffled That Most Latinos Do Not Use The Term 'Latinx'
ABC News Reports This Inflation Update Is 'Defying Fears' (Stoked by Dems and...
WHOA. Bad Timing?! Pramila Jayapal Shares Her Shiny New Trans Bill of Rights...
Sen. Lisa Murkowski's SAVE Act Gaslighting (on STEROIDS!) Torched By the Most Perfect...
CNN's Abby Phillip Understands 'Tom Homan Has Been Big on This Lost Children...
HILARIOUS Thread of Champagne Socialist Mamdani Bro Throwing TANTRUMS Over Airline Injusti...
'He's a FRAUD': Meteorologist Takes Al Gore's FREAK-OUT Over Trump Admin Overturning Obama...
Lee Zeldin Reality Nukes Alarmist BS From Dems and Media After Trump Ended...
WATCH As Keith Ellison Suddenly Realizes He Just Told the TRUTH About Dems...
Fire and ICE: Authorities Look for Arsonist Seen Setting Kansas City Building Ablaze
CNN Buries the Lede Again: This Resignation Story Is No Different
CA State Sen. Scott Wiener Joins Elementary School Students in Anti-Ice Walkout
CBS News: As Pathways to Freedom Narrow, More Detainees Are Voluntarily Leaving the...

'He is Todd Akin': Will the media run with Bernie Sanders' expert scientific take on cervical cancer?

So, it turns out that Salon can recognize a “smiling, condescending hit job” when it sees one — at least when someone else has published it. Salon is not happy with the New York Times’ fourth of July profile of presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, which included tidbits like Sanders’ one-time belief that cervical cancer could be caused by “psychological factors such as unresolved hostility toward one’s mother, a tendency to bury aggression beneath a ‘facade of pleasantness’ and having too few orgasms.”

Advertisement

Todd Akin, the Missouri Republican who lost the 2012 Senate race against Claire McCaskill after making comments about the connection between pregnancy and “legitimate rape” on a local TV station, inspired groans and outrage on both the Left and Right, with many Republicans begging him to drop out of the race.

Salon, though, is ready and willing to defend Sanders’ comment. Sanders, it turns out, was quoting a published study: “if he quoted it, he didn’t write it,” Salon reasons. No, but he felt it deserved repeating, didn’t he? Akin, though making a terrible mistake doing it, was also paraphrasing the ’70s-era “science” that he was taught.

Anyone else want to give it a shot?

Advertisement

True, and the GOP urged Akin to drop out for the sake of the party. But if there is some expiration date on campaign smears, tell that to the New York Times and its investigation into Marco Rubio’s traffic citations in 1997 or the Washington Post’s research into “troubling incidents” from Mitt Romney’s prep school days in 1965. But let’s get back to Sanders.

https://twitter.com/EmailMagician/status/618128075826573316

https://twitter.com/MeganLorraineG/status/618126586290831360

https://twitter.com/RealJLord/status/618126832337068032

Advertisement

Agreed. There is plenty of fresh material that makes socialist Sanders a terrible choice for president. We wholly encourage the New York Times to quit digging around in ’90s traffic records and concentrate on what the candidates say (or which reporters they tie off with rope) today.

* * *

Related:

‘Pretend Todd Akin said this’: Where’s media outrage over Bernie Sanders’ pervy old essay?

 

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos