Stephen Colbert Caught As Fake Censorship Stunt Blows Up
HOOBOY, This Was DUMB: James Talarico BUSTED Telling WHOPPER of an FCC Lie...
And Here We GO! Harmeet K. Dhillon Shares Her New, Shiny List of...
See if You Can Tell the Exact MOMENT Hillary Knows She's Been Caught...
AOC Can't Wait to Add Her Two Cents to the Muslim Anti-Dog Debate...
Dog-Hating Palestinian Activist Tries Walking Her Dog-Hating Comments BACK but X Ain't Hav...
LEGENDARY Community Note Makes Whiny Gavin Newsom Playing Ted Cruz's VICTIM Even Funnier...
Ricky Gervais Subtweets Dog-Hating Palestinian Activist As Only HE Can and It's Hilarious...
James Woods Just Needs One TEENY-TINY Word to Trigger the Ever-Loving EFF Out...
‘Do Not Wonder Why We Go BERSERK’: More on the Transgender Hockey Shooter’s...
'Clean Up, Aisle Sandy!' AOC Faceplants BIG TIME on World Stage, Sprints to...
Eric Swalwell Gives Us Three Words We NEVER Wanted to Hear: Secret ......
Jesse Jackson Passes at 84
Gavin Newsom Gets TORCHED for Playing Victim After Ted Cruz's Jab ('Victimhood Self-Own'...
DEVELOPING: Robert Dorgan a.k.a. ‘Roberta Esposito’ Shoots Six at a Youth Hockey Game...

'He is Todd Akin': Will the media run with Bernie Sanders' expert scientific take on cervical cancer?

So, it turns out that Salon can recognize a “smiling, condescending hit job” when it sees one — at least when someone else has published it. Salon is not happy with the New York Times’ fourth of July profile of presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, which included tidbits like Sanders’ one-time belief that cervical cancer could be caused by “psychological factors such as unresolved hostility toward one’s mother, a tendency to bury aggression beneath a ‘facade of pleasantness’ and having too few orgasms.”

Advertisement

Todd Akin, the Missouri Republican who lost the 2012 Senate race against Claire McCaskill after making comments about the connection between pregnancy and “legitimate rape” on a local TV station, inspired groans and outrage on both the Left and Right, with many Republicans begging him to drop out of the race.

Salon, though, is ready and willing to defend Sanders’ comment. Sanders, it turns out, was quoting a published study: “if he quoted it, he didn’t write it,” Salon reasons. No, but he felt it deserved repeating, didn’t he? Akin, though making a terrible mistake doing it, was also paraphrasing the ’70s-era “science” that he was taught.

Anyone else want to give it a shot?

Advertisement

True, and the GOP urged Akin to drop out for the sake of the party. But if there is some expiration date on campaign smears, tell that to the New York Times and its investigation into Marco Rubio’s traffic citations in 1997 or the Washington Post’s research into “troubling incidents” from Mitt Romney’s prep school days in 1965. But let’s get back to Sanders.

https://twitter.com/EmailMagician/status/618128075826573316

https://twitter.com/MeganLorraineG/status/618126586290831360

https://twitter.com/RealJLord/status/618126832337068032

Advertisement

Agreed. There is plenty of fresh material that makes socialist Sanders a terrible choice for president. We wholly encourage the New York Times to quit digging around in ’90s traffic records and concentrate on what the candidates say (or which reporters they tie off with rope) today.

* * *

Related:

‘Pretend Todd Akin said this’: Where’s media outrage over Bernie Sanders’ pervy old essay?

 

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos