Here's How the NY Times Framed Mayor Mamdani's Answer About His Wife Liking...
John Fetterman Has a Question for Dems Who Now Condemn What Once Was...
President Trump Demands Surrender From Ayatollahs
Bill Maher Quotes 'the Administration,' Adam Schiff Thinks He's Talking About Trump, Backf...
Funeral Derangements: Joe Biden Tells Mostly Black Mourning Crowd That He’s Smarter Than...
Man of Fake: Preachy Dem Senate Candidate James Talarico Says That Jesus Is...
YOU DON'T QUESTION GERALD: The Dolphin Apocalypse is Upon Us! ...Or This Dude...
Illegal Immigrant Nashville Reporter Nabbed by ICE in Targeted Operation – Visa...
Dem Candidate Graham Platner's Fresh Red Flag: Brags About Wrestling (and Beating?) High...
Quick Verdict: Asif Merchant Found GUILTY on All Counts in Iran-Ordered Plot to...
ABC News Earns Ratio of the Day for Effort to Turn Sinking of...
Semafor Platforms Hasan Piker: Mainstream Media's Chat with the Left's Dog-Shocking, Jew-H...
The Face of Dems? Jennifer Welch's Haggard, Vulgar GLAAD Tirade Proves the Party...
Polyamory Isn't Liberation—It's Lindy West's Public Humiliation Ritual to Convince You Mon...
Time to Fight for Marriage, Children, and the Backbone of Society

'He is Todd Akin': Will the media run with Bernie Sanders' expert scientific take on cervical cancer?

So, it turns out that Salon can recognize a “smiling, condescending hit job” when it sees one — at least when someone else has published it. Salon is not happy with the New York Times’ fourth of July profile of presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, which included tidbits like Sanders’ one-time belief that cervical cancer could be caused by “psychological factors such as unresolved hostility toward one’s mother, a tendency to bury aggression beneath a ‘facade of pleasantness’ and having too few orgasms.”

Advertisement

Todd Akin, the Missouri Republican who lost the 2012 Senate race against Claire McCaskill after making comments about the connection between pregnancy and “legitimate rape” on a local TV station, inspired groans and outrage on both the Left and Right, with many Republicans begging him to drop out of the race.

Salon, though, is ready and willing to defend Sanders’ comment. Sanders, it turns out, was quoting a published study: “if he quoted it, he didn’t write it,” Salon reasons. No, but he felt it deserved repeating, didn’t he? Akin, though making a terrible mistake doing it, was also paraphrasing the ’70s-era “science” that he was taught.

Anyone else want to give it a shot?

Advertisement

True, and the GOP urged Akin to drop out for the sake of the party. But if there is some expiration date on campaign smears, tell that to the New York Times and its investigation into Marco Rubio’s traffic citations in 1997 or the Washington Post’s research into “troubling incidents” from Mitt Romney’s prep school days in 1965. But let’s get back to Sanders.

https://twitter.com/EmailMagician/status/618128075826573316

https://twitter.com/MeganLorraineG/status/618126586290831360

https://twitter.com/RealJLord/status/618126832337068032

Advertisement

Agreed. There is plenty of fresh material that makes socialist Sanders a terrible choice for president. We wholly encourage the New York Times to quit digging around in ’90s traffic records and concentrate on what the candidates say (or which reporters they tie off with rope) today.

* * *

Related:

‘Pretend Todd Akin said this’: Where’s media outrage over Bernie Sanders’ pervy old essay?

 

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement