Monday Morning Meme Madness
Divide and Ruhle: MS NOW Host Rejects That Viewers Know What They’ll Get...
Dem Seth Moulton: Trump Will Start Blasting Americans Like He’s Blowing Up Foreign...
Dem Mark Kelly Backtracks on ‘Illegal Orders’ - Doesn’t Want to ‘Prejudge’ Drug...
NYT’s Pulitzer-Worthy Timing: Biden Border Catastrophe Revealed Safely After He’s Gone
The Diddy Documentary Is Brutal – Then You Meet the Daft Juror and...
Real Americans, Real Jobs, Real Results – Deportation Wave Hits Louisiana and Phones...
Utah’s ‘Republican’ Senator Wants You Hugging Immigrants Every Morning—No, Thank You
Tammy Duckworth Accuses Pete Hegseth of Murder & War Crimes… Then Admits She...
Per Scott Rasmussen, Voters Hold Blended Opinions of Socialism and Capitalism
'We Should All Be Alarmed': Bill Kristol and GOP Senators Are on Different...
Former DEA Deputy Chief Charged With Narcoterrorism in Cartel Money Laundering Scheme
Scott Jennings SO Drops the MIC on Axios for WHINING About the Right...
AWKWARD: Patty Murray BRUTALLY 'Introduced' to Illegal She's Been Defending and Fighting f...
THIS! JD Vance's Response When Asked Why He's Being SO CRUEL to Illegal...

'He is Todd Akin': Will the media run with Bernie Sanders' expert scientific take on cervical cancer?

So, it turns out that Salon can recognize a “smiling, condescending hit job” when it sees one — at least when someone else has published it. Salon is not happy with the New York Times’ fourth of July profile of presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, which included tidbits like Sanders’ one-time belief that cervical cancer could be caused by “psychological factors such as unresolved hostility toward one’s mother, a tendency to bury aggression beneath a ‘facade of pleasantness’ and having too few orgasms.”

Advertisement

Todd Akin, the Missouri Republican who lost the 2012 Senate race against Claire McCaskill after making comments about the connection between pregnancy and “legitimate rape” on a local TV station, inspired groans and outrage on both the Left and Right, with many Republicans begging him to drop out of the race.

Salon, though, is ready and willing to defend Sanders’ comment. Sanders, it turns out, was quoting a published study: “if he quoted it, he didn’t write it,” Salon reasons. No, but he felt it deserved repeating, didn’t he? Akin, though making a terrible mistake doing it, was also paraphrasing the ’70s-era “science” that he was taught.

Anyone else want to give it a shot?

Advertisement

True, and the GOP urged Akin to drop out for the sake of the party. But if there is some expiration date on campaign smears, tell that to the New York Times and its investigation into Marco Rubio’s traffic citations in 1997 or the Washington Post’s research into “troubling incidents” from Mitt Romney’s prep school days in 1965. But let’s get back to Sanders.

https://twitter.com/EmailMagician/status/618128075826573316

https://twitter.com/MeganLorraineG/status/618126586290831360

https://twitter.com/RealJLord/status/618126832337068032

Advertisement

Agreed. There is plenty of fresh material that makes socialist Sanders a terrible choice for president. We wholly encourage the New York Times to quit digging around in ’90s traffic records and concentrate on what the candidates say (or which reporters they tie off with rope) today.

* * *

Related:

‘Pretend Todd Akin said this’: Where’s media outrage over Bernie Sanders’ pervy old essay?

 

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement