Gold Medal in Hockey, But Zero Apologies for Triggering John Pavlovitz
Bloomberg Contributor's Silver Medal Virtue Signal Gets Absolutely Torched by Americans
Judge Rules That ICE Agents Violate the Fourth Amendment by Making Arrests While...
US Women's Hockey Team Offered 'Real Celebration' in Las Vegas by Famous Feminist...
Democrats Pounce: NPR Reports the DOJ Hid Epstein Files of Trump Sexually Abusing...
Lefties RAGE at Governor Abigail Spanberger for Giving Democrats' SOTU Rebuttal From Slave...
Designated Survivor: The New Ultimate Excuse for Skipping Anything – Thanks, Rep. Thompson
OOF! X Ratios TF Out of Miles Taylor for Trying to Taunt Trump...
Don't Miss Our MASSIVE State of the Union VIP Sale
Trans-Flag Flying Lefty Melts DOWN in Weepy Blog Because Hockey Is MANLY and...
Will Trump Defend the American Dream During His State of the Union Speech?
Mama Hughes Owns the Ice—and the Narrative: 'It's Just About the Country' as...
Jessica Tarlov Rages As USA Men's Hockey Shuts Down Trump-Hating Liberals
Something UNBELIEVABLE Is Happening To NYC Cops Under Mayor Mamdani
OOPSIE! Gavin Newsom's Comms Troll ACCIDENTALLY Gives Away How Catastrophic His Racist Flu...

'He is Todd Akin': Will the media run with Bernie Sanders' expert scientific take on cervical cancer?

So, it turns out that Salon can recognize a “smiling, condescending hit job” when it sees one — at least when someone else has published it. Salon is not happy with the New York Times’ fourth of July profile of presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, which included tidbits like Sanders’ one-time belief that cervical cancer could be caused by “psychological factors such as unresolved hostility toward one’s mother, a tendency to bury aggression beneath a ‘facade of pleasantness’ and having too few orgasms.”

Advertisement

Todd Akin, the Missouri Republican who lost the 2012 Senate race against Claire McCaskill after making comments about the connection between pregnancy and “legitimate rape” on a local TV station, inspired groans and outrage on both the Left and Right, with many Republicans begging him to drop out of the race.

Salon, though, is ready and willing to defend Sanders’ comment. Sanders, it turns out, was quoting a published study: “if he quoted it, he didn’t write it,” Salon reasons. No, but he felt it deserved repeating, didn’t he? Akin, though making a terrible mistake doing it, was also paraphrasing the ’70s-era “science” that he was taught.

Anyone else want to give it a shot?

Advertisement

True, and the GOP urged Akin to drop out for the sake of the party. But if there is some expiration date on campaign smears, tell that to the New York Times and its investigation into Marco Rubio’s traffic citations in 1997 or the Washington Post’s research into “troubling incidents” from Mitt Romney’s prep school days in 1965. But let’s get back to Sanders.

https://twitter.com/EmailMagician/status/618128075826573316

https://twitter.com/MeganLorraineG/status/618126586290831360

https://twitter.com/RealJLord/status/618126832337068032

Advertisement

Agreed. There is plenty of fresh material that makes socialist Sanders a terrible choice for president. We wholly encourage the New York Times to quit digging around in ’90s traffic records and concentrate on what the candidates say (or which reporters they tie off with rope) today.

* * *

Related:

‘Pretend Todd Akin said this’: Where’s media outrage over Bernie Sanders’ pervy old essay?

 

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement