Let's Go Back Exactly 6 Years to When Health 'Experts' Decided to Torch...
Leftist YouTuber Adam Mockler Demands Ben Shapiro Be Sued for the 'Crime' of...
MSNOW Cuts Feed in Panic as Spencer Pratt Supporters Drop Unfiltered Truth Bombs
Dems Lecturing About Standards of Conduct Shift Into Stammer Overdrive When Asked About...
Terry Moran Crashes Out Defending Scott Pelley ... Demands Martyrdom for the Idiot...
Katie Porter's Campaign Gets Mashed — Stuck in Single Digits in a Brutal...
Nazi Platner Flees DC Fundraisers, Blames Big Bad Media at Family Home (After...
Scott Pelley's Departing Statement Contains the Most Cringe-Inducing Quote Ever From a Lib...
NJ Dems Just Chose an Al-Qaeda Volunteer Who Testified for the WTC Bomber...
A Glance at the People Most Upset CBS News Canned Scott Pelley Speaks...
Ripple Defect: Brian Stelter Says Scott Pelley’s CBS News Firing Is Like an...
Time’s Up: CBS News Fires Insubordinate Scott Pelley After Clash With New ‘60...
'Minor Crimes' Doing a Lot of Heavy Lifting to Defend Protests in Wired...
Antifa Members Disrupt Council Meeting That Declared Them Terrorists, Act Like Terrorists
Senate Candidate Alexander Vindman’s Aides Shield Him From Questions About Graham Platner

'He is Todd Akin': Will the media run with Bernie Sanders' expert scientific take on cervical cancer?

So, it turns out that Salon can recognize a “smiling, condescending hit job” when it sees one — at least when someone else has published it. Salon is not happy with the New York Times’ fourth of July profile of presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, which included tidbits like Sanders’ one-time belief that cervical cancer could be caused by “psychological factors such as unresolved hostility toward one’s mother, a tendency to bury aggression beneath a ‘facade of pleasantness’ and having too few orgasms.”

Advertisement

Todd Akin, the Missouri Republican who lost the 2012 Senate race against Claire McCaskill after making comments about the connection between pregnancy and “legitimate rape” on a local TV station, inspired groans and outrage on both the Left and Right, with many Republicans begging him to drop out of the race.

Salon, though, is ready and willing to defend Sanders’ comment. Sanders, it turns out, was quoting a published study: “if he quoted it, he didn’t write it,” Salon reasons. No, but he felt it deserved repeating, didn’t he? Akin, though making a terrible mistake doing it, was also paraphrasing the ’70s-era “science” that he was taught.

Anyone else want to give it a shot?

Advertisement

True, and the GOP urged Akin to drop out for the sake of the party. But if there is some expiration date on campaign smears, tell that to the New York Times and its investigation into Marco Rubio’s traffic citations in 1997 or the Washington Post’s research into “troubling incidents” from Mitt Romney’s prep school days in 1965. But let’s get back to Sanders.

https://twitter.com/EmailMagician/status/618128075826573316

https://twitter.com/MeganLorraineG/status/618126586290831360

https://twitter.com/RealJLord/status/618126832337068032

Advertisement

Agreed. There is plenty of fresh material that makes socialist Sanders a terrible choice for president. We wholly encourage the New York Times to quit digging around in ’90s traffic records and concentrate on what the candidates say (or which reporters they tie off with rope) today.

* * *

Related:

‘Pretend Todd Akin said this’: Where’s media outrage over Bernie Sanders’ pervy old essay?

 

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement