Make It Make SENSE: Iranian Television Aired THIS Tucker Carlson Segment As Pro-Iranian...
The Black Robed Regiment How Pastors Led the Fight for American Independence
HOOBOY: Jessica Tarlov Learns the HARD WAY You Don't Mess With Texas Trying...
Joe Scarborough's SAVE America Act Fit Was Hard to Watch
WOW: Newly Released CIA Docs Show the Biden Administration Declared WAR on Motherhood...
So... Extradition? Republic of Somaliland Drops Some CRAZY-DAMNING Receipts About Ilhan Om...
Judging From This Cover The Economist Is Trying to Sell Subscriptions to the...
Ric Grenell Posts the PERFECT 2-Word DIG at Dems Throwing Hissy Fit and...
Dogged House Dems Had Another Chance to Prove How Much They Oppose Deportations...
Megyn Kelly Ditches the Last Shred of Sanity We Hoped She Had Left...
Here's a Shot/Chaser Starring Kathy Hochul Telling Certain New Yorkers to Get Out...
WOOF: Yale Prof Tim Snyder SCHOOLED on Basic Economics After He Claims 'Migrants...
Dem Sen. Warnock Makes an Accidental Pitch for the SAVE Act Before Claiming...
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy Has the Last Word About a Fresh Boondoggle in...
Joe Kent's Attempt to Use Charlie Kirk for Anti-Israel Argument DEBUNKED By Charlie...

'He is Todd Akin': Will the media run with Bernie Sanders' expert scientific take on cervical cancer?

So, it turns out that Salon can recognize a “smiling, condescending hit job” when it sees one — at least when someone else has published it. Salon is not happy with the New York Times’ fourth of July profile of presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, which included tidbits like Sanders’ one-time belief that cervical cancer could be caused by “psychological factors such as unresolved hostility toward one’s mother, a tendency to bury aggression beneath a ‘facade of pleasantness’ and having too few orgasms.”

Advertisement

Todd Akin, the Missouri Republican who lost the 2012 Senate race against Claire McCaskill after making comments about the connection between pregnancy and “legitimate rape” on a local TV station, inspired groans and outrage on both the Left and Right, with many Republicans begging him to drop out of the race.

Salon, though, is ready and willing to defend Sanders’ comment. Sanders, it turns out, was quoting a published study: “if he quoted it, he didn’t write it,” Salon reasons. No, but he felt it deserved repeating, didn’t he? Akin, though making a terrible mistake doing it, was also paraphrasing the ’70s-era “science” that he was taught.

Anyone else want to give it a shot?

Advertisement

True, and the GOP urged Akin to drop out for the sake of the party. But if there is some expiration date on campaign smears, tell that to the New York Times and its investigation into Marco Rubio’s traffic citations in 1997 or the Washington Post’s research into “troubling incidents” from Mitt Romney’s prep school days in 1965. But let’s get back to Sanders.

https://twitter.com/EmailMagician/status/618128075826573316

https://twitter.com/MeganLorraineG/status/618126586290831360

https://twitter.com/RealJLord/status/618126832337068032

Advertisement

Agreed. There is plenty of fresh material that makes socialist Sanders a terrible choice for president. We wholly encourage the New York Times to quit digging around in ’90s traffic records and concentrate on what the candidates say (or which reporters they tie off with rope) today.

* * *

Related:

‘Pretend Todd Akin said this’: Where’s media outrage over Bernie Sanders’ pervy old essay?

 

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos