Rejection Letter: Eric Swalwell’s Campaign and Congressional Staff Denounce Him in New Sta...
TPUSA Reporter Savanah Hernandez Assaulted at Anti-ICE Protest
Graham Platner: I Came Out of a ‘Hyper-Masculine, Hyper-Violent Place’ When I Left...
Powerful: Blindfolded Women Perform Protest Dance Aimed at Trump and Epstein
Sen. Mike Lee Agrees It Might Be Time to Put James Carville in...
ICE Allegedly Detained and Deported Two Elementary School Children Without Due Process
13 Arrests, One Machete Rampage: 'Lucifer' Slashes Seniors on NYC Subway Platform
From Tiki Torch Hoax to Swalwell Exposé: Adam Parkhomenko's Wife Speaks Out
NPR's Podcast on Race Does an Episode on 'Mar-a-Lago Face'
America Deserved 9/11 Meets ‘Some People Did Some Things’ – Hasan Piker &...
Martina Navratilova Wants to Know Why the Airman Rescued in Iran Isn't All...
Recycling Raskin: Democrats Demand Trump Undergo Yet Another Cognitive Test in 25th Amendm...
NYT: Trump Shares Video of Graphic Attack and Rails Against Haitians
Four Women Accuse Eric Swalwell, Rep. Luna Moves to Expel Him — Bulwark's...
Activists Line the Fencing at ICE Detention Center in Minnesota With Dildos

'He is Todd Akin': Will the media run with Bernie Sanders' expert scientific take on cervical cancer?

So, it turns out that Salon can recognize a “smiling, condescending hit job” when it sees one — at least when someone else has published it. Salon is not happy with the New York Times’ fourth of July profile of presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, which included tidbits like Sanders’ one-time belief that cervical cancer could be caused by “psychological factors such as unresolved hostility toward one’s mother, a tendency to bury aggression beneath a ‘facade of pleasantness’ and having too few orgasms.”

Advertisement

Todd Akin, the Missouri Republican who lost the 2012 Senate race against Claire McCaskill after making comments about the connection between pregnancy and “legitimate rape” on a local TV station, inspired groans and outrage on both the Left and Right, with many Republicans begging him to drop out of the race.

Salon, though, is ready and willing to defend Sanders’ comment. Sanders, it turns out, was quoting a published study: “if he quoted it, he didn’t write it,” Salon reasons. No, but he felt it deserved repeating, didn’t he? Akin, though making a terrible mistake doing it, was also paraphrasing the ’70s-era “science” that he was taught.

Anyone else want to give it a shot?

Advertisement

True, and the GOP urged Akin to drop out for the sake of the party. But if there is some expiration date on campaign smears, tell that to the New York Times and its investigation into Marco Rubio’s traffic citations in 1997 or the Washington Post’s research into “troubling incidents” from Mitt Romney’s prep school days in 1965. But let’s get back to Sanders.

https://twitter.com/EmailMagician/status/618128075826573316

https://twitter.com/MeganLorraineG/status/618126586290831360

https://twitter.com/RealJLord/status/618126832337068032

Advertisement

Agreed. There is plenty of fresh material that makes socialist Sanders a terrible choice for president. We wholly encourage the New York Times to quit digging around in ’90s traffic records and concentrate on what the candidates say (or which reporters they tie off with rope) today.

* * *

Related:

‘Pretend Todd Akin said this’: Where’s media outrage over Bernie Sanders’ pervy old essay?

 

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement