CNN Releases Poll Showing Leftist, White, Millennial and Boomer Chicks Like Obama Best...
JD Vance Calling Out the Absolute COWARDICE in the Senate Over the SAVE...
The Obama Presidential Center's First Order of Business: Acknowledging Who the Land Was...
Something Incredible Happened After Trump Signed the MOU
Abigail Spanberger’s VA Governorship Is Already a Dumpster Fire of Petty Grievances and...
SNARKIER Than a Speeding Bullet! Dean Cain Reminds Susan Rice How LITTLE She...
Chris Murphy Demanded an End to Iran War, Now Claims Trump Surrendered (Farewell...
Oilfield Rando SHREDS John Thune Claiming Repubs Hate Trump With DAMNING Reminder of...
Does NOT Work Anymore: Brandon Gill Isn't ABOUT to Let Rep. Yassamin Ansari...
'What's the PROBLEM?' Maria Bartiromo DROPS Ro Khanna for Pushing SAVE Act Lies...
Newt Gingrich Absolutely DISMANTLES Jon Ossoff Point-by-Point on Every Issue in Brutal Pos...
Imagine What I Could Pay for by Confiscating the Wealth of These Musk...
'So GHEY': Scott Wiener Attacking Christian MLB Players for 'Defacing Their Pride Caps'...
Hunter Biden Pivots to a Career in Comedy by Telling Joe Rogan Why...
Amy Klobuchar Trying to Appeal to America First While TRASHING Trump Is Even...

'He is Todd Akin': Will the media run with Bernie Sanders' expert scientific take on cervical cancer?

So, it turns out that Salon can recognize a “smiling, condescending hit job” when it sees one — at least when someone else has published it. Salon is not happy with the New York Times’ fourth of July profile of presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, which included tidbits like Sanders’ one-time belief that cervical cancer could be caused by “psychological factors such as unresolved hostility toward one’s mother, a tendency to bury aggression beneath a ‘facade of pleasantness’ and having too few orgasms.”

Advertisement

Todd Akin, the Missouri Republican who lost the 2012 Senate race against Claire McCaskill after making comments about the connection between pregnancy and “legitimate rape” on a local TV station, inspired groans and outrage on both the Left and Right, with many Republicans begging him to drop out of the race.

Salon, though, is ready and willing to defend Sanders’ comment. Sanders, it turns out, was quoting a published study: “if he quoted it, he didn’t write it,” Salon reasons. No, but he felt it deserved repeating, didn’t he? Akin, though making a terrible mistake doing it, was also paraphrasing the ’70s-era “science” that he was taught.

Anyone else want to give it a shot?

Advertisement

True, and the GOP urged Akin to drop out for the sake of the party. But if there is some expiration date on campaign smears, tell that to the New York Times and its investigation into Marco Rubio’s traffic citations in 1997 or the Washington Post’s research into “troubling incidents” from Mitt Romney’s prep school days in 1965. But let’s get back to Sanders.

https://twitter.com/EmailMagician/status/618128075826573316

https://twitter.com/MeganLorraineG/status/618126586290831360

https://twitter.com/RealJLord/status/618126832337068032

Advertisement

Agreed. There is plenty of fresh material that makes socialist Sanders a terrible choice for president. We wholly encourage the New York Times to quit digging around in ’90s traffic records and concentrate on what the candidates say (or which reporters they tie off with rope) today.

* * *

Related:

‘Pretend Todd Akin said this’: Where’s media outrage over Bernie Sanders’ pervy old essay?

 

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement