James Talarico Has Met So Many Non-Christians Who Are More Christ-Like Than His...
NYT Updates Its 'Smoking Jars of Metal and Fuses' Headline in Wake of...
Revenge of the Radicalized Rich Kid: Bucks County Brat Bombs Protest, Flashes ISIS...
Aaron Rupar: Often a Liar, Now Just Oblivious to How Obama's 'Optimism' Turned...
David French Fanboying Over Abortion-Supporting, Trans-Loving 'CHRISTIAN' Dem James Talari...
No Wonder They're Seething: Teen Bomber's Family Lives Large in Luxury While He...
Mamdani Panics As Live NYC Press Conference Goes Horribly Wrong
EPIC Post Takes Gov. Abigail Spanberger's Big BRAG About Her First 50 Days...
Community Notes Drops Mother of ALL Truth Bombs on Rashida Tlaib and Her...
LOL! This NBC News Poll May Be the Single Most Hilariously DAMNING Poll...
The NYC Bombing Story the Media BURIED Before You Could See It
San Jose State Spartans Celebrates Women's International Day With GIRL POWER Post, Just...
Scott Jennings Uses Democrats' FAVORITE Talking Point to Stop, Drop, and ROLL Them...
'You Are REALLY Nasty': Greta Van Susteren Has Had ENOUGH of Adam Kinzinger...
Impotent, POS Commie Openly THREATENS Iran War Veterans and BOOM, Conservative X Takes...

'He is Todd Akin': Will the media run with Bernie Sanders' expert scientific take on cervical cancer?

So, it turns out that Salon can recognize a “smiling, condescending hit job” when it sees one — at least when someone else has published it. Salon is not happy with the New York Times’ fourth of July profile of presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, which included tidbits like Sanders’ one-time belief that cervical cancer could be caused by “psychological factors such as unresolved hostility toward one’s mother, a tendency to bury aggression beneath a ‘facade of pleasantness’ and having too few orgasms.”

Advertisement

Todd Akin, the Missouri Republican who lost the 2012 Senate race against Claire McCaskill after making comments about the connection between pregnancy and “legitimate rape” on a local TV station, inspired groans and outrage on both the Left and Right, with many Republicans begging him to drop out of the race.

Salon, though, is ready and willing to defend Sanders’ comment. Sanders, it turns out, was quoting a published study: “if he quoted it, he didn’t write it,” Salon reasons. No, but he felt it deserved repeating, didn’t he? Akin, though making a terrible mistake doing it, was also paraphrasing the ’70s-era “science” that he was taught.

Anyone else want to give it a shot?

Advertisement

True, and the GOP urged Akin to drop out for the sake of the party. But if there is some expiration date on campaign smears, tell that to the New York Times and its investigation into Marco Rubio’s traffic citations in 1997 or the Washington Post’s research into “troubling incidents” from Mitt Romney’s prep school days in 1965. But let’s get back to Sanders.

https://twitter.com/EmailMagician/status/618128075826573316

https://twitter.com/MeganLorraineG/status/618126586290831360

https://twitter.com/RealJLord/status/618126832337068032

Advertisement

Agreed. There is plenty of fresh material that makes socialist Sanders a terrible choice for president. We wholly encourage the New York Times to quit digging around in ’90s traffic records and concentrate on what the candidates say (or which reporters they tie off with rope) today.

* * *

Related:

‘Pretend Todd Akin said this’: Where’s media outrage over Bernie Sanders’ pervy old essay?

 

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement