UK Rag Says That Comedy Legend John Cleese Is Ruining His Legacy
Lord of the Rings Trilogy Has Many Elements That Are Difficult to Watch...
Venezuelan Deported to CECOT Last Year Suing the Trump Administration for $1.3 Million
WIN: Second Federal Appeals Court Rules ICE Is Required to Detain Most Deportees
AV Club Ruins Harry Potter Excitement by Whining About Rowling Funding 'Transphobic Causes...
'Pasty, White, Wannabe Cowboy' Markwayne Mullin Says He’s a Cherokee Like Elizabeth Warren
Bringing Death and Disease: Rep. Mary Miller Highlights Illegals with AIDS and TB...
Good: TSA Tipped Off ICE to Woman at Airport With Deportation Order
Dem Rep. Jason Crow Spills REAL Reason Schumer's Shutdown Continues (THIS Is Why...
Church of England Enthrones First Female Archbishop: Years of Tradition Overturned
Cringe: Governor Newsom Press Office Introduces the 'TrumpBot 3000'
Here's Springsteen Promoting US Tour Fighting Authoritarian Admin (While Trump Does NOTHIN...
AI Propaganda Video Shows Iran Hitting Baal-Headed Statue of Liberty With a Missile
What Would Patrick Henry Say to Chuck Schumer Today?
Bodega Bathroom Horror: Trans Illegal Gets Time-Served Deal for Raping a 14-Year-Old Boy

'He is Todd Akin': Will the media run with Bernie Sanders' expert scientific take on cervical cancer?

So, it turns out that Salon can recognize a “smiling, condescending hit job” when it sees one — at least when someone else has published it. Salon is not happy with the New York Times’ fourth of July profile of presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, which included tidbits like Sanders’ one-time belief that cervical cancer could be caused by “psychological factors such as unresolved hostility toward one’s mother, a tendency to bury aggression beneath a ‘facade of pleasantness’ and having too few orgasms.”

Advertisement

Todd Akin, the Missouri Republican who lost the 2012 Senate race against Claire McCaskill after making comments about the connection between pregnancy and “legitimate rape” on a local TV station, inspired groans and outrage on both the Left and Right, with many Republicans begging him to drop out of the race.

Salon, though, is ready and willing to defend Sanders’ comment. Sanders, it turns out, was quoting a published study: “if he quoted it, he didn’t write it,” Salon reasons. No, but he felt it deserved repeating, didn’t he? Akin, though making a terrible mistake doing it, was also paraphrasing the ’70s-era “science” that he was taught.

Anyone else want to give it a shot?

Advertisement

True, and the GOP urged Akin to drop out for the sake of the party. But if there is some expiration date on campaign smears, tell that to the New York Times and its investigation into Marco Rubio’s traffic citations in 1997 or the Washington Post’s research into “troubling incidents” from Mitt Romney’s prep school days in 1965. But let’s get back to Sanders.

https://twitter.com/EmailMagician/status/618128075826573316

https://twitter.com/MeganLorraineG/status/618126586290831360

https://twitter.com/RealJLord/status/618126832337068032

Advertisement

Agreed. There is plenty of fresh material that makes socialist Sanders a terrible choice for president. We wholly encourage the New York Times to quit digging around in ’90s traffic records and concentrate on what the candidates say (or which reporters they tie off with rope) today.

* * *

Related:

‘Pretend Todd Akin said this’: Where’s media outrage over Bernie Sanders’ pervy old essay?

 

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement