How Keith Ellison Reacts to Journo Asking Him About Minnesota Fraud PROVES He...
DAAAMN, Son: UK Survivor Helps SHRED Mehdi Hasan in BRUTAL Back and Forth...
Humza Yousaf Wastes NO Time Turning Edinburgh 'Attack' Into 'Muslims Are the Real...
Jessica Tarlov's 'He COULD Be a Weird, Gay Vegan BUT' Save for James...
Police Release Photo of Karmelo Anthony’s Multi-Tool ‘Like With the Little Scissors’
Panefully Stupid: KTVU Reports Car Break-Ins Decline, Glass Repair Shops Hardest Hit
TRAs in Scotland Upset That Men Who Think They're Women Will Be Incarcerated...
Tulsi Gabbard Adds ANOTHER Element to Her Fauci Document Drop (Media Shaming INCOMING)
First Transgender State Legislator Sentenced to 33 Years for Child Porn, Claimed Retardati...
Sen. Chris Murphy Notes That No President Except Trump Has Ever Stolen Air...
After Beheading, Elmo Makes It Clear That He's Rooting for Team USA in...
The Atlantic's Matt Viser Went to Journalism School to Learn New Things, Like...
The Atlantic Looks at Pete Hegseth's Efforts to Diminish the Role of Blacks...
MeidasTouch: Aerial Photo Shows Grass Was Completely Destroyed by UFC 250 Freedom Event
Bill Kristol Wants You to Celebrate Juneteenth In Order to ‘Annoy MAGA’

No, 'sexually sick' Fox News didn't censor Picasso's 'Women of Algiers,' despite backlash from Left; Updated

Picasso’s “Women of Algiers (Version O)” made news earlier this week by selling at auction for a record-breaking $179.4 million, and it continued to make news today on the grounds that the “sexually sick minds” at Fox News had censored the painting in the network’s coverage.

Advertisement

Leading the charge was Jerry Saltz, senior art critic for New York magazine.

Saltz’ tweet inspired pieces like, “This Is What Classic Pieces of Art Would Look Like if the Prudes at Fox Had Their Way” in Mother Jones and a brief article at Daily Kos which incorporated an excerpt from the Sydney Morning Herald referencing Twitter’s #freethenipple hashtag campaign.

Unfortunately, Saltz apparently saw some real censorship on Fox 5, New York City’s network affiliate, and attributed the blurring to all conservatives and to the Fox News Network.

Those “sexually sick” conservatives watching the cable news network and not Channel 5 in New York saw nipples aplenty.

https://twitter.com/lachlan/status/598947495587270656

https://twitter.com/TexasJew/status/598954536326209536

Advertisement

To its credit, Mother Jones appended a correction to its piece noting that “it was a Fox affiliate in New York” that had blurred the Picasso and not Fox News. But Ace asks a good question.

While waiting for an answer, we’ll have to settle for Take 2 from Saltz.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/RodrigoLopez03/status/598964821212733441

https://twitter.com/Warden_AoS/status/598986618985443328

* * *

Update:

Joining Australia’s Sydney Morning Herald in picking up Saltz’s mistaken tweet is the U.K. Independent, which refers consistently and exclusively to Fox News, apparently unaware of the concept of a network affiliate.

Linking to this example of “Saudi-style censorship” is Mona Eltahawy, who proudly spray-painted over anti-jihad posters in the New York subway, explaining that her actions weren’t censorship but rather “freedom of expression on top of freedom of expression.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement