Mahmoud Khalil Says America Broke Its Promise — Deport Him Quick Since It's...
Find Someone Who Loves You the Way the Media Loves Terrorists: Sick Spin...
Court Halts Christa Pike’s Execution An Hour Before She Was Due to Die...
The 'Death to America' People in Iran Have Made a US Midterm Election...
Jasmine Crockett Won’t Endorse Talarico — So a Fellow Democrat Told Her to...
Kat Rosenfield Reminds Everyone the Cornell 7 Haven’t Been Proven Guilty — and...
Here's Abdul El-Sayed Getting the Money Out of Politics by Raking It in...
A Manlet and His Girlfriend Busted After Lighting an Abandoned House on Fire...
Flydubai Co-Pilot Stabs Captain Midair — Israeli Passengers Subdue Him Before the Plane...
Stephen Miller Blasts CNN's Propaganda Effort About Children at Immigration Court
No Cash Bail Leaves a Pittsburgh Doctor Dead and a Growing Scandal Over...
The Supreme Court Rules on Deportations to Third-Party Countries (LAWSPLAINING)
UK Home Secretary Reopening Resettlement Schemes for Palestinians Who Have Fled the Horror...
Sen. Mark Warner Says 100,000 Virginians Have Been Kicked Off of SNAP Because...
Sunny Hostin Defended the Cornell 7 — and, Painfully, She’s Right

Patricia Heaton shocked that NYT publishes positive op-ed on kids with Down syndrome

Noted atheist Richard Dawkins recently responded to a hypothetical question about being pregnant with a baby with Down syndrome by telling a woman to “abort it and try again,” arguing that it would be “immoral to bring it into the world if you have the choice.”

Advertisement

A few days later, Dawkins walked back his comments a bit, apologizing for “impugning the morality of the approximately ten percent of women who deliberately choose NOT to abort a Down’s fetus.”

Dawkins’ comments were at the center of a New York Times op-ed published Thursday, entitled “The Truth About Down Syndrome.” Shockingly, the op-ed, authored by Jamie Edgin, an assistant professor of psychology at the University of Arizona, and Fabian Fernandez, a research associate at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, was sympathetic to families with children with Down syndrome. Edgin and Fernandez write:

…Mr. Dawkins suggested that his view was rooted in the moral principle of reducing overall suffering whenever possible — in this case, that of individuals born with Down syndrome and their families.

But Mr. Dawkins’s argument is flawed. Not because his moral reasoning is wrong, necessarily (that is a question for another day), but because his understanding of the facts is mistaken. Recent research indicates that individuals with Down syndrome can experience more happiness and potential for success than Mr. Dawkins seems to appreciate.

…
In 2010, researchers reported that parents of preschoolers with Down syndrome experienced lower levels of stress than parents of preschoolers with autism. In 2007, researchers found that the divorce rate in families with a child with Down syndrome was lower on average than that in families with a child with other congenital abnormalities and in those with a nondisabled child.
In another study, 88 percent of siblings reported feeling that they themselves were better people for having a younger sibling with Down syndrome; and of 284 respondents to a survey of those with Down syndrome over the age of 12, 99 percent stated they were personally happy with their own lives.

Advertisement

While Heaton was disheartened to read some of the comments left in response to the op-ed, her followers were happy to read a rejoinder to Dawkins.


https://twitter.com/Fleming3C/status/505468450819809280
https://twitter.com/BlueIslandGrl69/status/505469529733226496
https://twitter.com/awfultruth37/status/505459735488126976

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement