We too had thought we’d heard just about every possible argument both for and against same-sex marriage, but then we realized we hadn’t heard José Canseco’s take. “Leading change” is just about the very last thing the Supreme Court ought to be doing; besides, today’s events suggest the justices aren’t anxious to do it.
Whatever the justices’ ages have to do with it, we suspect their minds would be blown were they to read Canseco’s view of the gay and the ungay.
ungay and gay how are they not equal humans
— Jose Canseco (@JoseCanseco) March 26, 2013
Justice Canseco weighs in RT @JoseCanseco ungay and gay how are they not equal humans
— Dan Treadway (@Dan_Treadway) March 26, 2013
Here's Jose, lobbying for a spot on the SCOTUS, I pressume. RT @JoseCanseco ungay and gay how are they not equal humans
— Jared Eborn (@jaredeborn) March 26, 2013
https://twitter.com/adamconner/status/316625616109715456
https://twitter.com/jedgatsby/status/316626569076563968
@JoseCanseco Bengay
— Lynsie Lee (@LynsieLee) March 26, 2013
RT @JoseCanseco ungay and gay how are they not equal humans // Like me, he only sees the world as gay and ungay, baseball and unbaseball 🙂
— Scott Dagostino (@scottdagostino) March 26, 2013
As an ungay man, I support this profound statement. RT @JoseCanseco: ungay and gay how are they not equal humans
— Rob Sheridan #BLM (@rob_sheridan) March 26, 2013
Recommended
I wasn't convinced, but now that it's been phrased so eloquently… “@JoseCanseco: ungay and gay how are they not equal humans”
— John Caison (@caison3) March 26, 2013
jose canseco, a man who believes there was less gravity in the past, knows more about the world than a large number of politicians
— now that's blockchain baby!! (@purgatos) March 26, 2013
You are a national treasure. RT @JoseCanseco: ungay and gay how are they not equal humans
— Allie Gravitt (@alliegravitt) March 26, 2013
Join the conversation as a VIP Member