That’s Eracism!: Stanford University Gets Caught AI-Altering Ad Photo to Make Students Mor...
The Banish Acquisition: Insiders Say Mood at CNN Is Like a Funeral After...
El-Sayed and El-Salad: Dem Enlists Kamala Harris to Win Over ‘Black Birthing People’...
Minister From James Talarico’s Church Admits They’re Not a Belief-Based Church
Since 1986, Geraldo Rivera Has Never Met a Rake He Couldn't Step On
CNN's Brian Stelter Says There Will Almost Certainly Be Layoffs After Paramount Merger
Boston Globe: Queer Community Splintered Over Lesbian Bar That Dropped Strict Mask Mandate
CBS News: Critics Say Converse 'Lynching' Ad May Have Been Intentionally Crafted to...
Vandals Spray-Paint ‘Kill Donald Trump’ and ‘Talarico — Love Wins’ at Site of...
Grand Jury Finds Zero Evidence of Foul Play in Death of Black Teen;...
Chris Christie Is Thinking About 2028, and X Has Thoughts
The Snark Is Strong With This One: JD Vance Echoes His Boss With...
What Alaska’s 50+ Voters Are Saying About the Senate Race
Choice of Color: Podcaster Joy Reid Sides With Clancy Trial Holdout Juror for...
Trump Made His First Remarks Without the TV Pool and Reviews Are Enthusiastic

Libs ridicule 'Southwestern Commission' on border security

Yesterday’s bipartisan announcement of a immigration reform plan by the Gang of 8 was supposed to be a model of the new, “functioning” Congress. Four Democrats and four Republicans presented a plan that all could support … with certain conditions.

Advertisement

Sen. Marco Rubio made the media rounds last night and today (including a call to Rush Limbaugh) to clarify that some form of measurable border enforcement was necessary in order for the plan to go forward. If the Democrat senators could live with it, it must be reasonable, right?

Not quite. Liberals are already targeting the so-called “Southwestern Commission,” a group composed of “governors, attorneys general, and community leaders living along the Southwest border to monitor the progress of securing our border.” That sounds fair, seeing as those groups have first-hand experience with enforcement of the U.S./Mexico border. Libs aren’t happy with the proposed makeup of the group, though. Take Talking Points Memo editor Josh Marshall, for instance.

Ah, there we go. Govs. Perry and Brewer are just “really angry.” Maybe they’d be in better spirits if they could get some help from the federal government to secure their borders.

Advertisement

“Daily Show” co-creator Lizz Winstead digs into the “Big Book of Campaign Humour 2012” to take a swipe as well.

Does anyone else want to lend their support to this bipartisan plan?

https://twitter.com/socratic/status/296340690609266688

Liberals have been trying to find some confirmation that the commission will act in a strictly advisory fashion. Who will have power over border enforcement, then? Talking Points Memo managed to track down Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Il.), who passed the ball to the Department of Homeland Security.

Advertisement

Let me — let me clarify this. What we — we haven’t written the section, but what we envision is — is to create metrics, measurements, in terms of progress on border security that could be certified or at least attested to by local officials. But the ultimate decision will be by the Department of Homeland Security. So it isn’t going to be something as generic as safe and secure borders. We’d never agree on that. But metrics, in terms of resources on the border and the impact it has on illegal immigration.

What was that about not having faith in a Southwestern Commission? Looks like we can reach some bipartisan agreement on that, too.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement