Barb McQuade Loses It on MS NOW As SCOTUS Torches Dem Dream of...
Masked Antifa Thug Attacks Videographers at Seattle Pride Event With a Baseball Bat
Scorn Porn: Failed ‘Journalist’ Jim Acosta Posts Video Mocking Attendance at Great America...
Man Arrested for Shooting Participants in the World Naked Bike Ride with a...
Several States Will Not Send an Official Delegation to the Great American State...
CATO Simp Notes That Agent Who Shot Renee Good Has Never Been Charged...
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey Repeals Ban on Adult Bathhouses in Honor of Pride...
Nate Silver Looks at Sales Figures for Dr. Jill Biden’s Memoir
Brad Lander's Jewish Blind Spot: Whitewashing Mamdani's Wife's Jew-Hatred for Political Su...
Nicholas ‘Dog Rape’ Kristof Names Children Who Have Died From Elon Musk’s Aid...
Make Up Your Dang Mind, Hakeem: Supreme Court Whiplash: Pack It Yesterday, Praise...
Fetterman Roasts Dem ‘Crazypants’ as Media Pulls a Classic: Total Amnesia Until the...
Hands Off, Bros: Muslim Grad’s Handshake Ban Goes Viral, Proving Tolerance is One-Way
Unbothered King: Justice Clarence Thomas Walks Through Capitol with Zero Drama While Media...
Nationalism is Toxic Poison... Unless It's Ilhan Omar Twerking for Somalia, Then It's...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement