Scott Jennings Exposes the $200 BILLION Scam Machine Targeting Your Parents
Florida House Overwhelmingly Passed DeSantis' New Congressional Maps and the Dems Did NOT...
Rosa DeLauro Said the Most Anti-Science Thing Ever to Lee Zeldin During Purple...
Left: 'Trump Must Lower the Temperature!' Wajahat Ali: Literally Begs Trump to Die...
Ex DOJ Official Tells CNN the Comey Indictment Is the Worst Case Ever...
Fraud Alert: Mallory McMorrow Deletes Thousands of Tweets Trashing Michigan While Running...
Dorkiest Assassin EVER: WHCD Shooter Takes Cringe Mirror Selfie, Gears Up Like John...
Chris Cillizza Says Trump Wants to Make James Comey's Life Miserable for As...
Instead of Addressing Sasse’s Call to Value Kids Over Dopamine, American Humanist Editor...
Heartstrings Over Hard Facts: NBC Turns Illegal Congolese Migrants (Denied Asylum Twice) I...
Bill Kristol’s Brutal 2026 Wake-Up Call: He and The Bulwark Are Completely Irrelevant
Toxic Spreadsheets! In Another Resurfaced Clip, AOC Proves That She Can Still Out-Stupid...
Rep. McBride's Great Gaffe-by: Can't Pick a Gender, Drops an F-Bomb, and Still...
Limousine Leeches: Sec. Brooke Rollins Drops a BOMBSHELL About People Who Are Receiving...
Short Supply: Stephanopoulos Has ‘Little Patience’ for Those Blaming Dem Rhetoric for Poli...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement