Jonathan Chait Argues That Abolishing the Senate May Be the DSA’s Best Idea
Lawyer Says Elderly and Disabled Will Suffer as 350,000 Haitians Lose Temporary Protected...
French for 'Oops': Mamdani’s Pied-à-Terre Tax Sends $56K Bills to First Homes —...
Mamdani Publishes Names and Addresses of Everyone to Be Hit by His Pied-à-Terre...
Political Operative Behind Graham Platner’s Rise Faces Multiple Sexual Assault Allegations
Dana Bash Tells Tom Homan We All Saw ICE Make at Least Five...
Mass Shooter Named David French Makes Headlines While Twitter Scratches Its Head
Stupor Hero: Fauci’s Diary Reveals Infectious Relationship With CNN’s Dana Bash and Jake...
Here's a Video Preview of Where Mamdani's City-Run Grocery Stores Are Likely Headed
In His Private Diary, Fauci Estimated the Fatality Rate of COVID at Around...
Prices at Zohran Mamdani’s City-Run Grocery Stores Will Be 30 Percent Below Retail
Headline on Maine's New Senate Candidate Perfectly Sums Up 'No Kings' Dems Who...
Megyn Kelly Embraces Her Delusions of Grandeur in Lashing Out Against Ben Shapiro
Cracker Barrel Finally Rolls Out New CEO to Replace ‘Leader’ Who Spearheaded Disastrous...
Ron DeSantis Weighs in Now That We Know He Was Living Rent-Free in...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement