Shackles and Shakedowns: Gavin Newsom Seeks to Shame California Companies With Ties to...
Susan Rice Wants Steve Hilton to Stop Using Her Name Against Becerra (by...
LA-HOO-ZA-HER: Hillary Clinton Instantly REGRETS Sharing 2 Headlines to Dunk on Trump's Ec...
Letitia James Appointed Special Prosecutor in Cornell 7 Case
LOL-YIKES: Randi Weingarten's Unhinged Rant Appears to Frighten the 2 Dems Onstage With...
El-Sayed's Viral Exchange With Iranian-American Backfired So Hard the Guy Cut an Ad...
Abdul El-Sayed Says 'Black Folk' Have Never Had Access to REAL Capitalism —...
Sir Charles Barkley Has a Few Questions for the No-Cops, No-Prisons Crowd (Dems...
James Woods Just Needs One PERFECTLY Brutal Pic-Post to END Ro Khanna and...
Try to Spot Trends in These Gas Price, Income Tax and Population Gain/Loss...
Clean Up, Aisle CNN! WATCH Bill de Blasio Loses His Cool Debating...
Abdul El-Sayed Would Like a Million Millionaires Instead of 1 Billionaire (Has He...
Socialist Nutball Rep. Angie Nixon BIG MAD at JD Vance for Speaking HIS...
Absolutely Freaking NOT! Zohran Mamdani Describes His Grand Vision for Socialist Utopia to...
Marrow-Minded: Ben Rhodes Says His Bones Tell Him Racism Over Obama Shapes Today’s...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement