She CAN'T Bury It! INCONVENIENT Charlie Kirk Video Surfaces Making Candace Owens Look...
Ratio Alert! Karen Bass' Anti-ICE 'No One Is Above the Law' Lecture Is...
Ana Navarro Goes Full-Shrieking-HARPY in FIERY CNN Debate 'Cuz Americans DO Back Trump...
Bill Maher Told an NPR Journo They're Far Left and He Didn't Want...
Lemon Prepper: Ex-CNN Anchor Is ‘Serious’ About Running for President but Doesn’t Want...
This Blows!: Netflix Webpage Tells Viewers ‘Gone with the Wind’ Is Racist and...
Presidential Zeal: A Quasi-Exclusive Look at Chapters That Didn’t Make It Into Joe...
German World Cup Tourist Freddy Hits the Gun Range, Learns About Freedom (and...
Complain Campaign: Michelle Obama Is Angry the Media Treated Her As a Fashion...
Harry Sisson Gives the New Charlie Kirk Statue in Times Square About 10...
Todd Blanche Takes on a Deranged (and Preemptively Pardoned) Dirtbag Named Adam Schiff
Gov. Tim Walz on Pardoned Child Rapist: 'We Can't All Be Judged by...
Canadian Woman in ICE Custody After Slapping Teen in Pro-Trump, Pro-ICE Clothing
Escape From New York: Gov. Kathy Hochul Blames Trump for Families and Businesses...
Podcaster Thinks Homeschooling Is Weird, Doesn’t Trust Anyone Who Wants to Be With...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement