Socialist Angie Nixon Says Billionaires and Elected Officials Are Conspiring to Keep Stude...
Podcaster Chuck Todd Says Sec. of War Pete Hegseth Is the One of...
Rotund Antifa Agitator 'Spider Mike' Literally Gets Rolled Outside Hasan Piker Event
Bill Melugin Fills in the Gaps in GOP Congressman’s Self-Deportation Sob Story
The Cult of Total Maternal Sacrifice: Why Young Moms Are Breaking Under Impossible...
Sportscaster: WNBA Set the Table by Not Disciplining Sophie Cunningham for Her Transphobic...
Jesse Watters Asks El-Sayed If Castrating Kids Is Cool — He Replies It’s...
Hulk SCHMUCK! Mark Ruffalo Defends His Antisemitic Statement on the Paramount Warner Merge...
Morocco Makes Territorial Claims on Spanish Cities Its Citizens Invaded Last Month
SCOTUS Ruling on Mail-In Voting Has Triggered Nancy Pelosi, Gavin Newsom and MANY...
49ers Owner Caught in Human Trafficking Sting After Arranging $140 Hookup at Mobile...
Newsom’s Boondoggle: $126 Billion and Counting: CA Admits It Can’t Finish High-Speed Rail...
Bernie Sanders Asks If Mike Rogers Will Condemn Jake Lang or Fan the...
Girl Scouts Go Full Mosque: Earn Badges by Learning Islam’s Pillars, Praying &...
Indiana Lieutenant Governor Appalled at Woman-On-Woman Violence at Fever Game

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement