Scott Jennings Calls Birthright Citizenship Ruling by SCOTUS an ‘Abomination’ That Benefit...
Dems Frame Their SCOTUS Birthright Citizenship Victory As a Hyper-Partisan Loss, Vow to...
NYC DSA Leader Won’t Condemn Darializa Avila Chevalier’s Post About Wiping Her Dirty...
Third Reich Rugrat: Middle School Yearbook Baby Photo Is Causing a ‘Führer’ in...
Ringleader of Pakistani Grooming Gang Stripped of Citizenship but Can't Be Deported
PA Senators Reach Across the Aisle to Rally Commonwealth for Great American State...
The Amish Clearly Do Not Want to Assimilate Into American Society, Yet the...
The Nation Scolds AOC for Never Apologizing for Covering for the Pro-Genocide Wing...
Axios: GOP Reboots the Red Scare as Young Voters Embrace Socialism
Elon Musk Responds to Nicholas Kristof’s List of Children He’s Killed With Aid...
Gov. Tim Walz: The Supreme Court Says States Can Be Cruel to Trans...
NBC Offers Viewers a 'Trigger Warning' Before Reporting the SCOTUS Ruling on Title...
Anchor Baby Congresswoman Celebrates Birthright Citizenship Ruling by 'Sell-Out Supreme Co...
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Uses … (Wait for It) … TikTok Slang in...
Ro Khanna Is One Wealthy MOFO and Here I Thought Democrats Were the...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement