Permanently Broken: Canada Lights Up CN Tower For ... 'Long COVID Awareness Day'?
Conan O’Brien Jokes That at Least in Britain, They Arrest Their Pedophiles
TIME Lists Some of the Ways the Operation Epic Fury Money Could Have...
Cesar Chavez Too 'Problematic' Even for the Left? UFW Ditches Founder Amid Sexual...
Proposed Rule Could Ban Trump From Major International Events, Including the Olympics
Warner Goes From Calling Kent Dangerous to High-Fiving His Resignation – TDS Strikes...
Hearing a 27-Year-Old Mom Say She Feels Nothing for Her Baby Broke Me—Because...
Cato Director: Immigrants Reduce Crime Rates, So You’re Less Likely to Be a...
Talarico Goes Full Vegan: Because Nothing Screams 'Elect Me' Like Banning Brisket in...
California’s First Partner Says Don’t Listen to Bullies Like President Trump
Fairfax Schools Releases Worthless Statement Regarding Illegal Who Groped a Dozen Girls
Governor Newsom's Press Office Gets Ratioed INTO THE SUN by Nick Shirley (and...
Ireland’s New President Says ‘Patrick’ Reminds Us of the Courage and Resilience of...
NYT's Kristof Laments Iranian Butcher as 'Pragmatic Peace Partner' After Israel Takes Him...
Bodycam Video Released of Jasmine Crockett’s Bodyguard Pulling a Gun on Police

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement