We Did Nazi That Coming: Larry Krasner Dons His Jackboots and Promises to...
Streamer Hopes Border Hawks Get What They Want for Illegals—Cool, Already Home in...
'Saying the Quiet Part Out Loud': Washington Governor Inslee Demands ICE Stay Away...
Senate Democrats Blame Trump for Tragic Child's Death in ICE Custody.. That Happened...
Tiffany Cross, Too Toxic for MSNBC, Now Peddling 'Right-Wing Violence' Lies About Kirk's...
Trump Unleashes Massive Armada on Iran: Make a Deal or Face Major Destruction
IRONY! Chris Cillizza and Chuck Todd Blasting WaPo's Demise Is Pure Unintentional Comedy
When Will Woke Media Scolds Realize That Hockey Players Are Made Different?
When ‘Reporting’ Sounds Like a Pep Rally: ABC’s Trevor Ault and the Gun-Toting...
A Monster of His Own Making: After Walz Talked to Trump Protesters Swarm...
From London to Miami? Nah — Giles Coren Says US Too Risky, Gets...
Compassion Without Discernment: Why Women Are Falling for Leftist Propaganda Again
Cam Higby Infiltrates ANTI-ICE Group Chats. I Break Down What He Found and...
WHOA: Even the Biden Admin Thought Something Was Shady About Ilhan Omar and...
LFG! Make 'Em FAMOUS! Tom Homan Puts Fear of GOD Into Signal Chat...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement