This Explosive Headline Is a Lock for First-Ballot Induction Into the 'TDS Hall...
The Evolution of the Dems' 'Noncitizen Voting Never Happens' to This Judge's Ruling...
Hot Take on The View: Biden Might Still Be President If Dems/Media Had...
School Is in Session! Tom Homan Teaches 'Deportation 101' to Reporter Pushing Dem...
Lyin’ Witch and the Wardrobe: Dem Peggy Flanagan Is Struck Fashion Senseless in...
Triggered by Vigor: CNN’s Kasie Hunt Questioned Trump’s Health but Time Reporter Shot...
Hilarious 'Hijacking Attempt Thwarted, Medhi Hassan Hardest Hit' Memes
No Mixed Signals Here: Hegseth Makes His Military Standards Crystal Clear (WATCH)
Hegseth Encouraging ALL US Servicemembers to Vote Causes a Lefty Meltdown for SOME...
Shackles and Shakedowns: Gavin Newsom Seeks to Shame California Companies With Ties to...
Susan Rice Wants Steve Hilton to Stop Using Her Name Against Becerra (by...
LA-HOO-ZA-HER: Hillary Clinton Instantly REGRETS Sharing 2 Headlines to Dunk on Trump's Ec...
Letitia James Appointed Special Prosecutor in Cornell 7 Case
LOL-YIKES: Randi Weingarten's Unhinged Rant Appears to Frighten the 2 Dems Onstage With...
El-Sayed's Viral Exchange With Iranian-American Backfired So Hard the Guy Cut an Ad...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement