From Usha Vance’s Marriage to Melania: Stepstool Abdul El-Sayed Can’t Leave Other Men’s...
Oompa Loompa-Sized Activist Calls America a Dictatorship — and Walks Off Unarrested
Michelle Obama Says She Doesn’t Miss Her Kids at Home. A Lot of...
Jeffries Accuses Trump and Republicans of ‘Jim Crow-Like Tactics’ and ‘Wickedness’
Jasmine Crockett Ain’t Standing by Any Man — Especially Not the One She...
Terrible Terrorist Tabloid: Rolling Stone Anoints Hasan Piker a Top 'Influencer' For 2026
Don Lemon Says He’s Like Malcolm X and Can ‘Tell the Truth’ Since...
Systemic Racism: Brandon Johnson Brags About Violating Civil Rights Law in His Administrat...
ICE Nabs Its Own Cheerleader: Milo Yiannopoulos Held in Louisiana Detention Facing Removal
Imagine That!: Dem Chris Murphy Lies About DHS Illegal Alien Crackdown in Connecticut
Democrats Invent a Trump Affair Scandal, but Gavin Newsom’s Aide Has Been Velcro’d...
Heap Big OUCH! Scott Bessent Offers Elizabeth Warren a Free Course on 'Foreign...
Joe Walsh Remains One of the Biggest Self-Serving, Annoying TOOLS on Social Media
HA HA HA —WATCH! Never-Trumper Norm Eisen Accidentally Makes Case Against ALL Mail-In...
Hillary Clinton-Inspired Immigration Shot and Chaser Proves She Has ZERO Actual Principles

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement