'Do Your Friggin' Job, Lady': Superman Offers Some Sound Advice to Screeching Randi...
Neera Tanden Goes From Annoyed to Angry to FLIPPED OUT Debating Scott Jennings...
She MAD: Sunny Hostin FLIPS OUT When Thom Tillis Gets a Little TOO...
Listen: You Can HEAR Greg Gutfeld Laugh at Jessica Tarlov Insisting Polls Spell...
AY-YI-YI: CA Latino Voters Ain't PLAYIN' With Xavier Becerra and EXPOSED Lies About...
THIS! —> What WH Insider Posts About Dems' Plans After Midterms Should Motivate...
When Even THIS Fact-Checker Knows Trump Wasn't Inviting Iran to NUKE Los Angeles...
New Maine Poll: Susan Collins Trails Overall, Leads Older Voters by 12
Democrats Plan Mass Protest Against Zohran Mamdani
WHOA: Black Michigan Voters Are Going OFF on Abdul El-Sayed (Obama to the...
Su-Su-SUPER Sucks! Dan Bongino UNLOADS on Phil Collins for Calling MAGA 'Fat Guys...
He's DEAD, Jim! Spencer Pratt Wipes the Floor With Ro Khanna Who INSISTS...
It's Called Karma and It's Spelled HA HA HA: CNN Officially in a...
Loony Lefties Haven't Figured Out Their 'Nazi' Pete Hegseth Rhetoric Says MORE About...
Keith Ellison SPEECHLESS As CNN Asks Him About His Lavish Gifts From Corporate...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement