KEEP LEADING! Sarah Huckabee Sanders Comes Out SWINGING Defending Usha Vance and Lefties...
OUCH: Scott Jennings Using Young White Socialists to Mercilessly SHRED Hakeem Jeffries Is...
NYC FORGOT: Zohran Mamdani Openly Pushing for America to Embrace 'Islamic Values of...
Don't Mess With Moms: Usha Vance Fires Back at The New York Times...
Chicago City Council Gets Advice From Teens on Preventing Teen Takeovers
Water Log: Jim Acosta Vies for ‘Swimmy’ Award in Aquatic ‘Journalism’ With Latest...
DOJ Charges 455 Fraudsters in $6.5 Billion Billing Scheme
Meek Streak: Michelle Obama Says Her Humble Hubby Hates That His Presidential Library...
Zohran Mamdani Spotted a 'Fundamental Constitutional Right' That Nobody Else Can Find in...
Families of Jailed Antifa Terrorists Are Livid, Say Government Lied to Prosecute Innocent...
Doomsday Bouquet: NRCC Gifts Flowers to Dem Jeffries for Being So Blooming Wrong...
Sen. Ted Cruz Looks at NY Election Results, Declares 'Rich Children Like Playing...
Perpetual PhD Parasite: 7th-Year Student Can't Afford NYC, Runs for Congress to Live...
The Guardian: Texas Protesters Received Unusually Harsh Sentences in Crackdown on Dissent
ICE to Fine Attorney for Filing Dozens of False Asylum Claims on Behalf...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement