Joyce Carol Oates: Trump Likely Embarrassed Because His Assassination Attempt ‘Looked So A...
Unhinged Philly Mayor Asks Uber and Lyft How Dare They Tell Her How...
Repugnant Liar Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Bag) Went Overseas to Blast Trump's 'Totalitarian Take...
University Graduate Returning to Turkey, Citing ‘Hostility’ in the US
Spain Plans to Grant Legal Status to 500,000 Undocumented Migrants
Chicago Public Schools Will Hold Official 'Civic Day of Action’ on May 1...
From Whose Office Could the NYT Have Obtained Classified SCOTUS Memos?
WIRED Reports That Much of MAGA Is Convinced Butler Assassination Attempt Was Staged
ABC News Runs Obama’s Campaign Video for VA Gerrymandering as a News ‘Exclusive’
Harmeet Dhillon Calls BS on The Atlantic's Kash Patel Hit Piece and Predicts...
‘Bring Your Checkbook’: Kash Patel Tells The Atlantic He'll See Them in Court
Here's a Dramatization of 'Ilhan Omar and Her Accountants Discovering the 'Rounding Error'
Bill Maher Should Ask Jimmy Kimmel to Come on So They Can Compare...
'The Manhattan Project': Mamdani Promotes Visionary Idea to Have New Yorkers Using Trash...
Dem Sen. Ed Markey Trips Over a Big Stumbling Block While Claiming 'I'm...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement