ABC Files Suit Against FCC Because Trump Admin 'Has Waged a Retaliatory Campaign'...
Roll Those EYES! Rashida Tlaib Flips OUT on MI Republicans AND DEMS in...
Fredo's Delusions of Grandeur: Chris Cuomo Claims He Would Be HUGE If He...
$5 Strippers?! Dems Are ONTO Sean Duffy's Son Over His VENMO Account. in...
This Is WILD: So, About That Polling Group That Had Francesca Hong Up...
Dearborn Mayor Proclaims His Name Is 'As American As Any Other' (Spoiler Alert:...
Polling Group Caught Intentionally Spreading Fake Polling Data in 'Social Experiment'
No WORDS: Sounds INSANE but It's True — Abdul El-Sayed MUST Answer for...
Democrats Looking Worse and WORSE for the Midterms (and It's All Their Own...
OOF: James Talarico's LATEST Stunt Says SO MUCH About How He's Doing With...
How DESPERATE Is Ro Khanna's Race-Baiting Talking Points? ONE Repugnant Post Says It...
Just WOW: Lefty Coffee Shop Owner Boots Young Pro-Lifers After Comparing Them to...
Pros. Descano Helped Illegal Islamic Extremist Murderer Get Passport — Yeah, It Gets...
WOW: The Way Jon Ossoff Is Trying to SPIN His Sleazy Natalie Harp...
Adam Carolla Blasts Chris Cuomo After Ex-CNN Host Tells Him to Stop Sharing...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement