Another CNN Reporter Walks Back Post Implying That Mamdani Was the Target of...
Molly Jong-Fast Raked for Complaining About ‘Astronomical Amount’ Spent on Shellfish for T...
Human Springboard for IED-Throwing Terrorist Spends His 15 Minutes Talking About White Sup...
Adam Schiff's Attempt to Shame Pete Hegseth's 'Waste of Taxpayer Dollars' Via a...
ANOTHER Chuck Schumer Flashback Has Aged Wonderfully (THIS One Is Slamming Obama's Disastr...
Winston Churchill to Be Replaced on UK Banknotes With a Hedgehog or Badger
Russian State Media Joins US Dems in Slamming Pete Hegseth for Steak and...
Lady, Put Down the Shovel: Abby Phillip Tries a Half Apology, Gets Walloped...
UPDATED: CNN's Edward-Isaac Dovere Joins the Gracie Mansion Gaslighting: Mayor Mamdani Was...
This Video of Bill and 'Supreme Leader' Hillary Clinton Stumbling Around NYC Is...
From Bangladesh to Banning Guns: Senator Saddam Salim Dismantles 2A in the Birthplace...
From Mideast to Malibu? FBI Warns Iran Could Launch Drones at California Targets
Jasmine Crockett vs. Our Troops: Lobster for Illegals? Fine. For Warriors? Scandal
Gavin Newsom Gets Called Out for Sudden Pivot About How Trump and Hegseth...
Schumer's SAVE Act Meltdown Backfires: Pressure Against Thune Builds Up

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos