It's a MYSTERY! New York Times Can't Figure Out Why the Crime and...
Texas Congressional Hopeful Learns How Voters (Even Friends) React to Her Being an...
MS NOW’s Nicolle Wallace Mistakes Hysteric Knavery for ‘Historic Bravery’ in Minneapolis P...
NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani Reveals ‘Free Childcare’ Plan That Includes Illegal Aliens (of...
Church-Invader Nekima Levy Armstrong Rushes to Democrat-Friendly CNN After Release by Acti...
Anti-ICE Activists Protest JD Vance at His Minnesota Hotel. There's Just One Problem
One Year of Trump Winning: VIP SALE, FINAL HOURS!
Libs Eat Up Fake 'ICE-Scared-Off-My-Carrot-Pickers' Hoax – Because Orange Man Bad
Hypocrisy Alert: Gavin Newsom's Team Drops Homophobic AI Memes on Gay Treasury Sec....
A Viral Reel of Leftist Meltdowns Shows What Happens When Rage Replaces Reason
Government Bureaucratic Incompetence Is a Fatal Pandemic, and It's Time To Stop the...
MN Church Protest Leader's Haul: Huge Haul from 'Anti-Poverty' Scam, Sends Kids to...
Jordan Alleges Jack Smith Spied On More Than 12 GOP Lawmakers and the...
CNN Host Crushes Jack Smith: Lies Exposed As D.C. Elites Panic
Backlash After Arizona AG Says Stand-Your-Ground Laws Could Justify Killing ICE Agents

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement