FINALLY! WaPo Announces Bernie Sanders' New Initiative to Reach Leftists on College Campus...
This Damning Segment on the SPLC Is Just 1 Reason Dems Are Melting...
NASA’s Missing Scientists Mystery Is Getting Way Too Real
John Harwood Gets Introduced to Himself After Questioning the Objectivity of a CBS...
Trump Made Sure Schumer Will NEVER Recover From That Mistake
Bill Kristol Is Officially So Totally and Completely Broken It's Not Even Worth...
Pete Buttigieg Says Majority Agrees With Dems Despite What Algorithms Indicate (THIS Is...
Greg Gutfeld Shreds Jessica Tarlov in VICIOUS Back and Forth About SPLC Funding...
Media (and Dems) Don't Mind Anonymous Sources for Hit Pieces but NOT When...
SHOCK FOOTAGE: Fairfax Democrat Caught on Video STEALING Vote No Info From Election...
FBI Gets Some Other Tips After Arresting US Soldier Accused of Insider Trading...
DAMNING Thread BUSTS Spanberger for Being Even SHADIER in Redistricting (GUESS What She...
Here Are 3 Calif. Economic Comparisons to the Nat'l Average That Gavin Newsom...
'TIRED of the SWAMP!' Rep. Brandon Gill DOG-WALKS John Cornyn and His (Spanish)...
If You Donate to Harvard's 'Viewpoint Diversity' Scam, You Are Probably Dumb Enough...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos