Jim Acosta Gets a First Amendment Schooling While on the 'Journalism Is Under...
Deport Every Single Illegal Alien Possible
Democrats Playing With Dynamite on Another Shutdown
Delicious! Abby Phillip Gets HOUSED by Lydia Moynihan About the Facts of Don...
NY Times' Condemnation of Don Lemon's Arrest Avoids Key Facts (Effort to Protect...
Mother Jones: 'Churches We Don't Like Don't Get First Amendment Protection' (or Something)
DNC's Words Come Back to Bite Them After Call to 'Free Don Lemon'...
Oh, NO! Secretary General Warns that the UN Might Be on the Verge...
LAWSPLAINING: Detransitioner Wins $2 Million Judgment Against Psychologist and Surgeon
Color Commentary: Jim Acosta Says Don Lemon Is Being Targeted for His Race,...
Love to See It: Judgmental 'Journo' Don Lemon Gets Caught in His Own...
Taxpayer-Funded Schools Escort Kids to Anti-ICE Protest Instead of Class – Abbott Demands...
A Deep Dive into the Lemon Indictment: Are Lemon’s First Amendment Rights Being...
Boca Grande's Elite: No Parking for You, But Save Our Cheap Help from...
Connected Lefty Jamael Lundy, Married to Council Member and Running for Office, Busted...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement