Does Anybody Believe Nancy Pelosi's Response to This Question About Eric Swalwell's Resign...
WaPo: Pre-K Applications in DC Falling at Bilingual Schools in Immigrant Neighborhoods
WNBA Player Brianna Turner: 'Trans Women Are Women With No Advantage' — Still...
Mark Halperin Says Trump Is Dead Politically After ‘Attacking’ Pope on Social Media
Democrat Fundraiser Spreads Easily Debunked Lie About Trump's 'No Tax on Tips' Policy
Citizen Who Claims She Was Detained by ICE for Two Days Being Sued...
Joke’s on you, Pod Save Bro Favreau: Hasan Piker Proudly Doubles Down On...
Hauling the Trash: NYPD Carries Away Jewish Voice for Peace Protesters Blocking Traffic
More Than 16,000 Immigrants in Illinois May Lose Food Assistance in the Coming...
Game Over: Eric Swalwell Resigns in Disgrace to Avoid Full Investigation
Et Tu, Ruben? Swalwell's 'Best Friend in the World' Now Demands His Expulsion...
Nancy Pelosi Urged Eric Swalwell to Leave CA Governor’s Race, But Was OK...
Brian Stelter Credits 'Investigative Journalism' for Swalwell Story, Gets Educated
Trump Dashes McDonald’s to the White House: DoorDash Grandma Delivers No-Tax-on-Tips Messa...
Adam Schiff Hopes We Have Short Memories While Slamming Possible Trump 'Culture of...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement