Member of Trans Death Cult the Zizians Charged in Execution-Style Murders of Her...
John Fetterman Asks Why He’s the Only Dem Senator to Denounce ’Self-Identified Communists’
Evita Duffy Claps Back at Daily Beast’s Obsession: ‘I Don’t Find Fulfillment From...
Say 'Free Palestine' or Else: Free Palestine Thug Corners Cowering Scott Wiener at...
‘Temporary’ Insanity: Attorney on MS NOW Says Haitian Refugees Should Stay Because Equity...
Convicted Traitor Bradley Manning Trades Leaking Secrets for Dropping Beats at DSA Commie...
James Carville: Done Sharing a Tent With Jew-Haters … Except an Actual Nazi-Tattooed...
Jemele Hill: Is Boomer Esiason Saying Caitlin Clark Deserves 'Special Treatment' for Being...
Clown Ro Khanna Accuses Man With Chinese Wife of Being Racist Against the...
FIFA to Allow Rainbow Flags at Seattle’s ‘Pride Match’ Between Iran and Egypt...
Team Newsom Tried and Failed to Convince SCOTUS There's a Grocery Store Exception...
Deleted Tweet Alert: Phoenix Mercury Mocks Caitlin Clark After Its Players Maul and...
Krystal Ball Can’t Believe Antifa Terrorist Faces Jail ‘For Having Leftist Reading Materia...
We Saw It, So You Have To: Abdul El-Sayed Dances to Whitney Houston...
Tara Palmeri’s ‘My Notes Disagree’ Defense After Betraying Kat Cammack Is Peak Media...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos