Daughter of Turkish President Wants to Decolonize the West, Adopt Ideas From Islam...
Berlin Pride Killer Attended Three-Day Deradicalization Course Run by Progressive White Wo...
He Preened While Families Buried Their Dead: an Unfiltered Response to the Fauci...
Man Who Dislikes Concept of Capitalism Just Wants to Make Art and Be...
Gavin Newsom’s Ex-Mistress Admits She Wet the Bed on Their First Night Together
Rashida Tlaib Is Concerned About Whom Haley Stevens Accepts Money
NYT Shocked: ICE Enforces Visa Laws at Airports—Foreigners With Expired Papers Actually De...
Berlin’s Queer Commissioner Says Far-Right Will Seize on Muslim Pride Attack to Demonize...
'If I Had to Ramble for 8 Hours': Adam Hamawy Excuses Hasan Piker’s...
Texas Rep. Files American Dream and Promise Act to Extend TPS Protections for...
Inside the U.S. Capitol: The Christian Heritage Hidden in Plain Sight
Joe Biden's Ghostwriter Erased the Tapes After He Heard About Robert Hur's Investigation
AARP's John Hishta Reveals the Polling Data That Could Decide the Midterm Elections
CNN’s Kaitlan Collins: ‘It’s Not About Me’ As She Rushes to Jon Stewart’s...
Fauci Complained That HHS Didn’t Let Him Do a CNN Interview ‘Out of...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement