Prog Account Made a 'Stunning Admission' in Clip of JD Vance Describing What...
After Yet ANOTHER Loss, Marc Elias Begs for X to Financially Support His...
Gavin Newsom Brags About How Much Calif. Spends Per Student but Will NOT...
Nick Minock Wasn't ABOUT to Let Fairfax DA Descano Pretend He Gave a...
Dem Tim Walz Calls Limping Shooting Victim Steve Scalise ‘Boot Licker’ for Online...
Adam McKay Calls Out White Liberals, There's Only One Problem
The Kiss of Darth: Pedro Pascal Smooches Stephen Colbert While Promoting Family-Friendly S...
Hasan Piker Scoffs at Israeli Govt.’s Plan to File Lawsuit Over Nicholas Kristof’s...
Dem Jasmine Crockett Claims Constitution-Minded SCOTUS Justices Are Partisans Doing Trump’...
Justice Department Investigation Shows Yale Discriminated Against Whites and Asians in Adm...
CIA Accuses Senate Committee of ‘Dishonest Political Theater’ Over Lab Leak Coverup
Tlaib's Endless Nakba Lie: Celebrating Arab Defeat as 'Genocide' While Demanding Israel's...
Cato Stooge: One in Five Fairfax Residents Is or Lives With Someone Who...
NBC News: Dems Are Moving on to a More Combative Style of Politics
Trump Calls Him a Disaster, Dem Ro Khanna Calls Him a Founder’s Ideal:...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos