Word on the Street: Seattle Police Officer Says They Use ‘Trigger-Puller’ Instead of...
Clothes-Minded Gavin Newsom Says He's Open to Doing a Presidential Podcast If He...
Beaver Fever: Dem Mark Warner Posts Cringey Jerky Video From Deep Red County...
Podcaster Adam Carolla Says We’re Not Arguing Ideas, Dems Just Can’t Pull Any...
Blonde Rage: Sportswriter Jemele Hill Blasts Podcast Viewer for Asking About Yellow Dye...
Police Track Stolen Republican Campaign Signs to Home of Retired Professor and Pastor...
Tinseltown Talarico: The Rotten ‘Grass Roots’ of Texas Dem’s Senate Campaign Stretch to...
Sen. Mike Lee Says It's Time to Impeach Activist Judge Who Keeps Blocking...
Thuggish 'Far-Right' Brits Block Buses Loaded With 'Asylum-Seekers' As Another Boatload Ar...
Gavin Newsom in SC: Don’t Dump the Socialists, Get Chummy With the Commies
Self-Deportation With Benefits: Dem Operative Offered Remote Job Running U.S. Elections Ov...
USA TODAY Network Does the Meme: 25 Years After 9/11, Muslims Fear New...
Rolling Stone: The Next President Must Vow to Restore the White House to...
‘Compassionate Caregiver’ in Florida Faces Firestorm for Gloating Over Charlie Kirk’s Assa...
CBS News: Did Two Million Germans Just Vote to Put Neo-Nazis in Power?

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos