SHOUT IT! Gene Simmons Taking on HORDE of Angry, Mouth-Breathing, Anti-American Trolls Is...
Bad Egg? Democrats Bunny-Hop Over Biden’s ‘Startling’ White House Easter to Focus on...
Dr. Oz Uncovers Rampant Hospice Fraud in California, Gavin Newsom Claimed Investigation Wa...
Here's the Entertainment You Get for Your $1,000 Floor Ticket to Bruce Springsteen
Hot Take: Fortunately for Missing Airman, Iran Is Not as Barbaric as Trump...
Kamala Harris: We Cannot Allow Trump to Hand Pick Another Supreme Court Justice
Rep. Shri Thanedar Announces Impeachment Effort Against Pam Bondi in Unfortunate Video
Sen. Chris Van Hollen Has Found Another 'Asylum Seeker' Sob Story to Share
Fox Business Anchor Looks at Questionable Charges to Eric Swalwell’s Campaign
Qasem Soleimani‘s Niece, Who Was Granted Asylum, Arrested by ICE; Legal Status Terminated
EVERYONE IS HITLER! AP Government Textbook Shows Everything Wrong With Education in a...
Brit Hume Busts Gavin Newsom Telling ANOTHER Whopper (This Time About Fox News...
Protesters March on Good Friday to Site of ‘Crucifixions’ of George Floyd, Renee...
SAVE Act Opponent Barack Obama Has an IRONIC Requirement in Order to Win...
NY Times Spotted Serving Up Another Embarrassing Take (It's 123 Years Old and...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos