Library Lies: Obama Rewrites the Book on 2012 Presidential Contest with Mitt Romney...
Me, Michelle, and I: The Former First Lady Says the Next Chapter of...
Muslim Texan Who Wanted to Participate in GOP Convention Leaves in Tears
Climate Captivity: Al Gore Compares Abolition of Slavery to Fight Against So-Called Global...
French President Thanks UAE for ‘Joining the Movement’ in Setting Age Limits for...
Restroom Crisis for Dads: Viral Video Shows Why We Need More Family Bathrooms
Action News: Pixar Blazes New Trails for Diversity by Perfecting Curly Hair in...
UK City Council Launches Court Bid to Ban Union Jacks That ‘Intimidate Diverse...
You Got Nailed: Tom Hanks Drops a Funny on MS NOW's Ratings and...
Major Pakistani Donor to Zohran Mamdani & NYC Democrats Arrested in Massive $38M...
NBC News: Tiny Baseball Team Cancels Pride Night After Players Refuse to Wear...
Presidents (Minus Trump) Gather at Obama Library — Bush Suddenly Redeemed, Election Denier...
Deranged: Whoopi Wants Knicks to Visit White House for Slavery Reminder, Not Victory...
CNN: Trump Administration Plans to File at Least 250 Denaturalization Cases by October
Toot Suit Riot: Kevin Bacon Dons ‘Bean’ Blazer for Meatless Wednesdays, X Users...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement