Sen. Chris Van Hollen Adds 'Went Through a Rough Period' *Exception to Having...
Ron DeSantis Made Sure Nobody Will Take Hakeem Jeffries Seriously Again
The GOP Chairman Growing His Party in 80/20 Democrat Silicon Valley
The Man, the LEGEND: Check Out What Trump JUST DID to Anti-Ice May...
He's a MONSTER: Senate Republicans' Ad Featuring Graham Platner's Own POSTS Is Honestly...
LOL! Straight In Our VEINS: WATCH What Saxophonist Does While Listening to Kamala...
Olivia Julianna Claims Scott Jennings GLARED at Her for Being in the Same...
Compare Tim Walz Portraying Trump and Musk As Nazis to Who He's Campaigning...
X Account Using Grok to Explain SCOTUS Ruling to Ilhan Omar As if...
'Reeks of Jealousy'! Scott Jennings Swatted Down a MeidasTouch Lefty and Jim Acosta...
In RUSH to Scold SCOTUS on Ethics, Rashida Tlaib TRIPS Over Her Own...
BRING IT, Commie: Jessica Tarlov THREATENS GOP That if They Don't Stop Fighting...
Stand Back, He's GONNA BLOW! Marc Elias Continues Multi-Day CRASH OUT Over SCOTUS...
Dem Rep. Jamie Raskin Claimed SCOTUS Is Gerrymandered and MS NOW Was Totally...
DAMN! Scott Jennings UNLOADS on MeidasTouch Gnat for Wagging His Finger in His...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos