AOC Holds Up a Jar of Georgia 'Drinking Water' Polluted by a Nearby...
Foolhardy Flashback: Stephen Colbert’s Late-Night Exit Is Here, Check Out His 2020 TDS...
Dem Insists Trump Didn’t Win Those Swing States, Blames Elon Musk and Malware
DNC Autopsy Goes Wrong: Democrat Moskowitz Says the Party Is a Botched Corpse
Third Chief of Staff Out: Fetterman’s Shift to Sanity Triggers DC Staff Revolt
Bruce Springsteen Says Stephen Colbert Lost His Show Because the President Can’t Take...
Jimmy Kimmel Urges Viewers Never to Turn On CBS Ever Again (After Colbert...
Gen Z vs. Gen X War Over Lunches Continues: PB&J Is 'What They...
'Because You Never Know When the Last One Is': Kyle Busch Passes Away...
Mastermind Behind $250 Million Feeding Our Future Scam Sentenced; Rep. Ilhan Omar Speechle...
Maine Senate Dem Candidate Graham Platner: Time Magazine's Latest Nazi-Chic Cover Boy
Hostin, We Have a Problem: Sunny Lies on The View, Claims BLM Riots...
Let Us All Join Brian Stelter In Mourning Over One Less Hour of...
Minnesota Fraud Defendant 'On the Run' After Jumping From Fourth Story Balcony to...
Majority Leader John Thune Announces Senate Will Go Home Until June

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement