Not-a-Communist Melat Kiros Notes Some Big-Tent Democrats Call Themselves Capitalists
Friendship of Fools: Chris Cuomo Defends His Good Pal Fauci After Silent COVID...
Relish the Thought: FCC Chairman Points Out Legacy Media Is Less Trusted Than...
Scott Jennings Shares Three Reasons GOP Could Survive the Midterms Despite Bungling Trump’...
Rand Paul Takes a Stroll Down Memory Lane With an Enraging Fauci vs....
Kamala Harris Just Made It Obvious the Dems Know They Can't Win on...
GOP Candidate for WI Gov Promises Not to Cancel Thanksgiving, Unlike His Unhinged...
'Medic!' US Oil and Gas Assn Lights Up Noted Energy Expert and Trump/Big...
RATIO ALERT: John Thune Gets WALLOPED on X for Posting About Anything but...
Senator and Ratio Machine Sheldon Whitehouse's Attempt to Make ICE Racist Blows Up...
WEAK: In Response to Sophie Cunningham's Common Sense, Her Coach Mimics Ketanji Brown...
Fauci Takes the Fifth 111 Times While Tillis and Cornyn Betray Trump
Kamala Harris Shares the Dem Party’s Anti-American Agenda As Rumors of Another White...
Bill Maher Ends Anti-Communist Rant by Saying He’d Vote for Sarah Palin Over...
WI DSA Gov Hopeful Francesca Hong Tells Fox News She’s Against Abolishing Senate…...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement