Bill Maher Makes Dems and Media Smearing Natalie Harp Look Like the Awful...
VA AG Jay Jones Tells County Sheriff He's Under Investigation for ::Checks Notes::...
Radical Left Rising: Britt Blasts Abortion Extremism, Johnson Warns of Midterm Stakes
Pull Yourself Together, Hasan — Getting Giddy Over Trump Calling You a Terrorist...
Mark Cuban Gripes About High California Taxes Before Endorsing James Talarico in Texas...
NYT Reporter Warns DSA-Dems Want to ‘Take Out Our Entire Constitutional System’ on...
Jasmine Crockett Says the Democrat Party Will Face a Racial Reckoning After Midterm...
'Stop Gaslighting Me!': FL Dem. Senate Nom and Dem Chair Explode in Yelling...
Oh, SHELL No!: Canadian WNBA Team Introduces Non-Binary Turtle Mascot With She/They Pronou...
One Meta Data Center Just Doubled (and Then Some) Teachers’ Pay in a...
Chris Cuomo Says Ossoff’s Natalie Harp Dig Meant Her and Trump Hanging Out...
Melugin Highlights Illegal Who Poured Hot Wax on Kids — Then Schools Cato...
Men Dump Girlfriends Who Defend Lindsay Clancy: 'Not Who You Want Raising Your...
NYT’s 'Honest Mistake' Just Cost It $9.25M After Falsely Tying Innocent Alabama Hooper...
One Mom Tried to Ban Oreos From the Entire Class Lunchbox — and...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement