Bake the Cake, Bigot: X Reminds Governor Polis What Rolling Back Freedoms Actually...
Outlier Out-and-Out Liar: Hakeem Jeffries Dodges Question About Dems’ Record Low Approval...
But Trump! Tim Kaine Isn’t Too Worried His Former Running Mate’s Husband Is...
Christmas Came Early: Andrew Tate Finally Meets a Man Who Hits Back –...
Kaaa-BOOM! Anna Paulina Luna OBLITERATES Uber-Creepy Scott Wiener In Heated Exchange
The Rot in California: Jury Says It's OK to Tow Federal Vehicles During...
Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
No, Seth Moulton, You Are Not God; You Don't Get to Define What...
Sen. John Kennedy Calls for 'Another Reconciliation Bill'
Surprise! Nicki Minaj Electrifies at AmFest, Standing Up for Trump and Global Christians
Rob Schneider Brings the House Down -- and More Importantly, Together -- At...
Tulsi Gabbard Goes Off on Islamism: A Brutal Wake-Up Call for America Before...
DOJ: 'We Will Bring Charges Against Anyone Involved in the Trafficking and Exploitation'
Hugh Hewitt on 'GOP's Nominee': 'The Assumption of No Challengers Is Naive'
Jamie Raskin Tries Playing STUPID on CNN About the MANY Pictures of Bill...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement