Guy Wearing DSA Pin Fist-Bumps Woman in ‘Hot Girls for Zohran’ Shirt
Psycho Woman Finds a Way to Paint Lindsay Clancy's Husband As a Suspect...
A Family Benefit That Rewards Marriage, Motherhood, and Citizenship
Lindsay Clancy Defense Attorney ‘So Proud’ of Jury Foreperson for Identifying Holdout Juro...
WaPo: County Coroner Confirms First Infant Death From Measles in Amish County; Shapiro...
WaPo: USS Abraham Lincoln's Stop in Thailand Was Pervaded With a Sense of...
He Did It on Purpose: NYC Mayor Mamdani Hands 9/11 Pen to Al-Qaeda...
Documentary to Examine If Elon Musk Used 'Space Lasers' to Rig the 2024...
VA Dem Party Official Imprisoned for Child Sexual Abuse Material Kept Some High-Profile...
Monster Mash?: Creature Feature Fans React to Godzilla/King Kong Film Hiring ‘Intimacy Coo...
Lay Off of Wajahat Ali, Who Is ‘Just a Small-Time Podcast Host Who...
Team Newsom Would Like Us to Believe Gavin's 'Huge' Crowd in SC Is...
Joy Reid Launches Rehab Tour for Wajahat Ali and Guest Who Called Hakeem...
'Just Perfect'! Guess Where James Talarico Is Taking His 'Grassroots' Campaign to Rake...
Fans Paid a Fortune for Ed Sheeran ... Got Macklemore’s Unsolicited Free Palestine...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement