Owner of Tiny Variety Store Convicted of Trafficking $7 Million in Food Stamp...
Hot Take: Japanese-American Relations on Twitter Got a Lot Warmer
Townhall's Kurt Schlichter Says Not to Freak Out When We Lose the Birthright...
This Isn’t Asylum — It’s Why We Can’t Let Democrats Win Again
NASA Administrator Shares a Seriously Bada** Photo of the Artemis II Liftoff ('MERICA!)
Strong Voice Against Trumpism Notes Ivanka Trump Wasn’t a Citizen When She Gave...
The Verge Argues That the Artemis Moon Base Project Is 'Legally Dubious'
April Fool's Day Fun: Police Introduce Elite Unit of SAUSAGE Dogs
This Kid Gets It! One ... Ahem ... Outspoken Youngster Tells CNN Exactly...
Anti-ICE Activists on Patrol Approaching Cars and Demanding Badges, IDs, or Warrants
Former City Councilman Sentenced After Investigation Found 71 Voter Names Registered to Hi...
California's First Partner Wants to Hold Tech Leaders Responsible for 'Jordan Peterson-Typ...
Chuck Schumer Found a Way to Inject Anti-Trump Politics Into the Artemis II...
Laura Ingraham Says One Question Alone Indicates How Preposterous Justice KBJ’s Appointmen...
TDS Media Claim Trump Was Made to Feel 'Very Small' With a Bad...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement