PSYCHO ALERT: Gavin Newsom Asks X If He Resembles a Famous Movie Character...
Never-Trumper Mocked ENDLESSLY (and Hilariously) for Posting Pic of ICE Agent 'Bullying Ai...
We SHOULD Be Shocked, BUUUT We're Not: Check Out the Secret Facebook Group...
Mike Cernovich Suggests Bizarrely Unpopular 2028 Ticket Because 'Physically Fit White Men...
We Could Watch Journos' Pouty, Angry Faces As They're Forced to Report ICE's...
Christian Colleges Leave Their Faith: Harvard, Yale, Princeton and Others
Cory Booker's ICE Meltdown Sparks a Fight Between Joe and Mika
DIABOLICAL: So Desperate to Pin Kirk's Murder on Israel (?), Joe Kent Now...
Abigail Spanberger Supporters Doing MAJOR Damage Control As Dems' Redistricting Efforts Pr...
5-10%!!! Cory Booker Admits the SAVE Act Will Do EXACTLY What Democrats DON'T...
Nicole Arbour Spills ALL the Tea (and Then Some) About Candace Owens 'Drama'...
WHOA! Did He MEAN to Say That?! Chris Murphy Says the Quiet Part...
HOOBOY: WATCH Mika Brzezinski's Face As Joe Scarborough Explains That She's Too STUPID...
Adam Schiff Whining About Women Needing Their Marriage License for SAVE Act BEYOND...
Bro. LOL! Tom Colicchio Does the Most Popular (and Hilarious) Meme Claiming Illegals...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement