Seize Heil!: Dem Graham Platner Imagines Himself As a Robin Hood Socialist Who...
Double Drivel: Hakeem Jeffries Ignorantly Claims New York Knicks Fan Trump Knows Nothing...
Craze and Means: Trump’s Not the Only Republican Kristen Welker of NBC News...
WNBA’s Brianna Turner Opposes USA 250 Patches on Uniforms Because Players Wouldn’t Have...
Jonathan Chait: The GOP's Refusal to Accept Spencer Pratt's Defeat Is Bizarre and...
Los Angeles Dodger Blake Treinen Was Not Wearing a Pride Hat on Pride...
WSJ Calls Them 'Dark Years.' Reality Calls Them Graham Platner’s Entire Pathetic Adult...
End Wokeness: ‘Nothing Can Prepare You for the Voice of this US House...
Bernie’s Last Gift to America: A Cheating Socialist With a Nazi Skull Tattoo
Woman Sues to Stop UFC Freedom 250 Event, Claiming ‘Aesthetic Injury’ to Her...
See Jane Divorce Dick: Scott Pelley Compares Getting Fired to Wife Jane’s Murder
Karmelo Anthony’s Defense Asks If It Was Possible Austin Metcalf Impaled Himself on...
Democrats Admit: Forget Border, Prices, or Crime — We’re Impeaching President Trump on...
Ex-Gawker Writer's Pathetic Knicks Fanfic: 'Boo Trump, Cheer My Commie Hero' Gets Absolute...
Democrats Suddenly Love White Men Again… Too Bad They Only Have the Self-Hating...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement