Trump Obliterates Norah O’Donnell: 'You’re Disgraceful' After She Tries Smearing Him With...
Obama Plays Dumb on Trump Assassination Attempt: 'Unknown Motive' Despite Shooter’s Anti-T...
Disposable Lives: The Media’s Selective Outrage Over Assassination Attempts on Trump
Truth Hurts, Malcolm: Democrats Slam Fetterman for Basic Common Sense on White House...
Princeton Prof Kevin Kruse & Popehat: Trump’s Being a Big Baby About All...
Some On The Left Are Already Trying to Luigi Mangione the Trump Assassin...
Sen. Rand Paul Gives an Encouraging Prognosis on the Debt
Jonathan Turley Shares the Truth: The Left Called It a False Flag —...
AOC: 'No Place for Political Violence' — After Calling Trump Hitler And Palling...
Apology Lasted Hours: Jvnior Promises to Stop Lying, Immediately Posts Bogus IDF Shirt...
Sean Davis Spots a Difference Between Football Games and a Hotel
Bill Kristol Is Concerned About How It Could Be Used
PBS WH Correspondent (Acosta's GF!) BODIED for Whining That Hegseth Wouldn't Answer Questi...
Bless Their HEARTS! Brian Stelter and Other Media Already Making Assassination Attempt Abo...
CLASSY: You Can Tell How ABSOLUTELY SHOOK Mainstream Media Were After WHCD Shooting,...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement