Hoppin' Mad Joe Walsh Croaks Out Demented Rant to Tiny Gathering of Freaky...
Legacy Media’s ‘Moderate’ Democrat Andy Beshear Won’t Say He’ll Put Americans Before Illeg...
CNN Talks to Slurmit the Frog of the Portland Frog Brigade
Robert De Niro Says He Chokes on the Phrase, ‘We All Love Our...
Rashida Tlaib Advises Americans to Keep Their Children Away From Sicko Pedophile Trump
Touching Grass Wins: USA Hockey Gold Brings Back 1980 Magic, Inspires and Reminds...
Judge Rules Trump Admin Can’t Deport Illegals to Third-Party Countries
Monica Crowley Had a Front Row Seat for Dems' Reaction During Trump's SOTU...
Jessica Valenti Had to Write Something About the US Men's Team Locker Room...
Mullin to Bernie Sanders: 'What Have You Been Doing Your Whole Life?' —...
Ilhan's Latest Stunt Backfires – Her ICE-Harassing Guest Arrested After Defying Police at...
Jen Psaki Criticizes the ‘Gross, Violent Pornography’ Part of the SOTU and the...
'Security Called the Cops on Us'! Looks Like Jim Acosta Is Trying to...
Canadian Paper: SOTU Was a Zoo, and Team USA Were the Monkeys
Clean Up on Aisle TDS! Allow Chuck Schumer to Explain Why Dems Didn't...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement