Podcaster Jennifer Welch: Dems Schumer and Jeffries Are Acting Like Trump’s ‘Fascist Colla...
A Lesson In Deflection: Dem Hakeem Jeffries Dodges Boy’s Question on ‘Take Your...
Pallywood Employing Child Actors for Its Latest Propaganda Campaign
NBC Tells DOGE Layoff Sob Stories on Behalf of the DNC
Gavin Newsom Funded an NGO Tasked With Importing HIV-Positive Migrants
NYC Mayor Mamdani Earns Sarcastic Applause After Billionaire 'Name and Shame' Effort Start...
High-Six-Figure USAID Layoffs Meet Public Eye-Roll: 'You Made Bank Off Our Taxes'
Investigative Reporter Self-Owns While Arguing Conservatives Are Lying About the SPLC Indi...
Writer Brags About Stealing from Whole Foods with Hasan Piker — Turns Out...
Hypocrite Jim Acosta Leaves Replies On, Does ‘So Many Triggered People’ Meme
Tucker Carlson Asks How American Evangelicals Can 'Support' IDF Soldier Vandalizing Jesus...
Shipwrecked Crew Drops Truth Bomb: Court Killed Virginia Amendment Because Dems Illegally...
NYT Podcast Lets Hasan Piker Casually Endorse Stealing Cars and Louvre Heists: 'Pro-Piracy...
AL Gubernatorial Candidate Who’s Taken on the Klan Misrepresents SPLC Indictments
NPR Media Guy Claims FBI Investigated Journalist Whose Work Reflected Poorly on FBI...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement