Culture Clubbed: MS NOW’s Lawrence O’Donnell Says Trump’s Second Election Already Crushed...
'I'm With Iran': John Pavlovitz and the Left's Long Tradition of Siding With...
Did Iran Cave or Was This TACO Tuesday? CNN's Erin Burnett Apparently Disappointed
From Tampon Tim to Hypocrite-in-Chief: Walz's Trump Attack Backfires Spectacularly
Zohran Mamdani’s Office Says New York’s History Is One of Colonization and Racial...
Society Thrives on Marriage and Birth Celebrations— Not Birthday Extravaganzas for the Sin...
Rep. María Salazar Hopes Her Dignity Act Eventually Leads to a Path to...
As Crime Explodes, Minneapolis Leaders Go Full Sodom: Legal Bathhouses Incoming
Politico Wants You to Meet Harmeet Dhillon, the Woman Who Thinks Civil Rights...
AP: Iran's Supreme National Security Council Has Accepted a Two-Week Ceasefire
Video Shows Illegal Wanted for Murder Attempting to Run Down ICE Agents, Getting...
Rubio Tuesday
James Woods Calls Out Jennifer Newsom for Telling Prisoners Their Crimes Were Probably...
Scum of the Earth Stick Together: Cheating Ruben Gallego Defends Eric Swalwell Amid...
Iranian TV: Iranians Locking Arms to Form Human Shields Around Power Plants

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement