Harwood Sneers at Former Plumber Markwayne Mullin — Then Wonders Why Dems Got...
Impeachmental Illness: Scott Jennings Burns CNN Dems Who Claim Party’s Not Running on...
California Democrats Proclaim (Or Try To) Who Is and Who Is NOT 'Allowed'...
Texas Dem Bobby Pulido Bragged About Springing Pedophile Bandmate from Jail — Now...
Does Anyone in the Media Want to Ask 51 Ex Intel Officials for...
Woke Superintendent Who Tried to Stop TPUSA Chapter at School Shown the DOOR...
Just WOW: Check Out Alleged TX Parole Supervisor’s Rant AGAINST Metcalf Family After...
Ilhan Omar Screws Herself: Camera Catches Her Admit She Doesn't Belong
Elizabeth Warren's Triggering Over Elon Is Getting Ratioed So Hard We Almost Feel...
Dither and Lawn: Talarico Can’t Think of Anything Manly He’s Done So He...
ANOTHER Platner Ex-GF Comes Forward Willing to Spill ALL the Tea Including Some...
SNL Skit? Supposed 'Dr.' Sets the Record STRAIGHT on Anthony Case DA...
Hunter Biden Takes to X and Reminds Us We've All Got Something to...
Allow JB Pritzker to Explain Why the Chicago Bears Moving to Indiana Is...
'Nazi Temu BERNIE' --> Graham Platner BODIED for Ugly Dig at Elon Musk...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos