Honeymoon Over: Democrats Turn on Their Own After Fetterman Podcast Appearance With Katie...
Daily Beast Hits Rock Bottom: Smears Sec. Duffy's Newborn Grandchild in Deranged TDS...
Talarico's Mystery Vegan Gal Pal: Ex-Chief of Staff, Gay Bar Dancer, and the...
Christians: Stop Equating Paxton's Personal Sins with Talarico's Outright Heresy
Jill Biden’s Family Image Rehab Tour Crumbles: Even Dems and Ex-Aides Aren’t Buying...
Cough Once and Suddenly You Hate Open-Air Drug Markets: Pratt's Epic New Video...
Platner’s Phony War Grievance: Volunteered for Combat, Ignored His Parents, Then Blamed Su...
What Happened to the Man Who Built CNN Should Terrify Every American Over...
Maria Shriver Fears for Future of 'Free Press' (Translation: The Dem Propaganda Machine...
Symone Sanders Slams DNC's F-Bomb Social Media Meltdown — And the Defenders Pile...
Anti-ICE Rioters Arrested As Loser Dems Roasted Outside Detention Center
Clay Travis Uses Ken Paxton Ad and a Sideways Jasmine Crockett 'Compliment' to...
Obama's 'Pod Save Bros' Laugh As Jill Biden Admits She Thought Joe Was...
BRO, Do You Even History?! Ro Khanna SCHOOLED After Comparing Nazi Tat Democrat...
'You're BOTH Commies'! Kennedy SAVAGES Karen Bass for Bragging About Hanoi Jane's Endorsem...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement