Report: Man Who Believed He Was Jesus Sent to Meet Him After He...
Mehdi Hasan Calls John Cleese a 'Racist Unhinged Ignoramus,' Cleese Calls Him a...
Cenk Uygur’s Muslim Pity Party: When ‘Oppressed’ Muslims Run Half the World
Hakeem Jeffries Disavows Antisemitic Dem Candidate in Texas, But What About Graham Platner...
From Elon’s Baby Mama to Hasan Piker's New Bestie: Ashley St. Clair’s Wildly...
SpaceX Employees Asked Not to Chant Nationalist Dogwhistles on Livestream
Sheriff Says She’ll Arrest Fake Made-Up Wannabe Law Enforcement: ‘You Don’t Want This...
Brilliant LA Hack: Spray 'Vote Pratt' Over Graffiti and Potholes — Watch Karen...
Graham Platner Notes the Words ‘Gaza’ and Genocide’ Didn’t Appear in DNC’s Autopsy
Rep. Steve Cohen Introduces Six Articles of Impeachment Against Chief Justice John Roberts
Porta-Potty Perv: GOP Ad Torches Dem Senate Candidate Graham Platner With His Own...
Pander Backfires: Protester Pulls Knife on CA Gov Candidate Tom Steyer’s Staff in...
Judge Dismisses Human Trafficking Case Against Maryland Man Kilmar Abrego Garcia as Vindic...
Hamas Supporter Mahmoud Khalil Will Appeal His Deportation Case to the Supreme Court
Kimmel Family Bullying Spree: Jimmy’s Sister-in-Law Harasses Bakery for Selling Spencer Pr...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement