Small Businesses Are Quietly Doing Something Nobody Notices
AWW! No Fair! Reason Why North Hampton Yacht Elites Can't Party Anymore Is...
NYC Immigrant Grocers Are Now Officially Living in the JOY That IS Socialism
Wells Fargo Exec Liked Death Threat on Corey DeAngelis' Family Pic — NOW...
Ro Khanna Tries TRASHING Former Bernie Sanders Jewish Staffer, THEN the Staffer Shows...
Sleep TIGHT, Virginia! Fairfax County Stings 9 Child Predators BUT This Is Steve...
Hot for HAMAS?! Rep. Dingell GUSHES Over Piker's MUSCLES After Raging at Media...
N’Kiyla Jasmine Thomas Wins OK Dem Nod — Then Goes Viral for Video...
UK Home Office Offers Mental Health Services for Staffers Who Fear the Sight...
Rep. Ro Khanna Calls Mark Ruffalo ‘One of the Great Humanitarians of Our...
Brian Krassenstein Deletes Post Announcing His Donation to a Designated Terrorist Organiza...
WaPo: How Did a Costume Resembling Blackface Make It Into Target's Offerings? Systemic...
Borderline Stupid: Chris Cuomo Doubts Dems Will Flood US With Illegal Aliens If...
PA Gov. Josh Shapiro Says He's Suing to Stop 'Unconstitutional' Attempt to Restrict...
Toronto Sun Columnist: New Memo Tells CBC Journalists Not to Refer to 9/11...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement