'You Built a Franchise on a Dead Man's Name': Data Republican Says 'Hello'...
'Vile Beyond Belief': Abdul El-Sayed's HQ Condemns Primary Opponent for Having Basic Human...
MS NOW Taps Influencer Harry Sisson to Talk About Sexual Scandals Plaguing Platner...
Pesky Past: Gavin Newsom Wants Everyone to Treat Platner’s Senate Implosion Like It’s...
Possible Platner Replacer Troy Jackson Says the Disgraced Maine Senate Nom Lied to...
Cope Harder: We're Back to Trump Is a Rapist and Pete Hegseth Has...
Kyle Kulinski Tells Republicans to Sit at the Kids’ Table While the Adults...
Noah Smith: That Dems Booted Platner Shows They Have Morals While Republicans Are...
Zohran Mamdani Grabs a Shovel and Helps Break Ground on 2 WTC Just...
Cops Threaten to Ticket Christian Street Preacher If Someone Claims They're Offended by...
Dear Hollywood: Stop Imagining Fake, Racist Scenarios and Hurting Your Own Feelings
Judge Sparkle Rejects Court Order Dismissing Her Ruling Against Election Integrity Measure
Mexico’s President to Pursue Legal Action Against US After ICE Shoots Mexican Illegal
Current Maine SOS Announces Her Bid to Replace Platner — Gets Attacked by...
Zohran Mamdani Calls to Abolish ICE After Illegal Shot While Trying to Run...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos