What's The One Thing You Hate About The Odyssey Asked and Hilariously Answered
Socialists and the City: Cynthia Nixon Scores a Sweet NY Gig After Staying...
Hijab-Wearing DSA Queen Linda Sarsour: 'Screw 1776, Let's Build a Document That Matches...
Maine Dem Freezes at Last Night's Debate, Blames ICE Shooting, Then Begs for...
Put American Students First: The Viral Indian Harvard Plea That Exposed Everything
Raccoon Swoon: Seattle Residents Hope to Catch a Glimpse of Cute Masked Bandit...
Carry On, Patriots! Navy Secretary Hung Cao Puts an END to Lefties Screeching...
Trump Exposes China, Democrats for 2020 Election Inteference
Jennifer Newsom Stumbles and Stammers When Confronted With the Fact the DOJ Probe...
Hillary Clinton Just Broke Her Projection Record While Ranting About Trump 'Undermining Ou...
Tim Walz's 'Friendly Reminder' About Donald Trump Is Blowing Up in His Face...
Dem Michigan Senate Candidate Abdul El-Sayed Exposes His Own Wife as a Bigot...
CNN National Security Hack Gets Called Out for Bogus Claim About Election Interference...
Hot Take of the Week: Bring Back EV and Solar Tax Credits to...
Mamdani's Commie Care: Nothing Says 'Great Parenting' Like Dumping Your Kids With Randos...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement