So, NOT Climate Change?! Alleged Spokane Wildfire Arsonist Arrested — WOW, How TF...
Worst ... Dad ... EVER! Seth Moulton Throws His Daughters Under the Bus...
CNN’s Kaitlan Collins Talks Turkey With Anti-Thanksgiving Francesca Hong, Gets Served DSA...
Brianna Morello Exposes Plano PD For Totally Mishandling Her Stalker Case
Balls on the Sidelines: Pro-Trans WNBA Coach Gripes About Men Stealing Women's Coaching...
Columbia Journalism School Appoints Two Fired ‘Journalists’ for Its Inaugural Residency Pr...
Oxford Union Debate on Islam Reportedly Cost £100,000 in Policing
That Absolute Coward Tony Fauci: Aaron Rodgers Nukes the COVID Gnome From Orbit
Denver City Council Debates Adding Slavery Acknowledgement to Meetings
Jeff Dye Discovers Comedy Is Not Pretty When Ugly Comedian Vandalized His Tesla
Man Has No Idea What’s in the DSA Platform, Doesn't Care, Voted for...
Madison Mayor Says Real Harm Is Being Done to Residents and Businesses, Proposes...
Politico Checks in on James Talarico After Attacks on His Masculinity by Seizing...
Francesca Hong’s Chief of Staff Has PTSD From All the Islamophobic Violence Following...
Corey Ruiz Autonomous Zone ‘Security’ Threatens Nick Sortor’s Life: 'There's a Whole Team...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement