Chris Rufo Strikes Again! Karen Bass Loves Homeless Drug Addicts So Much, She's...
Newsom and Jeffries Realize They Can't Stop Trump's Plan to Crush Democrats
'Shattered Fundraising Records'! Dems' Unhinged Rhetoric Is Working Out Great... for the N...
A 'YUGE' Endorsement: Trump Comes Out in Support of Spencer Pratt, Slams Clown...
WaPo Stomps on a Rake While Alleging Another Outlet's 'Contentious Layoffs' and 'Dwindling...
Joyce Carol Oates Calls Bluesky an ‘Upscale Mall’ — Conservatives Say That’s Exactly...
Dem Sen. Gillibrand Told Sean Duffy She'd Never Flown on Private Jets but...
Carlson Urges Massie to Heroically Name Epstein Names; Replies: ‘Remember What Happened La...
Dem Adviser: What Platner Bragged About Doing Makes Him More Relatable (Apparently Liz...
Former U.S. Rep. Barney Frank of Massachusetts, Key Architect of Dodd-Frank Act, Dies...
Dem Senate Candidate Graham Platner Mocked Purple Heart Hero: 'Dumb [Expletive] Didn’t Des...
A Glance at Some of the People Upset Thomas Massie Lost Speaks Volumes
It's a Cringe-Off! Gavin Newsom and JB Pritzker Battle Each Other for WORST...
MAGA Vs. Massie: Scott Jennings Delivers Kentucky Republican Incumbent’s Primary Post-Mort...
'Epstein Class': Ro Khanna Flirts With Antisemitism

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement