Off Their Block: Tetris Threatens to Sue WH Over ‘Build the Wall’ Online...
Former Fetterman Staffers (Losers) Launch X Dump Account, Promise Private Texts Starting S...
When Mothers Rally for a Child Killer, the Slippery Slope Is No Longer...
DA Couldn't Believe a Reporter Asked Him This Question About the Prosecution of...
America Is Healing: Maryland Renaissance Festival Announces a Ban on Furries
Reporter Describes Some Clancy Jurors As Mistrial Was Declared (Imagine What the Holdout...
Dishonest Rep. Ted Lieu Pushed Fake News About Where the GOP Convention Link...
Senate Hopeful’s Temper Tantrum: El-Sayed Destroys Store Property Because Someone Dissed H...
Wajahat Ali Nods Along As Rula Jebreal Slurs Hakeem Jeffries As 'Monkey' and...
OOPS! Mike Huckabee Apologizes for Unfortunate 'Typo' in His Valediction to Maria Bartirom...
Cop Says 3-Foot Petting Zoo Donkey HeeHaw ‘Charged’ Him, So He Shot the...
Holdout Won't Budge in Clancy Trial; Judge Calls Mistrial, Defense Asks High Court...
NYC Assembly Socialist Has the Most Insane Suggestion of All Time for How...
‘Limited by Their Experience’: James Talarico Explains Why Straight White People Have 'Bli...
Scott Jennings Feels Bad for Jasmine Crockett … CNN Panelist Acts Like He...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement