'We Were Sold a Character Arc': MSNOW Pundit Molly Jong-Fast Admits Media Bought...
John Fetterman Gives the WaPo a MUCH More Accurate Headline About Graham Platner's...
Amanda Litman Praises Michelle Goldberg’s Platner Apologia: ‘Everyone Made Mistakes Here’
Pundit Notes That GOP Isn’t Calling for Ken Paxton to Drop Out Despite...
Why This American Mom Chose Norway and Erling Haaland as Her New World...
Nick Searcy Spotted the Only Unforgivable Sin Cory Booker Isn't Willing to Overlook...
Ryan Grim, Drop Site News Report That Graham Platner's Victim Was Sort of...
Move Over for Do-Over?: Dem on CSPAN Says Platner Is ‘Obstructing’ a Fair...
Sarcastic 'Sorry, Not Sorry': MN Mayor Mocks Backlash After Ditching America's Birthday fo...
Chris Rufo's Latest Report on Gavin Newsom's California May Be the Most Stomach-Turning...
Trump Jr. Caught Something Insane at the Charlie Kirk Murder Trial
First Lady of NYC Hosting $5K Luxury Islamic Retreat Claiming Mary Was a...
Former Judge Hannah Dugan Given No Jail Time After Conviction for Obstructing ICE
Platner’s Team Goes Nuclear: Dems Planning Switch Behind Closed Doors While Our Guy...
WTF Are You Even SAYING? Keith Ellison Claims He Uses 'Gender-Affirming Care' Every...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement