Sexist TOOL Wajahat Ali Shows How Muslim Men REALLY Treat Women With UGLY...
Deets of 2012 Hijab Hate Crime Hoax Abdul El-Sayed Blamed on Islamophobia Have...
Middle Ma’am?: CNN’s Dana Bash Says She Sees All Sides, Scott Galloway Praises...
Tragic Carpet Stride: Actress Shailene Woodley’s Eccentric Emmy Ensemble Elicits Cringe an...
The Mitch Is Back: Kentucky Sen. McConnell Returns to Congress for First Vote...
Macklemore Dropped From Ed Sheeran Tour
Professor Who Blamed Austin Metcalf's Father for His Death Wishes MAGATs 'Happy Kirkiversa...
NYT: Whistleblower Says Federal Agents May Have Broken Laws to Find Noncitizens on...
CBS News Flies to Liberia to Show Us Hotel Where Deportees Are Being...
Enjoy Totally Authentic Footage of Gavin Newsom Fly Fishing With CNN's Jake Tapper
Bernie Sanders Says Abdul El-Sayed Faces the Same Kind of Bigotry That JFK...
NYT, NBC News Hot and Bothered by Ad in Which Sydney Sweeney 'Sexualizes...
Rep. Shontel Brown Demands Federal Investigation Into 'Possible' Lynchings
MA Takes Custody of Daughter of Couple Who Won’t Affirm Her Gender, Gets...
Is Ilhan Omar Going to Finally Face Consequences?

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement