Karmelodramatic Response: Emotional Court TV Contributors Have Hard Time Accepting Anthony...
Blitzkrieg Opp: Graham Platner Wins Democrat Senate Primary and Credits ‘Love and Redempti...
Member of Parliament Says No Good Will Come From Sharing Video of Attempted...
Roseanne Barr Not Impressed With Rolling Stone's Wrap-Up Smear Against Spencer Pratt
Inclusionmaxxing So Hard You Invent the Muslim Lesbian Power Couple
Daily Beast: 'CBS News Veteran' Shreds ‘Brazen MAGA Slant’ of 60 Minutes
'THIS IS A WAR': Here Are More Reactions to the Karmelo Anthony Murder...
‘Our Tea Party Is Here’: The Left is Standing By Their Nazi-Tattooed, Adultery-Plagued...
MeToo Who? AOC: Abuse Allegations Against Democrat Are 'Hard to Stomach'... But We'll...
Irish Politicians Respond to Immigrant Stabbing Incident, You Wont Believe What They're Co...
LIVE ELECTION RESULTS: Primary Night in Maine, Nevada, North Dakota, and South Carolina
Tom Steyer: Billionaire Democrat Proves You Really Can Buy Everything Except Votes
Trump Watches Basketball Like a Normal Human, Jonah Goldberg Has a Full-On Nervous...
‘FAFO, Donald’: Gavin Newsom Signs Law Imprisoning Politicians Who Spread Election Lies
Karmelo Anthony Supporter Rages, Wants to Know What to Tell Her Five Boys

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement