Stacey Abrams Subpoenaed for Some Pretty MASSIVE Campaign Finance Violations
And Here We GOOO: Scott Jennings SHUTS DOWN Dems Who Want Racist Districts...
Thomas Massie Allegations, Reportedly From His Ex-GF, Making the Rounds on X and...
REEEE! Nutbag Rebekah Jones Sees Something Super FASCIST-Y on Redistricted Tennessee Map a...
He Isn't Just Unhinged, He's REALLY Stupid: Check Out How BAD VA AG...
PA Supreme Court Justice David Wecht Leaves Democratic Party Over Rise in Antisemitism
Dem Katie Porter Says Fellow Gubernatorial Candidate Leaked Video of Her Verbally Abusing...
Politico ‘Journo’ Warns Republicans They’ll Be Called ‘Racists’ for Umpteenth Time If VRA...
Dem FCC Official Tells Jimmy Kimmel Bestie Jake Tapper About Trump's Effort to...
Spanish Police Fear Islamist Terrorists Taking Advantage of Massive Grant of Legal Status
WaPo: Immigrants Are Giving Up Their Cases and Leaving In Soaring Numbers
Hantavirus Cruise Ship Scare Hits Nebraska; Experts Say No Pandemic Risk — Lockdown...
Chris Van Hollen: If You’re Mad Trump’s Trying to Muzzle Jimmy Kimmel, Be...
D'OH! The Left's Redistricting Efforts in the Courts Continue to Backfire (Cue MORE...
Backfire: Family Demands Answers in Police Shooting, Gets Them in Bodycam Footage

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement