Sen. Chris Murphy Thought Visiting the Middle East Made Him Look BRAVE. He...
Jessica Tarlov Claims Mamdani Is Actually 'Pretty Cool' for Not Ushering in Sharia...
RUH-RO! Ro Khanna Reaps a Ratio TSUNAMI on Post Blaming Republicans for America's...
That One Time John Fetterman Made Donna Brazile Look STUPID on Bill Maher...
People Are LOVING How BADLY Western Lensman EMBARRASSED Amy Klobuchar With Old Biden...
Xavier Becerra Has Some SERIOUS ’Splainin’ to Do About That $12 Sob Story...
Bro, Take the L! James Talarico's OFFICIAL Campaign Account BUSTED Lying About Rally...
MI’s Jewish AG Supports Abdul El-Sayed Because He’ll Better Protect Separation of Church...
Socialist Asks What You Want Your Tax Dollars Going to If Not Food...
Lunatic Tries to Run Down Maine Wire Reporter for 'Invasion of Privacy': Suspect...
Woman Mystified by Middle Eastern-Looking Men Filling Up Walmart Grocery Carts With Milk...
Shooting Outside High School Football Game in Minnesota Blamed on Somali Gangs
Amy Siskind Wants All 57 Men in Cornell Fraternity’s Group Chat Investigated and...
Extreme or Extremely Funny? Steve Hilton ‘Lesbian’ Campaign Ad Is Rubbing Some Voters...
Ro Khanna Can't Believe Vance Would Go So Low As to Tell a...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement