Ryan Grim: Republicans Looked Silly When ‘Nazi Tattoo’ Turned Out Not to Be...
What Stuck Out to Karmelo Anthony’s Father Was the ‘All-White Jury’
World Cup Tourists Find Surreal Sporting Goods Store With a Firing Range; Also...
Gavin Newsom's 'Donald Trump's Dream' Video Melts All Remaining Projection Detectors
BOMBSHELL: MI Senate Dem’s Campaign Staffer Busted in Hamas-Linked Threat Plot Against UM...
Pentagon on Lockdown, Trump Striking Iran, Seizing Kharg Island?
Kimmel and TMZ Tried Again to Mock Spencer Pratt and Ended Up Accidentally...
VP Vance’s Next-Level Fearless Move: Battle-Tested Veteran Set to Face the Shrews of...
'I've Watched That 67 Times'! Here's Our Anti-ICE Loon FAFO of the Day
ABC News Journo Reports Susan Collins Has Pounced on the Platner Allegations (and...
The Left Has Found Their World Cup Hero: a Somali Referee With Ties...
Nancy Mace Goes Nuclear: Brutal Brother-Marriage Roast After Ilhan Omar Mocks Her Primary...
Ron Klain Pivots From Vouching for Biden's Cognitive State to Whitewashing Graham Platner'...
Predator App Patron Platner’s New Plan: Hammer the Epstein Class and Pray Voters...
Presidential Pool Party: While the Left Screeches, Trump Welcomes Workers Into the Oval...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement