Ron DeSantis Ends Pennsylvania’s Recruitment Attempt: ‘Florida Has More Wawa Stores’
NYT Tries Sympathy for Illegal Who Sneaked Back In to Birth ‘Anchor Baby’...
Ilhan Omar’s Phony ‘War Survivor’ Act Exposed: She Wasn’t a Victim — Her...
Christine Amanpour Claims She’s the Same Military Rank as Pete Hegseth: 'My Dog...
LIES! Ayanna Pressley: Deporting Haitians Will Collapse U.S. Healthcare Because They’re 1...
The Drunk Republican (and Others) Troll the UK MERCILESSLY After They Found Out...
'Isn't Communism Awesome?' 'New Study' About Mamdani's City-Owned Grocery Stores Will Only...
Zero Self-Awareness Detected: KBJ Says Fellow SCOTUS Justices Are 'Utterly Irrational'
Pattern of Ignorance: Dem Hakeem Jeffries Dodges 'Years of Rumors' Question About Eric...
Wait, Eric Swalwell Reportedly Spent HOW MUCH Donor Money on Hotels?
Trump Wins: Iran Agrees to 'Everything' As Strait of Hormuz Opened 'Forever'
Crockett and Dockets: Jilted Jasmine Shares Career Plans After Losing House Seat and...
Chuck Schumer's Attempt to Mock Trump's Authenticity Gets Roasted Into a Fully Cooked...
Journo Who Admits Burying Swalwell Info Now Blames Fox for Not Covering It—Even...
Spineless in New York: Rep. Lawler Sides With 'The Squad' to Protect Haitian...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement