Brian Stelter Finds Out in a Ratio-Worthy Way Nobody Needed CNN to See...
Mike Lee Pulls ZERO Punches Calling Out Both Democrats AND Republicans Over the...
Let Kids Be KIDS: Parents UNLOAD on Santa Fe Public Schools About Their...
'Not Funny to the Victims!' Michigan Dem Candidate Laughs Off Mention of Her...
Texas Daycare Accused of Running a Fight Club and the Internet Immediately Broke...
DEFCON MAPLE SYRUP: Carney Prepared for a Trump Invasion, and X Has Entered...
'Here's Why God Is Trans': Episcopal Priestess Says Mary Assigned Jesus Male at...
Macklemore Announces Free Palestine Tour After What Happened to Him From the Billionaire...
Pastor at James Talarico’s Church Says We Have No Way of Knowing If...
Flock Cameras Gone, Predator Dead: Sheriff Judd’s ‘We Could Have Saved Him’ Argument...
James Talarico Asks How Paralyzing a DoorDash Driver Makes Anyone More Safe
Longhorns Coach Sarkisian Blames Trump’s Exit for Miami’s Title-Game Loss, but Facts Say...
Instead of Arresting Netanyahu, Mamdani Plants an Olive Tree With Palestinian Families Fro...
Obama Was ‘Absolutely Confident’ Women Would Govern Better. X Is Less Certain -WATCH.
Netanyahu Rips Mamdani, Saying Genocide Is What His Buddies Would Have Done If...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement