All Hell Broke Loose As Fauci 'Testified' Today
Deranged WNBA Owner Berates Teenage Fans Supporting Fair Play for Women
Laura Ingraham Suggests Rand Paul Take a Different Approach in Getting Fauci to...
Mamdani’s Freebie Groceries Spark Lawsuit: Immigrant Owners Warn Bodegas Face Extinction
No Interviews, No Free Palestine Drama: Studios Keep Mark Ruffalo Quiet for Spider-Man...
PolitiFact's Defense of WI Dem Candidate for Gov Is Why So Many 'Fact-Checkers'...
Is That Really Their Only Concern? MSNOW Frets Fauci’s Fifth Amendment Could Become...
OUCH! Bernie Moreno Straight-Up NUKED Fauci AND His 'Dirtbag Attorney'
DNC Woes Continue As New Report Reveals They Were Scammed by Someone Pretending...
Senator Hawley Hilariously Forces Fauci to Plead the Fifth on His Tie Color...
WNBA’s Stef Dolson Slaps on Pro-Trans Tank Top to Own the Cons… Her...
Fauci Wanted to Plead the Fifth but Have His Lawyer Do the Talking...
Rand Paul Mocks Fauci's Cowardly Invocation of the Fifth Amendment During Senate Hearing
Frenzy on X After Fauci Refuses to Answer Congress: Users Call Him Coward...
Rand Paul Makes a GREAT Case for Fauci's Pardon Being Put to the...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement