Pastor at James Talarico’s Church Says We Have No Way of Knowing If...
Flock Cameras Gone, Predator Dead: Sheriff Judd’s ‘We Could Have Saved Him’ Argument...
James Talarico Asks How Paralyzing a DoorDash Driver Makes Anyone More Safe
Longhorns Coach Sarkisian Blames Trump’s Exit for Miami’s Title-Game Loss, but Facts Say...
Instead of Arresting Netanyahu, Mamdani Plants an Olive Tree With Palestinian Families Fro...
Obama Was ‘Absolutely Confident’ Women Would Govern Better. X Is Less Certain -WATCH.
Netanyahu Rips Mamdani, Saying Genocide Is What His Buddies Would Have Done If...
CAT-Egorically Insane: NYC Shelter's Adoption Policy Is So Unhinged, Even PETA Is Calling...
Hakeem Jeffries Says Justice Has Been Delayed for Nolan Wells, but Not Denied;...
John Cleese Suggests That He Wishes African Slaves Had Been ... (Ahem) ......
Steele the Same: MSNOW President Claims Former RNC Chair Adds to Network’s ‘Broad...
Rep. Rashida Tlaib Claims ICE Killed Another Man (or Was It the Tree...
Trump Introduces Xi to 'Biden' Portrait in the WH Presidential Walk of Fame,...
Marco Rubio Holds NOTHING Back Explaining to Globalists That America Is Putting AMERICA...
Brian Stelter Says Press Holds Trump WH Accountable (but Under Biden Wanted It...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement