Video of Abdul El-Sayed Listening to Kamala Harris Gets the Musical Accompaniment It...
Hidden Camera Catches Talarico's Mom Planning Move to DC to Keep Him in...
CNN's Jake Tapper Wonders Why More Conservatives Aren't Defending Legacy Media Against Tru...
WaPo Has ALL the Climate Change Alarmist Bases Covered When It Comes to...
CBS News' Margaret Brennan's Assessment of Iranian Nukes Changes Based on What Trump...
Where's the Love? The View Asks the Single Most Idiotic Question (yet) About...
Bill Burr: Maybe If Healthcare Execs Had Just Listened, Luigi Wouldn’t Have Had...
Charles Cooke Won’t Clap As Hannah-Jones ‘Oopsies’ Sacrificing Her Kid to the Cause
DHS Catches Kamala Harris Going Full 'Quiet Part Out Loud' on Removing Noncitizens...
Mehdi Hasan Says He's Now on the Same Page As Bill Kristol 'Thanks...
That’s Eracism!: Stanford University Gets Caught AI-Altering Ad Photo to Make Students Mor...
The Banish Acquisition: Insiders Say Mood at CNN Is Like a Funeral After...
El-Sayed and El-Salad: Dem Enlists Kamala Harris to Win Over ‘Black Birthing People’...
Minister From James Talarico’s Church Admits They’re Not a Belief-Based Church
Since 1986, Geraldo Rivera Has Never Met a Rake He Couldn't Step On

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement