Chris Rufo Exposes California Program That Gives Taxpayer-Funded Meth Pipes to the Homeles...
Scold News: Five Years Ago, Fauci Chum Chuck Todd Was Lecturing the Vaccine-Hesitant...
James Carville Says Fauci Is an Honest Guy Who Made No Mistakes and...
John Cleese Says He’s Being ‘Ritually Humiliated’ as a Racist for Supporting Rupert...
Toy Box Doc: Brandon Gill Asks X If James Talarico Still Plays With...
Gov. Tim Walz of All People Tells Elon Musk, ‘See You in Court,...
Agitators in Madison Use Boards With Nails to Defend Their BLM Encampment, and...
Fully Vaxxed. Promised Protection, And Still They’re Rewriting What Fauci, Biden & the...
Rolling Stone: We’re No Closer to Getting to the Origin of the COVID...
Good Question: Will NYC Residents Need to Show ID to Shop at City-Run...
TMZ’s Harvey Levin Calls Fauci Attacks ‘Heartbreaking,’ McCarthy-Like
David Axelrod Races to Defend Fauci After He Pleads the Fifth on Everything—Even...
Dem Sen. Andy Kim Feting Dr. Fauci Was a Deranged Political Version of...
Bulwark's Correspondent Confirms MS NOW's Theory That Fauci Hearing Was a Show Trial
Gov. Andy Beshear Pulls the 'Poor Old Man' Card on Anthony Fauci, Scolds...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement