Meltdown ALERT! Thomas Massie Lashing OUT When Asked About Ex-GF and an NDA...
'Hello, Mr. French': DataRepublican Turns Her Attention to David French and HOOBOY, YIKES,...
Ain't THAT Sweet?! Merch at Texas Democrat Convention SCARY Reminder of Who They...
John Cornyn's SMUG Post Talking Down to Grassroots About the SAVE Act BACKFIRES...
OOF! Dems' Reaction to a CRAZY Confused Joe Biden RANT Speaks VOLUMES About...
Kamala Chameleon: Victor Davis Hanson Channels the Former VP for a Meandering Message...
Party Departure?: James Carville Freaks Out on Fox News Over DSA Takeover of...
The Intercept: 30-Year Sentence for ‘Transporting Zines’ Is 5-Alarm Fire for Free Speech
Socialist Sickness: Bill Maher Says DSA Candidate Is ‘Patient Zero’ for Woke Mind...
Imagine Being Amy Coney Barrett and Telling Your Haitian Children You ‘Voted’ to...
Why Fleeing to Russia for 'Traditional Values' Is a Mistake
Sharpton Tries to Script a Softball Apology for Mamdani’s Socialist Candidate — She...
CNN's Kaitlan Collins Pushes Back on Trump Rhetoric, Says Democratic Socialism Is Not...
The ‘Hole’ Story: Conan O’Brien and Anderson Cooper Once Said Don’t Talk ‘Sh**’...
School Counselor Promotes Kids' Book About Finding a 'Chosen' Family Accepting of Their...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement