Beshear Madness: ‘Moderate’ Dem Kentucky Governor Wants to Abolish the Electoral College
Kristen Welker of NBC News Goes After AG Todd Blanche for Not Treating...
Cuban Snivel Crisis: Mavs Billionaire Mad at Khanna’s Wealth Tax, Touted Harris As...
It's Not 'Brat Summer' Anymore: Democrat Mary Peltola REJECTS Endorsement From Kamala Harr...
Erick Erickson Spots an Ongoing Theme With the Vice President
What's the Difference?: Maggie Haberman Says Trump Is a ‘Construction Guy’ Not a...
Terry Moran Says ABC News Is ‘Liberal Institution’ That Lacks ‘Viewpoint Diversity’ —...
Meltdowns Incoming! Sophie Cunningham Celebrates Her Birthday With Some Raucous Patriotism
Price Caps Growing Popular, Frank Luntz Reports
Go HOME. You're DRUNK: Pramila Jayapal Thinks Medicare for All Is a Human...
In AMERICA?! WHAT?! WATCH Virginia Small Business Owner Kick Client Out After Learning...
Doesn't Give a S**T About These Sailors: Gold Star Wife Takes Jim Acosta...
Somali? Fraudsters Vandalizing MN GOP Candidate's Car SO DUMB They Missed the CAMERA...
If What Happened to Mark Kelly at This Conference Is Indicative of Dem...
Rashida Tlaib Sucks. That's It. That's the Headline. (Hint: Hands Up Don't Shoot)

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement