Matt (Matty)Yglesias Throws Tantrum Over Judges Who Won't Let Virginia Dems Ignore the...
'F***!' Anonymous House Dems Spill to Axios How Disastrous the SCOVA Ruling Is...
Babylon Bee Has the PERFECT Final Scene for Mark Hamill's Despicable Tale of...
Stick a Fork In Him: Wes Moore Tanks His 2028 Aspirations With BIZARRE...
Stacey Abrams Takes Time Out of Her Busy Schedule Being President
Megyn Kelly's Producer Goes Full TINFOIL Blaming Algorithm (Mark Levin?!) for Abrupt Click...
Acosta Sounds the Democracy Alarm ... Right After Virginia Supreme Court Dares to...
Angry Staffer Gets a Heapin' Helpin' of GOV 101 After Claiming VA Decision...
Cuck Chair Karma: Louise Lucas Taunts Backfire as VA Supreme Court Strikes Down...
Louise Lucas' Customized Va. License Plate Aged Poorly (Your 'Maybe She Can Make...
Virginia Supreme Court Strikes Down Illegal Map & Spells Doom for Broke Democrats
She MAD! Unhinged Leftist Woman Screeching Outside the VA Supreme Court Building Is...
Here's a 'How It Started vs. How It's Going' Starring a Formerly Braggadocious...
HOOBOY: Now That SCOVA Has Tossed Out VA Dems' Gerrymander, the Left Is...
Hakeem Jeffries' Va. Ruling Meltdown Begins (Seems His 'Maximum Warfare' Effort Has Massiv...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement