Texas Court Swears in Witness 'in the Name of Allah,' Igniting Fury Over...
'Once He Knew the Source, Fetterman Ate Him Alive' — Senator Shut Down...
Jessica Tarlov Says Dems Need More Troy Jackson-Style Anonymous Account Trolling Energy (R...
A Gentle Reminder: The Science Writer Who Labeled COVID Lab Leak Racist Still...
Eagles Defensive Coordinator Mocks Dr. Fauci to Escape a Reporter's Question
Yikes: Official WNBA Account Posts Players Betting on Itselves, Then Scrubs the Evidence
Look at This Insane Video From Spain for a Reminder of What Dem/DSA...
Detroit Rev. Picks Stevens Because El-Sayed Won’t Shut Up About Gaza Long Enough...
'Made Me Sick': Ex DNI Tulsi Gabbard Reminds Everyone Why Dr. Fauci Took...
'Jail Won’t Fix His Heart': NYU Student Defends Letting Rapists, Including Her Own,...
Fetterman Tells Bernie to Sit This One Out; Sanders Fires Back, Questions Whether...
Basement Hermit Michael Tracey Shocked That People Whose Lives Were Ruined Still Care...
Sen. Eric Schmitt Digs Up a Fauci-Related Flashback From NPR to Let Them...
Joyce Carol Oates Calls Criticism of Nolan’s ‘The Odyssey’ the 'Crude Language of...
The Atlantic Says the Fauci Hearing Was Full of 'Unchallenged Allegations' (Yeah, About...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement