Step Aside BlueSky, Because MapQuest Is the New Destination for TDS Sufferers
What Happens to Cenk Uygur While He's LIVE Ranting About People Being Mean...
'Miserable GRIFTERS': Media Blame Trump for Nepal Landslide — Michael Shellenberger AIN'T...
Yesterday's Shooting in Minneapolis Had Nothing to Do With ICE but the NYT...
DAMNING Thread of Anti-American, Deleted 9/11 Posts Should be CAMPAIGN-ENDING for Abdul El...
Gloria Steinem Dead at 92
Bloomberg Gets Torched for Using the Nepal Disaster to Dishonestly Sound the Climate...
CNN’s Abby Phillip Says No Distinction Between Citizens and Illegal Aliens Who Murder...
Overstepping the Marx: Hakeem Jeffries Lashes Out at Democrats Who Voted to Condemn...
TMZ Reports That AOC 'Is Officially Back on the Market' but Not for...
Documents Show 'Beloved' Kennedy Center Statue Targeted by Trump Administration for Remova...
Cory Booker’s Sob Story About a 5-Year-Old’s Father Being Detained by ICE Earns...
BOOM! Harmeet Dhillon Shares That Bowe Bergdahl’s Conviction for Desertion Stands
Abdul El-Sayed’s ‘Genocide’ Post From October 2023 Gets a Fresh Look
Two Ambassadors Tell Jim Acosta Trump Admin Reminds Them of Germany in the...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement