Pittsburgh Schools: Sorry Kids, No In-Person School—The NFL Needs Roads Clear for Their...
Two Women Face Prison Time for Stalking an ICE Agent They Followed Home
Chuck Norris Hospitalized? Nah, Hawaii Had a Chuck Norris Emergency – The Internet's...
CBS News Still Reports That ICE 'Arrested' a 5-Year-Old; Family's Asylum Claim Denied
NASCAR Driver Required to Undergo Sensitivity Training After Speaking in a Tone ‘Mocking...
The Left Hates You, Moms: New York Magazine Encourages Non-Monogamy for Mothers
Scott Jennings Nails It: Hypocrisy Alert – Alito Flag Scandal vs. Mamdani Wife's...
Conor Lamb Still Seething Over Fetterman's Primary Beatdown, Brands Him a 'Vigilante' for...
Cry Harder, Lefties: Free Beacon Dares Dig Up Mamdani Wife's RACIST Posts From...
'You Must Be Fun at Parties': CNN's Jake Tapper Fact Checks Trump's Pearl...
Margaret Brennan Is BIG MAD That Pete Hegseth Is Asking the Public to...
BAHAHAHAA! Check Out the Name Adam Kinzinger Gave the Documentary He Made About...
Elon Lives Rent-Free in Bernie's Head: Sanders Rants About Musk's Fortune Amid SAVE...
Lefties and Dems Come COMPLETELY Unglued Over John Fetterman's Vote for Sen. Mullin...
Funniest. President. EVER! Trump Makes Hilarious (If Awkward) Pearl Harbor Joke In the...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement