Lefty Thug Trying to Block Vehicles at ICE Detention Center Gets Introduced to...
Border Security Funded, Family Values Defended: Conservatives Deliver on Capitol Hill
Ex Biden-Harris Staffer Explains Why Hypocrisy Is Running Rampant (THIS Deflection Sounds...
Ratio-Palooza! JB Pritzker's Statement on Chicago Bears' Likely Move to Indiana Gets Torch...
Bill Maher Torpedoed and Sank Dem Sen. Chris Murphy's BS Spin About 60...
P-Hustle and Bustle: Fetterman Holds Class for ‘Journos’ Clueless About Graham Platner’s C...
Respectable Hypocrisy?: James Carville Tells CNN’s Jake Tapper the Truth About Dems and...
Late Night Fun With Graham Fatner, Der Uber Grossenfurher
Rep. Ro Khanna Beclowns Himself: Epstein Crusader Campaigns for Alleged Woman-Abuser Graha...
Nazi-Tatted Nepo-Baby Just Delivered the Final Nail in #MeToo’s Coffin — And the...
The Blind Sheikh’s Defense Witness Wants to Gut America’s Defense Budget
Dem Senator Whitehouse Bankrolling Platner Tells His Victims to Get Over It —...
Matt Stoller Ditches 'HR Lady' Politics for Nazi-Tattooed, Sexting, Girlfriend-Roughing, R...
With the Bidens Determined to Stay in the Spotlight This Year, CNN Has...
Marco Rubio Faced Down a Democrat Firing Squad and Walked out Without a...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement