Moderation Operation: Is Dem Jessica Tarlov AOC’s One-Woman PR Rep? Sure Seems Like...
Abdul El-Sayed Notes That Jesus Was Considered a Radical in His Time Too
Florida Squeeze: MS NOW’s Morning Joe Crew Fawn Over Latest Democrat DSA Darling...
Daily Beast and Rosie O'Donnell Think an Iranian Assassination Plot Is Enough to...
Former NIAID Adviser Pleads Guilty to Scheme to Hide Records During the COVID...
Harmeet Dhillon Explains What Was Really on Display From CNN's Erin Burnett and...
Spencer Pratt Notices Something Very Curious About How Long 'Democracy' Takes in Certain...
Karen Bass Brags About Forcing Taxpayers to 6x Her Campaign Cash While the...
Western Lensman Breaks Down Bottom-Feeder 'Journalism' From CNN That Helped Dems Smear Nat...
Everything Team Rick Wilson Touches Dies: That’s How Vindman Blew a Race He...
CNN Just Went Too Far and It Backfired
Vindman-Slayer Angie Nixon Will NOT Answer Questions About How Her Socialist Utopia Would...
Brian Stelter Says Media Rushed to Meet the Demand for Info (Also Known...
Holy Backfire, Batman! Hakeem Jeffries' Post About Accountability Gets Ratioed Into the Su...
Miami Herald ‘Journalist’ Julie Brown Disgustingly Labels Trump Aide Natalie Harp His ‘Sid...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement