Singer Kelis Is Selling Race-Swapped Collectibles, Will Her Remakes Bring All the Boys...
Scott Jennings Re-Ups Unanswered Question About Dem Senate Hopeful James Talarico’s Six Ge...
POPCORN: Watch Police Beat the Crap Out of Gaza Flotilla Clowns
Lived Experience: Dem Ro Khanna Wants to Add Four More ‘Apolitical’ Ketanji Browns...
ABC News: 'Experts' Say Travel Restrictions to Contain Ebola Could Have Unintended Consequ...
Governor Newsom Press Office Tells Pete Hegseth It Just Wants Lower Gas Prices
Another Reason to Be Thankful to Be American: Air Conditioning
Denver Post: With No Options Left, Venezuelan Family Walks Into ICE Custody
CBS News: For Group of Vietnam Vets, Opposing Trump’s Proposed Arch Is ‘True...
City of Minneapolis Says to Gather This Memorial Day and Celebrate the Life...
'This Is VILE': Democrats ‘Honor’ the Service Members Who’ve 'Died in Trump’s War...
Dave Portnoy EMBARRASSES Graham Platner's Team for Thinking He Would 'Play Footsy with...
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey Gets Ratioed Into the Sun for His First Remembrance...
Graham Platner Slammed Long-Serving Politicians While Bernie Sanders Stood Next to Him and...
Liberal Celebs Sounding Alarms About the First Amendment Need Some Reminders

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement