If Iranian Regime State Media Wrote This ABC News Post What Would They...
Islamic Radicalism Hits America
Abigail Spanberger Gets Help Figuring Out How the ODU Terrorist Was Able to...
Counterfeit Cop: Dem Jasmine Crockett’s Security Officer Gunned Down by SWAT Team in...
Suicidal Empathy: CNN’s Jake Tapper Acts Out Norm MacDonald’s Viral ‘Muslim Backlash’ Meme...
Treason in Times Square? Crowds Proclaim Loyalty to Islamic Republic, Chant 'Shame, Shame...
Lefty Outlets: Just a Guy Avenging Innocent Family. Reality: Hezbollah Ties All Along
Trump Bombs Kharg Island Military Sites, Spares Oil—Warns Iran to Leave Strait of...
Biden DOJ's Masterstroke: 'Sorry, Not Sorry' Letter for Straw Buyer Who Then Armed...
‘This Is a Case About Swinging D***s:’ A Dissent Goes THERE on Transgender...
Oh Joy: Fake Dr. Jill Biden Drops Memoir LITERALLY No One Asked For
The Cost of Real Community: Showing Up When It's Inconvenient
Cuba's 'Never Bend the Knee' Pledge Meets Reality: Now in Talks with Trump
Congrats to Dearborn: Your Mayor Just Invented the 'Tragic Family Loss' Defense for...
Babylon Bee Breaks the Story About CNN's Much Needed Format Change After an...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement