Ruh-Ro!: Khanna Wants Debate With Elon Musk After He Threatened to Sue Over...
Swimming Fool: All Wet MS NOW Contributor Confuses Reflecting Pool With a Water...
Family of English Woman Killed by African Asylum Seeker Told to ‘Tone Down’...
‘America’s BS Detector’ Claims 400,000 Were Killed in Revenge for October 7
Miami Just Got Stormed by Kilts, Bagpipes, and Brazilian Whistles
Blaming Musk: Ro Khanna and Chris Van Hollen Warn USAID Cuts Will Kill...
Illegal Alien Mother Sues Government Over Anxiety, Hair Loss After Masked ICE Agents...
WaPo: DOJ Will Appeal 'Her' Sentence to Keep Would-Be Assassin 'Sophie' Roske Behind...
Boston Middle School Sorry for Triggering Muslim Students With FACTS About Six Million...
Mehdi Hasan Notes Elon Musk Has Not Posted About White Child Sex Offender
Full Commie Trainwreck: NY Dem Brad Lander Embraces Radical Islamists, Hopes to Join...
Podcaster Airs Pro-Life Congresswoman’s Ectopic Pregnancy Story Despite Her Request Not To
CA State Senator Wiener Accuses Bible of Rainbow Hijacking – Because History Started...
Judge Blocks Trump Administration From Using Database to Ensure Noncitizens Can’t Vote
Judge Finds That DOJ Investigation of Tim Walz Was Politically Motivated; Gavin Newsom...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement