Anti-Gun Public Defender Has Felon Clients Serving Prison Terms for Having Guns They...
AP: Voting by Noncitizens Is Extremely Rare, but Trump Is Fueling Attempts to...
NBC News Exclusive: Pete Hegseth Considering 2028 Run
WaPo: Historic Cherry Trees Are Coming Down by the Dozen Thanks to Trump
Biden’s International Women of Courage Award Winner Lands on US Terror Watchlist, Visa...
Arizona AG Says Trump’s Mail-In Ballot Measures Will Go Into Effect Over Her...
Gov. Gavin Newsom Takes Credit for Judge Blocking Trump's EO on Securing Mail-In...
'So, Like, a Normie D**che': Hasan Piker Gets Demolished ... by His HAIRDRESSER
Gov. Josh Shapiro Claims Newborn Died From Measles, Doubles Down When Caught Lying
Mamdani's 'Signature Childcare Program' Launch Provides a Preview of City-Owned Grocery St...
'Learing Center' Alert! Minn. Dems Spent HOW MUCH on Beds That 7 Homeless...
Do You Notice Something About the Scene As Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Insists...
CNBC's Joe Kernen Delivered Some Brutal Trade War Reality Checks to Canada's Ex-...
WaPo Gets Shredded During Attempt to Help Dems With Spin About Arrested Illegals
Stephen Miller Drops a Truth Bomb About Illegal Aliens That Should Be in...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement