A-HOLE Who Publicized Aborting His Unborn Child With Down Syndrome NOW Playing the...
YUP, Looks Like the NYT Set Lyndsey Fifield Up As a Gift to...
There's Obviously Been a Rule Change Since These Dems Said This About the...
A Set-Up All ALONG: Lyndsey Fifield SHREDS The New York Times for Using...
‘Stached Away: Ex-Trump Adviser John Bolton to Plead Guilty to Mishandling Classified Docu...
Out-of-Sync Ink: Dem Graham Platner Responds to Ex-Girlfriend’s Nazi Totenkopf Tattoo Time...
Update: Boston's Trans Period Pride Event Is Back On: 'We Are Not Backing...
Roseanne Remembers How No One Stood Up for Her
USA Today Reports Several GOP-Run States Have Declared June Nuclear Family Month
'Stay the Course': Parents of Children With Down Syndrome React to Despicable Abortion...
'The Only Good Cracker Is a Dead Cracker': This Karmelo Anthony Supporter Seems...
Delaney Hall Further Trolls Chef José Andrés With Menu of ‘Chef’s Signature Meals’
Paradise Lost: California’s Stunning Scenery Can’t Hide Its Comically Broken Elections
Gov. Gavin Newsom, Sen. Mark Warner Butthurt Over SCOTUS Upholding Alabama’s Congressional...
Rep. LaMonica McIver Notes That Every Detainee in Delaney Hall Is a Person...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement