Marrow-Minded: Ben Rhodes Says His Bones Tell Him Racism Over Obama Shapes Today’s...
What a Fool Conceives: Believe It or ‘Yacht’ — Adopted Man’s Dad Is...
Socialism Offers 'Liberation,' but It's Really About Control
'Having the Trains Run on Time Is Worth Me Having to Ride in...
Socialism Offers 'Liberation,' but It's Really About Control
Man Needs Conservative Christian to Explain Why They're Against Free School Lunches
Rep. Ayanna Pressley Says We’ll Never Have Justice for Nolan Wells, Unveils Hashtag...
TIME: How Can the President of Peace Be Calling for the Annihilation of...
WI Gubernatorial Candidate Stands With To-Be-Deported President of Islamic Society of Milw...
CNN’s Jake Tapper White-Knights for Kaitlan Collins Again Against Historically Unpopular P...
‘You’re Welcome, America’: Newsom Signs EO Protecting AI From Being Renamed by Trump
Renee Good's Attorney Says She Was Just Driving Home When Her Drive Was...
Israel War Room Torches NBC News' Post About Plane That Apparently Decided to...
JD Vance Personally Thanks Trump As a Marine for Ending the War in...
VIDEO: Former DOJ Lawyer John Yoo Says Christa Pike Could Face a Firing...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement