Dem Hakeem Jeffries Lies That His Party Never Withholds Government Funding for Political...
Amnesty Aim: Dem Peter Welch Reveals His Party’s Real Reason For Making Americans...
FL Gov Candidate's Lawyer Seeks Withdrawal Over Unpaid Fees; Harmeet Dhillon Questions Con...
Dems Are So Weird ... AOC's Old Chief of Staff Begs Peaches Christ...
Young Life Snuffed Out at Loyola: Killer Illegal Released Under Biden—But Cato Insists...
Mehdi Hasan Blames GOP for TSA Chaos—But Democrats Are Holding DHS Funding Hostage...
Poverty Tourism? Fine. But Don't Forget Your Mask, Comrades – Taylor Lorenz's Latest...
White Savior Vibes: Code Pink Jets to Cuba, Paints a Mural, Ignores the...
Joe Scarborough Dunks on Himself While Trying to Blame Republicans for DHS Shutdown
Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin Remembers Robert Mueller
Two Tweets React to ICE Coming to Airports
Sen. Eric Schmitt Attempts to Interpret Democrat Values
'Hello, Politico': Data Republican Does It Again, Exposing Politico's Bias and Financial B...
'Lots of Illegals There ...' ICE Agents' Responses About Helping With Airport Security...
PSST: Would Someone Let John Brennan Know It's a BAD Thing When Communist...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement