That Emoji... LOL! Mehdi Hasan Learns the HARD WAY Not to Pick a...
OOF! Not Sure Chuck Schumer Can Come Back From WHOOPIN' Doug Burgum Just...
Iranian Woman Explains What Abdul El-Sayed REALLY Means When He Claims He Cares...
Leftist Media Darling Krystal Ball Cheers Rise of Anti-Semitic Socialists in the Democrat...
WILL Creep You Out! Guess WHY Debbie Dingall Supports Hasan Piker (Even If...
Allahu Akbar! Ben Rhodes Writes Check His Hamas-Loving Butt Can't Cash in DIG...
REALLY!? Bernie Sanders Says No Serious Lefties Running for Office Have Called to...
Can't EVEN Make This UP: Thomas Massie Blames Expensive Burritos on the Jews...
A Dox on Your House!: Scott Galloway Still Coping Over Being on Mamdani’s...
This Eye-Opening Poll of Latino Voters Should Be a Wake-Up Call for Republicans
Tanked by Thanksgiving?: David Axelrod Says Voters Will Reject Francesca Hong Over Her...
Dem House Candidate Will Lawrence Says He Let DSA Membership Lapse for Sake...
Case Against Teen Rapist Dismissed After He Completes 'Youthful Offender' Rehab Plan
Dem Wisconsin Governor Hopefuls David Crowley and Francesca Hong Battle for Biggest Victim
Georgia State Trooper Shows How to Handle a Street Takeover

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement