MS NOW’s Nicolle Wallace Tells ‘Independent’ Podcaster Jim Acosta WH Briefings Under Trump...
South Carolina Governor Appoints Lindsey Graham’s Sister, Darline Graham, to His Senate Se...
Ben Crump, Al Sharpton Get Involved as Protesters Demand Answers in Death of...
Keith Ellison: Trump’s Attacks on Somali Kindergartners Are Disgusting
Photo From ICE-Involved Shooting in Maine Shows Bullet Holes in Car's Windshield
Crazy Candace Conspiracy Comedically Crushed
Nearly 300,000 People Comment on Rule That Would Strip Grant Funding Power Away...
James Talarico Says ‘Fellow Texan’ Who Tried to Run Down ICE Agent Deserves...
Fed-Up 'Trump Supporter' Asks Congressman If There's Any Line in the Sand Where...
Mayor Zohran Mamdani Pleased to Announce New York's Fashionable New Sidewalk Sheds
HIDE THE WOMEN! Zohran Mamdani's Explanation of Why R*pe Is Rising In New...
Toronto Police in ‘Trans SUV’ Post Video of Harassment by Pickup Truck Driver
Yes, Lefties, Red States Are HORRIBLE and You Should Stay Far, FAR Away...
Fairfax County Police Gets Ratioed Into The Sun After Proudly Announcing New Translation...
Bernie Sanders Rake Stomps During His Lecture About Which Side Doesn't 'Believe in...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement