Democrats Look Down on Working Class Americans (They Just Do)
ICE Agents at This Airport Had the Perfect Reaction to Lefty Screeching About...
Ben Shapiro TORCHES James Fishback for Dropping Pants-on-Fire Lie About His Byron Donalds...
'No Kings' Lefties Wonder Why Trump Took So Long to Say He Could...
Ship Has SAILED: Bill Melugin Explains How Democrats Lost AGAIN With Senate Passing...
Sen. Ted Cruz Helps Media Make Their Headlines About Chuck Schumer and Photo...
FINISH THEM! Scott Bessent BODIES Financial Times for Pushing Explicitly FALSE Story About...
JB Pritzker Blasted for What's NOT Mentioned in His Post About Firefighter Who...
OOF: Hakeem Jeffries Thinks Democrats Won the DHS Funding Battle, but Ultimately They...
Is There a Second Sunken Sphinx? Speculation Abounds as Twitter Fun Ensues
The Rise of Public Schools in the American Nation: When and Why They...
You're Not the 51st State (Yet): Toronto Mayor Goes on Bizarre Rant Demanding...
From Gifts and Games to Pure Evil: The Vile Leftist Comments on Karoline...
Broom Schtick: ‘Black Snape’ Memes Explode Online After AI-Generated Rap Video Goes Viral
The Economist: Soaring Number of Canadian Muslim Schools Traced to Islamophobia

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement