NYC Mayor Mamdani Calls Wife 'Private' While Taxpayers Fund Her Security — Her...
Report About Largest Population Decline in the US Earns Newsom and Bass a...
FEAR: Check Out Eric Swalwell's Face When He Realizes WHOSE Hand He's Shaking...
Trump Pays TSA Agents! Dems Pissed! 'No Kings' Rallies Fail! Iran Over In...
So Much THIS! Mike Rowe Politely FLUSHES Elitist Hollywood Snob Jimmy Kimmel and...
Let's Check on National Test Scores While AFT President Randi Weingarten Screeches About...
Daniel Goldman Tries Picking a Fight With Elon Musk Over Voter ID and...
EPIC, (Nay, LEGENDARY) Post Takes Every No Kings Rally Mouth-Breathing, Chest-Thumping Pro...
TSA Workers Start Getting Paychecks and This Rep Is NOT Happy Trump Took...
Khamenei? REALLY? MI Democrat Senate Candidate Has Some EXPLAINING to do About This...
Let Them FIGHT! AOC and Ana Kasparin Tear INTO One Another in HEATED...
'Has Hell Frozen Over?' ABC News' Jon Karl Calls BS on Sen. Chris...
There's Just Something REALLY Annoyingly Stupid About Gavin Newsom Whining Over Gas Prices
The COMMENTS! He's Getting DESTROYED! Peter Baker and NYT Circle Wagons Around Eric...
Gov. Newsom's Wife Explaining Why They Took the Kids on Gavin's Red State...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement