Rashida Tlaib's FURIOUS Because These Antifa Terrorists Were Sentenced to a Combined 450...
Five-Card Dud: Trump Gloats As George Conway Gambles Away Millions in Crowded NY...
Socialism Surge: Scott Jennings Warns a Wave of Mamdani-Like Dem Candidates Could Wash...
Raze the Roof: Van Jones Says Socialist Primary Victories Signal Collapse of the...
Majority Muslim City Council in Michigan Bans the Pride Flag on Public Property;...
Atlantic Editor: Mike Lee Is a Monster for Not Caring About 1 Million...
Fetterman Warned It — Dirtbag Left on the March as Socialists Win Big...
Popehat Banned from Bluesky Over Bizarre Musk Assassination Missive
John Cornyn Credits US’ Traditionally Welcoming Immigration System for Successful Soccer T...
'Journalist' Sara Higdon Fact-Checked After Attacking Kash Patel's Girlfriend for Singing...
Antifa Terrorists Who Led ‘Noise Demo’ (With Guns) on ICE Facility Sentenced to...
Radical Hospitality? Poetica Coffee Owner FAFO: $400K Tax Deadbeat, 9/11 Truther, and Dan...
Judge Sides With Rioters, Says Safety Fence Around Federal Building Tramples Their Free...
LIVE Election Results With TWITCHY! Primary Night in New York, Maryland, and South...
SCOTUS: Rastafarian Can’t Sue Prison Guards for Shaving His Dreadlocks (Scott Wiener Whine...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement