Borderline Stupid: Chris Cuomo Doubts Dems Will Flood US With Illegal Aliens If...
PA Gov. Josh Shapiro Says He's Suing to Stop 'Unconstitutional' Attempt to Restrict...
Toronto Sun Columnist: New Memo Tells CBC Journalists Not to Refer to 9/11...
BOMBSHELL Study: Trans Ideology Fans More Likely to Back Violence — Including Killing...
Kentucky Fried Nightmare?: China KFCs Add Chicken Sandwich With Oreo Cookie-Style Bun to...
Jon Favreau Tries to Contain Backfire for El-Sayed With a 'Stop Talking About...
Judge Lifts Her Nationwide Block on Trump's Mail-In Ballot Executive Order After SCOTUS...
We Have Lost Too Many Legends — but a First-Of-Its-Kind Pill Just Gave...
El-Sayed's Latest Attempt to Distance Himself From 'a Streamer in California' Is Failing...
American Heroes of 9/11: Rick Rescorla
Appeals Court Tosses Rep. LaMonica McIver's Claim of Legislative Immunity
Here Are Details About the Arrested 'Father' This NM Dem Didn't Mention While...
Taylor Lorenz: Queen of Cancel Culture & Leopards Eating Faces Party Founder Discovers...
Lunatic District Attorney Vows to 'Blow Up' White House Ballroom
Dana Loesch’s Bold Fix: Stuff Near-80 Icons in Giant Koozies Before We Lose...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement