A Shaken Democrat Party Dusts the Cobwebs Off Nancy Pelosi to Stir Up...
Daily Beast Breaking News Intern: Pete Hegseth Targets Rite of Passage for Young...
CBS Austin: Teen Says She Was Threatened With a Taser During Anti-ICE Walkout
Karen Files Report With CPS After Turning Point USA Holds a Recruiting Event...
US Border Patrol Has a Valentine's Day Post GUARANTEED to Trigger the Loony...
Fat Dork Is New Leftist Hero for Taking a Swing at Classmate Holding...
WaPo’s Review of Video Appears to Contradict Indictment’s Claims About Don Lemon’s Actions
Mehdi Hasan Can’t Think of a MAGA Congressman Who Could Match AOC’s Rhetorical...
Check Out the Birthday Party Former Councilwoman Who Pleaded Guilty to COVID-19 Fraud...
Mark Ruffalo Circulates Petition to Award Minneapolis the Nobel Peace Prize
ABC News' Jon Karl Taken Aback That Kristi Noem Said 'the Right People'...
Rep. Sarah McBride Speaks at Hillary Clinton’s ‘Fundamental Rights for Women’ Panel
NY Times Grabs a Mop for Media's 'Clean Up in Aisle AOC' After...
Minnesota DFL Gets Ratioed Into the Sun After Complaint About What the ICE...
Gretchen Whitmer Said AOC Knows More Than Her About Foreign Policy (Then Tried...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement