Woman at Illinois State Capitol Says in Prayer That Islam Is Woven Into...
ABC News: ICE Detainees Are Taking Their Own Lives at an 'Alarming' Rate
NY Assemblyman Introduces a 100 Percent Tax on Trump’s 'Illegal January 6 Slush...
WaPo Asks a Pool Guy If Trump Picked the Correct Color for the...
Jill Biden Now Claims She Feared a Stroke — But Only After Spending...
Brandon Johnson Says He Will Fight ‘Teen Takeovers’ by Holding Social Media Accountable
Tim Miller's Blasphemous Meltdown: 'The Bulwark' Doubles Down on Vulgar Anti-Christian Att...
DHS Secretary Drawing Up Plans to Block International Flights Into Sanctuary Cities
DNC Insults Trans Community in Vulgar Response to Stephen Miller Post About James...
Zaid Jilani Wants to Know Why Graham Platner’s ‘Accidental Tattoo’ Is Disqualifying
No, James Talarico: Galatians 3:28 Doesn’t Mean God is Nonbinary
ICE Agent Shover Rep. LaMonica McIver Says ICE Henchmen Are Shoving Her 'Neighbors'
'This Is Texas, THIS Is Not': Ken Paxton's First Ad About Low-T Talarico...
Jesse Watters Reading 'Disgusting' RNC Research on Graham Platner Didn't Sit Well With...
Dems Lost It After Polis Freed GOP Grandma — Today He Showed Up...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement