Victor Davis Hanson: Schumer and Jeffries Lost Control of Dem Party, Talarico Makes...
Jessica Tarlov: Abdul El-Sayed ‘Seemed Like a Bro’ From U of M, Not...
ABC News Interviews Alex Pretti’s Grieving Family, Who Want Accountability
Variety Thinks Rosie O'Donnell Should Shatter Comedy's Glass Ceiling With Her Own Show
Active Duty USAF Major Who Called for Trump’s Impeachment on Capitol Steps Charged...
Mayor Agrees With Don Lemon That Gary, IN Is Being Neglected Because It's...
Transgender Inmates, Including Baby Killer, Suing State Over Lack of 'Gender-Affirming Car...
Boston’s Rockin’ Debut: Fifty Years of ‘More Than a Feeling’ (It’s Been Such...
ABC, NBC News Report on Power Outage in Gary, IN, Neglect to Mention...
LIVE Primary Results! Twitchy Has the Latest South Carolina, Georgia, and Oklahoma Primary...
'I Kind of Laughed': SLOTUS Usha Vance’s Gracious Reply to Stepstool Abdul El-Sayed’s...
After SCOTUS Ruling on Mail-In Voting, Gov. Gavin Newsom Says CA Will Sue...
Did Tim Walz Just Encourage President Trump to Invade Canada, or Is He...
Target Pulls ‘Blacklight Circus Clown’ Costume After Blackface Outrage
Tropical Storm Dolly? Next Atlantic System Could Share Name of Country Legend Days...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement