Battle of the Bulge: Olympic Ski Jumpers Allegedly Injecting Themselves 'Down There' for...
Another Crazed Nurse Posts Anti-ICE Video, Appears to Be Armed With Saline Spray
Scott Jennings Comes Up Empty in Attempt to Teach Econ 101 to CNN...
Pretend to Be SHOCKED: New Watchdog Report Links Rashida Tlaib to Terrorist Groups
Don Lemon Calls JD Vance a Vile Human Being and Not a Real...
Rep. Summer Lee Says ICE Is Not the Gestapo but 'Regular, Run of...
Rep. Explains How ‘Dignity Act’ Would Grant Legal Status to a 'Segment' of...
Amnesty International Gets Ratioed and Wrecked Over 'RIP Fact-Checkers'-Style Take on Mass...
Sen. Chris Van Hollen Asks Scott Bessent If He'd Like to Retract His...
Semi-Truck Driver Who Crashed Into a Van of Amish Men, Killing Four, Was...
Rep. Maria Salazar Tells ICE Not to Touch the Ones Picking Up the...
Matt Walsh and Other ‘Writers’ Laid Off by Washington Post Tell Their Stories
Schumer Panics As 'Morning Joe' Host Betrays His Voter ID Narrative
Even Her Own Voters Can't Stand Her: Kamala's Book Tour Stop in Richmond,...
Dress-Wearing 'Antifa General Kyle' Who Called on People to Doxx and Even KILL...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement