John Konrad BLISTERS Europe In a Devastating Post About the REAL Reason NATO...
Physician, Heal Thyself: WaPo/Guardian Hack Lectures World That Only Journalists Should Be...
CBS News: Five-Year-Old ‘Arrested’ by ICE ‘Still Living With the Trauma’
Army Sergeant's Illegal Wife Detained by ICE: Not 'Caged', Just Facing Long-Ignored Deport...
NY Times' Horrible Month Got Even Worse After Their Reporter Asked Trump About...
Trump at Easter Egg Roll: 'Sell My Autograph on eBay, Kids ... Biden...
Abraham Lincoln and the Power of Prayer Leading a Nation Through Crisis
Spencer Pratt Accuses LA Times Reporter of Stalking Family & Burrito Spot as...
LOL! What's Drunker Than DRUNK? WATCH Kamala Harris Openly Slurring About Needing a...
Slim Jim Shocker! Image on X Surfaces of a Valuable US Asset Iran...
Trump Crushes Democrat Operation to Remove Him As Republican Support Surges
DAMN, Son: Trump Says They WILL Find Who Leaked to Media Outlet About...
'INSANITY!' Sean Duffy ENDS 'Gavin's Crazy Train' After 60 Minutes' Piece on What...
Five-Alarm FIRE ... for Dems! CNN Has DEVASTATING News for Democrats Ahead of...
Dem Rep. Pramila Jayapal's Claim About 'Being Undocumented' Gets Community Note Nuked Into...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement