Frigid Foresight: NBC News Provides Invaluable Information About Keeping Food Fresh
Judge Orders Trump Admin to Restore White House Access to CNN, MSNOW, and...
Same-Sex Drive: Dem Rosa DeLauro Puts the Brakes on Roadtrip to MA Lesbian...
Rep. Frederica Wilson Honors Nolan Wells' Parents and 'Other Parents of Murdered Young...
The Revolution Will Be Catered: X Notices the Fence at DSA's 'Tax the...
Taylor Lorenz Explains How Lesbians Can Drink at a Bar With a Strict...
‘Proud Anchor Baby’ Congresswoman Introduces Legislation to Abolish ICE and 'Dismantle' DH...
Fernando Mendoza Is the Total Package — and Now He’s Teaching Gen Z...
Nancy Mace Is Speechless Over Sunny Hostin’s Brag About Being a Holdout Juror...
Ben Rhodes Trying to Imagine a Foreign Ambassador Calling for the Arrest of...
L Is for Lie, Ms. Rachel: Star Slammed for Passing a Biased Report...
AP: Guess the Race of Second Suspect Arrested in Hanging of Black Woman
Shockingly the Network Newscasts Are ALL OVER the ActBlue Foreign Funding Scandal (JUST...
RIP What’s Left of LA: Nithya Raman Takes the Lead Over Karen Bass
Javier Milei Just Destroyed the UN's 'Arrogant Parasites' Off the Top Rope (Right...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement