AG Todd Blanche NUKE-I-FIES Van Hollen for DISGRACEFUL Insinuation During Heated Trump Fun...
Marc Elias Sets Himself Up for a MAJOR TORCHING from Mollie Hemingway That's...
Stolen Valor Dick Threatens Kash Patel and LA-HOO-ZAH-HER PLEASE
SHOCKER! An Even NASTIER Graham Platner Reddit Post Has Surfaced That Makes His...
NEWSFLASH! Mike Johnson SCHOOLS Braindead MS NOW Panel on Where Our Rights Actually...
Stephen Miller Takes OFF the Gloves in Straight-FIRE Posts (1 Video) Slamming Thomas...
AOC Has a Whole LOTTA Tea to Spill on Majorie Taylor Greene and...
Photo of One of the Alleged San Diego Mosque Shooters Raises Eyebrows on...
Scott Wiener Campaign Event Features Drag Queen Singing ‘Wiener Is a Girl’s Best...
The View to a Shill: Sunny Hostin and Ana Navarro Use Their ‘ABC...
Huge if True: The Teachers Unions Are More Committed to Democrat Politics Than...
AP: New York Gallery Opens Exhibit of Epstein Files That Visitors Aren’t Allowed...
Ratio-Palooza! TMZ Gets ROASTED After Cooking Up ANOTHER 'Scandal' About Spencer Pratt
Reuters Removes Video That 'Lacked Necessary Context' About Supreme Court Ruling
Medicine Bawl: Mark Cuban Working With Trump Is a Hard Pill to Swallow...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos