Journo Tells Rupert Lowe a Lot of People Could Interpret 'Anglo-Saxon' as White...
Convicted Murderer Karmelo Anthony Seeks a New Trial, Claims Judge Was Biased
Judges Enter Orders Preventing DHS From Terminating TPS for Ethiopia, South Sudan
Landlords Ban Work-from-Home Tenants: Because Using the Place You Rent Is Apparently Too...
NYT's Maggie Haberman Reports Trump Has Massively Escalated Against the Smithsonian
NY Talk Show Host Sid Rosenberg Drops the Mic in Describing Zohran Mamdani...
Madison Police Completely Surrender Press Conference to Black Activist Ranting About Colon...
Canadian Journalist Annie Dufour Big Mad After Watching Trump Roast the Press at...
Mehdi Hasan Wants to Know Why Dan Goldman Only Mentioned Jewish Man Stabbed...
Sister of Man Shot by Cop Says His Long Criminal History Tells a...
BLM Is Back in Force: Activists Harass Sidewalk Diners in Madison, WI, Surround...
Leftist Podcaster Emma Vigeland Demands 'Better White Women' — Starts by Exempting Herself
Look at the Happy Faces of All These Journos Getting Roasted by Trump...
BREAKING: Fake Shiloh Hendrix Account Scammer Bragging on Live Stream
Katy Perry Appalled WH Used Her Song About Blowing Things Up for Footage...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement