NIH Director Cooly Endures Margaret Brennan’s Unhinged ‘Misinformation’ Rant on ‘Face the...
Screen Queen?: Filmmaker Justine Bateman Says LA Mayor Karen Bass Knows Nothing About...
DSA Dial-Up: Dem Michigan Senate Hopeful Abdul El-Sayed Says Obama Called, May Campaign...
Scott Jennings Rebukes Donna Brazile for Comparing Tea Party Movement to Dem Party’s...
Men Need Purpose at Work — Here’s the Advice I’m Giving My Daughter
From Comedy to Commie: DSA Co-Chair Says Jon Stewart’s ‘The Daily Show’ Was...
Mehdi Hasan Is Still Pretending Hasan Piker’s 9/11 Posturing and Jew-Hatred Are No...
This Legislation Could End Government Shutdowns Once and for All
Sen. Jim Banks Gives Credit to Trade Policies
Abdul El-Sayed Brags That He and His Wife ‘Actually Like Each Other —...
Prez Agency: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Says She Hasn’t Ruled Out White House Run In...
'Woke 1 Was Crazy': AOC Tries to Memory-Hole Her Peak Defund-And-Abolish Era
Insane Framing: Sports Illustrated Claims Sophie Cunningham Got a 'Bitter Taste of Karma'
House Leadership: American Security Against Healthcare Costs
AOC Freezes Her Eggs and Films the Shot: The Parturition Will Be Televised...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement