Cenk Uygur Has Zero Self-Awareness: Calls the Biblical Covenant a 'Psychopath’s Whisper'
Poor Stacey Abrams: Trapped Under 'Authoritarian Rule' … yet She Still Wanted to...
'No Greater Insult': Trump Condemns Vandalism of WWII Memorial As Lunatic Lady Faces...
Fever Pitch: Some Are Pointing to WNBA’s Sophie Cunningham As Trump’s New WH...
Suddenly Hormones Matter: 'Comedian' Walter Masterson’s WNBA Rule Exposes His Own Hypocris...
Michigan Voters Aren’t Buying Stepstool Abdul — CNN Can’t Figure Out Why
'An Animal Slaughterhouse': New Allegations About Abdul El-Sayed's History Are Horrifying
Jim Acosta Is Mad Trump’s Name Going Back Up on Kennedy Center, Wants...
They Would Know: Nick Freitas and Spencer Pratt Tell Us EXACTLY What Happened...
‘Hurt People Hurt People’? Cool Story, Bro: MI Jews Build a Coalition to...
Dad, It's Just ISIS: SNL Got It Right Spoofing White College Age Leftist...
'No One Should Be Jailed for Stealing Toothpaste' — Peak Progressive Brainrot From...
Chelsea Handler Warns That Todd Blanche Will Overturn Roe v. Wade As Attorney...
Chris Matthews Loses It on 'Morning Joe' As Democrat Party Starts Fracturing
Vets BODY Mark Kelly for BS'ing About 'Grandma' Calling Him About Her POOR...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement