Tim Kaine Passive-Aggressively Reading the Book of Exodus for Lent Backfires BIBLICALLY
Don Lemon Tells Jim Acosta MN Church Congregants Didn't Think He Was a...
Deported With a Baby and $190: Sam Stein Calls It 'Heinous' Cruelty, but...
Jill Filipovic Gets Salty: Babies Don't Need Two Parents If Mom Has Money...
Plot Twist! Transgender Hockey Shooter Allegedly Has an Arsonist Son (and Other Updates)
MS NOW’s Jen Psaki Learned the Truth About Talarico’s ‘Banned’ Interview But Pushed...
Dozens of Donalds: AI Video Offers a Peek at What Trump Would Look...
Is This What You Voted For? ICE Detains Husband After More Than 30...
Houston Chronicle: Anti-ICE Student Walkouts Were a ‘Fantastic Educational Experience’
Face, Meet Plant: Sharice Davids Uses Actual Copypasta to Wish Her 'Neighbors' a...
Seattle’s New Socialist Mayor Kicks Off State of the City Address With a...
Hollywood Reporter: Say Goodbye to Political Candidates on Daytime and Late-Night Talk Sho...
Did DEI Play a Role in the Massive Sewage Leak Into the Potomac?
From Grief to Gratitude: D.C. Grandma Tears Up Thanking Trump for Caring About...
French President Emmanuel Macron Says Free Speech Is ’Pure Bulls**t’ Unless Regulated

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement