'Gayer Version of Beto' James Talarico DEFENSIVE Over the Whole Being a VEGAN...
He's Gonna BLOOOW! Ben Rhodes Frothy-Mouthed Smear of Susan Collins Sending Platner to...
Martha MacCallum Obliterates Dem Sen. Chris Coons' Attempt to Project Biden's Issues Onto...
Bless Her HEART: Martina McBride SHREDDED After Her Own Posts Expose ‘Nonpartisan’ 250...
Deep Blue Dem Candidate Drops Truth Bomb on Boys in Girls’ Sports (GASP!)...
Jim Acosta and Katie Couric Laughably Warn That CBS News and CNN Are...
CNN’s Abby Phillip Asks Why DNC Autopsy Report Ignores Biden’s Mental Decline Her...
Jimmy Kimmel SKEWERS, TEARS INTO and UNLEASHES on Spencer Pratt
UK Jury Finds Man Guilty of Murdering Student Despite Self-Defense and Racism Claims
Tickets Go on Sale Friday to See Dave Matthews Band and Joan Baez...
Game OVER! Greg Gutfeld Has Jill Biden's Number Big Time
MS NOW’s Ken Dilanian Hears Kash Patel Has Fired Another FBI Official for...
Hot Talarico Take: The Homophobia on the Right Is Disgusting and They're Obsessed...
'Keep the Kids Away from Creepy Uncle Jimmy': Talarico Calls Women 'Neighbors with...
35 Retired Judges File Motion to Reopen Settled Lawsuit Between Trump and the...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos