NEW: Deets Released of One of the Alleged Organizers of UFC White House...
Rachel Bitecofer Tries to Give 'The Left' Credit for Building America’s Middle Class...
Greg Gutfeld SHREDS Jessica Tarlov for Scolding Trump After UFC Fighter Calls Michelle...
Justine Bateman UNLOADS on Gavin Newsom As a California Taxpayer With DAMNING Laundry...
Can't EVEN Make This UP! LOL! SPLC Boss Had a Neo-Nazi Lover ......
Jennifer Van Laar Goes Straight-Up FAFO and Breaks Out a MAJOR Receipt...
Scott Jennings Reacts to Ana Navarro’s R-Rated Rant About Robert De Niro and...
Out to Lynch: ‘Historian’ Heather Cox Richardson Tells Jim Acosta UFC ‘Impulse’ Tied...
Miles Off: ‘Anonymous’ Writer Says UFC Freedom 250 Event Was Humiliating Image of...
Phallus in Chains: The View’s Sunny Hostin Says Claims Michelle Obama Is a...
How Will UK Enforce Its Ban on Social Media for Kids Under 16?
Judge Dismisses Lawsuit by Nonbinary Park Ranger Fired for Hanging Trans Flag in...
CBS News: Veteran Desperately Urging ICE to Release His Wife; 'It Rips My...
Can't You FEEL the Love? Obamas Unveil Commissioned Portrait of Themselves at Presidential...
Sister of MI Senate Candidate Charged With Aggravated Battery at Anti-ICE Protest

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos