Rand Paul Catches Sen. Blumenthal at Contempt Hearing ADMITTING Dems Know Fauci Lied...
BREAKING: Senate Homeland Security and Gov Accountability Votes to Refer Fauci for Crimina...
YIKES! It Appears That Francesca Hong Is Even 'Too Crazy for Bernie'
HA! WATCH Kaitlan Collins' Face As Abdul El-Sayed Tries Dodging Hasan Piker BROMANCE...
End of an Era: Nikita Bier 'Demotes Himself to His Natural State' at...
Desperate Lefties Make BIG DEAL About 'Longtime TX Republican' Endorsing Talarico (Just 1...
Mark Warner Gets Walloped With a Ratio in Post About Why He's Running...
Have You Read the Declaration of Independence Lately?
Daughter of Former CBS Late-Night Host Stephen Colbert Resigns From Network’s ‘60 Minutes’...
Two Professors Invite Only BIPOC People to Outdoor Camp Because Nature Is Racist
Impeachment-Happy Rep. Shri Thanedar Crushed in Primary (Yay!) by DSA Member (Boo!)
Democrats Boycott Meeting on Influence of Muslim Brotherhood in the US as 'Political...
OUCH! Zohran Mamdani's Anti-Police Rhetoric Came Back to Bite Him at an NYPD...
Brihana Joy Gray Declares Thanksgiving Is a Holiday About Genocide
Why El-Sayed’s Primary Win Should Alarm Every American

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement