‘Circle Back’ Psaki Preaches the Value of Media Asking Tough Questions to ‘Hold...
Actor Wallace Shawn: You Can't Be More Evil Than What the Israelis Are...
BBC: Bare Nails Trend Perpetuates White Supremacist Standards of Beauty
NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani and the Socialist Prime Minister of Spain Play With...
Americans Are Not McLovin’ It: Russia Hits McDonald’s Warehouse Near Kyiv — Twice
Britain Naturalized a Hamas Bodyguard, and He Planned a Mass Attack on Jews...
Ms. Rachel Blasts ‘Christian Hypocrisy’ While Ignoring Who Actually Gives More to Charity
Sunny Hostin Explains That As a Black Woman in the US, Her 'Average'...
PhD’s Heart Breaks for Marine One Pilot Being Yelled at by Trump
The Rent-A-Mob Clocked in Again: Palestinian Flags Appear at Google’s Anti-AI Protest
Report: Black Woman's 'Lynching' Was Staged After She Was Killed During Drug Dispute
CNN's Jake Tapper Reports That Trump's 'Outside Advisors' Are Telling Him to Declare...
Female App State Student Arrested for Threatening to Massacre Viewers of ‘We Will...
'Moderate' Rep. Ro Khanna Calls for Release of Convicted Murderer and Terrorist From...
In the Toronto Star’s Latest Fever Dream, the U.S. Invades and Canada Turns...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement