Federal Judge Refers Leftist Philly DA to DOJ for Criminal Investigation
Judge Blocks the Kennedy Center Board From Putting Trump's Name on the Building...
How NYC’s First Couple Hides Devout Islamism Behind Western Clothes and Drag-Show Vibes
Rep. Thomas Massie Moves to Impeach Pete Hegseth for High Crimes and Misdemeanors
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Busts Out ‘The Robot’ in TikTok Rooftop Dance
Famous Last Words He Yelled on Camera: ‘I’m Not Going Back to Haiti.’...
NY Regents Scrap Graduation Exam Requirement: ‘You Don’t Assess a Fish on Climbing...
Sheriff Calls Lame-Duck Dan Goldman a ‘Degenerate’ for Smearing Him in Front of...
Bernie Sanders: Today's AI Is the 'Dumbest Version.' Replies: 'Mirror's Right There, Bro'
Haley Stevens Lost the Senate Primary. Then She Became Michigan’s Most Charming Also-Ran
Journalism: Jim Acosta Reminds Us That Trump Votes by Mail
Athletic Columnist Explains Why Sydney Sweeney's Ad Triggers Her PTSD From a 12-Year-Old...
The Holdout the Left Can’t Cancel: Haitian Immigrant Refused to Acquit Clancy —...
Iowa Democrat Rob Sand Wants to Be 'Governor for All.' Zach Lahn Says...
Kash Patel Tries in Vain to Make Mazie Hirono Understand That He’d Replied...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement