Democrats Loves Charles Barkley... Until He Names a Jewish Man for President in...
Karmelo Anthony Verdict Shatters Jasmine Crockett
Do the ActBlue CEO's Smug and BRIEF Non-Responses to Reps' Questions About Dems...
Ilhan Omar's 'Go Back' Taunt at Nancy Mace Explodes in Ironic Backlash
Here's Elizabeth Warren Encouraging Female Accusers to Come Forward and Tell Their Side...
Noted Legal Scholar Cardi B Is BIG MAD That Murderer Karmelo Anthony Is...
Ro Khanna Defends Nazi-Tattooed Candidate by Attacking Professor’s Tenure: 'We Need Higher...
Jonathan Turley Details Resume of Maine Senate Candidate Dems Are Lining Up Behind
Platner Will 'Dominate' Collins in Debate, Says Kasky — Just Like He Dominated...
Just Make the Recipes, Not the Raunch: Blue Apron Goes Full Gross for...
Chicken Coup at the VP Mansion: JD Vance’s Epic American-Made Coop Goes Viral
The Today Show's Spin on Platner's Tattoo Helps Explain 'Why People Rightfully Hate...
'Scum Attracts Scum': Data Republican Delivers a Truth Bomb Ratio to Graham Platner
Nothing Concerning Here: Platner Brushes Off Nazi Tattoo, Abuse, and Adultery in Cringey...
Will the REAL James Talarico Please Stand Up!? (Texas-Sized Flip-Flopping in Progress)

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement