Curdling Scheme: Dem Jamie Raskin’s ‘No Illegal Alien Voters’ Claim Has Aged Like...
Double Dribble: Unhinged Sport Journalist Dumps on Caitlin Clark Because Emmett Till or...
Left-Field Lament: Gov. Gavin Newsom Moans About Sports Being Infected With Politics
Jake Tapper: CNN Has Posted the Video Version of the Chaos and Coverups...
AP: Trans Aid Workers in Nepal Turn to Sex Work After USAID Cuts...
CNN: Trump Has Activated a Never-Used 'Secretive Court' for Deporting ‘Alien Terrorists’
Jasmine Crockett Welcomes Witnesses to the Republican Party's 'Great Replacement Therapy S...
The AWFLs and Boomers Are Singing Again, This Time Performing 'Hit the Road,...
No, NDAA Section 219 Doesn’t Merge the U.S. and Israeli Militaries — Here’s...
Jamaican National Working as Southwest Flight Attendant Arrested by ICE After Years-Long O...
Mamdani Tells Jon Stewart They’d Be Slandered for Introducing Buildings That Lend Books...
Pint-Sized RI Rep. Enrique Sanchez Vows Biblical Payback on ICE for Deporting His...
Bombshell Biden Memo: Not So Temporary TPS to Shield Illegals & Trap Trump...
Black Lives Matter Protests Break Out in WI Where Man Who Stabbed Cop...
Epic Meltdowns: Hollywood Screams As Elon Musk Vows to Make Accurate AI Version...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement