I Can't Be Sure, But I THINK Joe Biden Is Bragging to Jay...
Rumors Squashed: Knicks Confirm White House Visit as Libs Melt Down
Laken Riley’s Legacy on the Ballot — Collins Authored the Law, Ossoff Voted...
'Defaced with a Bible Passage’ — Sen. Wiener Melts Down Over Giants Writing...
New TDS Achievement UNLOCKED! Pro-Algae Demonstrators Arrive at the DC Reflecting Pool
Ratio Machine Elizabeth Warren Rake Stomps While Pitching All the 'Free' Stuff a...
LGBTQ ... WTAF? Annapolis Cares About Emergency Preparedness, But Only for SOME of...
Viral World Cup German Freddy Milkshake-Ducked for Supporting Israeli Hostages
Trump WH Statement Puts the Left's Domestic Terrorist Goon Squads on Notice While...
These Optics While Joe Biden Brags About Efforts to Kill the Oil Industry...
Algerian Fans Declare War on Messi in Allah’s Name — He Answers with...
Trump Forces Thune's Hand: Leadership Challenged Over SAVE Act?
FAFO: Judge Hannah Dugan’s Felony Conviction for Shielding Illegal Immigrant from ICE Offi...
Here's a Poll About Flying the American Flag on the 4th of July...
Doctor Who’s 'Been Everywhere' Declares American Groceries Trash, Gets Schooled on Cool AC...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement