Former 'Conservatives' With Trump Derangement Syndrome Are Paying for Nationwide 'No Kings...
New York Magazine Breaks Down ICE Facility Ambush by Antifa That ‘Went Awry’
James Woods Tells 'Worthless Hack' John Thune He Had ONE Job
Great Downgrade: Men Went from War Heroes and Cathedral Builders to 'Go-Getters' Who...
Dem Sen. Mazie Hirono Makes a Great Case for Why the 'No Kings'...
Billionaire vs. Socialist: Mark Cuban Schools Bernie Sanders on Who Really Pays the...
Elderly Canadian Offered Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) for Fracture — She Climbed...
Jim Acosta Got a Good Laugh From No Kings Protester's 'Very Clever' Sign...
CAN'T Make It Up! 'Country That Literally Has a King Is Protesting Against...
Democrat Shutdown Continues as President Trump Works to Make America Safe Again
WaPo Community Note Nuked for Post on Athletes Who Have Been 'Excluded From...
Western Lensman Has a Biden Flashback the 'No Kings' Lefties Applauded (Translation: They'...
Proof-Positive That the 'No Kings' and 'Stop the Oligarchy' Screeching From the Left...
AWKWARD: Dem Sen. Elissa Slotkin Pivot Quickly When Bill Maher Calls Out Dems'...
Putting the ‘Art’ in Arthritis: Seniors Gather to Make Protest Signs for Saturday’s...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement