Bernie Sanders Calls Hasan Piker ‘Just a Podcaster’ Despite His Campaign Presence in...
Swalwell Seizure: Video of Disgraced Dem’s Encounter With FBI Agents at California Airport...
Mehdi Hasan Won't Forgive the Tens of Millions of Americans Who Voted to...
Democratic Socialist Hypocrisy Exposed Yet Again
Honduran National Registered to Vote in CA Taunted ICE Agent He Was Going...
What the Socialists Get Wrong About the Affordability Problem Is... EVERYTHING
Judge Rules Trump Admin Cannot Deport Noncitizens for Supporting Terrorist Organizations
Transphobe Norman Ornstein Demands WNBA Prospects Take Estrogen and Have Surgery
Snopes Looks Into Whether Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library Donated Books to Israel
Gov. Kathy Hochul’s Press Office: Trump Is Lying About Her Releasing 7,000 Criminal...
Jewish Congressional Candidate Brad Lander Not Exactly Warmly Welcomed at Indian Protest
CBS News: As 9/11 Anniversary Approaches, Abdul El-Sayed May Face Increased Political Atta...
American Heroes of 9/11: Rescue Dogs
InfantryDort Pens Impassioned Plea to Jeff Bezos: 'Give Us a F***ing Chance!'
NUTTIER Than A Squirrel's BM —> Rosie O’Donnell Claims America Is Making Concentration...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement