Young Washington Beats Supergirl at the Box Office Over the Holiday Weekend; Excuses...
'Immigrant' Mahmoud Khalil’s Independence Day Wish Is Freedom and Justice for Everyone (Bu...
Lyndsey Fifield Has a Question for Ruben Gallego and Dems After Their Sudden...
Judge Cites Trump Admin’s Hostility to Nonwhite Immigrants in Unfreezing Benefit Applicati...
Ro Reversal: Dem Khanna Overlooked Platner’s Nazi Tattoo but Ends Endorsement Over Latest...
Donna Brazile: Accused Rapist Graham Platner Just Needs Time to Heal
The Odyssey’s Lupita Nyong'o Would Ask Homer Why He Gave Women So Little...
Minnesota Mayor Observes America's 250th by Meeting With Somalia's President at His Palace
Platner’s Backers Hit Delete: The Great Endorsement Purge Begins
Essence Calls Cover Girl Ketanji Brown Jackson ‘The People’s Champion’
Marjorie Taylor Greene: Last Soldier Standing for Graham Platner (And Getting Paid for...
Vindicated: Left Ignores Conservative Woman’s Assault Claims Against Platner — Until a Dem...
MN Madness: 'Warrior' Flanagan Calls Trans Senator 'My Sister' and Drops Spirit Name...
Graham Platner Releases Business-as-Usual Campaign Video With a Tacked-On Denial
Señor Sedicioso Seis: Mark Kelly Gets ROASTED on X for His Choice of...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement