Dem Sen. Chris Murphy Sounds Like He's Angling to Serve As Iran's Foreign...
EPIC Post Fact-Checks Point-By-Point Every Dolt Claiming Trump's Plan for Iran Is THE...
Harpy Blogger Says Democrats ARE Giddy Over Americans Suffering at Airports (Check Out...
Media's Already Putting a Predictable Spin on Tragic Story of Illegal Alien Arrested...
On Diego Garcia, Anthony Scaramucci Is Just Asking Questions -- Really, Really Dumb...
The Crying Caucus: Democrat Presidential Hopefuls 'Lean Into Their Childhood Traumas'
Monday Morning Meme Madness
Dem Hakeem Jeffries Lies That His Party Never Withholds Government Funding for Political...
Amnesty Aim: Dem Peter Welch Reveals His Party’s Real Reason For Making Americans...
FL Gov Candidate's Lawyer Seeks Withdrawal Over Unpaid Fees; Harmeet Dhillon Questions Con...
Dems Are So Weird ... AOC's Old Chief of Staff Begs Peaches Christ...
Young Life Snuffed Out at Loyola: Killer Illegal Released Under Biden—But Cato Insists...
Mehdi Hasan Blames GOP for TSA Chaos—But Democrats Are Holding DHS Funding Hostage...
Poverty Tourism? Fine. But Don't Forget Your Mask, Comrades – Taylor Lorenz's Latest...
White Savior Vibes: Code Pink Jets to Cuba, Paints a Mural, Ignores the...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement