Khanna Get an Amen?: West Coast Dem Says He Supports Graham Platner Because...
Chest Defense: Adam Mockler Presents ‘Weird’ Explainer of When Republicans Go Low, Democra...
Australian TV Blames Elon Musk for Inciting Violence for Not Censoring Video of...
Pond Scum: WaPo ‘Journos’ All Wet for Deflecting on Reflecting Pool Renovation Because...
Attorney: The Anthony Family Has Been ‘Legally Lynched’ by This Slaughterhouse of a...
Americans Will Be So Triggered When the Whole Planet Cheers Every Goal Against...
Congresswoman Claims Trump's DOJ Is Harassing ActBlue CEO Because She's a Black Woman
Maine Candidate Hit with NEW Cheating Scandal — Ex Says Platner Knew About...
Here Are More Unhinged Reactions to the Karmelo Anthony Verdict
Newsweek: Karmelo Anthony, Kyle Rittenhouse, and Two Self-Defense Americas
Ms. Rachel Leads Protest Sing-Along Outside Delaney Hall
Jasmine Crockett Doubles Down on Support for Convicted Murderer Karmelo Anthony
CNN Asks Dem Rep and Daughter of Holocaust Survivor If She Backs Platner...
Maine's Teflon Candidate: Scandals Slide Off Platner as Voters Double Down
The Bulwark on Graham Platner’s Many, Many Scandals: BUT TRUMP!

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement