Sister of MI Senate Candidate Charged With Aggravated Battery at Anti-ICE Protest
California Fault Lyin’: Gavin Newsom Blames Trump for DOJ Investigation Started Under Anot...
Pro-Trans Doctor Denies Teenage Girls Are Having Healthy Breasts Removed, Just Teenage Boy...
Report: Graham Platner Mocked Teen’s Suicide Attempt on Reddit
Knicks 'Fans' Destroy Cab Driver's Livelihood in Mamdani's NYC — Immigrant Ruined After...
Bombshell Betrayal: Spencer Pratt Teams Up With Karen Bass’ Brother to Sue Her...
Politburo Posse Poses Proudly for Trump’s World Cup Win None of Them Helped...
Hasan Piker Goes Full Stalin: Cheers Plan to Throw Republicans in Prison
Graham Platner’s Face Now Too Toxic for National Dem Ads — Even as...
PHRASING! MeidasTouch Dweeb Picks the WORST Way to Express His 'Outrage' Over Michelle...
NYT: Several San Francisco Giants Wrote Bible Verses on Their Caps on Pride...
Variety: Deceased ALF Star’s Family Remembers Her 'Burning Hatred for Trump'
HELL, YEAH! UFC Fighter Gives the BEST History Lesson After Winning His Title...
Allow Gavin Newsom to Explain Why the DOJ's Investigating Him (He Left Out...
TMZ Insider Blows the LID OFF Lefty News Directors Playing Politics, ESPECIALLY in...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement