'Life Comes at You FAST': VICIOUS Post Lays Out Day by Day How...
BAHAHAAA! Angry Staffer in for Hilariously RUDE Awakening Claiming Democrats Hold Their Ow...
And Here Come the RECEIPTS: It's Only Getting Worse for Eric Swalwell's ROOMIE...
DEIdiot: Mark Kelly Disgraces Himself (Again) While Also Insulting Every American Astronau...
‘It’ll All Come Out’: Democrat Prophet Eric Swalwell Foretold His Own Political Reckoning...
‘A Long Time Ago in a Middle-Earth Far, Far Away...’ Star Wars Meets...
Lie of the Nanshee: Pelosi Thinks We’re Dumb Enough to Believe Dems Didn’t...
Democratic Governors Delivering 'Free' College for Everyone
Dem Ruben Gallego Claims He’s SHOCKED to Discover ‘Best Friend’ Eric Swalwell Led...
Jen Psaki Shares Words of Wisdom From ‘Minnesota Angry Man’ Who Assaulted TPUSA...
Does Anybody Believe Nancy Pelosi's Response to This Question About Eric Swalwell's Resign...
WaPo: Pre-K Applications in DC Falling at Bilingual Schools in Immigrant Neighborhoods
WNBA Player Brianna Turner: 'Trans Women Are Women With No Advantage' — Still...
Mark Halperin Says Trump Is Dead Politically After ‘Attacking’ Pope on Social Media
Democrat Fundraiser Spreads Easily Debunked Lie About Trump's 'No Tax on Tips' Policy

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement