Ro Khanna Says Voting for the Laken Riley Act is Disqualifying for Any...
The Economist Offers Their Not-At-All Hot Take on Spencer Pratt
Sam Stein Thinks It’s Low Stakes to Vote for a Senator on Whether...
Platner Campaign Posts Video of Dem Candidate's Wife Making a Fresh 'Clean Up...
Woman Fired After Praying to ‘MAGA Lord Jesus’ to Make Pam Bondi’s Throat...
Scott Wiener Asks Who Would Campaign by Demonizing Children Who Just Want to...
WaPo: Pentagon Moving to Recruit Hundreds of Troops to Be Spectators at White...
New Yorker: In Nation of MAGA Hats, ‘Patriotism Just Isn’t Cool Anymore’
CBS News: Jill Biden Supported Hunter’s Pardon Because She Didn’t Want Him in...
Scar Issue: Dems ‘Forget’ Biden's Post-Op Topless Trans Activists at WH While Blasting...
DHS Secretary Ratioed for Thanking NJ Governor for Her Cooperation in Restoring Law...
Atlantic Drops 'Do Better Than Platner' Bomb as Shipwreckedcrew Warns: DNC Prepping Anothe...
Rioters Dismantle the ‘First Amendment Barriers’ Set Up by New Jersey State Police
Dem Senate Hopeful Graham Platner’s Wife Flagged His Sexually Explicit Texts With Other...
The Bulwark's Tim Miller Asks for More Posts About James Talarico's Hot Vegan...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement