Wailing at Walz: Leftist Mob Amasses at Minnesota Governor’s Mansion to Demand ‘Legalizati...
Dem Dick Durbin Was Against Using the DOJ to Prosecute Political Enemies Until...
‘Temporary’ Insanity: AOC Can’t Accept That TPS Status Has an Expiration Date and...
Max Tani Cries Fowl At Critics To Point Out Washington Post's Birdpoop Articles,...
Dems Go for Gold in BS: JD Vance 'Booed Relentlessly' at Olympic Opening...
People Have Questions About This Local Media Description of the Weapon Carried by...
Cue the Outrage! Lefties Blow a Gasket at Trump for 'Racist' Meme (Except...
It's Only February but Rep. Jamie Raskin Just Made 'the Dumbest Argument of...
WATCH: Jews and Allies Drag Tone-Deaf Superbowl Advertisement Against Anti-Semitism
Reid Hoffman's Terrible, Horrible, No-Good, VERY BAD Epstein's Files Release Just Keeps Ge...
Jamie Raskin Starts Panicking During Hysterical SAVE Act Meltdown
'Very Revealing'! One Short Word in AOC's WaPo Layoffs Take Gives Away How...
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Showed Her TRUE Colors at The Grammys
GRRL, No! LOL! Kamala Harris Tries to QUIETLY Make BIG Change to Her...
Here's Brian Stelter on WaPo's Woes vs. X's Potential Demise (One of These...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos