Joy Reid Launches Rehab Tour for Wajahat Ali and Guest Who Called Hakeem...
'Just Perfect'! Guess Where James Talarico Is Taking His 'Grassroots' Campaign to Rake...
Fans Paid a Fortune for Ed Sheeran ... Got Macklemore’s Unsolicited Free Palestine...
OUCH! Justine Bateman Knows How to Make the LA Mayor Willing to Travel...
'This Isn't Journalism': Media Hacks Copy and Paste Alarmist Climate Change Propaganda
Move Over, Fat JD: Woke Right Insult 'Chudley' Becomes the New Conservative Meme...
Abdul El-Sayed Preps Us for Socialist Utopia With a Reminder That Being Poor...
Socialism on the Rise? Mike Johnson Warns Democrats Are Showing Their True Colors
Off Their Block: Tetris Threatens to Sue WH Over ‘Build the Wall’ Online...
Former Fetterman Staffers (Losers) Launch X Dump Account, Promise Private Texts Starting S...
When Mothers Rally for a Child Killer, the Slippery Slope Is No Longer...
DA Couldn't Believe a Reporter Asked Him This Question About the Prosecution of...
America Is Healing: Maryland Renaissance Festival Announces a Ban on Furries
Reporter Describes Some Clancy Jurors As Mistrial Was Declared (Imagine What the Holdout...
Dishonest Rep. Ted Lieu Pushed Fake News About Where the GOP Convention Link...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement