Rejection Letter: Eric Swalwell’s Campaign and Congressional Staff Denounce Him in New Sta...
TPUSA Reporter Savanah Hernandez Assaulted at Anti-ICE Protest
Graham Platner: I Came Out of a ‘Hyper-Masculine, Hyper-Violent Place’ When I Left...
Powerful: Blindfolded Women Perform Protest Dance Aimed at Trump and Epstein
Sen. Mike Lee Agrees It Might Be Time to Put James Carville in...
ICE Allegedly Detained and Deported Two Elementary School Children Without Due Process
13 Arrests, One Machete Rampage: 'Lucifer' Slashes Seniors on NYC Subway Platform
From Tiki Torch Hoax to Swalwell Exposé: Adam Parkhomenko's Wife Speaks Out
NPR's Podcast on Race Does an Episode on 'Mar-a-Lago Face'
America Deserved 9/11 Meets ‘Some People Did Some Things’ – Hasan Piker &...
Martina Navratilova Wants to Know Why the Airman Rescued in Iran Isn't All...
Recycling Raskin: Democrats Demand Trump Undergo Yet Another Cognitive Test in 25th Amendm...
NYT: Trump Shares Video of Graphic Attack and Rails Against Haitians
Four Women Accuse Eric Swalwell, Rep. Luna Moves to Expel Him — Bulwark's...
Activists Line the Fencing at ICE Detention Center in Minnesota With Dildos

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement