Michael McFaul: Shameful That Canada Is Now a More Consequential Leader of Free...
Mexicans Rage at American Beach Home: 'Stay Out' – But Migration and Remittances...
Reuters: The Supreme Court ‘Gutted’ a Core Voting Rights Act Protection
CNN: Trump Admin Opening Investigation Into Smith College in ‘Latest Move to Limit...
Katie Miller Confronts Biased Abby Phillip — HuffPost’s S.V. Dáte: 'Her Husband IS...
'In Short, He's in Deep DOO-DOO': MASSIVE Public Records Audit Shows Ro Khanna...
LA Mayor Karen Bass Wastes $250K on Anti-ICE Virtue Signal ... Useless Taxpayer-Funded...
Katie Pavlich DECIMATES Brian Tyler Cohen for Dishonestly Insinuating She Cut Him Off...
James Woods Bestows GREATEST Nickname EVER on Katie Porter While Sharing Her Cringe...
Corrupt Obama Judge Demands Special Treatment After WHCD Attack
WELL, What Do You KNOW?! Jessica Tarlov's Iranian Clip Left Out a BUNCH...
Noah Rothman Takes Snot-Nosed, Soy-Boy Adam Mockler to the CLEANERS for Disrespecting the...
Pete Hegseth Delivers Warning to Islamic Regime With a Heapin' Helpin' of FAFO...
Super-Wealthy Hollyweirdo Sarah Paulson Performs the Most Tone-Deaf Protest EVER at the Me...
And Here We GOOO! DataRepublican's Thread Calls Down the THUNDER on Woke Right...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement