Dana Bash Wishes Rupar Hadn’t Cut Her Question About Trump Calling Press the...
President Trump Endorses Changing ICE’s Name to NICE
'You Can’t Touch Jimmy': Jake Tapper's Defense of Kimmel's Sick Melania Joke Draws...
Hakeem Jeffries Is BIG MAD That Karoline Leavitt Got DIRECTLY Over the Target...
Jay Jones 2.0: Ana Navarro Says Trump Now Knows the Fear of Schoolchildren...
Simp Pines for Biden’s ‘No Drama’ Days — Forgets Afghanistan, Inflation, Open Borders,...
'But This One Goes to ELEVEN!' Ilhan Omar and the Fantastic Flub Heard...
Teachers’ Unions: Taking Teachers’ Money, Paying Themselves, Laundering the Rest to Democr...
Rep. Andy Ogles Says There Was a Reporter Who Said, 'I Hope They...
Chuck Todd Says Trump Doesn’t Care About the Safety of Anyone in His...
CA’s First Partner Shocked Seeing Trump Speak to a Female Journalist With That...
Sick Twist: Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi Says Trump’s Popularity Problem Justifies Attempts on...
CNN, Axios Report Team Trump's Back to Slamming the Media Even After Their...
David Axelrod Says Trump Immediately 'Seized' on WHCA Attack to Justify 'His' Ballroom
Self-Proclaimed 'Socialist Socialite' Gets SLAMMED for Trying to Dunk on Jennifer Hegseth'...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement