LA Mayoral Candidate Raman Looks Like a Wet Noodle After CNN Journo Pushes...
The Gardener from Jamaica and the Limits of Pocket-Watching Billionaires
Visibly Shaken Commie Streamer Hasan Piker Calls FBI Foreign Ties Probe 'Not Great...
Jemele Hill Lectures America: Spencer Pratt’s Candidacy ‘Says More About Us’ Than Him
Peak Taylor Lorenz: Hoping the 'Communist Mayor' Fixes the Cashew Cream Cheese Gap
Thom Bomb: Bolo-Wearing Tillis Drops ‘Extra Filter’ and Explodes on Trump Senate Pick...
Bernie Sanders Proves Dave Portnoy Right — Stumps for Maine’s Nazi Sympathizer
Fishy Move: Fl Gov Candidate James Fishback Marries Mystery Blonde Weeks After Ditching...
Thomas Massie Melts Down: 'AI Hotel Room Throuple Video With AOC and Omar'...
Rubio Condemns Hezbollah Call to Overthrow Lebanese Government
WATCH: Shabbos Kestenbaum Humiliates Ana Kasparian On Air — She Blocks Him Immediately...
Veterans Affairs and Armed Services Remember on Memorial Weekend
And Just Like That She Became a Meme: Clueless Correspondent's WH Shooting...
'SICK of It': Taxpayer Confronting Local Gov for Putting Illegals First Will Take...
What Graham Platner Did When PRESSED About His Vile Comments Regarding Army Combat...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement