Hot Take of the Week: Bring Back EV and Solar Tax Credits to...
Mamdani's Commie Care: Nothing Says 'Great Parenting' Like Dumping Your Kids With Randos...
ABC News' Did an On-Air Fact-Check After the Trump Speech They Refused to...
'Screeching Like a Hyena': Randi Weingarten’s Viral Rant Proves Why Teachers’ Unions Are...
Jim Acosta Nods Along When Lefties Say Trump Stole an Election but Calls...
Trump Calls Out China’s 2020 Election Interference — DeSantis Drops Hammer: Yank All...
Mark Kelly Trips Over Fellow Democrats in Rush to Slam Trump for Election...
Maine Dem 'Ashley': Puts AI Fantasy Waifu As His Real Book Author Pic...
It Gets REAL: Post Details What Can Happen Now That Trump Has Declassified...
CBS News Rates Election Info Trump Declassified As 'False' Without Looking at the...
Release the Clown Car! Maine Dems Host a Forum to Replace Disgraced Graham...
Herridge BOMBSHELLS: Intel Officials ‘Massaged’ Briefings to Hide China’s 2020 Election In...
German World Cup Tourist Freddy Hits the Gun Range, Learns About Freedom (and...
Rob Schneider Declares Islamophobia Doesn’t Exist in Response to Proposed VA Legislation
Rep Says There Are So Many Homophobes in This Admin With 'Weird, Like,...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos