Hasan Piker Goes Nuclear After El-Sayed’s MI Primary Win: Calls Foes 'Islamophobic Pieces...
Mamdani Tries to Do a One-Eighty After Proof of Residency to Shop Comment...
BOOM! Hawaii Dem Congressional Candidate Gets an Instant FAFO With One Punch (and...
Outkick’s Clay Travis Challenges WNBA Team to Play HS Boys’ Basketball Team for...
The GOP Must Focus on the Cost of Living
Dem Pete Buttigieg Proposes ‘Normal’ Things Like Ending the Electoral College and Altering...
Viewers Heed Brian Stelter’s Advice and Hold Two CNN Anchors to Account With...
Forbes: Canadian Singer Doesn't Outright Deny MAGA Association
Mehdi Hasan Reminds Ron DeSantis That 90,000 Floridians Died During the COVID Crisis
These 'Republican Moms' Are All Voting for James Talarico: 'I Find Him to...
Francesca Hong Notes Her Proximity to Whiteness Continues Through Her Half-White Son
Jezebel: ‘MAGA Barbie’ Sophie Cunningham Working to Be WNBA’s Worst Player
LIVE Election Results on Twitchy: Primary Night in MI, MO, VA, KS, and...
A Very Masculine James Talarico Wields a 'Blowtorch'
Rage Return?: Politico ‘Journo’ Declared COVID Damage Repaired Until Fauci Forced to Testi...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement