Worth Every Penny: Why Choosing Your Child’s Peers Matters More Than Test Scores
Nice Timing: Marc Elias Says: Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Demanding New Jersey Release Voter...
Election Results LIVE on Twitchy! Arizona on Tap Tonight
'Politeness is White Supremacy?' Rep. Gill Grills Smithsonian Director on Their Own Woke...
Even a Senior Mamdani Administration Official Says There's No Way He's Arresting Benjamin...
CRAZY Jasmine Crockett Implodes: Calls GOP Hearing a 'Republican White Pride Rally'
Former Sanders Outreach Chief: Bernie Has Endorsed the Most Antisemitic Candidates in a...
Jasmine Crockett Exposes the Racism Behind the World Cup Final
CNN’s Own Legal Expert Buries BIG Dummy Zohran Mamdani’s Netanyahu Arrest Threat: 'A...
Jim Accosted?: Ex-CNN ‘Journo’ Recounts Terrifying Trump Rallies Where Grandmas Shouted at...
NOT YOU! Pete Buttigieg Asks, 'Then What?' After Trump ... and He's Not...
Software Error Adds 6,600 Noncitizens to NJ Voter Rolls, Gov Says, As Trump...
Mia Farrow's Manner of Defending Trans People Deemed WRONG and Now She's in...
WaPo Predictably Melts Down Over Trump Placing Founding Father Statue in White House...
Not Just Bibi: Parkland Grifter Cameron Kasky Calls Entirety of Israel 'Irreconcilably Gen...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement