BRO, That's NOT How It Works: Jessica Reidl's Tantrum Over Women's Birth Certificates...
Trump Stuns Democrats, 2026 Panic As Republicans Surge?
*SNORT* Lt. Gov Peggy Flanagan Shares Her 'Tribe Name' and LOL Its Meaning...
US Oil and Gas Assn. Notices They're a Useful Prop for Democrat Photo...
Free Stuff Isn't FREE? WHO KNEW?! Zohran Mamdani Reverses Course on Yet ANOTHER...
NBC News Baffled That Most Latinos Do Not Use The Term 'Latinx'
ABC News Reports This Inflation Update Is 'Defying Fears' (Stoked by Dems and...
WHOA. Bad Timing?! Pramila Jayapal Shares Her Shiny New Trans Bill of Rights...
Sen. Lisa Murkowski's SAVE Act Gaslighting (on STEROIDS!) Torched By the Most Perfect...
CNN's Abby Phillip Understands 'Tom Homan Has Been Big on This Lost Children...
HILARIOUS Thread of Champagne Socialist Mamdani Bro Throwing TANTRUMS Over Airline Injusti...
'He's a FRAUD': Meteorologist Takes Al Gore's FREAK-OUT Over Trump Admin Overturning Obama...
Lee Zeldin Reality Nukes Alarmist BS From Dems and Media After Trump Ended...
WATCH As Keith Ellison Suddenly Realizes He Just Told the TRUTH About Dems...
Fire and ICE: Authorities Look for Arsonist Seen Setting Kansas City Building Ablaze

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement