Georgia’s Youngest Mayor Lasted 10 Months — Impeached Over City Funds and Explicit...
'If Anybody Was Wondering Why Seattle Has Fallen Apart' Watch This Clip of...
AOC Tests Positive for COVID in 2026 — and Half the Internet Acts...
Mamdani’s ‘Normie’ Act Cracks As New Adviser Who Edits ‘Gay Communism,’ Backs Hamas...
NYT Shocking A-HA: Israelis View Themselves As the Victims of the Massacre That...
Meteorologist Chris Martz Obliterates Adam Schiff's Climate Change Panic Button
Letters From the Basement: Afghan Girls Risk Arrest to Learn : Then Hand...
'This You?' Scott Jennings NUKES David Axelrod for Phony Outrage About SCOTUS Criticism
WHOOPS! Gavin Newsom Tried to Pin High Housing Costs on Trump and KO'd...
JD Vance Provides the PERFECT Response After James Talarico Names His 'Favorite' Drag...
Hasan Piker Hates America, Abuses His Dog yet El-Sayed Embraces Him and Campus...
Kamala Harris Makes Articulate, Coherent Post on Dems' Call to Slow AI, Raises...
Mehdi Hasan Marvels at Childlike Ignorance of Brett Kavanaugh Explaining Why 9/11 Happened
Federal Judge Refers Leftist Philly DA to DOJ for Criminal Investigation
Judge Blocks the Kennedy Center Board From Putting Trump's Name on the Building...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos