Mamdani's 'Signature Childcare Program' Launch Provides a Preview of City-Owned Grocery St...
'Learing Center' Alert! Minn. Dems Spent HOW MUCH on Beds That 7 Homeless...
Do You Notice Something About the Scene As Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Insists...
CNBC's Joe Kernen Delivered Some Brutal Trade War Reality Checks to Canada's Ex-...
WaPo Gets Shredded During Attempt to Help Dems With Spin About Arrested Illegals
Stephen Miller Drops a Truth Bomb About Illegal Aliens That Should Be in...
Dem Abdul El-Sayed Is Trying to Pretend His Senatorial Campaign Was Never About...
Trump Blasts NYT's Maggie Haberman for ‘Sources Say’ 9/11 Smear, CNN’s Jake Tapper...
From Usha Vance’s Marriage to Melania: Stepstool Abdul El-Sayed Can’t Leave Other Men’s...
Oompa Loompa-Sized Activist Calls America a Dictatorship — and Walks Off Unarrested
Michelle Obama Says She Doesn’t Miss Her Kids at Home. A Lot of...
Jeffries Accuses Trump and Republicans of ‘Jim Crow-Like Tactics’ and ‘Wickedness’
Jasmine Crockett Ain’t Standing by Any Man — Especially Not the One She...
Terrible Terrorist Tabloid: Rolling Stone Anoints Hasan Piker a Top 'Influencer' For 2026
Don Lemon Says He’s Like Malcolm X and Can ‘Tell the Truth’ Since...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos