'Deported US Citizen' Hysteria Dies Screaming: Dude Had Forged Papers and Admitted Sneakin...
Twilight Zone Politics: Carville Backs Parkland Activist David Hogg to Lead ‘Dysfunctional...
Scott Jennings Warns of Dem Outrage After Sharing ‘Racist’ Cross on Sen. Graham’s...
Senator John Fetterman to Democrats: 'If You Don’t Want Me, Just Say So'
Brit Hume Counts the Ways Things Could Get VERY Awkward for Fauci at...
Rahm Emanuel, the Last Sane Dem, Tells Party: Stop Chasing Abolition Fantasies and...
MI Senate Candidate (D-Commie) El-Sayed’s Financials Drop: Rules for Thee, Overseas Rental...
Catherine Herridge Adds Disturbing Context to Tapes of Biden Sharing Classified Info With...
Patricia Heaton Drops Epic Banger: Watch for Jake Tapper’s New Book, 'How Fauci...
They're SO Guilty: Entire CNN Panel EXPLODES on Lydia Moynihan for Daring to...
My Dinner With Anthony: CNN’s Jake Tapper Was Sharing Meals in His Home...
CNN’s ‘Media Analyst’ Brian Stelter Opts to Ignore Fauci Diary Scandal Involving Tapper...
Minneapolis Restaurant Taking a 'Break' After Taking Prices Off the Menu in Name...
Black Lives Matter Mob in Madison Blocks Entrance to 'Racist Bar'
Jonathan Chait Argues That Abolishing the Senate May Be the DSA’s Best Idea

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement