Jemele Hill’s Dishonest Spin on Trans Athletes: The Fight for Girls’ Sports Is...
Bernie Coaches Baby Socialists: Keep the Real Agenda Quiet Until After You’ve Fooled...
Patients Who? Nurses Ditch the Sick to Stage a Walkout After ICE Grabs...
Mental Loop Lunacy: Hillary Clinton Still Hasn’t Gotten Over Her 2016 Presidential Debate...
Marriage on ICE: ‘Lifelong Republican’ Shocked to Learn Immigration Laws Apply to His...
Dr. Robert Malone Puts Fauci's Wife and the NIH on BLAST After She...
Half Woman by Birth Canal, Full WNBA Prospect by Declaration: Enes Freedom Enters...
'I Hate Mackinac': Michigan Senate Hopeful Abdul El-Sayed Prefers Dubai Over America’s Cro...
Bombshell Trump Interview Confirm Trump Understands Everything About 2026
It Must Be Pretty Good: Ben Shapiro's New Movie Trailer Has Infuriated ALL...
Wait... WUT? Marjorie Taylor Greene Declares Trump 'the Past,' Lectures Conservatives on C...
'Grouchy FAUCI' —> Fauci's Wife the EPITOME of Class As She Does THIS...
YIKES: Francesca Hong's Clapback at David Axelrod's 'Faculty Lounge Exotica' Dig Takes AWK...
That Emoji... LOL! Mehdi Hasan Learns the HARD WAY Not to Pick a...
OOF! Not Sure Chuck Schumer Can Come Back From WHOOPIN' Doug Burgum Just...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement