Revolting Situation: CNN Staff Upset Scott Jennings Is Referring to Illegal Aliens As...
Cycle Spectacle: Motocross Star Colby Raha Soars High in World Record Jump (WATCH)
Lemon’s Lemmings: Ana Navarro and ‘The View’ Crew Have Suddenly Soured on the...
Client Defiance Makes PETA Look Rational in ALL CAPS Rant
Another One? Nurse Says Hospitals Can’t Have MAGA Employees Treating Patients
Washington Post Journalists: Unburdened By What Has Been: Grammys Edition
Rural Areas Tasked With Finding Strategies to Make British Countryside 'Less White'
ABC News: Millions Could Lose SNAP Benefits as Work Requirements Take Effect
AWFL Thrilled to Take in Haitian Migrant — It's Like Having Your Own...
U-Haul Backed Up to the Open Door of the Quality Learing Center in...
Coached to Be Anti-ICE by Teachers, Preschoolers Hold Anti-ICE Rally at School
Woman Posts Video of Herself Kickboxing, Says It's Time to Start Training for...
Democrats Recreate Battle of Iwo Jima Flag Raising With Somali-Looking Minnesota Flag
WOMP WOMP: LAPD Says It Won’t Enforce Governor’s Mask Ban on Federal Agents
The Nation Nominates the City of Minneapolis for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement