John Brennan's Assessment of Tulsi Gabbard's Testimony Might Be the Least Self-Aware Thing...
Biden's Oval Office Bust Honored a Man Now Accused by NYT of Repeat...
Rep. Jamie Raskin Declares Thomas Paine Was an Undocumented Immigrant
Polymarket's New DC Bar: Monitor Iran, Bet on Elections, and Get 15 Beers...
NAILED It! John Fetterman Names Who (and What) Is the True Leader the...
James Talarico Spox Posts Official Statement Regarding ‘Vegan Accusations’
Pen and Paper Make a Comeback: Parents Demand School Choice to Escape Screen...
From Foe to Fan? Mark Cuban Defends TrumpRx as a Real Step Forward...
'ELON WINS'! Let's Check on How Tim Walz's Mocking of Tesla's Stock Drop...
Rand Paul Betrays Trump, Tries Sinking DHS Nominee Markwayne Mullin
CNN's Numbers Guy Has a Reality Check for TDS Crowd Claiming Trump Supporters...
Hochul Begs Billionaires to Come Home— Iowahawk Counters with Bounty for Every 'Fugitive'...
Sen. Angus King Is STILL Upset That Tulsi Gabbard Hasn't Listed Climate Change...
Bridges and Cougars and Butterflies, Oh MY! Chris Rufo Exposes Yet ANOTHER Gavin...
For SOME Reason Unhinged Sen. Elissa Slotkin Is Scared by the Thought of...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement