Do Nothing Ivy League PhD, Broke in NYC, Hates Jews: The Perfect Democrat...
'They’re Terrible People Who Don’t Love America' — JD Vance Goes Nuclear on...
Al Gore's Attempted 'Right All Along' Brag Collapses Under the Weight of its...
POPCORN! Watch Hillary Clinton Absolutely SQUIRM When Pressed to Comment About Graham Plat...
Mommy's Little Senator: 37-Year-Old Texas Dem Talarico Shares a Checking Account With His...
PA Supreme Court Smacks Down Soros DA Krasner: Needs Adult Supervision Before Freeing...
OUCH! CNN Sinks Gavin Newsom's Spin on Why California's 'First Partner' Is Under...
No Late Night Waffle House for Iran: Iranian World Cup Team Booted from...
'A Million Times Worse Than Epstein': New UK 'Groomer' Gang Report Is a...
Impeach Cobbler: Scott Jennings Knows What Dems Are Cooking Up for Midterms and...
Chicago Mayor Says Flaming Cross Lit to Protest Trump and Christians Is Reminder...
Swindler’s Tryst: X Users Clamor for SPLC Agent and Neo-Nazi Rom-Com Movie (Based...
JK Rowling Has Thoughts on ‘Woman’ Arrested for Pleasuring ‘Herself’ in Front of...
Hern Replaces Mullin: Trump-Backed Candidate Claims Oklahoma Senate Nomination
Sean Penn to Direct Film About Capitol Police Officer Defending the Capitol on...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement