TICK TOCK, BRO! Ruben Gallego Has Even MORE 'Splainin' to do About Certain...
SHOCKA! Ilhan Omar Tied to ANOTHER Minnesota Fraud Defendant via Emails With INTERESTING...
Trump Is Naming Names
We RIDE at Dawn! Trump Comes Out Swinging After Birthright Ruling – He...
Jim Acosta's Great American State Fair Coverage a Reminder of Why He's STILL...
We Don't Hate Them Enough: NPR Forced to Retract COMPLETELY FAKE Story About...
Cisgender? REALLY? Ketanji Brown Jackson's Trans Ruling Dissent Is Even DUMBER Than We...
HOO and BOY: You HAVE to See This MORONIC Rant From Tammy Duckworth...
BREAKING: SCOTUS Shares Ruling on Birthright Citizenship
Sanity WINS! Supreme Court CAN Define a Woman, Rules to Protect Women's Sports
FUME: Dem Rep. Melanie Stansbury Claiming the Great American State Fair's Empty? Backfired...
Forever Lost: Stephen A. Smith Says Establishment Dems Must Win Back Voters From...
Barb McQuade Loses It on MS NOW As SCOTUS Torches Dem Dream of...
Masked Antifa Thug Attacks Videographers at Seattle Pride Event With a Baseball Bat
Scorn Porn: Failed ‘Journalist’ Jim Acosta Posts Video Mocking Attendance at Great America...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement