Jessica Tarlov's Desperation to Downplay Dems/DSA Civil War Tells Us It's SO MUCH...
Rep. Ro Khanna SCHOOLED by Iraqi Veteran in Heated Debate About Trump VS...
Stunning Border Security Graph Confirms We Didn't Need More Laws, Just a New...
CBS News: Motive Not Yet Known for Attacker Who Yelled 'Allahu Akbar' During...
Universal and Atari Announce Classic Video Games Are Leaping From the TV Screen...
So Much for the First Amendment: Conservatives React to OUTRAGEOUS Shiloh Hendrix Verdict
Kamala Harris SOUNDS THE ALARM Because Women Are Getting Pregnant EVERY DAY (No,...
Elon Musk Told a Journo That Open Borders Dems Weren't Always Crazy (and...
DRAG HIM! John Thune Just Said the WRONG THING on the Senate Floor...
Yup, He Went THERE: Ben Shapiro TRIGGERS All the WORST People in the...
DOJ's Harmeet Dhillon Puts a Final Nail in Coffin of the Left's 'Illegal...
Tim Sheehy Delivers Powerful, Impassioned Speech About Who America Is Fighting In Iran
Elon Musk Tells British ‘Journo’ Who Called Him 'Far Right' That More People...
Curdling Scheme: Dem Jamie Raskin’s ‘No Illegal Alien Voters’ Claim Has Aged Like...
Double Dribble: Unhinged Sport Journalist Dumps on Caitlin Clark Because Emmett Till or...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement