Fake But Accurate: Journos and Other Assorted Propagandists Run With AI Enhanced Pretti...
Woman Claims ‘Real Masculinity’ Is Fleeing the Right
'Lying Oxygen Thieves' of Climate Defiance Branch Out From Climate Insanity to Anti-Ice...
Bill Kristol: There Was No ‘Unrest’ in Minneapolis Until ICE and CBP Showed...
Friend Murdered by Feds—Send Coffee Money: X Users Slam Doctor's Venmo Plea After...
Nurse Says He Won’t Give Anesthesia to Republicans Undergoing Surgery
The Left's Real Motivation: Not Loving Illegals, Just Despising Popular Kids Who Shoved...
Don't Buy the Martyr Myth: Pretti and Good Chose Confrontation with Law Enforcement
NY Gov. Kathy Hochul Posts a Video With Her Pro Tips on Shoveling...
Moms Trading Playdates for Bulletproof Vests: 'Protecting' Kids by Using Them as...
Minneapolis Insurrection Proves It: If Trump Blinks on ICE, the Left Wins Open...
David Hogg Claims We Now Have a Secret Police in America, Folks
Rep. Ilhan Omar Says All This Chaos Is About Rigging Elections, Not Immigration...
Woman Tries to Throw Flashbang Back at Law Enforcement, Fails
Lawrence O’Donnell Claims NYC Government Plowing Roads Is ‘Pure Socialism’

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement