Unsound Barrier: Dem Shri Thanedar’s X Post Shows He Doesn’t Get the ‘Ins...
Jessica Tarlov Didn’t Know Biden Lied About ‘Secure Border’ Until Fox News Drone...
Tapped Out Tapper: CNN’s Latest Attempt to Lure in Viewers As Bad As...
Tiny Village to Be Dumping Ground for Asylum-Seekers Votes to Become Independent From...
Say It Isn’t Sole: NY X Account Posts Freakish Foot-Face Photo to Promote...
Bernie Sanders Says It’s Embarrassing How Little the President Knows About the Dangers...
'FactPost' Claims Pennsylvania Has Reported Four Measles Deaths This Year; Shapiro Piles o...
Jake Tapper Thinks CA’s COVID Response Is Being Used As a Cudgel on...
Boston Herald: Lindsay Clancy Holdout Juror Now Getting the Negative Attention He Deserves
NYPost Looks Into Anthropic CEO's Woke Handpicked AI Watchdog Group
'Shady As F**k': Pro-Talarico Super PAC Finds ‘Roundabout Way of Paying People for...
NYT Blames 'Editing Error' for Saying Israelis See Themselves As the Victims of...
Watching Kash Patel Infuriate Cory Booker (While Getting in a Dig at Schiff)...
Athletic Scholarships Are Scarce. A Well-Rounded Kid Shouldn’t Be the Sacrifice
Chalk Up Another Massive L for Newsom: TMZ Reports That Paramount Is Ditching...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement