Canadian Woman in ICE Custody After Slapping Teen in Pro-Trump, Pro-ICE Clothing
Escape From New York: Gov. Kathy Hochul Blames Trump for Families and Businesses...
Podcaster Thinks Homeschooling Is Weird, Doesn’t Trust Anyone Who Wants to Be With...
Kamala's Kids: Gubernatorial Candidate Mike Lindell's Pillow Prices Are a Nazi Dog Whistle
Here's What Was in the Van of the 'Upstanding Non-Citizen on His Way...
Get Out Already: Mahmoud Khalil Sues Heritage Foundation, Stephen Miller Under KKK Act
Biden and His Autopen Return With Big Announcement
Sen. Blumenthal Continued to Insist There's No Evidence of Jack Smith Wrongdoing...
Second 'ICE-Related Fatality' This Week After Mexican Flees Encounter, Is Hit by Tractor-T...
No-Show Shame: EVERY Democrat Arrives As an Empty Seat for Senate Anti-Fraud Hearing
Here's How Republicans at Hearings Should Respond to Dem Questions About the 2020...
AG Nominee Todd Blanche Needed No Words to Properly Respond to Insults From...
Roach Encroachment: Los Angeles TV News Reporter Braves a Big Bold Bug During...
California Court Gives a Slap on the Wrist to Illegal Truck Driver Who...
Karoline Leavitt Shares Trump's Message About What ICE WILL Continue Doing (Cue More...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement