Judge Who Formerly Blocked Trump Administration Gives Green Light to Deport 350,000 Haitia...
President Trump Signs Two Executive Orders on Birthright Citizenship, Birth Tourism
Resister Says It’s Funny MAGA Never Had a Problem With Dr. Oz Being...
LIVE Election Results on Twitchy! Primary Night in Tennessee
If Students Can’t Handle Seeing Their Grades, They’re Not Ready for College
Hasan Piker Angry With Think Tank Third Way for 'Preparing for War' Against...
Canadian Lefty Lectures Americans: Melania Trump Less of a 'Real American' Than Born-In-US...
David Hogg Reminds Us It's Been Two Years of Total GOP Control and...
NYT's David French Informed of the Difference Between Nick Fuentes and Hasan Piker
Francesca Hong Spins Her Slams on Holidays With 'I'm Just Not a Fun...
Hasan Piker Tries to Backpedal on His 'America Deserved 9/11' Stance and Twitter...
Mamdani Booed Off Stage As Cops Hold Back Furious Crowd
Coco Gauff: 'Men Don't Belong in Women's Tennis... but Please Don't Yell at...
Not While I'M Alive! Justine Bateman SHREDS Islamic Scholars Caught Bragging About Taking...
Gov. Gretchen Whitmer Tells MI Which Dems to Vote for in Order to...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement