The Cult Strikes Back: Chicago Bulls Waive Jaden Ivey for Calling Out Forced...
Librarian Plays Free Speech Martyr, Gets Booted for Turning Kid's Section Into Rainbow...
*SNORT* Zohran Mamdani White Knighting for Trans Community on Trans Visibility Day Goes...
Pelosi's ‘False Count’ Vote Scam Unravels As Ilhan Omar Folds Under Pressure
AP: Obama-Appointed Judge Blocks Order Defunding NPR and PBS, Citing First Amendment
CAIR Screeching at Democrat Sen. Elissa Slotkin Because She 'Embraced' EVIL Bill Maher...
Kristi Should Euthanize This Marriage: The Byron Noem Strange Crossdressing Habit Scandal
Sounds FAMILIAR: Scott Jennings Has Entirely TOO MUCH FUN Owning Eric Swalwell for...
Jonah Goldberg Officially Needs a New Schtick
SCOTUS Hands a Giant L to LGBTQ+: Colorado's Ban on So-Called 'Conversion Therapy'...
BIG MAD Rashida Tlaib SHREDDED for Accusing Israel of APARTHEID Over New Law...
RUH-ROH: New FBI Update on Eric Swalwell's FANG BANG FILES Should Scare the...
WOOF, Dick! We've Seen a Lot of Posts That Age POORLY But This...
The Attack on Biblical Truth in American Schools
Take the L, BRO! MI Dem Abdul El-Sayed Tries Backpedaling on His Leaked...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement