Oh, Brother!: CNN’s Erin Burnett Questions Sibling of Natalie Harp to Prolong Scandal...
Don Lemon and Jemele Hill Say Stephen A. Smith Is ‘Problematic’ for Hosting...
Briahna Joy Gray and the Luigi Mangione Murder Apologists
Trump Gloats As Alexander Vindman Suffers Upset Loss to DSA Member in FL...
That's Not Funny: Amnesty International UK to Host 'Comedy' Event
AG Keith Ellison Sues Texas to Compel the Extradition of an ICE Agent...
Broadcaster Says Racism in the Media Is Responsible for ‘Proffesor’ Jason Arday’s Death
Jake Tapper Questions Framing of an Old Clip of Him Saying a ‘Politburo’...
Iowa Congressional Candidate’s ‘Security’ (He's a Mayor) Knocks Phone Out of Reporter’s Ha...
We Are Coke State: 14 Arrested in Fraternity Run Drug Ring at Penn...
California's Nanny Bureaucrats Make Purchasing Replacement Tires More Expensive
Journo Stops Guest Mid-Interview When He Claims Israel Is Committing Genocide
Live Election Results on Twitchy! Primary Night for Alaska, Wyoming, and Florida
Axios Reports on Democrats' New Campaign Tactic: Bringing Sexy Back
DSA Leader: Group Hates Constitution, It’s an ‘Obstacle’ to Their Socialist Revolution (WA...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement