Gesticulating Gavin Newsom Says ICE Agents are Being Humiliated and Used as Trump’s...
No Rhyme or Reason: Brooklyn Pro-Illegal Alien Protesters Demand an End to America’s...
The View’s Sunny Hostin Justifies Violence Towards ICE Agents, Says a ‘Reckoning’ is...
AOC Goes ABC: Trump's Been Called This Before and He Made Them Pay
CNN Panel Tries To Shame Scott Jennings for Backing Trump Because They Say...
Glenn Beck Posts Roadside Chat for Trump With Advice on Reported Flap Between...
While L.A. Residents Wait for Building Permits, Karen Bass Is Handing Out MORE...
CRAY-CRAY: Deranged Leftist Woman Thinks Her Side Would Win a MAGA Civil War...
Paging J.B. Pritzker! $30M Program Aimed at DEI Hiring FAILED Audit As HALF...
'How'd It Work Out?' Scott Jennings HILARIOUSLY Destroys Clintonista Karen Finney
Miami Bishop Says Politicians Who Enforce Immigration Laws Are 'Corrosive to the Common...
That's NOT How This Works, Karen! Bass Issues Executive Order Demanding ICE Report...
Cali's ABC7 Station Continues Left's Attacks on ICE With Misleading Post About Injured...
California State University's LA Campus Starts REMOTE Learning to Protect Illegal Students...
LAWFARE ALERT: WA State Anti-Trump Prosecutor Just Got FELONY Conviction for Unmasked GOP...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement