Victim Signaling: MN State Senator John Hoffman Tries to Link the Word 'Illegals'...
Democrats' Latest Great White Beta Male Hope Just Set a Record for Burning...
Pressley’s Hypocrisy: Fights to Make 'Temp' Protected Status Permanent for Haitians Yet Tr...
Tom Steyer's Radical Campaign Promise: Abolish ICE, Jail ICE Agents, and Turn CA...
Australian Journo on Team Humanity Hopes the US and Israel Suffer a Crushing...
CBS News: Five-Year-Old ‘Arrested’ by ICE Shows Signs of Psychological Trauma
AOC: Members of Congress Think They Can Get Away With It Because the...
Erika Kirk Backed Out of UGA Event with JD Vance Due to Serious...
'All Black Guys Look Like Obama?' Biden's Awkward Gaffe Goes Viral
WaPo Columnist Shadi Hamid: 'No Recollection' of Eric Swalwell Ever Running for President
Gov. Spanberger Signs Law Which Will Award VA's Electoral College Votes to Popular...
'They Don’t Know What They’re Talking About’: Homan Schools Pope on Immigration’s Brutal...
CNN's Kaitlan Collins Wins WHCA's Award for Excellence in Presidential News Coverage
Rubio Tuesday
Seth Dillon Drops Truth Bomb: Muslims Don’t Love Jesus, They Lie About Him

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement