Libs of TikTok Presents One of the Worst Cases of TDS She's Ever...
Boise, Banned From Flying Pride Flag at City Hall, Wraps Flagpoles in Pride...
Pentagon Takes Down Photo of Sailor Wearing ‘Save the Big Booty Venezuelans’ Patch
Chicago Teachers Union President Confesses: We Do Politics So Black Women Can Live...
George Conway Cries About Giving His Kids' Inheritance to Biden's Victory Fund
British Nationals Named Ali, Hameed, Ibrahim & Mohammed Busted Illegally Crossing from Can...
Jake Tapper: USC Freshman Loses Eye After Being Shot by Fed at Mostly...
CNN's Melania Hit Job Exposed: Elegant First Lady Pays for Trump Hate, Not...
CNBC: USDA Secretary Sent Easter Email Touting ’Jesus’ and ‘God’, One Staffer Offended
All the President’s Men Turns 50: The Movie That Gave Journalists an Unbearable...
President Trump Being Roasted for 'Dismantling' the US Forest Service
NBC News: Arrests of Illegals Without Criminal Convictions Have Risen Eightfold Under Trum...
Oregon CPS Investigates Parents for Refusing to Transition Their Mentally Ill 15-Year-Old...
Scott Jennings Blisters CNN About the ONE Qualification Anyone Needs to Be 'Credible'...
NYT Melts Down as Trump Finally Fixes Broken Asylum System — Bogus Claims...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement