Democrats Boycott Meeting on Influence of Muslim Brotherhood in the US as 'Political...
OUCH! Zohran Mamdani's Anti-Police Rhetoric Came Back to Bite Him at an NYPD...
Brihana Joy Gray Declares Thanksgiving Is a Holiday About Genocide
Why El-Sayed’s Primary Win Should Alarm Every American
Masked Douche at St. Paul City Council Meeting Says 'The System' Exists to...
DSA Members Propose Replacing the President With 'The Head Honcho of Whatever'
Abdul El-Sayed Says Keep the Name Abdulrahman Out of Your Damn Mouth If...
Trump Brushes Off Would-Be Assassin Who Was Staking Out His Los Angeles Golf...
SO Genuine! Francesca Hong's Slam on Thanksgiving Clearly Wasn't Polling Well for Her...
'I Think That's Daft': Ross Douthat Politely BODIES Yale Professor on Who Knows...
Schumer Loses Control As Abdul El-Sayed's Victory Deconstructs the Democrat Party
Elizabeth Warren Does a Rake Stomp While Complaining About 'Landlords Jacking Up the...
Amy Klobuchar Gets Absolutely Booed Off Stage for Border & Cop Lies —...
Jumpin' for Jihad: Chris Murphy Is 'All In' for Fake Doctor and Terrorist...
Tim Walz Might Want to Thank Fellow 'Manly Man' James Talarico for Eclipsing...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement