Fifty-Seven Republicans Betray Freedom: Vote to Keep Government 'Kill Switch' in Your Car
Operation Fakeout: Leftist Hotlines Send Protesters to Biker Bars — Surprise, No ICE,...
Bombshell: Ms. Rachel's Comedian Relative Outs Her as Hiding Jewish Family Ties Amid...
Game, Set, Match: Tennis Star Amanda Anisimova DROPS Reporter Goading Her to Denounce...
Trump's Glorious Troll: 'Whatever Happened to Global Warming?' as Arctic Blast Threatens M...
Labor and Delivery Nurse Takes 'Great Joy' at Thought of Karoline Leavitt Sustaining...
Some Things Never Change: Hanoi Jane Fonda Spreads Anti-American Propaganda With Stephen C...
Lemon in Orange? Activist Podcaster Dares Pam Bondi to Arrest Him but It's...
Satisfying Snapshots: Minnesota Church-Crashing Activists Provide Perfect Mugshot Montage...
Eric Swalwell Vows to Unleash His Inner Fascist If Elected CA Governor by...
Mayor Jacob Frey Wants BLM Ringleader Responsible for Storming Minnesota Church to Be...
BUCKLE UP: Trump Put the Brakes on a FETAL BODY PART CASH COW...
Reporter Asks Tennis Player ‘How It Feels to Play Under the American Flag...
Professional Agitator Who Stormed Church Has His 'Combat Veteran' Status Scrutinized
Kamala Harris Discovers New Low—Still Shilling the '5-Year-Old ICE Bait' Fairy Tale

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos