'Judge Me by My ENEMIES' --> THIS Five-Day-Old Post From Lindsey Graham DEFINITELY...
'MASSIVE POS' Ana Kasparian Gets Her Clock CLEANED for Shockingly VILE Post After...
'What's Happening on the Ground' Post Sheds Some Light on Lindsey Graham's Possible...
Breaking: U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham Dead at Age 71, Republican Lawmaker Passed After...
Climate Change Reportedly Driving Child Marriage as Families Struggle to Survive
Indiana Lt. Governor Calls for Ban on Mosques Broadcasting Call to Prayer Over...
Like a Rolling Stone: Mick Jagger Tells ‘The Boss’ Audiences Get No Satisfaction...
Harmeet Dhillon Says Her Civil Rights Team Is On Christian Preacher Threatened With...
Gov. Tim Walz Says Minnesota Stands With Houston, Where Illegal Tried to Run...
Man Who Recruited Platner Barred From Rep. Summer Lee's Campaign Over Sexual Misconduct...
Slither River: Large Scale Disaster Sends a Venomous Nile of Reptiles Flooding into...
WA Superintendent of Schools: It's Inaccurate to Say Biologically That There Are Only...
FAKE NEWS! Ro Khanna Goes Full Greta Thunberg With 'Detention' Stunt on a...
Randi Weingarten Being Harassed by Congress for Using Teachers' Dues to Promote Her...
FBI Calls MS NOW's Scoop on Kash Patel Being Called to the White...

Supreme Court denies Hobby Lobby injunction to block Obamacare contraception mandate

As Twitchy reported in November, arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby had turned to the courts to challenge language in Obamacare that mandates that employers provide contraceptive coverage. A U.S. District Judge had ruled that, because Hobby Lobby was not a religious organization but a for-profit business, it was not exempt from Obamacare’s requirement to provide morning-after and week-after birth control pills as well as some intrauterine contraceptive devices.

Advertisement

Today, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor declined to grant an injunction to Hobby Lobby and to another business, Christian bookstore Mardel. The businesses say they face devastating fines if they do not provide contraceptive coverage beginning Jan. 1, but that wasn’t enough to sway the court.

In part, Sotomayor wrote that, “while the applicants allege they will face irreparable harm if they are forced to choose between complying with the contraception-coverage requirement and paying significant fines, they cannot show that an injunction is necessary or appropriate.”

We were assured that we’d like Obamacare once we found out what was in it, but not everyone’s happy about the government’s expanded authority to mandate coverage.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/mike_oconner/status/284079811918454784

https://twitter.com/AnJACase/status/284071994654347264

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement