This open letter only has around 150 signatories, so it must be different from the one that had 270 “doctors” calling for Spotify to censor Joe Rogan’s podcast. It turns out most of those 270 doctors weren’t medical doctors anyway. This time it’s allegedly scientists, doctors, and health care professionals who are calling Rogan “extraordinarily dangerous.”
These experts say Joe Rogan is ‘extraordinarily dangerous’ to society – here’s why https://t.co/5wQJj6zfHl
— The Independent (@Independent) January 18, 2022
The Independent reports:
One said it was the vast size of his audience that made him so dangerous. Another suggested it was the fact the average age of his listeners was just 24, and hence particularly persuadable.
Another expert said he appeared to have a cult of personality. One said he had repeatedly spread misinformation about Covid, and ignored calls to stop.
These were among just some of the accusations levelled at Joe Rogan, podcaster, influencer and sometime actor, from more than 150 scientists, doctors and healthcare professionals who have said the 54-year-old was “extraordinarily dangerous”.
“The signatories to the letter ranged across disciplines and included a number of psychologists worried about the influence Rogan appears to hold over his audience,” it continues.
lol
— Peter Boghossian (@peterboghossian) January 18, 2022
This ratio 👌🏻👌🏻
— Dylton (@Dylan_caylor) January 18, 2022
"Experts."
— Curtis Schube (@AstroHog6) January 18, 2022
— Johnny (@TXTerror83) January 18, 2022
Because governments have been so open and transparent about information and facts haven’t they?
— Dave Oldham (@buffetbowler) January 18, 2022
Yawn.
— 😼Andy😼 (@AjaxStudy) January 18, 2022
Recommended
The peasants have had a bit too much to think lately
— Brandon (laser eyes forever) (@ran_the_numbers) January 18, 2022
If Rogan was a book, they would ban him or burn him. Most books that come in for that kind of treatment are worth the read.
— Thomas Cranmer⚡️✝️ (@kehetauhauaga) January 18, 2022
Not clicking on this garbage propaganda. If an expert can't make their case without trying to silence someone else's case, they aren't worth listening to.
— 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐅𝐥𝐚𝐰 ⏳🦺 (@TheDesignFlaw) January 18, 2022
Why so threatened?
Legacy media's dying, he's growing and dismantling your narrative simply by having free discussion.
— Michael™ (@MyKull_ed) January 18, 2022
He's only dangerous to the atrophying legacy media – that's about it. He interviews interesting people, and sometimes they are wrong. So what.
— Barnaby Patchett (@barnabarian) January 18, 2022
I want no part of any society that can be toppled by a podcast
— Neko (not like the cat) (@nek0wA) January 18, 2022
My god you must be desperate. Are the numbers that bad?
— Chris on Crypto (@ChrisOnCrypto1) January 18, 2022
Do you guys not get embarrassed having to type sentences like that
— BowTiedNerone (5’5, IQ 155+) (@BowTiedNerone) January 18, 2022
This isn't a news report, it's a press release. An outlet called "The Independent" might be expected to be objective. That expectation has been removed. Was there any checking if the claims of the signatories were accurate? Misleading?
— T. Ray🧢 (@T_Ray_TV) January 18, 2022
This article does nothing more that attempt to reify their misguided claims. Science is about skepticism and inquiry but they are promoting silence and obedience to a narrative offered by authorities that has been both demonstrably lying and often wrong.
— T. Ray🧢 (@T_Ray_TV) January 18, 2022
You guys simply can’t stand not being able to control someone. It’s eating you alive. It’s clincal
— blake (@bbqbaseball62) January 18, 2022
I'm an expert and I say this entire article is full of lies.
— Bidens' Dementia Drugs (@barfythedog) January 18, 2022
Joe is extraordinarily dangerous to the narratives "experts" push. For that reason, he's incredibly important.
— COY (@COYANGCOYANG) January 18, 2022
Freedom is dangerous. The alternative is worse: a safe, controlled, sterile life. All good, y'all, this is a feature, not a bug.
— BelleMyButterfly (@BelleMyButterf1) January 18, 2022
LOL. Delete your account.
— David (@HasReber) January 18, 2022
— Jonas Wunderkind (@JonasWunderkind) January 18, 2022
— Gonk Nodge (@gonk_nodge) January 18, 2022
It's amazing what a platform offering open, diverse, good faith conversations can achieve
— MJ (@0pppatunist) January 18, 2022
I checked the names on the list of experts and apparently they're all named Karen? What are the odds.
— Mission Bitcoin (@mission_bitcoin) January 18, 2022
We quickly scrolled down the list of experts but stopped when we reached, “Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist.”
“Experts” … the most meaningless phrase thanks to 2020/2021.
— Kevin (@afreetongue) January 18, 2022
We only listen to Anthony Fauci, who told us not to wear masks, then to wear a mask, then to wear two or even three masks, and then back to one mask before they decided cloth masks didn’t work and you needed N95 masks.
Related:
BUSTED: Many of the '270 doctors' who signed a letter urging Spotify to censor Joe Rogan 'are not medical doctors' https://t.co/mvtH7DMm4I
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) January 17, 2022
Join the conversation as a VIP Member