We’re thankful to be past Insurrection Week, topped off by President Joe Biden’s anniversary speech blasting Donald Trump. Democrats seem to think January 6 is one of the most valuable cards in the deck for the midterm elections, but a focus group consisting of moderate voters didn’t seem to care.
Watched 2 focus groups w/moderate voters last night, put on by a liberal group.
Moderator asked 1st group (five women) about Jan 6th. Long pause followed, before one of the women asked what he meant. Invoking "Jan. 6" didn't immediately mean anything, even days after anniversary
— Alex Roarty (@Alex_Roarty) January 11, 2022
The conversation didn't get much better from there for Dems , in either focus group.
Once the convo got going, it was clear Jan. 6 hadn't been memory holed by the 1st group. But one woman said flat out it wasn't she was worried about anymore compared to other concerns. And …
— Alex Roarty (@Alex_Roarty) January 11, 2022
… two others, after agreeing how awful the attack was, said they thought Biden and Democrats had gone too far in the way they talked about last week on the anniversary. One of the women said she thought they had over-embellished it.
— Alex Roarty (@Alex_Roarty) January 11, 2022
The 2nd group, this time five moderate men, had a similar reaction (though I'll include one important caveat later). None of them mentioned Jan 6 when prompted broadly about what news they had been paying attention to lately, mentioning Manchin, Arbery verdict, etc … instead
— Alex Roarty (@Alex_Roarty) January 11, 2022
Later, when asked specifically about how POTUS and Dems marked the anniversary, two men jumped in pretty eagerly to talk about how Biden had made a mistake looking backward instead of trying to move the country forward. They expressed a feeling he had politicized a tragedy
— Alex Roarty (@Alex_Roarty) January 11, 2022
One of the participants would later add that they also resented how reporters who were there personalized their experience
— Alex Roarty (@Alex_Roarty) January 11, 2022
Remember the Insurrection Week pieces about how we didn’t pay enough attention to the trauma experienced by journalists? Jen Psaki didn’t forget those in the press still suffering trauma. It’s because journalists don’t like to make themselves the center of the story.
However, cuz this is an important component: After the first two men agreed Biden had mishandled, another jumped in to say he thought Biden's speech was appropriate, that he needed to call out the forces/people responsible for the attack. And that prompted longer discussion …
— Alex Roarty (@Alex_Roarty) January 11, 2022
about how terrible the attack was, and how people were worried about democracy. One man — who was clearly very far from a liberal — said he abandoned the GOP after Jan 6 and thought the way Biden handled the anniversary was fine.
Tide turned a bit at this point …
— Alex Roarty (@Alex_Roarty) January 11, 2022
with one of the first two men — who had been so forceful about Biden mishandling the anniversary — jumped back in to clarify that he thought the attack was terrible and worrying. Very broad, strong agreement on that point in both groups
— Alex Roarty (@Alex_Roarty) January 11, 2022
(sorry, had to take a moment to do my actual job and interview someone on the phone!)
So people thought what happened on Jan 6 was awful and raised serious questions about the country's direction. But they didn't all necessarily connect it with the GOP/Trump (tho tbc, some did)
— Alex Roarty (@Alex_Roarty) January 11, 2022
the one point that kept coming up, across both groups, was a desire to find person responsible for attack. That person/people, the fg participants said, needed to be held accountable, and they weren't sure they had been.
That's probably the point that will frustrate Ds the most
— Alex Roarty (@Alex_Roarty) January 11, 2022
to clarify, these groups were labeled as either soft Biden voters — backed JB but not Clinton — or soft Trump voters, those who backed DT in '20 but said they regretted doing so
— Alex Roarty (@Alex_Roarty) January 11, 2022
Usual caveats apply: These were just two focus groups, not some kind of exhaustive poll/research. But what I saw does broadly align with what Rs and D strategists told me last week about what they saw in their own research https://t.co/aUSGf7xWrO
— Alex Roarty (@Alex_Roarty) January 11, 2022
Here’s how crooked focus groups work—but the guy didn’t mean to give it away: first reaction is “meh, who cares.” Then the guy badgers the focus group about the subject, and they start to align with the guy’s point of view. https://t.co/LPmsZCJvUt
— David Reaboi, Late Republic Nonsense (@davereaboi) January 12, 2022
It's called focus group bias and/or moderator bias. One or more lead the "group-think"…
— Kevinomehrica (@MericaProud1776) January 12, 2022
The initial "meh" view is the one that matters. The second round is an engineered outcome.
— Mark Gustav (@MGustavH78) January 12, 2022
I did focus groups for years in marketing. They’re just there for the food and stipend. They all go along with the alpha. Such a waste of time
— bigred (@MaryCol69061277) January 12, 2022
So hopefully for Republicans, the January 6 select committee keeps the issue front-and-center right through November.
Related:
Presidential historian compares Biden's January 6 speech to 'FDR after Pearl Harbor, Lyndon Johnson after Selma [and] George W. Bush after 9/11' https://t.co/S8wK0pA6iP
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) January 6, 2022
Join the conversation as a VIP Member