TMZ Insider Blows the LID OFF Lefty News Directors Playing Politics, ESPECIALLY in...
'It IS Our Money': Ed Markey Goes Full Karl Marx in Claiming Ownership...
Trump Iran Deal Ignites Obama Meltdown: Prices Plummeting
Suck It, SPLC! Major Tech Platform Will No Longer Blacklist Conservatives Using Controvers...
The Left's Alternative to Trump's UFC Event Made it a TOTAL Mystery Why...
THIS --> Michael Knowles Only Needs Four Minutes TOTAL to Explain How Democrats...
Libs of TikTok and Others Have Reminders for Lefties Claiming Trump's Making a...
Hakeem Jeffries Hoped His Knicks Hat Would Offer Protection From NY Host Calling...
Jonathan Turley's Thread Unravels Hillary Clinton's Utter Contempt for Middle America
Eat Your Wheaties Because You'll Need Your STRENGTH to Adequately Mock These UFC...
Ma'am? LOL! Buzz Patterson Just CLEANED Hillary's Clock Spilling Some Seriously DAMNING Te...
Jim Acosta Has Staked Out the Kennedy Center and Provides Another Gripping Berlin...
Social Media Platform the UK Is Still Allowing Kids Under 16 to Use...
Weather Channel Falls FLAT on Its Trump-Hating FACE After Pushing APOCALYPTIC UFC Freedom...
Super Rich Actor Leads Dems Into a Bold Midterm Strategy of 'I Can't...

Salon: Biologist says biology does not determine when human life begins; Perhaps future biologists will learn more

Sahotra Sarkar is a professor of philosophy and integrative biology at the University of Texas at Austin College of Liberal Arts. He’s written a piece that’s been picked up by Salon about when life begins. Sarkar says that the question can’t be answered by biologists and is thus left to politicians and judges to determine.

Advertisement

Sarkar writes:

The overall point is that biology does not determine when human life begins. It is a question that can only be answered by appealing to our values, examining what we take to be human.

Perhaps biologists of the future will learn more. Until then, when human life begins during fetal developments is a question for philosophers and theologians. And policies based on an answer to that question will remain up to politicians – and judges.

Sarkar gives four possible points in pregnancy when life can be considered to begin, from fertilization to birth itself. But about the argument that life begins at conception because a human’s full genetic sequence exists, Sarkar explains, “If genetic material alone makes a potential human being, then when we shed skin cells – as we do all the time – we are severing potential human beings.”

OK.

Advertisement

What is it that future biologists might find that will help us determine when life begins?

Advertisement

Here’s the thing: If you’re pro-choice, then it shouldn’t matter to you when life begins. Just admit it begins at conception and then go ahead and have your abortion on demand, without apology.

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement