Greg Gutfeld Asks How a Columnist Could Put These Sentences Together 'and Not...
Newsom Press Account Had NO IDEA the Hell They Would Unleash Trolling Elon...
Newsom’s Trans Godson Who's Actually a Girl: 33-Year-Old Nepo-Baby Heir Becomes Gavin’s La...
Utah Gov. Spencer Cox: 'Why Won’t Everyone Just Get Along?' The GOP: Because...
Dem. Congresspersons Argue in a Brief That the Supreme Court Should End Women’s...
SICK: Rep. Johnson (D-TX) Says Soldiers Shot in Head Because People Are Channeling...
Scott Jennings: Ruthless Dems Aim to Destroy Weak Republicans After Indiana Redistricting...
Jasmine Crockett Says She’ll Impose ‘Ethics Guidelines’ on Supreme Court Justices If Elect...
Gov. Wes Moore’s Doctoral Thesis Is Missing and No One Can Find It
University Launches Program to End the ‘Whiteness Pandemic’
Colorado Conservatives Receive Cards Mocking Charlie Kirk and Containing Empty Packets of...
Churches Get Creative With Their Anti-ICE Nativity Scenes
Author Hears a Lot of Canadians Are Canceling Their Trips to the US
Gavin Newsom Finally Says the Quiet Part Out Loud: Free Healthcare for Illegals...
Senator Says If Pete Hegseth Just Wants to Blow S**t Up He Should...

Salon: Biologist says biology does not determine when human life begins; Perhaps future biologists will learn more

Sahotra Sarkar is a professor of philosophy and integrative biology at the University of Texas at Austin College of Liberal Arts. He’s written a piece that’s been picked up by Salon about when life begins. Sarkar says that the question can’t be answered by biologists and is thus left to politicians and judges to determine.

Advertisement

Sarkar writes:

The overall point is that biology does not determine when human life begins. It is a question that can only be answered by appealing to our values, examining what we take to be human.

Perhaps biologists of the future will learn more. Until then, when human life begins during fetal developments is a question for philosophers and theologians. And policies based on an answer to that question will remain up to politicians – and judges.

Sarkar gives four possible points in pregnancy when life can be considered to begin, from fertilization to birth itself. But about the argument that life begins at conception because a human’s full genetic sequence exists, Sarkar explains, “If genetic material alone makes a potential human being, then when we shed skin cells – as we do all the time – we are severing potential human beings.”

OK.

Advertisement

What is it that future biologists might find that will help us determine when life begins?

Advertisement

Here’s the thing: If you’re pro-choice, then it shouldn’t matter to you when life begins. Just admit it begins at conception and then go ahead and have your abortion on demand, without apology.

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement