Showbiz Fizz: Actor Ben Stiller’s Soft Drink Falls Flat While a Perky Tom...
Family Fright: Actor Jerry O’Connell Describes Household Election Night Terror to Bill Mah...
RATIO ALERT! Dem Senator's Self-Imposed Term Limits Pledge Just Aged As Expected (SUCH...
Unemployed Joy Reid's Wild Take: Iran's Regime No Worse Than America's 'Secret Police'...
Trump Teases: A Former President Told Me 'I Wish I Did It' on...
The Harsh Reality of Daycare: High Turnover, Low Bonding, Long Days – Protect...
Trump Reveals GOP Rep. Dunn Faced 'Terminal' Heart Ailment, Would've Died by June...
GOP Senator's Support for Unpaid TSA Workers Turns into Fiery Clash with 'Defund'...
Dem Sen. Van Hollen, Not Content With Just DHS Going Unpaid, Threatens to...
You Gonna Cry? The Look on Adam Kinzinger's Face as Fellow CNN Panelist...
Coincidence? Three Attacks on Conservatives Tied to Furry Subculture – An Insider's Alarmi...
While Hollywood Congratulates Itself, Here's a Song That SHOULD Win an Oscar
Gavin Newsom Crosses His Legs This Way to Distract From the Lies He's...
Dem Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz Came 'SO Close to a Full Confession' While...
Why the Early American Schools Were Christian

Salon: Biologist says biology does not determine when human life begins; Perhaps future biologists will learn more

Sahotra Sarkar is a professor of philosophy and integrative biology at the University of Texas at Austin College of Liberal Arts. He’s written a piece that’s been picked up by Salon about when life begins. Sarkar says that the question can’t be answered by biologists and is thus left to politicians and judges to determine.

Advertisement

Sarkar writes:

The overall point is that biology does not determine when human life begins. It is a question that can only be answered by appealing to our values, examining what we take to be human.

Perhaps biologists of the future will learn more. Until then, when human life begins during fetal developments is a question for philosophers and theologians. And policies based on an answer to that question will remain up to politicians – and judges.

Sarkar gives four possible points in pregnancy when life can be considered to begin, from fertilization to birth itself. But about the argument that life begins at conception because a human’s full genetic sequence exists, Sarkar explains, “If genetic material alone makes a potential human being, then when we shed skin cells – as we do all the time – we are severing potential human beings.”

OK.

Advertisement

What is it that future biologists might find that will help us determine when life begins?

Advertisement

Here’s the thing: If you’re pro-choice, then it shouldn’t matter to you when life begins. Just admit it begins at conception and then go ahead and have your abortion on demand, without apology.

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement