Absentee Eric: No-Show Swalwell Adds Another Dubious Accomplishment to His Gubernatorial C...
Brown University Engages in Potential Coverup of a Suspect and Tim Burchett Exposes...
Jack Smith Pummeled by Questions, Runs From Reporters When Arriving on Capitol Hill
Sen. John Kennedy Nukes Dem Claims Hegseth and Rubio's Briefing Didn't Justify Narco...
CNN Host Reminds Ilhan Omar ICE Said They Never Pulled Over Her Son...
A Georgia Senate Panel's Grilling Fani Willis About Her Trump Witch Hunt Spending...
Dem Sen. Mark Kelly Leads Dem Pivot on Reasons Narco Boats Shouldn't Be...
REALLY? John Harwood Defends Dems With 'Nobody Told Anyone Obamacare Would Solve Everythin...
Tim Walz Hysterically Rants Against 'Assault Weapons' ... But Cannot Define What One...
Pete Hegseth Praises WaPo for FINALLY Having an Accurate Headline (Attn. 'Seditious Six'!)
Popular Smote: Scott Jennings Zings Bakari Sellers With Truth About Hillary Clinton’s 2016...
Meritless Merrick: Mar-a-Lago Raid Revelations Show Garland Was Not Applying Law Evenly As...
Dem Chuck Schumer Says Obliterating Narco-Terrorists Who Poison Americans Really Turns His...
Sen. Mark Kelly Posts Yet ANOTHER Video to Let Us Know He Won’t...
Cory Booker Says ‘ICE Was Here’ Nativity Sends Message That We’re All God’s...

Prosecutors seek to drop Capitol riot case that was based on 'evidence' from a paid confidential informant

NBC News is reporting that federal prosecutors on Tuesday told a judge they intend to drop a case against Christopher Kelly, who was arrested January 20 in connection with the January 6 storming of the Capitol by Trump supporters. There are nearly 500 such cases pending, so the prosecution is off to a bad start.

Advertisement

Pete Williams reports:

The man, Christopher Kelly of New York City, was arrested Jan. 20 after the FBI said a paid confidential informant told agents that Kelly was posting material on a Facebook Messenger app about the riot and his plans to be in Washington on Jan. 6. The informant said a photo taken inside the Capitol was also posted, according to the FBI.

In the charging documents filed in court, an FBI agent said, “I believe the messages and image … reflect that Chris Kelly was using this account to inform associates that he had breached the Capitol and was inside.”

The court document accompanying the charges included photos that the FBI said showed Kelly on the Capitol grounds, but they did not include any further indication that he entered the building.

Other riot cases have included data from cellphone service providers indicating that defendants’ phones were inside the building. This case did not. Nor did it include any photos of Kelly himself inside the Capitol or offer any direct proof that he was among the rioters.

Can they get their deposit back from the informant?

Advertisement

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement