Speaker Johnson Under Fire, NPR Underwater, Trump Jury Under Investigation!
Elon Musk Says Accounts Caught 'Engagement Farming' Will Be Suspended, Users Have Question...
Karine Jean-Pierre Warns Peter Doocy It's Inappropriate to 'Make Jokes About' Biden's Cann...
Man Sets Himself on Fire Outside Trump Trial Courthouse; Updated With Man's Identity...
Dumpster Fire in Waiting: Stephen Colbert to Broadcast The Late Show Live From...
Gen-Z Biden Shill Claiming He Left Trump Supporter Speechless Listing Biden's Accomplishme...
Since Dems Have Officially Deserted Women, Female WV Athletes Take Matters Into Their...
Here's What the Biden WH Is Touting As 'Campaign Rallies' (Beverage Warning)
YIKES: Leaked Video Shows Biden's 'Spontaneous' WaWa Visit Was Scripted DOWN to Cashier's...
*SNORT* Nancy Pelosi's Book Release Announced and Twitter Has SO Much Fun (at...
For Once I Actually Believe Something Biden Said (There's a First Time for...
We Can Take a Guess: Israel Unsure Why Pentagon Leaked Info on Iran...
Hawley Lights a Fire Under Mayorkas, Leaves Him Sweating After Fiery Exchange
Riley Gaines Calls Biden Out for 'Officially Abolishing Title IX As We Know...
AOC RAGES at Barnard and Columbia for Suspending Pro-Hamas Protesters and X Just...

'We are in receipt of your latest public relations stunt': Trump's lawyers respond to invitation to testify at impeachment trial

As Twitchy reported earlier Thursday, the House impeachment managers wrote a letter to Donald Trump inviting him to “provide testimony under oath, either before or during the Senate impeachment trial, concerning your conduct on January 6, 2021.” It was one of those offers you can’t refuse; the impeachment managers made it clear they’d interpret his absence as strong evidence of his guilt:

Advertisement

It seems as though Trump has had time to consider the invitation and decided to decline, according to an email sent by attorneys Bruce Castor and David Schoen to Rep. Jamie Raskin. “We are in receipt of your latest public relations stunt. As you certainly know, there is no such thing as a negative interference in this unconstitutional proceeding,” it begins.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Perfectly stated.


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos