It's a Cringe-Off! Gavin Newsom and JB Pritzker Battle Each Other for WORST...
MAGA Vs. Massie: Scott Jennings Delivers Kentucky Republican Incumbent’s Primary Post-Mort...
'Epstein Class': Ro Khanna Flirts With Antisemitism
DC Councilwoman Agrees Curfews Are a ‘Dangerous’ Way to Deal With Teen Takeovers
Unclassy With Massie: Thomas Massie's Concession Jab at Ed Gallrein Shows EXACTLY Why...
Welcoming Cambridge Residents Testify Against 'Racist' Gunshot Detection Service
Reporter Complains That Employees Working in the Pentagon's Food Court Can Walk Unescorted
Retail Register Fallacy: You Didn't 'Make' Anyone $2K — You Scanned Clothes Someone...
From X’s on Foreheads to Press Passes: The Deranged 'Mangionistas' Are Manson Girls...
Michigan State Rep. Born in Thailand Decides to Wear MAGA Garbage and Ridicule...
Who’s the Nazi Turd? Peter Hasson’s Brutal Quiz Exposes Dem Graham Platner’s Racist,...
LIVE ELECTION RESULTS: Primary Night in Georgia, Kentucky, Alabama, and Oregon (HOOBOY, He...
Sen. John Cornyn Notes That Trump 'Has Consistently Called Me a Friend in...
Mike Pence Shows Off His New Book on ‘Rediscovering the Conservative Conscience’
Texas Dem Candidate Maureen Galindo Calls for Internment Camps for Americans Who Stand...

Jonathan Turley calls out CNN's 'anti-free speech advocate' Oliver Darcy

Frankly, we think Glenn Greenwald said it all when he accompanied his tweet about networks’ “little hall monitor dweebs” with a promo shot of CNN’s Oliver Darcy. Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley had a bit more to add about Darcy, who recently suggested that each and every tweet by President Trump be labeled by Twitter as disinformation: “Why doesn’t Twitter just take the step of labeling his entire account as a known source of election disinfo? And why stop there?”

Advertisement

Turley singles out Darcy for criticism over his question, “Why stop there?” after labeling every Trump tweet:

Darcy is calling for more active and extensive regulation of speech to protect users from thoughts or views that he considers false or dangerous: “Think of it as a version of NewsGuard for Twitter.”

“NewsGuard” has a lovely Orwellian sound to be added to other codes for censorship like Sen. Richard Blumenthal recently calling for “robust content modification” on the internet. Who can object to a NewsGuard, which Darcy describes like some beneficent St. Bernard watching over our news and social postings? Of course, what Darcy considers “disinformation” or what Blumenthal considers “robust content modification” is left dangerously undefined.

It’s dangerously undefined, but it always goes in one direction.

Advertisement

Where were Darcy and colleague Brian Stelter when Twitter shut the New York Post out of its account for weeks because it wouldn’t take down its reporting on Hunter Biden’s laptop? Was there something that wrong with the story that the Post deserved to have URLs to its story blocked? Did CNN’s own reporters disprove the story?

Advertisement

What is PolitiFact going to do for the next four years when everything the big guy Joe Biden says is true?


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement