Exclusive Preview: Erin Molan Goes Inside Gaza's Terror Tunnels
Clap Trap: Kamala Harris Begs for Applause After Joke Doesn’t Pan Out During...
Scott Jennings Brings Receipts After CNN Dems Deny Party's Pushing ‘Election Rigging’ Narr...
The Athletic (aka, NYT) Demands the Indiana Fever CUT Sophie Cunningham Over 'Turbulent...
'Do Your Friggin' Job, Lady': Superman Offers Some Sound Advice to Screeching Randi...
Neera Tanden Goes From Annoyed to Angry to FLIPPED OUT Debating Scott Jennings...
She MAD: Sunny Hostin FLIPS OUT When Thom Tillis Gets a Little TOO...
Listen: You Can HEAR Greg Gutfeld Laugh at Jessica Tarlov Insisting Polls Spell...
AY-YI-YI: CA Latino Voters Ain't PLAYIN' With Xavier Becerra and EXPOSED Lies About...
THIS! —> What WH Insider Posts About Dems' Plans After Midterms Should Motivate...
When Even THIS Fact-Checker Knows Trump Wasn't Inviting Iran to NUKE Los Angeles...
New Maine Poll: Susan Collins Trails Overall, Leads Older Voters by 12
Democrats Plan Mass Protest Against Zohran Mamdani
WHOA: Black Michigan Voters Are Going OFF on Abdul El-Sayed (Obama to the...
Su-Su-SUPER Sucks! Dan Bongino UNLOADS on Phil Collins for Calling MAGA 'Fat Guys...

Christine Blasey Ford's lawyers trying to dictate which news outlets are allowed to cover her

The Washington Times is reporting Tuesday that Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyers are attempting to dictate exactly how her testimony will be covered, right down to the number of cameras and which press agencies will be allowed to take pictures.

Advertisement

Stephen Dinan and Rowan Scarborough report:

Michael Bromwich said in emails sent Tuesday afternoon that he was requesting access for three “robocams,” three specific wire services, photographers from the Associated Press, Reuters and one unspecified service, and a pool reporter for newspapers and magazines. In a follow-up email he specified that the robocams should be operated by “the CSPAN TV pool,” and said he also wanted space for a radio reporter.

…

While committees sometimes limit press based on space at hearings, and some witnesses have arranged to have their identities shielded, longtime Capitol Hill watchers struggled to think of precedent for a witness dictating terms of press coverage.

Are we the only ones who think it’s ridiculous that one accuser with precious little evidence is dictating a seemingly endless list of conditions that must be met for her to appear?

Advertisement

Advertisement

Good one.


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement