Kamala Harris Makes Articulate, Coherent Post on Dems' Call to Slow AI Raises...
Mehdi Hasan Marvels at Childlike Ignorance of Brett Kavanaugh Explaining Why 9/11 Happened
Federal Judge Refers Leftist Philly DA to DOJ for Criminal Investigation
Judge Blocks the Kennedy Center Board From Putting Trump's Name on the Building...
How NYC’s First Couple Hides Devout Islamism Behind Western Clothes and Drag-Show Vibes
Rep. Thomas Massie Moves to Impeach Pete Hegseth for High Crimes and Misdemeanors
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Busts Out ‘The Robot’ in TikTok Rooftop Dance
Famous Last Words He Yelled on Camera: ‘I’m Not Going Back to Haiti.’...
NY Regents Scrap Graduation Exam Requirement: ‘You Don’t Assess a Fish on Climbing...
Sheriff Calls Lame-Duck Dan Goldman a ‘Degenerate’ for Smearing Him in Front of...
Bernie Sanders: Today's AI Is the 'Dumbest Version.' Replies: 'Mirror's Right There, Bro'
Haley Stevens Lost the Senate Primary. Then She Became Michigan’s Most Charming Also-Ran
Journalism: Jim Acosta Reminds Us That Trump Votes by Mail
Athletic Columnist Explains Why Sydney Sweeney's Ad Triggers Her PTSD From a 12-Year-Old...
The Holdout the Left Can’t Cancel: Haitian Immigrant Refused to Acquit Clancy —...

Christine Blasey Ford's lawyers trying to dictate which news outlets are allowed to cover her

The Washington Times is reporting Tuesday that Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyers are attempting to dictate exactly how her testimony will be covered, right down to the number of cameras and which press agencies will be allowed to take pictures.

Advertisement

Stephen Dinan and Rowan Scarborough report:

Michael Bromwich said in emails sent Tuesday afternoon that he was requesting access for three “robocams,” three specific wire services, photographers from the Associated Press, Reuters and one unspecified service, and a pool reporter for newspapers and magazines. In a follow-up email he specified that the robocams should be operated by “the CSPAN TV pool,” and said he also wanted space for a radio reporter.

While committees sometimes limit press based on space at hearings, and some witnesses have arranged to have their identities shielded, longtime Capitol Hill watchers struggled to think of precedent for a witness dictating terms of press coverage.

Are we the only ones who think it’s ridiculous that one accuser with precious little evidence is dictating a seemingly endless list of conditions that must be met for her to appear?

Advertisement

Advertisement

Good one.


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement