Masked Douche at St. Paul City Council Meeting Says 'The System' Exists to...
DSA Members Propose Replacing the President With 'The Head Honcho of Whatever'
Abdul El-Sayed Says Keep the Name Abdulrahman Out of Your Damn Mouth If...
Trump Brushes Off Would-Be Assassin Who Was Staking Out His Los Angeles Golf...
SO Genuine! Francesca Hong's Slam on Thanksgiving Clearly Wasn't Polling Well for Her...
'I Think That's Daft': Ross Douthat Politely BODIES Yale Professor on Who Knows...
Schumer Loses Control As Abdul El-Sayed's Victory Deconstructs the Democrat Party
Elizabeth Warren Does a Rake Stomp While Complaining About 'Landlords Jacking Up the...
Amy Klobuchar Gets Absolutely Booed Off Stage for Border & Cop Lies —...
Jumpin' for Jihad: Chris Murphy Is 'All In' for Fake Doctor and Terrorist...
Tim Walz Might Want to Thank Fellow 'Manly Man' James Talarico for Eclipsing...
Mighty Big Threats From a Small Man: El-Sayed Warns Mike Rogers He Has...
NRSC Dares to Use Dem Candidate’s Actual Legal Name; Bulwark Writer Declares It...
NRSC Already Has an Ad Out About Abdul El-Sayed and It's BRUTAL (There...
'Stop Talking': Advice for Francesca Hong Reminiscent of Kamala Campaign

Christine Blasey Ford's lawyers trying to dictate which news outlets are allowed to cover her

The Washington Times is reporting Tuesday that Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyers are attempting to dictate exactly how her testimony will be covered, right down to the number of cameras and which press agencies will be allowed to take pictures.

Advertisement

Stephen Dinan and Rowan Scarborough report:

Michael Bromwich said in emails sent Tuesday afternoon that he was requesting access for three “robocams,” three specific wire services, photographers from the Associated Press, Reuters and one unspecified service, and a pool reporter for newspapers and magazines. In a follow-up email he specified that the robocams should be operated by “the CSPAN TV pool,” and said he also wanted space for a radio reporter.

While committees sometimes limit press based on space at hearings, and some witnesses have arranged to have their identities shielded, longtime Capitol Hill watchers struggled to think of precedent for a witness dictating terms of press coverage.

Are we the only ones who think it’s ridiculous that one accuser with precious little evidence is dictating a seemingly endless list of conditions that must be met for her to appear?

Advertisement

Advertisement

Good one.


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos