Mayor Agrees With Don Lemon That Gary, IN Is Being Neglected Because It's...
Transgender Inmates, Including Baby Killer, Suing State Over Lack of 'Gender-Affirming Car...
Boston’s Rockin’ Debut: Fifty Years of ‘More Than a Feeling’ (It’s Been Such...
ABC, NBC News Report on Power Outage in Gary, IN, Neglect to Mention...
LIVE Primary Results! Twitchy Has the Latest South Carolina, Georgia, and Oklahoma Primary...
'I Kind of Laughed': SLOTUS Usha Vance’s Gracious Reply to Stepstool Abdul El-Sayed’s...
After SCOTUS Ruling on Mail-In Voting, Gov. Gavin Newsom Says CA Will Sue...
Did Tim Walz Just Encourage President Trump to Invade Canada, or Is He...
Target Pulls ‘Blacklight Circus Clown’ Costume After Blackface Outrage
Tropical Storm Dolly? Next Atlantic System Could Share Name of Country Legend Days...
Judge Blocks Ohio Law Requiring Proof of Citizenship to Register to Vote
'Repeat the Line': Stepford Governor Gavin Newsom Has One Memorized Phrase He's Recited...
Reporter Decides Murder Trial Is the Perfect Backdrop for Cute Little Wink —...
It's Petty but I Can't Get Enough of Watching Chris Murphy Squirm When...
'We Will Always Love Her': Dolly Parton, Country Music Icon, Passes Away At...

Christine Blasey Ford's lawyers trying to dictate which news outlets are allowed to cover her

The Washington Times is reporting Tuesday that Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyers are attempting to dictate exactly how her testimony will be covered, right down to the number of cameras and which press agencies will be allowed to take pictures.

Advertisement

Stephen Dinan and Rowan Scarborough report:

Michael Bromwich said in emails sent Tuesday afternoon that he was requesting access for three “robocams,” three specific wire services, photographers from the Associated Press, Reuters and one unspecified service, and a pool reporter for newspapers and magazines. In a follow-up email he specified that the robocams should be operated by “the CSPAN TV pool,” and said he also wanted space for a radio reporter.

While committees sometimes limit press based on space at hearings, and some witnesses have arranged to have their identities shielded, longtime Capitol Hill watchers struggled to think of precedent for a witness dictating terms of press coverage.

Are we the only ones who think it’s ridiculous that one accuser with precious little evidence is dictating a seemingly endless list of conditions that must be met for her to appear?

Advertisement

Advertisement

Good one.


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos