Bill Maher Told an NPR Journo They're Far Left and He Didn't Want...
Lemon Prepper: Ex-CNN Anchor Is ‘Serious’ About Running for President but Doesn’t Want...
This Blows!: Netflix Webpage Tells Viewers ‘Gone with the Wind’ Is Racist and...
Presidential Zeal: A Quasi-Exclusive Look at Chapters That Didn’t Make It Into Joe...
German World Cup Tourist Freddy Hits the Gun Range, Learns About Freedom (and...
Complain Campaign: Michelle Obama Is Angry the Media Treated Her As a Fashion...
Harry Sisson Gives the New Charlie Kirk Statue in Times Square About 10...
Todd Blanche Takes on a Deranged (and Preemptively Pardoned) Dirtbag Named Adam Schiff
Gov. Tim Walz on Pardoned Child Rapist: 'We Can't All Be Judged by...
Canadian Woman in ICE Custody After Slapping Teen in Pro-Trump, Pro-ICE Clothing
Escape From New York: Gov. Kathy Hochul Blames Trump for Families and Businesses...
Podcaster Thinks Homeschooling Is Weird, Doesn’t Trust Anyone Who Wants to Be With...
Kamala's Kids: Gubernatorial Candidate Mike Lindell's Pillow Prices Are a Nazi Dog Whistle
Here's What Was in the Van of the 'Upstanding Non-Citizen on His Way...
Get Out Already: Mahmoud Khalil Sues Heritage Foundation, Stephen Miller Under KKK Act

Christine Blasey Ford's lawyers trying to dictate which news outlets are allowed to cover her

The Washington Times is reporting Tuesday that Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyers are attempting to dictate exactly how her testimony will be covered, right down to the number of cameras and which press agencies will be allowed to take pictures.

Advertisement

Stephen Dinan and Rowan Scarborough report:

Michael Bromwich said in emails sent Tuesday afternoon that he was requesting access for three “robocams,” three specific wire services, photographers from the Associated Press, Reuters and one unspecified service, and a pool reporter for newspapers and magazines. In a follow-up email he specified that the robocams should be operated by “the CSPAN TV pool,” and said he also wanted space for a radio reporter.

While committees sometimes limit press based on space at hearings, and some witnesses have arranged to have their identities shielded, longtime Capitol Hill watchers struggled to think of precedent for a witness dictating terms of press coverage.

Are we the only ones who think it’s ridiculous that one accuser with precious little evidence is dictating a seemingly endless list of conditions that must be met for her to appear?

Advertisement

Advertisement

Good one.


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement