Jake Tapper: Don’t Rush to Assign Motive to Synagogue-Ramming Muslim Man Who Opened...
MSNOW Blames Trump for U.S. Terror Attacks, Not the Dangerous Islamists Who Carried...
Seth Meyers Ridicules ‘Meat-Constipated’ Pete Hegseth With Assist From Jen Psaki Clip
Silent Spud: CNN’s Brian ‘Tater’ Stelter Avoids Addressing the Media Malpractice at His...
Norfolk Commonwealth's Attorney Blames 'Cult of Gun Absolutism' for Old Dominion Shooting
Not Shocking: Regular Churchgoers Thrive Mentally While Secular Liberals Struggle Most
Reporter Makes a Funny Out of Mamdani’s Wife Liking Posts About October 7
Dave Portnoy to Mamdani: Drop the Fake Horror—Your Wife's Probably Celebrating These Attac...
Three Norwegian Citizens 'With Links to Iraq' Bomb US Embassy in Oslo
Zohran Mamdani Dragged on X for Statement on Michigan Synagogue Attack
Three Salvadoran Nationals Charged With Possession of Molotov Cocktails in NYC
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand Demands Sen. Tommy Tuberville Apologize for Islamophobic Post
Vehicle Used in Attack on Synagogue Registered to US Citizen From Lebanon Who...
Trump Derangement Syndrome: Ed Krassenstein Cheers China's Ridicule of White House Prayer...
MS NOW Hosts Wonder If the Michigan Synagogue Attack Is the Fault of......

How feminist: Emergency contraception ad pits babies against shoes and lipstick

This ad for free emergency contraception comes to us from Great Britain’s National Health Service, and it caught the eye of Michael Davis, U.S. editor of the Catholic Herald, among others.

Advertisement

Yes … what sane woman would ever want a baby when she could be spending the money on shoes and makeup?

We get what they were going for, but Davis is absolutely right: the ad treats babies as obstacles to self-gratification; because, of course, mothers could never afford both shoes and a baby. Babies ruin everything that way.

But women love shoes. Who would trade shoes for a beautiful baby?

Advertisement

Oh, it’s real. There’s even a piece in today’s Daily Mail about a commuter blasting the ad for being sexist: “The fact that it went through so many people before being displayed is another thing that made me so mad. The person who designed it, signed it off, printed it and distributed it. Did nobody stop and think ‘are we really going ahead with this?'”

Advertisement

On the other hand …


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement