America's 250th Anniversary Is More Than Just One Single Day
James Carville Lashes Out at the 'Progressive Left' Frankenstein’s Monster His Dem Party...
DNC Deputy Director Scott Brown Strokes His Cat While Explaining the DNC Is...
PLEASE Put Out the Fire! Drunk Republican Revisits Billy Joel to Laugh at...
Schumer, Pelosi Back-Stabbed by Hunter Biden As Dem Coalition Collapses
Bought Blessing: How Abdul El-Sayed Quietly Paid $75,000 for a Detroit Pastor’s Endorsemen...
WH Posts Unreal Photos From Spain Due to Open Borders Insanity (Wait, This...
Comrade Mamdani’s DSA Just Pledged to 'Defend' Chinese Socialism — Peak Democrat Energy
'Dems Deliver' Account Celebrates NY Bill That Would Only Deliver Higher Prices at...
Dem Running for Maine Senate Troy Jackson Completely Blank on Tourist Spots in...
Senate Candidate Troy Jackson Is TRYING to Change the Subject to Susan Collins...
Seattle Mayor Forces Black Police Chief to Resign As Scapegoat for Shooting Chaos...
Dylan Mulvaney Has a 'Dolls Night Out' With 'Sarah' McBride and the Jokes...
Silly Prison Abolitionist Thinks Cages Are Cruel—Wait Until He Sees What the Pitchforks...
Hunter Biden Blames Trump Family for His Woes While Cursing Them All—Including the...

Hey, why not? Daily Beast spreads idea that #SCOTUSPick Brett Kavanaugh could help ban contraception

Remember late last month when The Daily Beast reported that Justice Anthony Kennedy’s retirement had sparked a run on IUDs?

Advertisement

That “flurry of tweets” urging women to stock up on birth control was actually two tweets. Two.

Now The Daily Beast has gone back to the well and floated the idea that contraception could be banned under Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

So where did The Daily Beast’s Jay Michaelson get this idea? He writes:

… While dissenting in favor of the Catholic religious organization objecting to the [Affordable Care Act’s contraception] requirement, Kavanaugh wrote that “the Government has a compelling interest in facilitating women’s access to contraception” because of a variety of factors, such as “reducing the number of unintended pregnancies would further women’s health, advance women’s personal and professional opportunities, reduce the number of abortions, and help break a cycle of poverty.”

That doesn’t sound like a man intent on banning contraception. “It is reasonable to wonder whether Judge Kavanaugh’s dicta in Priests for Life suggests more flexibility on contraception and abortion than hard-right conservatives would like,” Michaelson continues.

Advertisement

So why the scare headline, aside from acting as click-bait?

https://twitter.com/MangyLover/status/1016530368432832514

Advertisement

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement