Shattering the Irony Meter: Ellen Page Rants Against 'Vile Losers' Who Can't Accept...
Try Listening to Tim Walz's Argument Against Deporting a Child Rapist He Pardoned...
For Jim Acosta, Questioning Election Results Is Only 'the Big Lie' If a...
Zohran's Got Some 'Splainin' to Do: Mamdani Admin Gets Caught Setting Up Meetings...
Ratio Alert! Dem Rep. Jayapal Has Seen Enough of This Lawless Behavior (From...
DEMS IN CRISIS: Maine Senate Shake-Up Fuels Midterm Battle for America's Future
'What a Joke'! Look What the Calif. Secretary of State JUST NOW Certified
The White House Getting Security Upgrades Is All the TDS Crowd Needs to...
Jake Tapper Slathers Himself In Shame by Entertaining Rosie O'Donnell's Frothy-Mouthed Mad...
Graham Platner's Withdrawal Statement Is as Dignified as He Always Was (i.e., NOT...
‘Minnesota Man’: Guardian US Headline About Illegal Alien Child Rapist Is a Combo...
Skin Grifting: Texas Democrat Jolanda Jones Says James Talarico Needs to Pay Blacks...
Radial Ratio: Texas Dem’s Tired Idea of ICE Agent Self-Defense Against Moving Vehicles...
Marco Rubio Blocks Tim Walz's Illegal Pardon, Newsom Froze Like Deer In Headlights
Sayonara, Sex Offender: Marco Rubio Reminds Tim Walz What Protecting Americans Looks Like

Hey, why not? Daily Beast spreads idea that #SCOTUSPick Brett Kavanaugh could help ban contraception

Remember late last month when The Daily Beast reported that Justice Anthony Kennedy’s retirement had sparked a run on IUDs?

Advertisement

That “flurry of tweets” urging women to stock up on birth control was actually two tweets. Two.

Now The Daily Beast has gone back to the well and floated the idea that contraception could be banned under Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

So where did The Daily Beast’s Jay Michaelson get this idea? He writes:

… While dissenting in favor of the Catholic religious organization objecting to the [Affordable Care Act’s contraception] requirement, Kavanaugh wrote that “the Government has a compelling interest in facilitating women’s access to contraception” because of a variety of factors, such as “reducing the number of unintended pregnancies would further women’s health, advance women’s personal and professional opportunities, reduce the number of abortions, and help break a cycle of poverty.”

That doesn’t sound like a man intent on banning contraception. “It is reasonable to wonder whether Judge Kavanaugh’s dicta in Priests for Life suggests more flexibility on contraception and abortion than hard-right conservatives would like,” Michaelson continues.

Advertisement

So why the scare headline, aside from acting as click-bait?

https://twitter.com/MangyLover/status/1016530368432832514

Advertisement

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement