Watching Tim Walz Squirm Under Brandon Gill’s Cross-Examination Is the Closest Thing We’ve...
Brian Stelter Says Hegseth Injected Partisan Politics Into the Iran Briefing With This...
Nancy Mace Owns Tampon Tim Walz: Can't Define a Woman, But Sure Can...
BOOM! Quiet Death: Pete Hegseth Reveals US Sub Torpedoed Iranian Warship – Epic...
Tim Walz Goes Full Deer in Headlights When Jim Jordan Busts Him About...
Rep. Emmer Goes Nuclear: Ellison Grilled, Accused of Shielding Somali Fraudsters in Explos...
Elizabeth Warren Left a Classified Briefing and Quickly Proved Why She Shouldn't Get...
Communist Posterboy Forced to Eat Crow and Retract Wild Lies About Kevin O'Leary's...
Dem Golden Boy James Talarico Is a Bible-Twisting Hypocrite Who Thinks Mary Could've...
Bill Melugin's Question About Dem Hypocrisy Forces Hakeem Jeffries to Play the 'It's...
Leftist Trans Couple Arms Up Against 'Fascists' ... Proceeds to Shoot Their Own...
What Gives the US the Right? 'The B2 Bomber.' – Chamberlain's Brutal Iran...
Kristi Noem Made Dem Sen. Chris Coons' Line of ICE Questioning Backfire With...
Jasmine Crockett Loses Dem Senate Primary to Hoax-Boosted James Talarico - Blames Republic...
Patch Dispatched: Steve Toth Scores Double-Digit Republican Primary Upset Over Incumbent D...

Hey, why not? Daily Beast spreads idea that #SCOTUSPick Brett Kavanaugh could help ban contraception

Remember late last month when The Daily Beast reported that Justice Anthony Kennedy’s retirement had sparked a run on IUDs?

Advertisement

That “flurry of tweets” urging women to stock up on birth control was actually two tweets. Two.

Now The Daily Beast has gone back to the well and floated the idea that contraception could be banned under Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

So where did The Daily Beast’s Jay Michaelson get this idea? He writes:

… While dissenting in favor of the Catholic religious organization objecting to the [Affordable Care Act’s contraception] requirement, Kavanaugh wrote that “the Government has a compelling interest in facilitating women’s access to contraception” because of a variety of factors, such as “reducing the number of unintended pregnancies would further women’s health, advance women’s personal and professional opportunities, reduce the number of abortions, and help break a cycle of poverty.”

That doesn’t sound like a man intent on banning contraception. “It is reasonable to wonder whether Judge Kavanaugh’s dicta in Priests for Life suggests more flexibility on contraception and abortion than hard-right conservatives would like,” Michaelson continues.

Advertisement

So why the scare headline, aside from acting as click-bait?

https://twitter.com/MangyLover/status/1016530368432832514

Advertisement

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos