Shard Habit to Break: Sam Harris Holds to Debunked Theory Trump Hit by...
Trump-Proofing or Fire-Proofing? California Chooses to Protect Criminal Illegal Aliens as...
Fire and ICE: Fight Brews Over Criminal Illegal Alien Once-Suspected of Setting Blazes...
Bill Melugin: Ten Looting Suspects Arrested in Santa Monica Evacuation Zone
Don't Believe Your Lyin' Eyes: You're Better Off Than You Were Four Years...
After the Burn: Side-by-Side Video Shows the Destructive Reality of California Democrat ‘L...
What’s the Deal with Greenland? JD Vance on Why The Strategic, Mineral-Rich Country...
Stall Tactics: Biden Provides Sweeping Protections to Illegal Immigrants
We Are the Media Now, If We Can Keep It
'I've Been Defending These Guys for Years': J.D. Vance Tackles Criticism of Trump's...
READ THE ROOM: Even in a Crisis, the LA Times Makes Sure Its...
Bill Melugin Posts Video of Moment L.A. Wildfire Starts, Puts Another Dent in...
Tiny Violin Alert! Outgoing HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra WHINES About Inability to Regain...
WATCH: Adam Schiff-for-Brains Lies About California Reservoirs (and John Karl Doesn't Fact...
Associated PROPAGANDA: AP Gets SMACKED Down for Blaming 'Wild Weather Week' on Climate...

ACLU memo: Free speech cases may take backseat to organization's equality and justice work

Robby Soave at Reason reports Thursday on a leaked ACLU memo that suggests the ACLU’s defense of free speech might be weighed against the organization’s other commitments, such as social justice, racial equality, and women’s rights.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/robbysoave/status/1009789324492197889

Soave writes:

It’s hard to see this as anything other than a cowardly retreat from a full-throated defense of the First Amendment. Moving forward, when deciding whether to take a free speech case, the organization will consider “factors such as the (present and historical) context of the proposed speech; the potential effect on marginalized communities; the extent to which the speech may assist in advancing the goals of white supremacists or others whose views are contrary to our values; and the structural and power inequalities in the community in which the speech will occur.”

Soave notes that “the memo also makes clear that the ACLU has zero interest in defending First Amendment rights in conjunction with Second Amendment rights. If controversial speakers intend to carry weapons, the ACLU ‘will generally not represent them.'”

What a shocker.

Advertisement

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/tms1792/status/1009839401906647041


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement