Jewish Democrats Endorse Challengers to Squad Members
That's Gonna Leave a Mark: Riley Gaines SCHOOLS Scott Wiener After He Calls...
Politicizing the Baltimore Bridge Tragedy and Attacking Conservative Media is a New Low...
Missouri Attorney General Announces Suit Against Biden’s Student Loan Cancellation
The LEAST They Could Do: IL Parole Board Members Resign After Prisoner They...
Righteous Anger Boils Over as NYPD Union Tells City Council NOT to Attend...
Rob Reiner Says Taylor Swift Could Single-Handedly Save American Democracy
We Have So MANY Questions: Man Marries Conjoined Twin and Well, There is...
Timing of Biden-Harris Campaign's Attempted Slam on Trump is a SHAMELESS Fail
Paying Their Respects: NYT Announces Joe Lieberman's Passing With Hilarious Election Denia...
Joy Reid Dragged for Claiming GOP is Anti-DEI Because They Can't Stand Black...
Trump Steamrolls Biden, Liberals Love Losing
'Sorry the IDF Is Winning': WaPo Whines About Israeli Maps Not Showing 'Rubble,...
NYC Councilwoman Who Smeared Daniel Penny SHAMES Men for Not Calling Out Violence...
Here's a Poll Listing Biden's Positive Accomplishments and We CAN'T Disagree With the...

And there it is: Boston Globe editorial writer floats idea of seizing weapons from law-abiding citizens

The clear myth behind just about every “common sense” gun control proposal is that no one wants to take away law-abiding citizens guns. Of course, they’d love to take away all the guns if they could, but the best chance they have is to chip away incrementally, whether it be by regulating magazine sizes or keeping it difficult for people to buy suppressors.

Advertisement

David Scharfenberg‏, editorial writer for the Boston Globe, finally gets around all that in his opinion piece, “Hand over your weapons.”

Scharfenberg‏ writes:

Part of the problem is the sheer scale of the enterprise. An operation on par with the Australian buyback — claiming one-fifth of American guns — would mean tens of thousands of police officers collecting some 60 million guns. It is, on some level, simply unimaginable.

But perhaps gun-control advocates can propose something smaller — something more targeted.

In other words, it’s not possible and it wouldn’t work — but maybe try it anyway?

https://twitter.com/realJamesAllsup/status/930210364976873472

https://twitter.com/hfce354/status/930196182139273217

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/tfwnowife/status/930200181852856321

https://twitter.com/Mike_H_1775/status/930208178301734912

https://twitter.com/dangainor/status/929696303071801344

https://twitter.com/ClarenceWhorley/status/930204132773892096

https://twitter.com/ClarenceWhorley/status/930204580402647041

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/aJimHolmes/status/930204448818839552

* * *

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement