slide 9 to 15 of 15

Wrong again: Nate Silver says who funded Steele dossier not especially interesting

Twitchy has already posted a piece on pollster Nate Silver today, in which he repeats his theory that James Comey’s October surprise of a letter one year ago today almost certainly cost Hillary Clinton the 2016 election.

Advertisement

Silver isn’t only doubling-down on that theory today; he’s also confessing his unpopular opinion; namely, that who paid for the research to create the infamous Steele dossier on Donald Trump isn’t especially interesting or important.

Also from just about a year ago, here’s a reminder that, yes, Silver has been very wrong before.

Oops.

Maybe it’s just from hearing for nearly a year now about how Russian collusion “hacked” the 2016 election, but we’re very interested in who paid Christopher Steele to compile that bogus dossier.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/PenetratedLobe/status/924352261798744064

https://twitter.com/BuyReardenMetal/status/924313069341298689

https://twitter.com/davidjacksmith/status/924334091641786370

https://twitter.com/FDLReview/status/924347275962408962

https://twitter.com/alimhaider/status/924066699682504704

https://twitter.com/publicfreeman/status/924379726587707392

* * *

Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos