President Trump is on a tweeting spree today, taking on both the NFL and Iran via his personal Twitter feed. His tweet about Iran was inspired by a reported ballistic missile test by the country, leading him to criticize the Obama administration’s pricey Iran deal.
— Iran Freedom (@4FreedominIran) September 23, 2017
Iran just test-fired a Ballistic Missile capable of reaching Israel.They are also working with North Korea.Not much of an agreement we have!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 23, 2017
Anti-Trump celebs like Chelsea Handler are already warming up to Kim Jong Un as a leader, so it’s not surprising that many people took the occasion to criticize Trump for not understanding the terms of the Iran deal. What a dummy!
Iran ?has? NOT?violated?the?Nuclear?Deal.? https://t.co/l9J9POa9fW
— Amir (@AmirAminiMD) September 23, 2017
Ballistic missiles are not part of the Iran Deal , Stupid , If the Missile hit another area its normal But Israel is a red line ?
— Yasserj☪ (@Yjeoa) September 23, 2017
The President of the United States believes inaccurately that the Iran deal has a provision for missile tests.
— Narrated President (@NarratedPOTUS) September 23, 2017
We don’t see in his tweet where Trump claimed there was no provision for missile tests — only that it’s not much of an agreement. That said … missile tests really aren’t covered under the Iran deal?
— Strategic Sentinel (@StratSentinel) September 23, 2017
— Steve Herman (@W7VOA) September 23, 2017
Oh, weird. https://t.co/iV7TIVQ8xM
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) September 23, 2017
It was in one of those side-deal-thingys.
— Dave (@dccrue) September 23, 2017
Maybe next deal.
— Brian Faughnan (@BrianFaughnan) September 23, 2017
Nice work @brhodes
— Tyler Amick (@MickTy96) September 23, 2017
Yeah, what have you got to say for yourself, Ben Rhodes? We already know you never stop talking.
It's an agreement that prevents them from having a nuclear weapon. Without the deal that missile could have a nuclear warhead on it. https://t.co/qhul18T9Iy
— Ben Rhodes (@brhodes) September 23, 2017
Because conventional ICBM's are basically just fluffy kittens, right? https://t.co/Eoo1Yu0cfl
— Judge Dan (@JudgeDan48) September 23, 2017
Ah, if not for the Iran deal, that missile fired today could very well have had a nuclear warhead. Phew, that was a close one. Thanks, Obama.
No it doesn't. https://t.co/ShStkNUyYv
— Omri Ceren (@omriceren) September 23, 2017
You're dreaming. https://t.co/jekawaHuTQ
— David Martosko (@dmartosko) September 23, 2017
Narrator: It doesn't prevent them from having a nuclear weapon. https://t.co/AQHwqhYz2v
— Jonathan Greenberg (@JGreenbergSez) September 23, 2017
Oh we totally believe everything you say, Ben. Totally. https://t.co/j12BCwWNBh
— Michael_Haz (@Michael_Haz) September 23, 2017
Keep lying, midget. But the 27 year old know-nothings are all gone.https://t.co/YUiXOQ8bkX
— Problematic AF™? (@EF517_V2) September 23, 2017
This is the mindset of the guy who ran US foreign policy for the last 8 years.
Big surprise that the world is on fire right now, right? https://t.co/PnBykn4t84
— James Hasson (@JamesHasson20) September 23, 2017
Just so we're straight: The JCPOA permits Iran to test/develop nuclear delivery systems? https://t.co/z4TfocHzT9
— Armin Rosen (@ArminRosen) September 23, 2017
Yes, but the Iran deal …
Wow guys did you know all it takes to stop a nuke is a piece of paper? Damn, all this time https://t.co/ZFUGrIdH3X
— Brian Bisgard (@BrianBisgard) September 23, 2017
* * *
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) September 19, 2017