There was plenty of talk on social media — as early as Sunday, in fact — that President Donald Trump would announce the deployment of 4,000 additional troops in Afghanistan during a prime-time address Monday night.
President Trump’s plan expected to include sending as many as 4,000 more troops https://t.co/BFxW0MNEkr
— The Wall Street Journal (@WSJ) August 21, 2017
US to send 4,000 more troops to Afghanistan: Reports pic.twitter.com/dAX0rbdgCn
— Rehmat Mehsud (@RehmatMehsuds) August 21, 2017
4,000 more troops won't finish the war in #Afghanistan
Best case scenario: they stop Taliban momentum and buy time for a new strategy
— Buck Sexton (@BuckSexton) August 21, 2017
When Obama put in 30,000 troops, that was 25% less than McChrystal recommended. Is 4,000 supposed to accomplish victory?
— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) August 21, 2017
What I'm listening for tonight: A persuasive explanation about what difference 4,000 US troops can make in such a vast, complicated place
— John T. Bennett (@BennettJohnT) August 21, 2017
Erik Prince: 4,000 more troops in Afghanistan will not make much of a difference. #Tucker @FoxNews
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) August 22, 2017
However, that number wasn’t mentioned by the president during his address. In fact, he announced a strategy that seemed to be an unspoken rebuke to his predecessor: the U.S. won’t be announcing things like attack plans or timetables for withdrawal.
Pres. Trump says he will not talk plans for number of troops: "Conditions on the ground, not arbitrary timetables, will guide our strategy." pic.twitter.com/HIkBJODi2u
— ABC News Politics (@ABCPolitics) August 22, 2017
Trump says Afghan strategy will "change dramatically," says U.S. will not announce operations in advance and will not release troop numbers
— BNO News (@BNONews) August 22, 2017
Trump: "Conditions on the ground, not arbitrary timetables" will guide strategy. He says they won't announce troop numbers.
— Ted Johnson (@tedstew) August 22, 2017
POTUS: We're getting rid of timelines are will not talk about numbers of troops, conditions will matter, not time tables
— Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) August 22, 2017
He really is crazy! What happened to giving the enemy the date troops would be pulled out so they could bide their time?
"America's enemies must never know our plans so they can wait us out. I will never say when we are going to attack but attack we will."
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) August 22, 2017
What a concept…
— American Guy ?? (@YankReb69) August 22, 2017
https://twitter.com/FlyOnSilenceOwl/status/899802618264002560
https://twitter.com/bjwingo/status/899803105407234048
https://twitter.com/jamesrtoy/status/899802645795352580
https://twitter.com/daisycakes22/status/899805829230145537
As far as the press could tell, the man could shoot rainbows from the palms of his hands … he couldn’t help it.
https://twitter.com/grayhawk1853/status/899804254059327488
That's why they hate #Trump. They never know if they're going to get a visit from a MOAB while in bed. https://t.co/ynW000nHJA
— Hawaii MEL (@HawaiiMel808) August 22, 2017
not announcing withdrawal same time announcing addtional troops, allowing rules of engagement to kill enemy fast. Not Obama.
— Rebeccah Heinrichs (@RLHeinrichs) August 22, 2017
So great to hear strategy rather than acquiescence
— Mics Martial Arts (@MichaelianAaron) August 22, 2017
CNN’s media correspondent seems confused somehow.
"We will not talk about #'s of troops," Trump says, after multiple news outlets reported that the plan entails sending 4,000 more troops.
— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) August 22, 2017
Yeah, thanks for helping leak that.
TV anchors immediately noting that Trump wouldn't disclose the # of additional troops or "how long" the Afghan war will continue.
— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) August 22, 2017
* * *
Update:
Stelter still seems a bit astounded:
"Tonight, the president announced that he will NOT announce an increase in troop strength" —@Lawrence
— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) August 22, 2017
CNN’s Jim Acosta also seems super bummed that President Trump wasted his time.
Typically a presidential prime time address comes with major policy announcement or marks pivotal moment for country. We didn't get that.
— Jim Acosta (@Acosta) August 22, 2017
* * *
Join the conversation as a VIP Member