60 Minutes' Segment Contained a BOMBSHELL About Who Trump Considers Criminals (Who Wants...
Nicholas Kristof Says Congolese Girls Suffer Because of Careless Men in DC
Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
Department of Interior Pulling the Plug on Five Wind Farms, Citing National Security...
Mass Deportation Won't Rip Families Apart—Illegals Chose to Break the Law, Now They...
Young Girl in Minnesota Says They Should Not Be Illegal Because We're on...
Congresswoman Is Appalled That Trump and Vance Can't Stop With the Openly Racist...
Brian Stelter Pretty Jazzed That Canadian TV Channel Has Posted That 60 Minutes...
DOJ Sues DC Metropolitan Police Department for Infringement on Second Amendment Rights
Palmeri Claims Blowing Up Terrorist Boats Damages Trump's Legacy More Than Biden's Afghani...
Harmeet K. Dhillon Suing Minneapolis Public Schools for Anti-White Discrimination
'PEAK IRONY!' Joe Biden's Preemptively Pardoned Son Slams Connected Elites Who Avoid Conse...
There’s More to the Story of Four Masked Federal Agents Tacking a Man...
NPR's Hilarious Memo Ends Professor Carl Tobias's Reign as Rent-a-Quote King After 77...
Ezra Klein and the NYT Ask a VERY Stupid Question; Twitter Obliges Them...

Guardian writer: Pro-life messages don't belong on public property

As Twitchy reported earlier today, Planned Parenthood is at last making good on its long-standing threat to file suit against the Center for Medical Progress, which released a series of videos showing Planned Parenthood administrators haggling over the price of organs and abortionists describing in detail their “crunching” techniques for preserving the most desired fetal body parts.

Advertisement

While it looks like the courts will determine if the CMP’s undercover sting of Planned Parenthood violated any laws, NARAL took the unbelievable step today of copying and tweeting this nugget from yesterday’s issue of the Guardian. Obviously the U.S. Constitution states that abortion is a right, but putting up pro-life messages on public property where people might see them? Won’t someone think of these poor clowns? They need to be rested and funny when they reach their stop.

Writer Andy Kopsa’s specific complaint is that pro-choicers “can make up their own facts” but “they ought be limited to spreading that harmful and deadly rhetoric on private property, not public.” Last week, however, the group Louisiana Right To Life set up banners showing a 19-month-old fetus alongside the message, “Give Her a Chance.”

This, she argues, is “a purely religious message” which 1) had to be approved by the city and the department of public works, and 2) hangs from streetlights and other publicly funded infrastructure, which means that taxpayers are being forced to “subsidize a proliferation of anti-abortion rhetoric.”

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/LetsBanEvrythng/status/687772333365305344

Just because the group is pro-life doesn’t make it a religious entity, though.

Your First Amendment holds no power against the city’s department of public works.

Advertisement

Are you kidding? Imagine if Planned Parenthood received even one taxpayer dime of funding …

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement