Farm bill passes 68–52? Washington Post's math doesn't add up

Ummm? Probably not. RT @washingtonpost: UPDATE: Senate passes farm bill 68 to 52 http://t.co/mtz4HKJ7FP

— Anthony M. Kreis (@AnthonyMKreis) February 4, 2014

Ummm…. RT @washingtonpost: UPDATE: Senate passes farm bill 68 to 52 http://t.co/QPoDu2e3Fb

— Tim Krepp (@timkrepp) February 4, 2014

@washingtonpost nope

— Patricia (@postscript01) February 4, 2014

When did we get 120 senators? “@washingtonpost: UPDATE: Senate passes farm bill 68 to 52 http://t.co/J6pPY2Snne”

— Joel Mendelson (@JPMendelson) February 4, 2014

I don't remember much from high school, but I thought there are 100 Senators. RT @washingtonpost UPDATE: Senate passes farm bill 68 to 52

— Sean's Ramblings (@seansramblings) February 4, 2014

Um…#twittermath RT @washingtonpost: UPDATE: Senate passes farm bill 68 to 52 http://t.co/b9QeuMDHvO

— A.C. in D.C. (@ArykanotErika) February 4, 2014

CORRECTION: This tweet was wrong so we deleted it. CBO didn't say ACA would cut 2M jobs. It's about workers, not jobs pic.twitter.com/iAtq0cyIdQ

— Washington Post (@washingtonpost) February 4, 2014

@washingtonpost It's ok millions went from full time to part time.

— John Gort (@JohnGort) February 4, 2014

@washingtonpost LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

— acitrep (@acitrep) February 4, 2014

@washingtonpost: Ohhhhhh much better. =|

— Evan Nolan (@Evan_Nolan) February 4, 2014

@washingtonpost Put the toothpaste back in the tube!

— Rue d'Bega (@briarwoodsman) February 4, 2014