Independent Woman Ambassador Allie Coghan on Her Lawsuit and Greek Life Nightmare
Protester Says Officers Shot Him in the Face at Close Range With Non-Lethal...
Daily Beast Gloats Over 'Whistleblower’ Revealing Personal Data of ICE Agents in Data...
House Oversight Posts Audio and Video From Hillary Clinton's Deposition (When's the Arrest...
Bluesky Takes a Shot at X While Recognizing It as the 'Global Town...
Illegal Tries to Ram His Way Out of ICE Vehicle Blockade; One Officer...
Here's How Seriously ANOTHER Dem Takes Their Warning About Devastation Climate Change Will...
Democrats' Perfect Spokesman: Guy Who Struggles with English Demands We Abolish Border Cop...
Perfect Zeros From The Judges: The Lincoln Project's Epic Anne Frank Faceplant
MS NOW's Lawrence O'Donnell: 'Every Video From Every Angle' Shows Renée Good Posed...
State Dept. Pauses Visa Processing From Countries Whose Migrants Take Welfare at ‘Unaccept...
Sen. Josh Hawley Asked This Doctor If Men Can Get Pregnant and She...
Pramila Jayapal Rewrites American History—Here’s Who Actually Built the Country
The Digital Rage: MS NOW’s Jen Psaki Gets Touchy Over Trump’s Middle Finger...
From 'Not for Sale' to White House Talks: Trump's Greenland Power Play Goes...

Jonathan Turley calls out CNN's 'anti-free speech advocate' Oliver Darcy

Frankly, we think Glenn Greenwald said it all when he accompanied his tweet about networks’ “little hall monitor dweebs” with a promo shot of CNN’s Oliver Darcy. Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley had a bit more to add about Darcy, who recently suggested that each and every tweet by President Trump be labeled by Twitter as disinformation: “Why doesn’t Twitter just take the step of labeling his entire account as a known source of election disinfo? And why stop there?”

Advertisement

Turley singles out Darcy for criticism over his question, “Why stop there?” after labeling every Trump tweet:

Darcy is calling for more active and extensive regulation of speech to protect users from thoughts or views that he considers false or dangerous: “Think of it as a version of NewsGuard for Twitter.”

“NewsGuard” has a lovely Orwellian sound to be added to other codes for censorship like Sen. Richard Blumenthal recently calling for “robust content modification” on the internet. Who can object to a NewsGuard, which Darcy describes like some beneficent St. Bernard watching over our news and social postings? Of course, what Darcy considers “disinformation” or what Blumenthal considers “robust content modification” is left dangerously undefined.

It’s dangerously undefined, but it always goes in one direction.

Advertisement

Where were Darcy and colleague Brian Stelter when Twitter shut the New York Post out of its account for weeks because it wouldn’t take down its reporting on Hunter Biden’s laptop? Was there something that wrong with the story that the Post deserved to have URLs to its story blocked? Did CNN’s own reporters disprove the story?

Advertisement

What is PolitiFact going to do for the next four years when everything the big guy Joe Biden says is true?


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement