Shooting Outside High School Football Game in Minnesota Blamed on Somali Gangs
Amy Siskind Wants All 57 Men in Cornell Fraternity’s Group Chat Investigated and...
Extreme or Extremely Funny? Steve Hilton ‘Lesbian’ Campaign Ad Is Rubbing Some Voters...
Ro Khanna Can't Believe Vance Would Go So Low As to Tell a...
Bill Maher Roasts Hack Media Over Reports of an Argument in the Cockpit...
TMZ: Christa Pike Donated Her Last Meal Money to Buy Pizza for the...
Steve Hilton Couldn't Help but Notice What Susan Rice's Demand About Xavier Becerra...
This Explosive Headline Is a Lock for First-Ballot Induction Into the 'TDS Hall...
The Evolution of the Dems' 'Noncitizen Voting Never Happens' to This Judge's Ruling...
Hot Take on The View: Biden Might Still Be President If Dems/Media Had...
School Is in Session! Tom Homan Teaches 'Deportation 101' to Reporter Pushing Dem...
Lyin’ Witch and the Wardrobe: Dem Peggy Flanagan Is Struck Fashion Senseless in...
Triggered by Vigor: CNN’s Kasie Hunt Questioned Trump’s Health but Time Reporter Shot...
Hilarious 'Hijacking Attempt Thwarted, Medhi Hassan Hardest Hit' Memes
No Mixed Signals Here: Hegseth Makes His Military Standards Crystal Clear (WATCH)

Gillette becomes the billion-dollar losing segment of parent company following its toxic masculinity commercial

 

Proctor and Gamble recently released its quarterly earnings report and things were mostly positive. Quarterly revenue was up, and the stock performed well above Wall Street estimates. Share prices rose to new highs as the company appears to be performing very strong.

Advertisement

Just not all of the company. Amid all of the great economic news there was one dark cloud:

So while the rest of the company is doing gangbusters the only sector seeing a massive loss was the Gillette division. The report mentioned a number of factors leading to the losses, such as foreign monetary rates and an overall slump in the grooming market.

Others sense another influence:

Advertisement

Even if you wanted to cite those indicators this would still mean the commercial did not work as intended to stem the losses. It also defies the company announcing after the commercial’s release that it was widely supported. Guess calling your base customers problematic toxic individuals does not endear them to your product after all???

Advertisement

It was just days ago that the CEO of the company was still defending the ad, claiming that it may have only alienated “some” customers.

Gillette’s CEO and president, Gary Coombe, says that angering some consumers with its #metoo campaign was a “price worth paying” if it meant the brand could increase its relevance among younger consumers and turn around its falling market share.

That is some brazenly attempted spin. You are facing an isolated loss in the billions. That is quite the opposite of turning around a falling share in the market. This could be a classic case study in marketing schools in how to NOT to appeal to new customers.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement