Blind Justice? Margot Cleveland Exposes Just HOW Biased D.C. Judges Are When It Comes to Trump

We all know federal judges despise President Trump and are working -- unconstitutionally in some cases -- to thwart his agenda.

Here's more proof that their rulings aren't about justice, law, or the Constitution, but rather about stopping President Trump (and thwarting the will of the American voter in the process):

EXCLUSIVE: Memo Reveals D.C. Judges Are Predisposed Against Trump Administration https://t.co/Uv1GuRscov
— Mollie (@MZHemingway) July 16, 2025

Here's what Margot Cleveland writes:

During the week of March 11, 2025, members of the Judicial Conference met in Washington, D.C., for the first of its two regular meetings. As the U.S. Court’s webpage explains, '[t]he Judicial Conference of the United States is the national policymaking body for the federal courts.'
...
In a memorandum obtained exclusively by The Federalist, a member of the Judicial Conference summarized the March meeting, including a “working breakfast” at which Justice Roberts spoke. According to the memorandum, 'District of the District of Columbia Chief Judge James Boasberg next raised his colleagues’ concerns that the Administration would disregard rulings of federal courts leading to a constitutional crisis.'
'Chief Justice Roberts expressed hope that would not happen and in turn no constitutional crisis would materialize,' according to the memorandum. The summary of the working breakfast added that Chief Justice Roberts noted that 'his interactions with the President have been civil and respectful, such as the President thanking him at the state of the union address for administering the oath.'

Read the entire article.

pic.twitter.com/r0MlUOr4VJ
— Sunshine 🌞 on my shoulder CPA (@magicalmomU7) July 16, 2025

Over the last several years, I've lost faith in our legal system. Watching how the system was twisted to attack Donald Trump, his allies and supporters was eye opening. We have seen behind the curtain and it isn't a pure, even handed system. It's full of bias and petty vendettas.
— MaryAlice David, Esq. (@MaryAli20063775) July 16, 2025

The federal judicial system will get nuked by Congress if they keep it up, and they'll deserve it.

It is worth noting that the only administration which has directly failed to follow court orders is the Autopen administration, which consistently tried to forgive student loans although they had been advised by the Court that they had no authority to do so.

And it failed to…
— Robert J. Thomas (@RobertJThomas1) July 16, 2025

But that's (D)ifferent, of course.

Judges demonstrating obvious bias lack judicial temperament. If they are predisposed against the Trump Administration they are attempting to legislate from the bench - enabling lawfare and malicious prosecution. Remove them.
— Patricia Klee (@PK1only) July 16, 2025

This writer wasn't keen on removing them at first, but now, yeah. Remove them.

Absolutely insane story here about Judge Boasberg. https://t.co/5lBo0zWF1D
— Mollie (@MZHemingway) July 16, 2025

Absolutely insane.

So, one of the judges concerned about Trump following the law, ignored the law. https://t.co/RXGylC9tAL
— The Bearded Pew (@Thebeardedpew) July 16, 2025

There is no norm, no law, no Constitutional clause the Left won't nuke in their attempts to stop the 'Bad Orange Man.'

But he's the fascist. Or something.

I kind of thought their actions / decisions were a dead give-away but the memo is nice addition to the ocean of evidence. https://t.co/49O6lFiTKk
— Bill (@Bill3321718143) July 16, 2025

It certainly is.

This is pure projection. In reality, the president is obeying court orders (even improper ones) but judges are not. https://t.co/rWTfh77x9m
— K Crary (@Crary76) July 16, 2025

And they think they're the good guys.