As U.K. Police Slow Walk Compliance Trans Strip Searches, Rowling Vows to Fund Any Lawsuits

This writer isn't surprised the Left is engaged in various levels of resistance to the U.K. Supreme Court ruling on women and women's rights. We all know they only follow court rulings (and the election results) when they approve of them.

But J.K. Rowling is having none of it, and she's calling down the thunder on U.K. police who are slow-walking the repeal of letting 'trans women' (read: men) strip-search women:

So the police are dragging their heels on stopping males strip-searching females, which, as the Supreme Court ruling confirmed, was illegal all along. I'm sure they hope no woman decides to sue.

Of course, I'll fund her if she does.https://t.co/BvdH4zlZ4j
— J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) May 4, 2025

Here's more from the Telegraph:

Police chiefs “will not rush” to ban trans officers from strip-searching women despite the Supreme Court ruling that sex is biological.
Forces have been accused of a “stunning lack of urgency” after saying they would not immediately respond to the ruling.
A day after the landmark ruling on April 17, Chief Constable Rachel Swann, the diversity lead of the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC), told forces it “welcomed the clarity” but insisted “we will not rush our response”.
On Saturday, an NPCC spokesman told The Telegraph that, in the absence of national guidance, “forces should make decisions [about strip-searches by trans officers] on a case-by-case basis”.
The Telegraph understands that, in practice, this means opposite-sex strip-searches are still allowed in territorial forces across the UK.
This marks the first time forces beyond British Transport Police have clarified their policies on trans strip-searches following the ruling.
Sussex, Merseyside, Northumbria and Surrey Police all confirmed trans officers could still conduct strip or intimate searches on detainees who share their gender identity, but not their biological sex.

Why do policemen want to frisk women?
Seems pretty creepy & perverted to me.
If I was a policeman, I'd be asking my boss why I'm being asked to do something illegal & also immoral.
But hey, police, not exactly dealing with a full moral deck these days. https://t.co/LWOlbfPCYb
— Casey (@9casey99) May 4, 2025

These are the same police who jail people for memes while turning a blind eye to grooming gangs.

So yeah, their moral deck is short a few cards.

Supreme Court: you, the police, have been carrying out illegal practices for years, just thought we'd better let you know.

Chief Constable Rachel Swann and UK Police Chiefs: Oh, that doesn't sound urgent. Give us a bit of time to think about it. https://t.co/PawlLyT0Eo
— Rob Marchant (@rob_marchant) May 5, 2025

Imagine what the good Constable and Chiefs would do if British citizens said they weren't going to comply with certain laws.

'Give them more time' is not on that list.

Editor's Note: President Trump is leading America into the "Golden Age" as Democrats try desperately to stop it.

Help us continue reporting on President Trump's success. Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.