'Follow the science' was the Left's banner motto for many, many years. They wanted a world free of religion and rooted in scientific principles because they argued it would make a fairer, freer, more enlightened society.
Instead, we got 57 genders and the belief that men can have babies and some women have penises.
Lucky us.
The truth is that those of us who opposed, and continue to oppose, trans nonsense are the ones following the science. And British Labour MP Carolyn Harris even acknowledges that fact.
WATCH:
"[J.K. Rowling] believes... that if you're born a man, you can't ever be a woman."
— Wide Awake Media (@wideawake_media) May 3, 2025
British Labour MP Carolyn Harris: "Biologically, she's correct, but... when you introduce this level of hate into a debate, rationality goes out of the window." 🤡 pic.twitter.com/kda49sKbKv
The 'but' negates everything that came before it.
Biology is rational. Biology states there are two genders -- male and female -- and everything else is a mutation or abnormality.
That's not hate.
That's a fact.
— Jake Avra (@jakeavra) May 3, 2025
Our sentiments exactly.
Nothing more rational than ignoring biological science.
— Jim Bob Levy (@geotexasjew) May 3, 2025
For the Left, science is a religion that has zero rationality behind it.
We don’t know what people mean by “hate” when you state biological facts.
— DoryGenderAtheist 🦕🦖 (@NewFifeRight14) May 3, 2025
No man can be a woman.
No human can change sex.
What is “hateful” about these facts?
Recommended
It hurts Carolyn's feelings, ergo it's 'hate.'
When "hate" is defined as "anything I don't like and that upsets me", a lot of facts are going to get defined that way. Reality won't go out of its way to accommodate our feelings.
— Because Doctrine Matters (@BecauseDoctrine) May 3, 2025
Exactly all of this.
There is nothing at all hateful about stating facts.
— Miss Jo (@therealmissjo) May 3, 2025
People seem to have forgotten that stating actual facts: “you are fat”, “you cannot be a woman if you are a man”, is necessary.
And JK Rowling absolutely should be made a peer, if anyone should.
For those who don't know, peerage would give J.K. Rowling the right to sit in the House of Lords and have a ministerial role if appointed by a monarch or Prime Minister.
To date, Rowling has been offered peerage twice and declined both.
Hate or just logic? I don’t get this people. There is no hate, no lives are being threatened. Tr*ns ppl have the exact same rights and safety as anyone else. All they have to do is live and dress and call themselves whatever they want, but accept that they can never truly change… https://t.co/SXJ4bOE1Hp pic.twitter.com/eRJ5mF2Qqc
— Dyana (@Dyana_) May 3, 2025
And that they don't have the right to access women's spaces or force women to accommodate them.
Is it just me? Or has @jk_rowling never introduced hate. ALL she has done is voice her opinion (which is scientifically proven). We can disagree without throwing the word hate into the mix. https://t.co/5FyYEYtmJr
— Heather (@MAGA4ALL1776) May 3, 2025
She has never been hateful, but the Left categorizes any disagreement with them as 'hate.'
"Biologically she's correct, but..."
— Bubba Topia (@TopiaBubba) May 3, 2025
If she is correct, then what is there to debate? https://t.co/lArlfN5HRc
There is no debate.
Biology is now called Hate . . . https://t.co/AbhYJgUfJK
— Lawyerforlaws (@lawyer4laws) May 3, 2025
That's exactly what Harris is arguing.
I'm so grateful for @jk_rowling, who, in my opinion, is the rational person in the conversation. I especially love how this person states that JK is correct before saying she has caused all rationality to go out the window. https://t.co/NzrbvKGi7G
— Vicki 🇺🇲 (@NoWarningShot_) May 3, 2025
And the irony is lost on Carolyn.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member