Janice Dean Self-Awareness Nukes Hillary Clinton and What Made Her Furious About the...
FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson WRECKS the Washington Post for Blatant Hit Job on...
Trump Ignites GOP Fire In Texas, Democrats About To Find Out
Nick Shirley Spotlights the Record Gavin Newsom Has to Overcome As His Presidential...
Dancing on Charlie Kirk’s Grave: Hanania’s Anniversary Hit Job and Ahmari’s Endorsement Sp...
This YOU, Sir? 'Sarah' McBride Passive-Aggressively Subtweeting John Fetterman Goes OH SO...
Paladino Tells Hasan Piker to Go Back Where He Came From — and...
BOOM — > Kurt Schlichter DISMANTLES Marc Elias and His Overseas Voter Scare...
WI Dem Gives Democrats Up Claiming She's Visiting 'Constituents' in Detention Center
Nice Try, WEIRDO: So, About That Fancy List of Fancy 'Republicans' Endorsing Talarico?...
Megyn Kelly's Bright Idea of 'Saving' Erika Kirk Sounds Like Bending the Knee...
Harmeet Dhillon Has a Question for Kimmel and 'No One Is Above the...
Abigail Spanberger Shows Virginia Who She REALLY Is When Journo Asks Her About...
Our Friend, Charlie Kirk
American Heroes of 9/11: Chief Peter Ganci, Jr.

NC Court Rules 65K Voters Have Fifteen Days to Prove Eligibility In Contested Supreme Court Race

AP Photo/David Goldman, File

Well, this is interesting.

North Carolina's Supreme Court race is extremely close, with the Democrat incumbent Alison Riggs ahead by just 700 votes. The North Carolina Court of Appeals has just ruled 2-1 that 65,000 voters must prove their eligibility or have their votes tossed:

Advertisement

Here's more from Bloomberg:

A GOP challenger to a sitting North Carolina justice won a state appeals court ruling Friday that tosses or requires the 'curing' of more than 60,000 votes.

The ruling would almost certainly give the race between North Carolina Justice Allison Riggs (D) and appeals court Judge Jefferson Griffin (R) over to the GOP contender given the skew in favor for Democrats among the ballots he challenged.

Two Republican judges on the panel ruled that 'never residents'—adults who were moved out-of-North Carolina abroad by their parents before turning 18—who voted in the November 2024 race weren’t entitled to cast ballots. The remainder of the challenged ballots—either overseas voters who didn’t supply a photo ID, or local voters whose registrations didn’t include a driver’s license or social security number—would be given 15 business days after state election officials contact them to cure their registrations.

If they moved out of NC before the age of 18, why are they entitled to vote? If they haven't proven their identity per state law, their ballots should be tossed.

And if you look at the graphic, the gap is only 70 votes, not 700.

Probably, which is why the Left is freaking out over this.

Advertisement

Right. If she won fair and square, fine. Them's the breaks.

But if these voters were ineligible to cast ballots, that's a whole different issue.

The Left tells us this never happens.

Except when it happens again and again.

This graphic has a corrected vote total at 700.

Democrats would have no problem with this if invalid ballots leaned Republican. But they don't.

Weird how that always happens.

We're sure there will be updates to this case and we'll keep you posted.

Editor's Note: Unelected federal judges are hijacking President Trump's agenda and insulting the will of the people

Help us expose out-of-control judges dead set on halting President Trump's mandate for change. Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement