The Democrats are in disarray. Once again.
This time, they're mad -- really mad -- at Chuck Schumer for voting in favor of the GOP's spending bill. Van Jones went on CNN to talk about the 'eruption' of anger and Kyrsten Sinema is lighting up Democrats over their filibuster hypocrisy.
One of the Democrats who voted against the spending bill was Wisconsin Senator Tammy Baldwin.
Watch as she tries (and fails) to explain why:
Slush fund for Elon Musk and Donald Trump?
— Sen. Tammy Baldwin (@SenatorBaldwin) March 14, 2025
You are damn right I am against that. pic.twitter.com/ERm9VyISSM
A slush fund for the two billionaires?
Does she realize how stupid that argument sounds?
Wait until you hear what USAID was meant to be.
— Tony Kinnett (@TheTonus) March 15, 2025
That's (D)ifferent.
You should have stopped with the first sentence....Republicans control it all. You will not be involved in governance for the next four years toots.
— Matthew S Harrison (@MatthewSHarriso) March 15, 2025
Thank goodness.
"Slush fund" seems to be the democrat catchphrase for the week. Tell us about this "slush fund". Where is it deposited? What do you think it will be used for? Has there ever been a bigger slush fund than your USAID? Please clarify.
— Il Divo-The Hippocratic Oaf (@HenryPierzchala) March 15, 2025
She will not clarify.
But you didn’t have any problem with USAID being used by Congress people and senators, as well as the CIA & despots around the world?
— Mitt🧤Romney is a Hologram (@GlennWhite1) March 14, 2025
I think I’m gonna start running your name through @datareuplican NGO powerful search tool
Recommended
Might be a good idea.
"slush fund"?
— Individual Liberty 2.0🍁#MAGA (@Richard13844184) March 14, 2025
Do any of you think for yourself?
Or just repeat the daily Dem-O-Memo talking points? pic.twitter.com/j2U4279Ves
They keep repeating the talking points.
It's all they've got.
The funding resolution is the same exact resolution as the ones you all voted yes on in September, December and January.
— Rose Griswold (@Tinybird333) March 15, 2025
So it was a slush fund in September, December, and January.
Tammy's rules.
Offs another one.
— Chad Felix Greene 🇮🇱 (@chadfelixg) March 15, 2025
Who is telling you people to hold tiny awkward mics while filming yourselves in inconvenience locations? https://t.co/JBvPdsqyOx
They should keep listening to that person.
This lady voted for trillions in green slush fund for unelected bureaucrats to dole out to campaign donors and allies like Stacey Abrams.
— Matt Whitlock (@mattdizwhitlock) March 15, 2025
This nonsense is why they have a 21% approval rating. https://t.co/J8n2jbd8ER
Maybe they're hoping to get to single digits.
After years of refusing to work with Republicans the dems still refuse to acknowledge the great moves Trump is making for our country or to work with him to stop our march to destruction. AND THEN they complain when Trump goes pushes forward without them. https://t.co/Avge56LRR6
— James Fixer (@habeling7878) March 15, 2025
It's the game they play every single time.
“Slush Fund” echo chamber of astroturfed messaging that makes no sense. Must be a @dnc idea 🤣 https://t.co/kkzlnYZb9P
— Stop Repeating History (@PoliticalGaffe) March 14, 2025
David Hogg's doing a great job!
Slush fund? Prove it or stay quiet, as I don’t recall you or any Democratic Senator condemning @JoeBiden for any of the money he pushed to Ukraine or money the Biden crime family raked in. https://t.co/ok5GhCuK4u
— Jimmy “The Neck” (@jimmy_the_neck) March 15, 2025
Media are so fond of saying President Trump and Elon Musk make claims 'without evidence' and yet there they are, not making the same accusation against Senator Baldwin.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member