The Hill Asks Why Republicans Are Weaponizing the Hormones We All Have Against Trans Athletes

This writer doesn't understand why the trans issue is the one the Left has decided to cling to, even as the ship of trans ideology sinks around them. It's always been -- at best -- an 80-20 issue in the public mind, and probably closer to 90-10 or 95-5. Most people find the idea of men playing sports against women abhorrent and are repulsed at the notion men should be allowed in women's private spaces simply because they say they're a girl.

Yet they're clinging to their agenda like a deck chair on the Titanic, and we're not going to stop them from drowning.

It's interesting to watch how their arguments keep evolving as they throw everything they can at the wall in the hopes something will stick.

This time the argument is hormones, and the Republican weaponization thereof:

"We all have hormones — why are they being weaponized against trans athletes?" (@TheHillOpinion) https://t.co/PHd6UZSBkA
— The Hill (@thehill) February 21, 2025

Wut?

Here's what they wrote:

As a Ph.D. scientist specializing in genetics and genomics, as well as the founder of an at-home hormone monitoring company, it is clear to me that science had nothing to do with this decision. With such a small number of athletes even falling under the ban, it raises the question of why the administration implemented it at all.
The answer? This is just another way to turn hormones into a justification for exclusion.
Sports have long struggled with defining gender categories, often enforcing sex verification tests that have unfairly scrutinized and excluded some athletes. In the 1960s, these tests frequently included invasive physical exams and stereotyping athletes based on how they looked. Now, many sports governing bodies require women to have low levels of testosterone, with arbitrary thresholds for levels that make them ineligible to compete.
These levels vary by sport, governing body and even year. For example, starting in March 2023, track’s World Athletics required women to suppress their testosterone to a level below 2.5 nmol/L for six months, which was half the level of 5 nmol/L proposed in 2015. These inconsistencies are a problem across the sports world.