Bad Egg? Democrats Bunny-Hop Over Biden’s ‘Startling’ White House Easter to Focus on...
Dr. Oz Uncovers Rampant Hospice Fraud in California, Gavin Newsom Claimed Investigation Wa...
Here's the Entertainment You Get for Your $1,000 Floor Ticket to Bruce Springsteen
Hot Take: Fortunately for Missing Airman, Iran Is Not as Barbaric as Trump...
Kamala Harris: We Cannot Allow Trump to Hand Pick Another Supreme Court Justice
Rep. Shri Thanedar Announces Impeachment Effort Against Pam Bondi in Unfortunate Video
Sen. Chris Van Hollen Has Found Another 'Asylum Seeker' Sob Story to Share
Fox Business Anchor Looks at Questionable Charges to Eric Swalwell’s Campaign
Qasem Soleimani‘s Niece, Who Was Granted Asylum, Arrested by ICE; Legal Status Terminated
EVERYONE IS HITLER! AP Government Textbook Shows Everything Wrong With Education in a...
Brit Hume Busts Gavin Newsom Telling ANOTHER Whopper (This Time About Fox News...
Protesters March on Good Friday to Site of ‘Crucifixions’ of George Floyd, Renee...
SAVE Act Opponent Barack Obama Has an IRONIC Requirement in Order to Win...
NY Times Spotted Serving Up Another Embarrassing Take (It's 123 Years Old and...
Here's Why the NY Times' Cringey NATO Headline Likely Made It Past 'Layers...

LOL WUT?! Missouri Dem STRAIGHT UP Lies About SAVE Act Preventing Married Women From Voting

Twitter

When you have to lie about something, you're losing the argument.

There have been a lot of lies about the SAVE Act -- the legislation that would prevent non-citizens from voting in federal elections -- but this? This one may take the cake:

Advertisement

You'll be totally (not) shocked to learn Jess is a Democrat with Blue Missouri.

She's also a liar.

But here's what The New Republic says:

The SAVE Act is a proposed federal law, so, first off, it would put a future president (say, Trump) in charge of enforcing it, taking that power away from the states. Millions of voter registrations in any states the president decides are problematic could be removed until those voters “cure” their registrations, and state authorities would have no say in it.

And what will the law require citizens who want to vote do? Lacking a passport or other proof of citizenship with their married names, they must produce both a birth certificate (with the seal of the state where it was issued; no copies allowed) and a current form of identification—both with the exact same name on them. That could instantly disqualify about 90 percent of all married women without passports or other proof that matches their birth certificates or proof of a legal name change.

For women in that situation, they can still register to vote if they can prove that they went to court to change their name when they got married, but most women just start using their new married name without ever going through all those formalities (although a few states recognize marriage as a legal name change).

Advertisement

This is all lies.

There's also a simple solution: get a passport or a Real ID.

It's really that simple.

It really is breathtaking in its stupidity.

Apparently not.

If you're this gullible, you shouldn't be allowed to vote, anyway.

It really is.

Absolutely, mind-numbingly stupid.

Advertisement

Real ID is slated to start May 7, 2025. But it's been delayed multiple times and this writer bets you money it'll be delayed again.

It's not, and yet Democrats can't seem to comprehend it.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos