Woke CA Teacher Brags About Marrying Gaza Resident Online for Green Card —...
Far-Left Sends Elite Prep School Socialist Oliver Larkin to Primary Jared Moskowitz (Becau...
DeWine Intervention: Ohio Governor Tells CNN’s Jake Tapper Why He's Against Sending ‘Temp’...
Dem Raphael Warnock: Socialists and Communists Are Welcome Under His Party’s ‘Big Tent’...
Tweet Makes a Point About the Consequences of Socialism
No Money for Schools? Mary Katharine Ham Schools the Commie on NYC's $40K-Per-Student...
Sen. Blackburn, Gov. Stitt Congratulate ICE Nominee
DeWine, Kasich Argue Against Removing Haitians
Aw, How Heartbreaking: Illegal Parents Forced to Take Their Kids Home With Them
Exceptionalism Unmatched: Full-Service America Hosts Iran for World Cup … Then Bombs Them...
Meltdown ALERT! Thomas Massie Lashing OUT When Asked About Ex-GF and an NDA...
'Hello, Mr. French': DataRepublican Turns Her Attention to David French and HOOBOY, YIKES,...
Ain't THAT Sweet?! Merch at Texas Democrat Convention SCARY Reminder of Who They...
John Cornyn's SMUG Post Talking Down to Grassroots About the SAVE Act BACKFIRES...
OOF! Dems' Reaction to a CRAZY Confused Joe Biden RANT Speaks VOLUMES About...

LOL WUT?! Missouri Dem STRAIGHT UP Lies About SAVE Act Preventing Married Women From Voting

Twitter

When you have to lie about something, you're losing the argument.

There have been a lot of lies about the SAVE Act -- the legislation that would prevent non-citizens from voting in federal elections -- but this? This one may take the cake:

Advertisement

You'll be totally (not) shocked to learn Jess is a Democrat with Blue Missouri.

She's also a liar.

But here's what The New Republic says:

The SAVE Act is a proposed federal law, so, first off, it would put a future president (say, Trump) in charge of enforcing it, taking that power away from the states. Millions of voter registrations in any states the president decides are problematic could be removed until those voters “cure” their registrations, and state authorities would have no say in it.

And what will the law require citizens who want to vote do? Lacking a passport or other proof of citizenship with their married names, they must produce both a birth certificate (with the seal of the state where it was issued; no copies allowed) and a current form of identification—both with the exact same name on them. That could instantly disqualify about 90 percent of all married women without passports or other proof that matches their birth certificates or proof of a legal name change.

For women in that situation, they can still register to vote if they can prove that they went to court to change their name when they got married, but most women just start using their new married name without ever going through all those formalities (although a few states recognize marriage as a legal name change).

Advertisement

This is all lies.

There's also a simple solution: get a passport or a Real ID.

It's really that simple.

It really is breathtaking in its stupidity.

Apparently not.

If you're this gullible, you shouldn't be allowed to vote, anyway.

It really is.

Absolutely, mind-numbingly stupid.

Advertisement

Real ID is slated to start May 7, 2025. But it's been delayed multiple times and this writer bets you money it'll be delayed again.

It's not, and yet Democrats can't seem to comprehend it.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement