Scott Jennings Tries Reasoning With Dems Who’re Leaving Americans Open to Terrorism for...
California’s Unique Primary Could See Two Republicans Vying for Governor If Some Dems...
Kinder-Hearted: Dem James Talarico Says, Besides Family and Friends, He Also Loves Trans...
UK Appoints 'Anti-Muslim Hostility Czar,' Claims It Won’t Restrict Ability to Criticize Is...
Maggie Vs. MAGA: Director’s Severe TDS Led to Massive Box Office Bomb With...
Nicholas Kristof Considers Alternative Theory for Decline in Iranian Missile Launches
Brave Hero Marine Leaves Hospital, Poses for Photo With Palestinian Flag
Hysterical: Women Led in Group Screaming Session for International Women’s Day Protest
Voice Actor for Halo's Master Chief Demands White House Remove Him From 'Disgusting...
Mamdani’s Wife: Actually Born in Houston, Rebranded as 'From Damascus' for the Instagram...
Rosie O’Donnell Appears on Jim Acosta’s Podcast to Prove They’re Two Different People
Kai Trump 'Out of Touch' for ... Grocery Shopping? The Left's Hypocritical Pile-On...
James Talarico Has Met So Many Non-Christians Who Are More Christ-Like Than His...
NYT Updates Its 'Smoking Jars of Metal and Fuses' Headline in Wake of...
Revenge of the Radicalized Rich Kid: Bucks County Brat Bombs Protest, Flashes ISIS...

LOL WUT?! Missouri Dem STRAIGHT UP Lies About SAVE Act Preventing Married Women From Voting

Twitter

When you have to lie about something, you're losing the argument.

There have been a lot of lies about the SAVE Act -- the legislation that would prevent non-citizens from voting in federal elections -- but this? This one may take the cake:

Advertisement

You'll be totally (not) shocked to learn Jess is a Democrat with Blue Missouri.

She's also a liar.

But here's what The New Republic says:

The SAVE Act is a proposed federal law, so, first off, it would put a future president (say, Trump) in charge of enforcing it, taking that power away from the states. Millions of voter registrations in any states the president decides are problematic could be removed until those voters “cure” their registrations, and state authorities would have no say in it.

And what will the law require citizens who want to vote do? Lacking a passport or other proof of citizenship with their married names, they must produce both a birth certificate (with the seal of the state where it was issued; no copies allowed) and a current form of identification—both with the exact same name on them. That could instantly disqualify about 90 percent of all married women without passports or other proof that matches their birth certificates or proof of a legal name change.

For women in that situation, they can still register to vote if they can prove that they went to court to change their name when they got married, but most women just start using their new married name without ever going through all those formalities (although a few states recognize marriage as a legal name change).

Advertisement

This is all lies.

There's also a simple solution: get a passport or a Real ID.

It's really that simple.

It really is breathtaking in its stupidity.

Apparently not.

If you're this gullible, you shouldn't be allowed to vote, anyway.

It really is.

Absolutely, mind-numbingly stupid.

Advertisement

Real ID is slated to start May 7, 2025. But it's been delayed multiple times and this writer bets you money it'll be delayed again.

It's not, and yet Democrats can't seem to comprehend it.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement