Here's Springsteen Promoting US Tour Fighting Authoritarian Admin (While Trump Does NOTHIN...
AI Propaganda Video Shows Iran Hitting Baal-Headed Statue of Liberty With a Missile
What Would Patrick Henry Say to Chuck Schumer Today?
Bodega Bathroom Horror: Trans Illegal Gets Time-Served Deal for Raping a 14-Year-Old Boy
Jimmy Kimmel's Swipe at Markwayne Mullin Helps Explain Why Elitist Dems Have Lost...
Oh, You Sweet Summer Child! Scott Jennings Embarrasses MeidasTouch Dweeb Over Dems and...
Johnson Ends Jeffries' Career! Sheridan Gorman Killing! DHS, TSA Shutdown Intensifies!
LOTR WTF? Late-Night TV Host Stephen Colbert Tapped to Co-Write New ‘Lord of...
Why American Doctors Shouldn’t Have to Compete With the World for American Residencies
'Schumer's Shutdown' Explodes: Dems Reject GOP Compromise on DHS Funding, Insist on Guttin...
Guess Which State Media Outlet Warmly Quoted John Brennan (As Irony AND Projection...
Here's Nearly a Minute Worth of Dems Basically Admitting They're Too Clueless to...
Bearded Lady and Her Sidekick Busted: Couple Charged After Poo-Swastika Attack on Republic...
Student Slaughtered by an Illegal, Brandon Johnson Throws Naming Ceremony for 'Abolish ICE...
JB Pritzker Says the Quiet Part Out Loud About Why the Thought of...

LOL WUT?! Missouri Dem STRAIGHT UP Lies About SAVE Act Preventing Married Women From Voting

Twitter

When you have to lie about something, you're losing the argument.

There have been a lot of lies about the SAVE Act -- the legislation that would prevent non-citizens from voting in federal elections -- but this? This one may take the cake:

Advertisement

You'll be totally (not) shocked to learn Jess is a Democrat with Blue Missouri.

She's also a liar.

But here's what The New Republic says:

The SAVE Act is a proposed federal law, so, first off, it would put a future president (say, Trump) in charge of enforcing it, taking that power away from the states. Millions of voter registrations in any states the president decides are problematic could be removed until those voters “cure” their registrations, and state authorities would have no say in it.

And what will the law require citizens who want to vote do? Lacking a passport or other proof of citizenship with their married names, they must produce both a birth certificate (with the seal of the state where it was issued; no copies allowed) and a current form of identification—both with the exact same name on them. That could instantly disqualify about 90 percent of all married women without passports or other proof that matches their birth certificates or proof of a legal name change.

For women in that situation, they can still register to vote if they can prove that they went to court to change their name when they got married, but most women just start using their new married name without ever going through all those formalities (although a few states recognize marriage as a legal name change).

Advertisement

This is all lies.

There's also a simple solution: get a passport or a Real ID.

It's really that simple.

It really is breathtaking in its stupidity.

Apparently not.

If you're this gullible, you shouldn't be allowed to vote, anyway.

It really is.

Absolutely, mind-numbingly stupid.

Advertisement

Real ID is slated to start May 7, 2025. But it's been delayed multiple times and this writer bets you money it'll be delayed again.

It's not, and yet Democrats can't seem to comprehend it.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos