Screen Queen?: Filmmaker Justine Bateman Says LA Mayor Karen Bass Knows Nothing About...
DSA Dial-Up: Dem Michigan Senate Hopeful Abdul El-Sayed Says Obama Called, May Campaign...
Scott Jennings Rebukes Donna Brazile for Comparing Tea Party Movement to Dem Party’s...
Men Need Purpose at Work — Here’s the Advice I’m Giving My Daughter
From Comedy to Commie: DSA Co-Chair Says Jon Stewart’s ‘The Daily Show’ Was...
Mehdi Hasan Is Still Pretending Hasan Piker’s 9/11 Posturing and Jew-Hatred Are No...
This Legislation Could End Government Shutdowns Once and for All
Sen. Jim Banks Gives Credit to Trade Policies
Abdul El-Sayed Brags That He and His Wife ‘Actually Like Each Other —...
Prez Agency: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Says She Hasn’t Ruled Out White House Run In...
'Woke 1 Was Crazy': AOC Tries to Memory-Hole Her Peak Defund-And-Abolish Era
Insane Framing: Sports Illustrated Claims Sophie Cunningham Got a 'Bitter Taste of Karma'
House Leadership: American Security Against Healthcare Costs
AOC Freezes Her Eggs and Films the Shot: The Parturition Will Be Televised...
'Stewardship Is the Issue': HUD Secretary Scott Turner DROPS Reporter Asking About Budget...

LOL WUT?! Missouri Dem STRAIGHT UP Lies About SAVE Act Preventing Married Women From Voting

Twitter

When you have to lie about something, you're losing the argument.

There have been a lot of lies about the SAVE Act -- the legislation that would prevent non-citizens from voting in federal elections -- but this? This one may take the cake:

Advertisement

You'll be totally (not) shocked to learn Jess is a Democrat with Blue Missouri.

She's also a liar.

But here's what The New Republic says:

The SAVE Act is a proposed federal law, so, first off, it would put a future president (say, Trump) in charge of enforcing it, taking that power away from the states. Millions of voter registrations in any states the president decides are problematic could be removed until those voters “cure” their registrations, and state authorities would have no say in it.

And what will the law require citizens who want to vote do? Lacking a passport or other proof of citizenship with their married names, they must produce both a birth certificate (with the seal of the state where it was issued; no copies allowed) and a current form of identification—both with the exact same name on them. That could instantly disqualify about 90 percent of all married women without passports or other proof that matches their birth certificates or proof of a legal name change.

For women in that situation, they can still register to vote if they can prove that they went to court to change their name when they got married, but most women just start using their new married name without ever going through all those formalities (although a few states recognize marriage as a legal name change).

Advertisement

This is all lies.

There's also a simple solution: get a passport or a Real ID.

It's really that simple.

It really is breathtaking in its stupidity.

Apparently not.

If you're this gullible, you shouldn't be allowed to vote, anyway.

It really is.

Absolutely, mind-numbingly stupid.

Advertisement

Real ID is slated to start May 7, 2025. But it's been delayed multiple times and this writer bets you money it'll be delayed again.

It's not, and yet Democrats can't seem to comprehend it.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement