Congressman Says Drones Over Trump Estate Came From Iranian ‘Mothership’
Black Teachers Sue School District After Being Scared by Students in MAGA Hats
Salon Want Us to Know They're Very Disappointed With McDonald's Customers Who Turned...
LOW T ALERT: Trudeau Gets in Touch With His Feminine Side to Chide...
Daniel Penny Considers Suing Alvin Bragg for Malicious Prosecution
Julie Kelly Torches Christopher Wray's True FBI Legacy, Bids Adieu to Who Else...
Time MAGAzine: President-Elect Donald Trump Named ‘Person of the Year’ - Was There...
Look at That! CNN Finally Admits Inflation 'Heated Up' in November
That 'But' Is Doing Some HEAVY Lifting: Watch Elizabeth Warren Justify Shooting of...
Sanity Restored: Northern Ireland Set to Permanently Ban Puberty Blockers
HOO BOY: Even in Blue New York, Majority of Voters FAVOR Deportation of...
'You're All Reading Into That': The Way Jill Biden Got Awkward Laughter Was...
Adults Are Back in Charge, Y'all! Postmaster General Acts Like a Toddler During...
After Years of Lying for Biden, the New York Times Admits Illegal Immigration...
The Plot Thickens: Tom Cotton Calls for Investigation of West Point Lying to...

What Constitution? See What National Security Advisor Sullivan Says About Warrants for FISA Searches

AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta

The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution says: 

'The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.'

Advertisement

Pretty clear language, no?

Apparently not for National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan:

First, some background:

Later this afternoon there will be a vote to require warrants to search our communications.

It'll be very interesting to see how this vote goes.

Especially since NSA Sullivan says it's not in our 'national security interests.'

Twitter/X users, on the other hand, are very supportive of such an admendment:

Bury it in bureaucracy. 

Advertisement

It's the American way.

It's right there in black and white.

Yes it is.

Given the breadth of federal law, this gives them carte blanche to get you for breaking a law you didn't even know existed. Data collection should require a warrant and be minimized.

They hate the Constitution, and the rights it protects.

Advertisement

Yes, they do.

No Amendment should be ignored.

It is why the Fourth Amendment exists. To protect us from government overreach like this.

We're sure nothing bad could come of this.

'Because we said so' seems to be their argument here.

Advertisement

This is long overdue.

Exactly.

We can totally trust the government.

We'll update you once the vote takes place.

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 50% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement