Nice Try ... Dick: Pam Bondi BURIES Sen. Durbin Trying to Play 'Gotcha'...
Pam Bondi Delivers a Self-Awareness KO to Sen. Whitehouse About How the Justice...
Chuck Grassley Nukes Dem Concerns That Pam Bondi Would Weaponize the Justice Department
JAJAJA! Marco Rubio Owns Protesters SHRIEKING at Him About Human Rights With FANTASTIC...
The Look on Elizabeth Warren's Face After CNN Host Tells Her Pete Hegseth...
About Damn TIME! Pam Bondi Is Straight-FIRE Speaking About Returning the DOJ to...
Biden's Farewell Letter Is a Gaslighting Doozy
A Man Of Peace: Jesse Kelly Wants Mace and Crockett to 'Hug it...
Scott Jennings Erupts at WaPo Columnist for Saying Hegseth’s MAIN Qualification is Being...
The Top 5 Pete Hegseth Confirmation Hearing Moments per Collin Rugg of Trending...
Fingers Crossed (Again): NY Governor Kathy Hochul Says the NYC Subway is REALLY...
Dereliction of Duty Duo: Nero Newsom ‘Fiddled’ While Mayor Karen Bass Sipped Cocktails...
Dense, Repeat: Nero Newsom Takes His Wildfire PR Battle to MSNBC Instead of...
Sen. Angus King Says Pete Hegseth's Position Is That Torture Is OK
Nate Silver Wonders When the Pendulum Will Swing Back Toward Liberals

What Constitution? See What National Security Advisor Sullivan Says About Warrants for FISA Searches

AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta

The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution says: 

'The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.'

Advertisement

Pretty clear language, no?

Apparently not for National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan:

First, some background:

Later this afternoon there will be a vote to require warrants to search our communications.

It'll be very interesting to see how this vote goes.

Especially since NSA Sullivan says it's not in our 'national security interests.'

Twitter/X users, on the other hand, are very supportive of such an admendment:

Bury it in bureaucracy. 

Advertisement

It's the American way.

It's right there in black and white.

Yes it is.

Given the breadth of federal law, this gives them carte blanche to get you for breaking a law you didn't even know existed. Data collection should require a warrant and be minimized.

They hate the Constitution, and the rights it protects.

Advertisement

Yes, they do.

No Amendment should be ignored.

It is why the Fourth Amendment exists. To protect us from government overreach like this.

We're sure nothing bad could come of this.

'Because we said so' seems to be their argument here.

Advertisement

This is long overdue.

Exactly.

We can totally trust the government.

We'll update you once the vote takes place.

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 50% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement