ABC News Sends ‘Regrets’ But No Apology for Trump Rape Lies Spread by...
Seven Years Ago, Disney Enacted Order 66 on the Movie Industry (but We...
Israel Closing Embassy in Ireland, Citing 'Extreme Anti-Israel Polices' of Government
Infectious Disease Doc Gets WRECKED for Calling Lockdowns a 'Necessary Evil'
J. K. Rowling Pitches an Amazing New Action Series
BUT, BUT, BUT: Yet Another Democrat Defends Murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO
Set Phasers to BURN: Captain Kirk Throws Some MAJOR Shade at Luke Skywalker...
MAID in the Great White North: Canadian per Capita Euthanasia Deaths Now Beat...
Impostor Syndrome! NY Post Gets Ejected Into Orbit Over Headline About CEO Killer's...
Selective Activism: Justine Bateman Notices Something Missing After UnitedHealthcare CEO M...
Your Terms Are Acceptable: X Users Tell Lefty They're FINE With More Guys...
Thanks, Captain Obvious! New York Post ROASTED for Headline About Jimmy Carter Not...
Sen. Tim Scott: 'Never Take Our Essential Rights and Liberties for Granted'
JoJoFromJerz's Unoriginal Video About Spending Christmas With Her Trump-Supporting Family...
WATCH Stephanie Ruhle as Even the Members of Her Obnoxious Panel Don't Buy...

'You Mean Their LEGAL Names?': Ohio Candidates Face Ballot Trouble for Omitting 'Deadnames'

Transgender candidates for various political offices in Ohio are in a spot of trouble. Several of them are facing challenges, if not outright disqualification, for failing to list their 'deadnames' on their paperwork.

Advertisement

NBC News laments this development:

Several transgender candidates for state office in Ohio are facing challenges and even outright disqualification for omitting their former names from petition paperwork under a little-known state elections law, confronting a unique dilemma as they vie for office in increasing numbers in the face of anti-LBGTQ legislation.

Three of the four transgender candidates hoping to win Democratic seats in the Republican-dominated Ohio House and Senate have either been challenged or disqualified for not putting their former name — also called a deadname — on circulating petitions to get on the ballot. But state law mandates that candidates list any name changes in the last five years, though it isn’t in the Secretary of State’s 33-page candidate requirement guide.

State law mandates listing any name changes in the last five years.

Here's some carification:

Advertisement

We'd be curious to see it, too, and this explains a lot. But the law is the law.

And a follow up:

That's the rules.

And we thought no one was above the law.

This is a common response.

Yep.

Their point is this is somehow unfair.

Because reasons.

Yes, they did. Any other candidate would be disqualified.

It's only fair.

There you go. State. Law.

Advertisement

We bet she listed her legal name on the campaign paperwork. Because that's the issue here.

So are we.

If they changed their name legally, fine. But they have to list their given name if the change happened in the last five years.

Really, really stupid.

Peak clown world, indeed.

So do we.

If they won't follow these rules, what will the do with the laws?

The point is the activism.

These particular candidates are (D)ifferent because they're trans, and the laws shouldn't apply to him.

Advertisement

And you should have to list the name changes in the past five years. Per state law.

Perhaps not, but it's certainly helpful to know who a candidate was if they changed their name for any reason.

We do. With rules. Rules we all have to abide by.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement