Father of UNC Student Who Held American Flag Up and OFF the Ground...
BAHAHAHAAA! List of UCLA Demands Inspires HILARIOUS 'Updated List' annnd Now We're Officia...
OOF! J.D. Vance Leaves CNN's Kaitlan Collins SPEECHLESS Blasting Fraudulent Trials Against...
REPORT: Biden DOJ Civil Rights Chief Lied During Senate Confirmation About Being Arrested
Breaking: UCLA Police Clash With Campus Protesters
Criminalizing Christianity? The Antisemitism Awareness Act, President Trump, and Congress
He's Finally Done It: Joe Biden Has Brought Unity … Sort of
Liberal White Women 'Are Just Really Into Hamas'
AP: American Catholic Church Sees 'An Immense Shift Toward the Old Ways'
Biden-Harris HQ Is Campaigning for Donald Trump Again
White Students Protesting Slavery or Something? Cynthia Nixon Loses it on Rep. Nadler...
Antisemitism? Cenk Uygur Goes on Rant About Jewish Power Over Media and Muslims...
Michael Moore Tells CNN 98 Percent of Student Protesters 'Don't Believe in Antisemitism'
Twitchy Favorites Weigh in on the U.S. Taking in Palestinian Refugees
Wading Into the Debate Over the Importance of Stay at Home Mothers

'You Mean Their LEGAL Names?': Ohio Candidates Face Ballot Trouble for Omitting 'Deadnames'

Transgender candidates for various political offices in Ohio are in a spot of trouble. Several of them are facing challenges, if not outright disqualification, for failing to list their 'deadnames' on their paperwork.

Advertisement

NBC News laments this development:

Several transgender candidates for state office in Ohio are facing challenges and even outright disqualification for omitting their former names from petition paperwork under a little-known state elections law, confronting a unique dilemma as they vie for office in increasing numbers in the face of anti-LBGTQ legislation.

Three of the four transgender candidates hoping to win Democratic seats in the Republican-dominated Ohio House and Senate have either been challenged or disqualified for not putting their former name — also called a deadname — on circulating petitions to get on the ballot. But state law mandates that candidates list any name changes in the last five years, though it isn’t in the Secretary of State’s 33-page candidate requirement guide.

State law mandates listing any name changes in the last five years.

Here's some carification:

Advertisement

We'd be curious to see it, too, and this explains a lot. But the law is the law.

And a follow up:

That's the rules.

And we thought no one was above the law.

This is a common response.

Yep.

Their point is this is somehow unfair.

Because reasons.

Yes, they did. Any other candidate would be disqualified.

It's only fair.

There you go. State. Law.

Advertisement

We bet she listed her legal name on the campaign paperwork. Because that's the issue here.

So are we.

If they changed their name legally, fine. But they have to list their given name if the change happened in the last five years.

Really, really stupid.

Peak clown world, indeed.

So do we.

If they won't follow these rules, what will the do with the laws?

The point is the activism.

These particular candidates are (D)ifferent because they're trans, and the laws shouldn't apply to him.

Advertisement

And you should have to list the name changes in the past five years. Per state law.

Perhaps not, but it's certainly helpful to know who a candidate was if they changed their name for any reason.

We do. With rules. Rules we all have to abide by.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement