And. Here. We. Go! Watching Senior DOJ and FBI Officials Lawyering Up is...
Dead Media Talking: Scott Pelley Opens 60 Minutes With a TOTALLY Fair Review...
Yeah, Go With That! Jen Psaki Pushes Dems to Double Down on Trans...
Joe & Mika Crawl to Mar-a-Lago, Beg Trump for Mercy!
BS Meters MELTED: What John Brennan Said About Tulsi Gabbard Proves NO ONE...
Laken Riley Murder Trial Testimony Proves Biden, Harris, Mayorkas & Sanctuary City Dems...
STOP! We Can Only Love Trump So Much! Democrats Screeching About Trump Seeking...
FAFO! Democrat Commissioner Effing Around Openly Cheating in Bucks County, PA May FINALLY...
Pass the Popcorn! 'Morning Joe' Regulars Furious MSNBC Hosts Bent a Knee to...
'Sit DOWN, Son': Brian Krassenstein Picks Fight with Father of 6 Matt Walsh...
Trump Confirms Report About How He'll 'Reverse the Biden Invasion' and Secure the...
Sketchy AF! Rick Scott Calls McConnell OUT for Saying Trump Won't Get Recess...
'Warrior We NEED': Mollie Hemingway Delivers MASTERFUL Defense of Matt Gaetz as AG...
Talk About a Sore LOSER --> Former Obama Lackey Claims Trump's Win Was...
'Ignoring the Law': Here's What's Going on in Illinois and Pennsylvania 13 Days...

Hilarious Community Note on Brigitte Gabriel Post Also Shows the Absolute State of Community Notes

AP Photo/Michel Euler, Pool, File

Regular readers are probably familiar with the joke account Three Year Letterman. The key thing to get is that you just shouldn’t take most of the things he says seriously, but as different kinds of jokes. We're honestly not sure he is ever serious. One of those jokes came in response to the sad news that Joe Leiberman died:

Advertisement

Of course that is not his picture, that is not his name, he wasn’t vice president and so on. Basically …

… and the fact that almost everything in that post is wrong is kind of the joke. We don’t know whether he just thinks it's funny to intentionally get the story wrong, or he likes to laugh as people correct him, but this is the kind of thing that @gaypatriot (who is still unjustly suspended) did all the time. So, you’re just supposed to take it as a joke. But apparently Brigitte Gabriel of ACT For America didn’t realize it was a joke and decided to fact check it.

And that is pretty funny, in and of itself. But then what made it funnier is that her fact check received a Community Note. The Note has disappeared since then, but when we started this piece, there was a Community Note on it that said ‘Brigitte Gabriel never lettered in s—t,’ only with the curse word spelled out. It also contained a link to a Google search for ‘brigitte gabriel lettered in’—the entire phrase in quotes in the search.

Advertisement

Here’s a screenshot:

On one hand, that Community Note is pretty funny.

But, let’s get serious for a moment, here. It also shows you that Community Notes absolutely can be abused. We admit that sometimes they are fun and funny, sometimes even as we know they are being abuse. But this author has also said for a while that Community Notes was much better back when money wasn’t involved. But once Twitter/X changed its policies so that a post that was Community Noted was ineligible for monetization … 

… the quality of these notes went downhill very quickly. Very often the notes were argumentative, abusive or just plain wrong. One of the most egregious examples in recent memory has to be when End Wokeness kicked up a firestorm over a plan to ban the famous V-J Day photograph of a sailor grabbing a woman and kissing her:

This was 100% valid journalism. This post was based on a document proven to be authentic by subsequent events and it led to a change in policy where the government backed down, but the post still got a Community Note admitting that everything s/he said was right when s/he wrote it, but then they changed their mind. How do you get a Community Note that admits that the story was correct when written?

Advertisement

Well, the answer is you get them when Community Notes are broken and they are.

Another pretty egregious (albeit funny) example is when Slate put out this petulant post:

For a while, that post had a Community Note that said simply: ‘Yes they are.’ If we recall correctly, the Note also linked to Instagram, presumably showing lots of pictures of the actress as evidence. Of course, that is also funny but it was also kind of unfair to Slate. After all, ‘that big’ is kind of a vague statement, so how can anyone else dispute that? Maybe the Slate author has an … um … inflated sense of what counts as big in that context.

And, of course, we have previously has pointed out that a Community Note got the law flat-out wrong when talking about Robert Kennedy Jr. being denied Secret Service protection. Indeed, the people writing that Community Note don’t appear to be lawyers, even though they were discussing the law, because no competent lawyer would cite a website discussing a statute, rather than the actual statute itself.

Of course, at least two of those examples are funny. But these examples also highlight a serious problem. Musk et. al. needs to fix Community Notes. We think the simplest way to fix them is take them out of the monetization equation. Once activists stop believing they can use this to screw with people’s income, the desire to use it abusively is significantly reduced.

Advertisement

Coming back to Ms. Gabriel, several of ‘Letterman’s’ followers claimed to basically troll the rating system. Mind you, we don't think there is any malice here, just them clowning on a woman for missing a joke (who here hasn't done that at least once?).

More comedy:

Honestly, we are not fans of 'Letterman' ourselves. We’re not saying he is never funny (and to be fair, we are less likely to to find humor in bare text, anyway), but we are saying that he is not as funny as he seems to think he is.

Advertisement

We'll see how you feel in 76 years.

That is correct. If Twitter/X existed in the Seventeenth Century, Galileo might have posted that the sun is the center of the solar system, only to get a Community Note saying that he is wrong. There can be a strong consensus on a point that is factually wrong.

It might be hard to see, but his picture is nothing but the word "otherwise."

We admit we took too long to get that joke, but we first saw it early this morning, so we are going to plead not guilty by reason of not enough caffeine. Since this author is a lawyer who has a pristine copy of the World Book Encyclopedias, you can rest assured that this is a genuine legal defense.

Advertisement

(No, of course it isn’t a real defense. But maybe it should be.)

***

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy’s conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 50% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement