Okay, that headline is a bit of a feint. First, it’s not really a list. It’s more like a dump of court documents related to one of the many cases related to Jeffrey Epstein and his evil empire of child rape and pornography. As of this writing, we are not even sure what the case is about. Second, it’s not all of those files just yet. We’ll talk about what is being withheld and why in a moment.
And, before we get started, you are intelligent people. You know that at most these are accusations. This author comes second to no one in his hatred of child rapists, but we have to be fair to the accused—and certainly we at Twitchy will be fair to them. The documents are a valid place for investigations to start from, but this is not where the investigation should end. Being accused of these documents should not be mistaken for absolute proof of guilt.
And this author has not even attempted to go through all of the documents before publishing this piece, in part because we keep hearing that servers carrying them are crashing and we are being told it is around a thousand pages. And while the server crashes might prompt people to joke ‘the server didn’t kill itself’ the truth is that we would expect them to be overwhelmed in the beginning.
But maybe you can get through to the relevant servers and look for yourself. Here’s one link to the documents:
🚨BREAKING: Over 1,000 pages of documents containing 150+ names related to a lawsuit brought against Ghislaine Maxwell have been unsealed https://t.co/2gY4S9dzOP pic.twitter.com/jjh8hUoeQK
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) January 3, 2024
Here’s a second link if you need it:
Here ya go… The Epstein files in full. https://t.co/MSz62uIFj4
— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) January 4, 2024
The first link is a link to a long list of pdf documents, so that will take a long time to get through. The second is apparently one big document and the search function seems to be overwhelmed as of this writing.
Recommended
Probably the biggest headline so far relates to a certain ex-president:
From the unsealed Epstein documents:
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) January 4, 2024
"Bill Clinton likes them young."
Pass it on. They can't suicide us all. pic.twitter.com/W4EU9NLMrz
"[Bill] Clinton likes them young." Excuse us while we cringe to death.
Now, we don’t have a particularly high opinion of Bill Clinton, but, to be fair, this is a hearsay accusation. It wouldn’t even come into evidence in court, and he has had no chance to defend himself. We can imagine many scenarios where even if it was genuinely said, the allegation isn’t true—and maybe even Bill Clinton could actually prove it.
But this is a place to start an investigation, journalistically or criminally.
Here’s another allegation:
🚨🚨
— John Hasson (@SonofHas) January 4, 2024
Virginia Giuffre —who was trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—was allegedly forced to have sex with billionaire GLENN DUBIN
…Dubin is a BIG @VivekGRamaswamy donor pic.twitter.com/pqlOJ8ooZK
Again, we don’t know if the allegation against him is true, or even if he is a donor to Vivek Ramaswamy—and it would be a pretty thin gruel guilt-by-association theory to claim that this reflects poorly on Mr. Ramaswamy, even if the allegations against Dubin turn out to be true.
And we imagine that the British press is going to be rocked by this:
Epstein accuser says Prince Andrew groped her, documents show#EpsteinClientListhttps://t.co/47wcM3wLEu pic.twitter.com/A9yT4xEka2
— ViV (@VivicusVipare) January 4, 2024
Other allegations:
EPSTEIN CLIENT LIST (MOSSAD BLACKMAIL LIST)
— Sulaiman Ahmed (@ShaykhSulaiman) January 4, 2024
MICHEAL JACKSON WENT TO EPSTEIN’S PALM BEACH HOME BUT DID NOT GET A MASSAGE FROM AN UNDERAGE GIRL pic.twitter.com/9RIeCzUGKV
Of course, most of the allegations against Jackson didn't involve girls...
🚨#justin :Executive Chairman of Hyatt Hotels Billionaire Thomas Pritzker, identified in Epstein documents, allegedly INVOLVED IN SEXUAL ACTIVITIES with Epstein victim.
— Phan Vũ Ngọc Huy (@ISRAELEXPR1948) January 4, 2024
"How many times have you had sex with Tom Pritzker?"
"I believe I was with Tom once."
👁️ #EpsteinClientList pic.twitter.com/CzXWEqsCCP
Magician David Copperfield dined with Jeffrey Epstein, documents claimhttps://t.co/zsGDtLCjx3
— The Independent (@Independent) January 4, 2024
HUGE‼️
— Izuku Midoriya (@amongusin3d) January 4, 2024
David Copperfield mentioned in Jeffrey Epstein documents pic.twitter.com/OOZlssoCNW
But having not read the documents, we are told that Donald Trump is being exonerated. This highlights a real problem—how does one prove the negative? It’s literally impossible. But besides the presumption of innocence, Trump can point at this:
— The Right To Bear Memes (@grandoldmemes) January 4, 2024
https://t.co/EYdA2FX8Uh pic.twitter.com/xcEfbbsGXK
— Mostly Peaceful Memes (@MostlyPeacefull) January 4, 2024
That seems about right. It's a classic "dog that doesn't bark" argument. And this video is a handy throwback:
The 2 most frequent names on the sealed docs are Clinton and Prince Andrew
— Kendall Dina (@BLACKPINKLRJJJ) January 4, 2024
Trump called both out for visiting the island wayyy back 🔥🔥🔥😂😂😂 pic.twitter.com/vHGUdypaQl
And we will note that we have also seen allegations against Alan Dershowitz, who was Epstein’s lawyer at one point. A motion claims that that Epstein forced Jane Doe #3 (who is allegedly a minor victim of sexual assault) to have sex with Dershowitz at one point, but bluntly, we have seen enough false allegations in motions like this not to take that particularly seriously. Again, it’s a place to start an investigation, but not a place to end one.
Finally, as we said at the beginning, this is not even everything. Apparently a Jane Doe #107—who, for all we might know, might be an alleged victim—wrote to the judge saying that she faced a threat of death if her name was known and the judge delayed the release of documents related to her:
🚨 AS EXPECTED: The court has just announced that the full #EpsteinClientList will not be released until at least January 22, following the approval of Doe 107's request for a 30-day extension.
— Dr. Simon Goddek (@goddeketal) January 3, 2024
Who do you think Doe 107 could be, who is supposedly living in another country? pic.twitter.com/Dmr1HKr0Fv
The judge is giving her until January 22 of this year to submit an affidavit basically providing evidence of the threat. If she is an alleged victim, when you look at the names we have heard tonight … she really might have a very realistic concern in this case. After that date, the judge might withhold or possibly redact documents to protect this person. This author's gut says that the judge will not hold very much back.
One other thing to note is that even if these acts took place outside the United States, federal law can still reach that behavior. We won’t get into the nitty grits of it, but even if the alleged sex took place in one of those hellholes where child rape is legal or just ignored, if an American citizen has sex with a child, he or she might still face federal charges when they return to American soil.
Finally, we get this headline from the satire account News That Matters:
Colorado Supreme Court Votes To Remove Bill Clinton From Epstein Client List pic.twitter.com/ZVwiujNlvk
— News That Matters (@ThatmattersNews) January 4, 2024
Ahahahahahahahahaha!!! After all this serious business, we needed that laugh.
***
Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!
Join the conversation as a VIP Member