Ezra Klein and the NYT Ask a VERY Stupid Question; Twitter Obliges Them...
An Inside Look at AMFEST 2025 — Chloe and Willie Bring Us The Hottest...
'This Is Amazing': Rep. Jasmine Crockett Says the Right Fears Her Authenticity (Roll...
Leftists Lose It Over Bari Weiss's Sane Memo: 'Just Add Context and Sources'...
Mass Deportation Checks Tripled: Kristi Noem Gets Serious
Tubba Bubba Exposed: Eli Lake Demands Clinton Accountability Over Damning Epstein Photos—I...
The Spiciest, Weirdest, and Funniest Hot Takes From TPUSA’s AmericaFest 2025
Governor DeSantis Drops Truth Bomb: Stop the Student Loan Scam by Making Unis...
Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
Time Again to Play 'Media Headline vs. the Actual Story' About a 'Father...
Erin Go BLECH! New Ireland President Leaves Out a Pretty Key Detail From...
Glenn Greenwald's Anti-Israel Stance Sounds Increasingly Like Candace Owens' Brainrot
Guy Benson Has a Reminder About the 60 Minutes Journo Who Said Bari...
Journos Say CBS News/60 Minutes Destroyed Credibility by Delaying Deportee Story (Yeah, Ab...
Virginia Is for Lovers...of Illegal Alien Criminals: A Man Is Dead After Sheriff...

Watch the Dean of Berkeley Law School admit to illegal affirmative action

Screenshot of video posted by Christopher Rufo

Today, the Supreme Court struck down Harvard and Carolina’s affirmative action programs in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard College, and did so using reasoning that seems to have pretty much ended most affirmative action programs (and least in college admissions). We did a deep dive into the decision earlier today, and later talked about how it reflects a lack of deference by the Supreme Court to educational institutions.

Advertisement

However, in California, the consideration of race—including affirmative action—was already illegal, at least for state institutions. It had been illegal since 1996, under what is commonly known as Proposition 209. So, in theory for state schools, nothing is going to change.

But instead, Erwin Chemerinsky, the current Dean of Berkley Law School just got exposed for ducking around that law:

Really, why did he think no one would record this?

That being said, California appears to be a two-party state for recordings. But the statute has an exception for when the communication is made at a public gathering or ‘any other circumstance in which the parties to the communication may reasonably expect that the communication may be overheard or recorded.’ Furthermore, many legal scholars have argued there is a right to film public officials under the First Amendment. The point is there might be a fight about the admissibility of this evidence, but we feel confident that Chemerinsky would lose that fight.

And, yes, Rufo is contemplating lawsuits:

Advertisement

There’s not enough popcorn in the world:

One person tried to gaslight about it:

Advertisement

Except he explicitly states that he knows that this is happening at Berkeley and he is participating in covering the evidence up.

To tell the truth, that was our first reaction: Laughter.

Sarcasm phasers set to stunning.

Advertisement

Probably true, at least for a while.

We can’t say he’s definitely wrong.

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement