TICK TOCK, BRO! Ruben Gallego Has Even MORE 'Splainin' to do About Certain...
SHOCKA! Ilhan Omar Tied to ANOTHER Minnesota Fraud Defendant via Emails With INTERESTING...
Trump Is Naming Names
We RIDE at Dawn! Trump Comes Out Swinging After Birthright Ruling – He...
Jim Acosta's Great American State Fair Coverage a Reminder of Why He's STILL...
We Don't Hate Them Enough: NPR Forced to Retract COMPLETELY FAKE Story About...
Cisgender? REALLY? Ketanji Brown Jackson's Trans Ruling Dissent Is Even DUMBER Than We...
HOO and BOY: You HAVE to See This MORONIC Rant From Tammy Duckworth...
BREAKING: SCOTUS Shares Ruling on Birthright Citizenship
Sanity WINS! Supreme Court CAN Define a Woman, Rules to Protect Women's Sports
FUME: Dem Rep. Melanie Stansbury Claiming the Great American State Fair's Empty? Backfired...
Forever Lost: Stephen A. Smith Says Establishment Dems Must Win Back Voters From...
Barb McQuade Loses It on MS NOW As SCOTUS Torches Dem Dream of...
Masked Antifa Thug Attacks Videographers at Seattle Pride Event With a Baseball Bat
Scorn Porn: Failed ‘Journalist’ Jim Acosta Posts Video Mocking Attendance at Great America...

Watch the Dean of Berkeley Law School admit to illegal affirmative action

Screenshot of video posted by Christopher Rufo

Today, the Supreme Court struck down Harvard and Carolina’s affirmative action programs in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard College, and did so using reasoning that seems to have pretty much ended most affirmative action programs (and least in college admissions). We did a deep dive into the decision earlier today, and later talked about how it reflects a lack of deference by the Supreme Court to educational institutions.

Advertisement

However, in California, the consideration of race—including affirmative action—was already illegal, at least for state institutions. It had been illegal since 1996, under what is commonly known as Proposition 209. So, in theory for state schools, nothing is going to change.

But instead, Erwin Chemerinsky, the current Dean of Berkley Law School just got exposed for ducking around that law:

Really, why did he think no one would record this?

That being said, California appears to be a two-party state for recordings. But the statute has an exception for when the communication is made at a public gathering or ‘any other circumstance in which the parties to the communication may reasonably expect that the communication may be overheard or recorded.’ Furthermore, many legal scholars have argued there is a right to film public officials under the First Amendment. The point is there might be a fight about the admissibility of this evidence, but we feel confident that Chemerinsky would lose that fight.

And, yes, Rufo is contemplating lawsuits:

Advertisement

There’s not enough popcorn in the world:

One person tried to gaslight about it:

Advertisement

Except he explicitly states that he knows that this is happening at Berkeley and he is participating in covering the evidence up.

To tell the truth, that was our first reaction: Laughter.

Sarcasm phasers set to stunning.

Advertisement

Probably true, at least for a while.

We can’t say he’s definitely wrong.

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement