Duper Bowl: Ed Krassenstein’s ‘Liam Ramos’ Bad Bunny Grammy Hoax Post Gets Boost...
What the Canuck? Confused Public Has Questions About Canadian Olympic Team’s Bizarre Fashi...
Home Alone: Harry Sisson’s Response to Personally Housing Illegal Aliens Is ‘Mi Casa...
Texas Congressman Looney Tune Gene Wu, Shows His Racist Side Too
No to Voter ID: Hakeem Jeffries Tries to Justify Dems Being on Unpopular...
'How Do You Do, Fellow Bad Bunny Fans?', John Kasich Drops Cringeworthy...
Delete Your Account: John Harwood Gets DRAGGED By X for His Nasty-Looking Super...
Senate Republican Leader John Thune Provides a Sneak Peek of the Pregame Flyover
Halftime S***show: Even NFL Players Have NO IDEA Who Bad Bunny Is (Just...
HHS Hands Off Some Gameday Menu Suggestions
Legal Action Launched to Stop Puberty Blocker Experiment ON CHILDREN
Whoa, His Eyes Get BIGGER? Adam Schiff's Reaction to ABC's Jon Karl Pushing...
Narrative OBLITERATED --> Watch Dana Bash Call Hakeem Jeffries Out TO HIS FACE...
'Fire MORE Writers': WAPO's Woke Super Bowl Piece Gets the DRAGGING It Deserves...
This Is QUITE the List of Fake Stories the Washington Post Has Fallen...

Watch the Dean of Berkeley Law School admit to illegal affirmative action

Screenshot of video posted by Christopher Rufo

Today, the Supreme Court struck down Harvard and Carolina’s affirmative action programs in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard College, and did so using reasoning that seems to have pretty much ended most affirmative action programs (and least in college admissions). We did a deep dive into the decision earlier today, and later talked about how it reflects a lack of deference by the Supreme Court to educational institutions.

Advertisement

However, in California, the consideration of race—including affirmative action—was already illegal, at least for state institutions. It had been illegal since 1996, under what is commonly known as Proposition 209. So, in theory for state schools, nothing is going to change.

But instead, Erwin Chemerinsky, the current Dean of Berkley Law School just got exposed for ducking around that law:

Really, why did he think no one would record this?

That being said, California appears to be a two-party state for recordings. But the statute has an exception for when the communication is made at a public gathering or ‘any other circumstance in which the parties to the communication may reasonably expect that the communication may be overheard or recorded.’ Furthermore, many legal scholars have argued there is a right to film public officials under the First Amendment. The point is there might be a fight about the admissibility of this evidence, but we feel confident that Chemerinsky would lose that fight.

And, yes, Rufo is contemplating lawsuits:

Advertisement

There’s not enough popcorn in the world:

One person tried to gaslight about it:

Advertisement

Except he explicitly states that he knows that this is happening at Berkeley and he is participating in covering the evidence up.

To tell the truth, that was our first reaction: Laughter.

Sarcasm phasers set to stunning.

Advertisement

Probably true, at least for a while.

We can’t say he’s definitely wrong.

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement