Mark Cuban Gripes About High California Taxes Before Endorsing James Talarico in Texas...
NYT Reporter Warns DSA-Dems Want to ‘Take Out Our Entire Constitutional System’ on...
Jasmine Crockett Says the Democrat Party Will Face a Racial Reckoning After Midterm...
'Stop Gaslighting Me!': FL Dem. Senate Nom and Dem Chair Explode in Yelling...
Oh, SHELL No!: Canadian WNBA Team Introduces Non-Binary Turtle Mascot With She/They Pronou...
One Meta Data Center Just Doubled (and Then Some) Teachers’ Pay in a...
Chris Cuomo Says Ossoff’s Natalie Harp Dig Meant Her and Trump Hanging Out...
Melugin Highlights Illegal Who Poured Hot Wax on Kids — Then Schools Cato...
Men Dump Girlfriends Who Defend Lindsay Clancy: 'Not Who You Want Raising Your...
NYT’s 'Honest Mistake' Just Cost It $9.25M After Falsely Tying Innocent Alabama Hooper...
One Mom Tried to Ban Oreos From the Entire Class Lunchbox — and...
JD Vance Reveals Usha’s Sleep Training Approach: Start From the Beginning
Croon-Fed Insanity: Rosie O’Donnell Sings About Trump on Kimmel's Show As Acosta Applauds...
Half-Baked Attack: CNN Shuns Common Recipe Math to Smear HHS RFK, Jr., and...
Jill Biden's Insane Theory Behind Why Biden Might've Lost the Debate

Evolutionary biologist humiliates the Editor-in-Chief of Scientific American on transgender ideology

A few years back, David Burge wrote how the left tends to co-opt an institution and destroy it from within:

Advertisement

We have seen that play out in the last few years with Scientific American, abandoning science for woke ideology, so we admit we felt a fair bit of schadenfreude to see this exchange.

It started with Laura Helmuth, the Editor-in-Chief of Scientific American, tweeting out this:

Obviously, she was trying to make a point supporting transgender ideology. Using birds.

In stepped Colin Wright. Mr. Wright describes himself as follows: ‘Evolutionary Biology PhD | Founding Editor @RealLastStand | Fellow @ManhattanInst | Advisor @segm_ebm & @AtheistsLiberty.’ The pages of the Manhattan Institute and the Society for Evidence Based Gender Medicine back his claims up. He decided to dispute her claims:

If you don’t feel like enlarging the picture, it says:

The example they give of a species ‘with more than two sexes’ is the white-throated sparrow (Zonotrichia albicollis). This species has two color morphs, males and females with either white or tan stripes. The more aggressive white stripe morph has a large inversion on chromosome 2, and the species mates disassortatively by color morph, meaning that white stripe morphs tend to mate with tan striped morphs. This chromosome inversion coupled with the disassortative mating by morph has led to a situation where chromosome 2 ‘behaves like’ another sex chromosome.

But having more than two sex chromosomes is not the same as having more than two sexes. While this species may be an interesting case study for how sex chromosomes have evolved, it certainly isn’t an example of a species with ‘four sexes,’ which would require four distinct gamete types.

Advertisement

He also shows her that she is wrong by the terms of the article she linked to:

Again, if you don’t want to enlarge the image he provides, here’s the quote:

So the morphs differ in traits that parallel the usual differences between the sexes in birds. Looking at White-throats in the breeding season, we see four distinct types. To oversimplify, we could call them super-aggressive males, more nurturing males, somewhat aggressive females, and super-nurturing females. It’s almost as if the White-throated Sparrow has four sexes. That may sound like a joke, but it’s actually a good description of what’s going on.

(Emphasis added.) So, this is exciting! Maybe Ms. Helmuth will come back with an argument for why her interpretation is right! Maybe she will bring up a different and exotic species! Or maybe she will humbling admit she was wrong! Who knows?! But this is how science works! Each side offers reasoned, evidence-based debate and over time, truth wins out.

So, let’s see how she responds:

Advertisement

Oh.

Never mind.

In fact, when Mr. Wright made fun of her on Twitter for blocking him …

… Seth Dillon of the Babylon Bee tried to help the signal get around the block …

… and this happened instead:

Think about that for a minute. She is not only unwilling to debate with Mr. Wright, but by blocking him rather than muting him, she doesn’t even want him to see what she says on any other subject. Could there be a less scientific approach? And all of this from the editor-in-chief of a once-respected scientific magazine?

That’s one theory, the other is that she is doing exactly what the job entails:

Advertisement

To be fair, we’ve seen worse.

Also, does it really surprise anyone that Matt Walsh got involved? He responded to Mr. Wright:

Which is a good point. Let’s say these birds are quad-gender creatures. Mr. Wright disputes this, but let’s play pretend. Then in that case it took abnormalities in their chromosomes to create those extra genders. So unless a man purporting to be a woman (or purporting to be something other than a man) has a similar genetic abnormality, the argument actually cuts against Ms. Helmuth’s argument.

‘Will. Power’ stepped in to agree with Mr. Walsh:

But apparently, he never met this … um … being before:

So there!

(Jokes aside, ‘Dan the Bird’ seems to be running a brilliant troll on gender ideology—which is itself pretty funny.)

***

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy’s conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement