Would You Look at That: BLS Chart Shows SHOCKING Disparity in Jobs Between...
Scott Jennings: Why CNN Covering Gaetz When Biden Just Commuted Prisoners’ Death Sentences...
Republican Releases Video Advocating Public Executions for Illegal Aliens Who Kill or Rape...
Fire on the Water: Fatal Florida Boat Explosion Captured on Video
Former President Bill Clinton Hospitalized For a Fever: X Speculates On the Possible...
Woman Says Canada Is a White Supremacist, Colonial Project Just Like Israel
NY Immigration Committee Asked for Official Help With Migrant Who Needs Bigger Home,...
Politico: Europe’s Far-Right 'Seizes' on Christmas Market Terror Attack
Cope Springs Eternal: Don Lemon and His Bluesky BlueAnons ‘Know’ Who’s Really in...
Hidden Numbers: When It Comes to Crime, Graphs Don’t Tell the Whole...
Joe Biden Just Made Trump's Deportation Case for Him
Mark Hamill Talks Blocking People, Dissolving the Electoral College, and the 'Orange Atroc...
So It Begins: Poll Shows Kamala Harris Leading JD Vance by One Point
LAWLESSNESS: Seattle Bus Driver the Latest Victim of Left's 'Criminal Justice Reform'
Here's One of the Democrat 'Bro Whisperers' Engaging Young Men

BREAKING: Texas abortion pill ruling stayed indefinitely by Supreme Court

Previously, dear reader, we told you about how the Supreme Court issued and extended an administrative stay until today at midnight in the litigation around the FDA’s regulations related to the abortion pill. The purpose of that stay was simply to give the whole court time to decide whether to grant a longer stay, and the answer is that they did grant such a stay.

Advertisement

The bottom line is this makes the abortion pill available under the current rules of the Biden administration, such as allowing for it to be delivered by mail and to be taken outside of a doctor’s direct supervision until the Fifth Circuit and the Supreme Court are done hearing the case. Chris Geidner has a write-up, here:

As Mr. Geidner notes, just because it only states that two justices dissent, doesn’t mean the vote was 7-2. It just means that for whatever reason they are the only two announcing publicly that they dissent.

Gabriel Malor concurs and adds some other thoughts:

Advertisement

We’ll also note that previously Gabriel Malor made this prediction:

So that tweet genuinely aged well.

As for Alito’s dissent, the crux of his argument is that for a stay you have to show that either the FDA, the drug companies, or possibly women seeking an abortion will be ‘irreparably harmed’ by a delay and right now, under the prior stay granted by the Fifth Circuit, the abortion pill can still be distributed and women can still get lawful abortions using it: it is simply less convenient than before.

The most interesting part, however, was when Alito denounced one of the dirtiest tactics that liberal administrations engage in on the state and federal level, discussing the injunction issued by the federal court in Washington (state):

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has engaged in what has become the practice of ‘leverag[ing]’ district court injunctions ‘as a basis’ for implementing a desired policy while evading both necessary agency procedures and judicial review.…

The Washington District Court enjoined the FDA from altering its current practice regarding mifepristone—something that the FDA had never hinted it was contemplating. The FDA did not appeal that appealable order, and when seven States that might take such an appeal asked to intervene, the FDA opposed their request.

Advertisement

In other words, in the Washington case, an activist group sued the FDA to try to get the courts to enact their policy preferences. The FDA allegedly barely fought against this activist group because they wanted them to win. That resulted in an order that ‘forced’ the FDA to do what they wanted to do anyway but would have been more difficult if they had used ordinary regulatory procedures. And then not only did they refuse to appeal that order, but they also tried to stop anyone else from appealing. It’s dirty and it’s good that the courts are starting to take notice of it.

In any case, this stay is not very good news for anyone who believes that the FDA should not be subverting state abortion laws, but that is no guarantee that they will win in the long run. We will keep you posted as things develop.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement